杭州软黏土地区某30.2 m深大基坑开挖性状实测分析

doi:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2020.0636

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (806 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要以杭州某30.2 m深大基坑工程为研究对象，结合收集到的16个杭州基坑案例资料以及文献中已发表的上海地区同类工程实测数据，分析该30.2 m深大基坑开挖全过程中的地连墙隆沉及挠曲变形、地连墙墙体应力、立柱隆沉、支撑轴力、土压力、地表沉降等的发展演变规律。得出如下结论：(1) 地连墙最大侧移深度Hm在Hm = He－5和Hm = He + 2.5之间。受益于围护体系良好的整体性，基坑地连墙的最大侧移δhm得到了较好地控制，平均最大侧移为0.28%He。(2) 位于开挖中部的地连墙侧移是坑角附近的3.5倍，这主要是“坑角效应”所致，可见对未采用分区开挖的深大基坑，坑角的“加筋”作用对限制开挖变形非常重要。(3) 受杭州软黏土“蠕变效应”和深开挖“深度效应”的影响，地连墙和坑外地表在阶段6均产生了最大位移增量。深埋土层较浅埋土层的开挖会释放更多的应力，诱发更大的变形。(4) 水平支撑主要承担由邻近土层移除所产生的外荷载，较远处的开挖对支撑轴力影响有限，且由开挖引起的外荷载向支撑的转移主要在支撑浇筑后的1～2个月内完成。(5) 不同于梯形或AEP三角形包络线分布，本工程地连墙墙后水平土压力沿深度呈线性分布。靠近开挖面的地基土，更容易处于主动状态，产生较小的水平土压力。(6) 基于本30.2 m深大基坑实测数据以及杭州16个类似的基坑案例，提出了基于基坑开挖面积与地连墙最大侧移之间的经验关系式。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	程康1
	2
	3
	徐日庆1
	2
	应宏伟1
	2
	4
	李冰河5
	甘晓露1
	2
	裘志坚6
	詹晓波7
	秦建设6

关键词 ：基坑工程, 深大开挖, 挡墙挠曲, 蠕变效应, 坑角效应, 开挖面积

Abstract：Taking a 30.2 m deep and large basement excavation in Hangzhou soft clay as the research object，the excavation performances，including the stress of diaphragm walls，the displacement of columns，the axial force，the earth pressure and the settlements of ground surface，are thoroughly investigated based on 16 excavation cases collected in Hangzhou and the data published in literature about similar excavation in Shanghai. Following conclusions are obtained：(1) The location of the maximum wall deflection is between He－5 and He + 2.5. Benefiting from the excellent integrity of the retaining system，the maximum wall deflection is well controlled with an average value of 0.28%He. (2) Due to the“corner effect”，the deflection of the walls located at the excavation center is 3.5 times of that located at the corners，suggesting that the“corner effect”is significant to restrict the deflection for the excavation without adopting the zoned excavation technique. (3) Both the diaphragm walls and the ground surface produce a maximum displacement increment in stage 6 due to the“creep effect”of Hangzhou soft clay and the “depth effect” of deep excavation. The excavation of deep soil can release more stress and induce greater displacement than shallow soil. (4) The horizontal struts mainly carry the load due to the removal of the nearby soil and are slightly influenced by the distant excavation. The transferring of the excavation-induced load to the struts is completed in 1–2 months after strut casting. (5) Different from trapezoid or AEP triangle envelope distribution mode，the horizontal earth pressure behind the diaphragm wall of the considered project is linearly distributed along the depth. The ground adjacent to the excavation surface is more likely in an active state and generates smaller horizontal earth pressure. Based on the 30.2 m deep excavation and the collected 16 similar excavation cases in Hangzhou，an empirical relation between the excavation area and the maximum wall deflection is proposed.

Key words： foundation pit engineering deep-large excavation wall deflection creep effect corner effect excavation area

引用本文:

程康1，2，3，徐日庆1，2，应宏伟1，2，4，李冰河5，甘晓露1，2，裘志坚6，詹晓波7，秦建设6. 杭州软黏土地区某30.2 m深大基坑开挖性状实测分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2021, 40(4): 851-863.
CHENG Kang1，2，3，XU Riqing1，2，YING Hongwei1，2，4，LI Binghe5，GAN Xiaolu1，2，QIU Zhijian6，ZHAN Xiaobo7，QIN Jianshe6. Performance analysis of a 30.2 m deep-large excavation in Hangzhou soft clay. , 2021, 40(4): 851-863.

链接本文:

http://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2020.0636 或 http://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/Y2021/V40/I4/851

[7]	谭勇，康志军，卫彬，等. 上海软土地区某地铁风井深基坑案例分析[J]. 浙江大学学报：工学版，2016，50(6)：1 048-1 055.(TAN Yong，KANG Zhijun，WEI Bin，et al. Case study on deep excavation for metro ventilation shaft in Shanghai soft clay[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University：Engineering Science，2016，50(6)：1 048-1 055. (in Chinese))
[17]	应宏伟，王奎华，谢康和，等. 杭州解百商业城半逆作法深基抗支护设计与监测[J]. 岩土工程学报，2001，23(1)：79-83.(YING Hongwei，WANG Kuihua，XIE Kanghe，et al. Design and monitoring of deep excavation with semi-top-down method in Hangzhou Jiebai Commercial Building[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2001，23(1)：79-83.(in Chinese))
[5]	应宏伟，李涛，杨永文，等. 深基坑隔断墙保护邻近建筑物的效果与工程应用分析[J]. 岩土工程学报，2011，33(7)：1 123-1 129. (YING Hongwei，LI Tao，YANG Yongwen，et al. Effect and application of partition walls in protecting adjacent buildings from deep foundation pits[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2011，33(7)：1 123-1 129.(in Chinese))
[15]	YING H W，CHENG K，ZHANG LI S，et al. Evaluation of excavation induced movements through case histories in Hangzhou[J]. Engineering Computations，2020，37(6)：1 993-2 016.
[25]	TAN Y，LU Y，XU C，et al. Investigation on performance of a large circular pit-in-pit excavation in clay-gravel-cobble mixed strata[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technologyl，2018，79(9)：356-374.
[3]	程康，徐日庆，林存刚，等. 既有单桩在邻近基坑开挖下的水平向响应简化分析[J]. 浙江大学学报：工学版，2020，54(1)：91-101.(CHENG Kang，XU Riqing，LIN Cungang，et al. Simplified analysis method for evaluating horizontal deformation of single pile due to adjacent foundation pit excavation[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University：Engineering Science，2020，54(1)：91-101.(in Chinese))
[13]	CHEN H，LI J，LI L. Performance of a zoned excavation by bottom-up technique in Shanghai soft soils[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，2018，144(11)：05018003.
[23]	TERZAGHI. K，PECK. R. B. Soil mechanics in engineering practice[M]. New York：John Wiley and Sons Inc.，1967.
1]	郑刚，朱合华，刘新荣，等. 基坑工程与地下工程安全及环境影响控制[J]. 土木工程学报，2016，49(6)：1-24.(ZHENG Gang，ZHU Hehua，LIU Xinrong，et al.Control of safety of deep excavations and underground engineering and its impact on surrounding environment[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal，2016，49(6)：1-24.(in Chinese))
[2]	程康，徐日庆，应宏伟，等. 既有隧道在上覆基坑卸荷下的形变响应简化算法[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2020，39(3)：637-648. (CHENG Kang，XU Riqing，YING Hongwei，et al. Simplified method for evaluting deformation responses of existing tunnels due to overlying basement excavation[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2020，39(3)：637-648.(in Chinese))
[4]	CHEN R P，MENG F Y，LI Z C，et al. Investigation of response of metro tunnels due to adjacent large excavation and protective measures in soft soils[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology，2016，58(9)：224-235.
[6]	GUO P，GONG X，WANG Y. Displacement and force analyses of braced structure of deep excavation considering unsymmetrical surcharge effect[J]. Computers and Geotechnics，2019，113(9)：103102.
[9]	XU C，CHEN Q，WANG Y，et al. Dynamic deformation control of retaining structures of a deep excavation[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities，2015，30(4)：04015071.
[11]	TAN Y，LU Y. Responses of shallowly buried pipelines to adjacent deep excavations in Shanghai soft ground[J]. Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice，2018，9(2)：05018002.
[12]	TAN Y，LU Y，WANG D. Deep excavation of the gate of the orient in suzhou stiff clay：composite earth-retaining systems and dewatering plans[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，2018，144(3)：05017009.
[14]	李镜培，陈浩华，李林，等. 软土基坑开挖深度与空间效应实测研究[J]. 中国公路学报，2018，31(2)：208-217.(LI Jingpei，CHEN Haohua，LI Lin，et al. Observation on depth and spatial effects of deep excavation in soft clay[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport，2018，31(2)：208-217.(in Chinese))
[16]	应宏伟，杨永文. 杭州深厚软黏土中某深大基坑的性状研究[J]. 岩土工程学报，2011，33(12)：1 838-1 846.(YING Hongwei，YANG Yongwen. Characteristics of large and deep soft clay excavation in Hangzhou[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2011，33(12)：1 838-1 846.(in Chinese))
[19]	刘念武，龚晓南，陶艳丽，等. 软土地区嵌岩连续墙与非嵌岩连续墙支护性状对比分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2014，33(1)：164-171.(LIU Nianwu，GONG Xiaonan，TAO Yanli，et al. Comparison of supporting characteristics of rock-socketed diaphragm walls and non rock-socketed diaphragm walls in soft soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2014，33(1)：164-171.(in Chinese))
[21]	TAN Y，WANG D L. Characteristics of a large-scale deep foundation pit excavated by the central-island technique in Shanghai soft clay. I：Bottom-up construction of the central cylindrical shaft[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，2013，139(11)：1 875-1 893.
[8]	康志军，黄润秋，卫彬，等. 上海软土地区某逆作法地铁深基坑变形[J]. 浙江大学学报：工学版，2017，51(8)：1 527-1 536.(KANG Zhijun，HUANG Runqiu，WEI Bin，et al. Journal of Zhejiang University：Engineering Science，2017，51(8)：1 527-1 536.(in Chinese))
[10]	刘念武，龚晓南，楼春晖. 软土地基中地下连续墙用作基坑围护的变形特性分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2014，33(增l)：2 707-2 712. (LIU Nianwu，GONG Xiaonan，LOU Chunhui. Analysis on the longitudinal deformation of tunnels due to pit excavation considering the tunnel shearing effect[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2014，33(Supp.1)：2 707-2 712.(in Chinese))
[20]	TAN Y，WEI B. Performance of an overexcavated metro station and facilities nearby[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities，2012，26(3)：241-254.
[18]	丁智，王达，王金艳，等. 浙江地区软弱土深基坑变形特点及预测分析[J]. 岩土力学，2015，36(增l)：506-512.(DING Zhi，WANG Da，WANG Jinyan，et al. Deformation characteristics of Zhejiang soft soil deep foundation pits and their predictive analysis[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2015，36(Supp.1)：506-512.(in Chinese))
[22]	TAN Y，WANG D L. Characteristics of a large-scale deep foundation pit excavated by the central-island technique in Shanghai soft clay. II： Top-down construction of the peripheral rectangular pit[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，2013，139(11)：1 894-1 910.
[24]	WONG I H，OH T Y，CHUAH H L. Performance of excavations for depressed expressways for Singapore[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，1997，123(7)：617-625.
[26]	CLOUGH G W，O¢ROURKE T D. Construction-induced movements of in situ walls [C]// Proceedings of the Design and Performance of Earth Retaining Structures. [S. l.]：[s. n.]，1990：439-470.