地震作用下立体交叉下穿隧道动力响应振动台试验研究

doi:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2020.0353

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (71259 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要随着国家路网的不断建设与规划，大量铁路隧道或公路隧道近接平行、交叉等工程现象不断涌现，受地形、地质条件以及线路走向等因素的限制，隧道近接交叉的工程问题越来越复杂。以立体交叉草莓沟1#隧道和盘道岭隧道为例，着重选取盘道岭隧道(下穿隧道)为研究对象进行振动台试验，重点分析受上跨隧道影响，超小净间距小角度立体交叉下穿隧道拱顶、仰拱断面的加速度和应变动力响应特征。在此基础上，以该场区沿线地震动峰值加速度0.15 g加载工况为依据，对环向最大地震应变规律进行分析，根据有效频率加速度计的范围和输入的功率谱振幅，利用SPECTE反应谱分析程序，对交叉中心拱顶和仰拱位置的加速度反应谱的分布规律进行对比分析和研究。试验结果表明：(1) 受立体交叉隧道空间位置影响，超小净间距小角度立体交叉下穿隧道拱顶加速度时程和频谱较仰拱整体响应大，受振有效持续时间较长，空间分布表现为拱顶幅值反响突出的特点。(2) 拱顶峰值加速度响应具有叠加效应，其加速度峰值比率表现为明显的非线性、非平稳性增大的特点，地震烈度越高，应变响应越大，拱顶破坏模式表现为交叉段–河侧–山侧的传递演化形式。(3) 随着输入地震波增强，隧道仰拱动应变和加速度峰值比率增长变化表现出局部变化性质。(4) 隧道围岩对地震波的高频段存在滤波作用，对隧道结构影响较大卓越主频段集中在1～10和11～20 Hz两个低频段，主频段卓越频率的取值为5，12.5 Hz。(5) 不同地震烈度时，各特征点处应变峰值大小依次为：拱顶＞仰拱＞河侧拱腰＞山侧拱腰，加速度响应的卓越频率与速度、位移响应三者之间受基频和阻尼影响，从而产生时间和空间等的差异变化，宜鼓励设计过程中提高该隧道的阻尼结构性能，阻尼比建议值取为20%。研究结果可为立体交叉隧道的抗震设计提供一定的理论指导。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	牌立芳1
	2
	3
	吴红刚2
	3
	4

关键词 ：隧道工程, 立体交叉隧道, 振动台试验, 加速度响应, 应变响应

Abstract：With the continuous construction and planning of national road networks，a large number of close parallel or cross railway and highway tunnels has been emerging. Due to the limitations of topography，geological conditions and line strike，the engineering problems of near junction tunnels are more and more complicated. In this paper，taking the 3D crossing Strawberry Channel 1# and Pandaoling Tunnel as examples，especially the Pandaoling Tunnel(underpass tunnel) for the shaking table test，the acceleration and strain dynamic responses of the vault and inverted arch cross-section of ultra-small net spacing and small-angle underpass tunnels affected by the upper-span tunnel were analyzed. Specifically，the maximum seismic strain in the hoop direction was evaluated under the loading condition of 0.15 g peak acceleration of ground motion along the field，and according to the range of the effective frequency accelerometer and the input power spectrum amplitude and using the SPECTE response spectrum analysis program，the distributions of the acceleration response spectrum of the vault and inverted arch at the intersection central were compared. The results show that，affected by the spatial position of the 3D cross tunnel，the acceleration time history and spectrum of the ultra-small net spacing and small angle underpass tunnel are larger than the overall response of the inverted arch，the effective duration of vibration is longer and the spatial distribution is characterized by the prominent amplitude response of the arch. The peak acceleration response of the vault has a superposition effect and the peak acceleration ratio is obviously nonlinear and non-stationary. The higher the earthquake intensity is，the greater the strain response will be. The failure of the vault shows a transfer evolution form from the cross section to the river side then to the mountain side. With increasing the input seismic wave，the increases of the dynamic strain and the peak acceleration ratio of the inverted arch show local changes. The surrounding rock of the tunnel has filtering effect on the high frequency band of the seismic wave. The predominant main frequency markedly influencing the tunnel structure concentrates in two low frequency band of 1﹣10 Hz and 11﹣20 Hz，and the values of the predominant frequency corresponding to the maximum acceleration response of the vault and inverted arch are respectively 5 Hz and 12.5 Hz. For different seismic intensities，the peak strain at the vault are largest，followed by the inverted arch，and the arch waists of the riverside and the mountainside in turn. The predominant frequency of the acceleration response and the responses of the velocity and the displacement are affected by the base frequency and the damping，resulting in difference in time and space. It is suggested that he performance of the damping structure of the tunnel during the design process should be improved and the recommended damping ratio is 20%. The research results can provide certain theoretical guidance for the seismic design of 3D cross tunnels.

Key words： tunnelling engineering underpass tunnels shaking table test acceleration response strain response

引用本文:

牌立芳1，2，3，吴红刚2，3，4. 地震作用下立体交叉下穿隧道动力响应振动台试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2021, 40(1): 88-100.
PAI Lifang1，2，3，WU Honggang2，3，4. Shaking table test study on dynamic responses of underpass tunnels under earthquake. , 2021, 40(1): 88-100.

链接本文:

http://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2020.0353 或 http://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/Y2021/V40/I1/88

[1]	何卫. 暗挖地铁隧道下穿高速铁路路基沉降规律与控制措施研究[硕士学位论文][D]. 北京：北京交通大学，2015.(HE Wei. Research on subgrade settlement law and control measures of underground tunnel tunneling through high-speed railway[M. S. Thesis][D]. Beijing：Beijing Jiaotong University，2015.(in Chinese))
[10]	LIU J L，WANG Z Z，ZHAO Y F. Iterative calculation for contracted depth of horseshoe tunnel cross-section[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering，2010，26(Supp.2)：167-171.
[19]	刘鸿哲，黄茂松. 不同埋深矩形隧道地震响应的离心振动台试验[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2013，32(增2)：3 404-3 412.(LIU Hongzhe，HUANG Maosong. Centrifugal shaking table test of seismic response of rectangular tunnels with different buried depths[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2013，32(Supp.2)：3 404-3 412.(in Chinese))
[28]	徐炳伟. 大型复杂结构-桩-土振动台模型试验研究[博士学位论文][D]. 天津：天津大学，2010.(XU Bingwei. Model test of large complex structure pile soil shaking table[Ph. D. Thesis] [D]. Tianjin：Tianjin University，2010.(in Chinese))
[37]	CESCA S，GRIGOLI F. Full waveform seismological advances for microseismic monitoring[J]. Advances in Geophysics，2014，56(12)：169-228.
[6]	ZHANG Z G，ZHANG M X，JIANG Y J，et al. Analytical prediction for ground movements and liner internal forces induced by shallow tunnels considering non-uniform convergence pattern and ground-liner interaction mechanism[J]. Soils and Foundations，2017，57(2)：211-226.
[8]	LIU J L，WANG Z Z，FANG X. Iterative formulas and estimation formulas for computing normal depth of horseshoe cross-section tunnel[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering，2010，136(11)：786-790.
[15]	刘桂朋. 地震荷载作用下交叉隧道的动力响应及抗震方案研究[硕士学位论文][D]. 石家庄：石家庄铁道大学，2017.(LIU Guipeng. Study on dynamic response and aseismic scheme of cross tunnel under earthquake load[M. S. Thesis][D]. Shijiazhuang：Shijiazhuang Railway University，2017.(in Chinese))
[17]	刘聪，彭立敏，雷明锋，等. 立体交叉隧道结构地震动力响应特性及其相互影响规律振动台试验及数值仿真研究[J]. 振动与冲击，2019，38(19)：233-241.(LIU Cong，PENG Limin，LEI Mingfeng，et al. Shaking table test and numerical simulation research on seismic dynamic response characteristics and interaction rules of three-dimensional cross tunnel structure[J]. Vibration and Impact，2019，38 (19)：233-241.(in Chinese))
[24]	张曙光. TRT—6000在山西中南部铁路通道隧道工程中的应用研究[硕士学位论文][D]. 天津：河北工业大学，2015.(ZHANG Shuguang. Research on the application of TRT—6000 in the tunnel engineering of the south central railway channel in Shanxi[M. S. Thesis][D]. Tianjin：Hebei University of Technology，2015.(in Chinese))
[4]	李玉峰，彭立敏，雷明锋. 高速铁路交叉隧道动力学问题研究综述[J]. 现代隧道技术，2015，52(2)：8-15.(LI Yufeng，PENG Limin，LEI Mingfeng. Summary of research on dynamic problems of high-speed railway cross tunnels[J]. Modern Tunnel Technology，2015，52(2)：8-15.(in Chinese))
[13]	杜立兵. 小净距空间交叉隧道施工及运营安全性研究[硕士学位论文][D]. 兰州：兰州交通大学，2013.(DU Libing. Study on construction and operation safety of small clear space cross tunnel[M. S. Thesis][D]. Lanzhou：Lanzhou Jiaotong University，2013.(in Chinese))
[22]	中华人民共和国行业标准编写组. JTG 3370.1—2018公路隧道设计规范[S]. 北京：人民交通出版社，2018.(The Professional Standards Compilation Group of the People's Republic of China. JTG 3370.1—2018 Highway tunnel design specification[S]. Beijing：People¢s Communications Press，2018. (in Chinese))
[26]	DOU H，BYRNE P M. Model studies of boundary effect on dynamic soil response[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal，1997，34(3)：460-465.
[31]	AYRES J，MOURA R，SANTOS P，et al. Exploring similarity relations according to different contexts in mining，generalized association rules[J]. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing，2013，141(9)：137-152.
[33]	SHINOZAKI T，IWATATE T，KOBAYASHI T，et al. Seismic response analysis of existing shield tunnel on neighboring construction[J]. Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshuu A，2010，29(22)：842-849.
[35]	中华人民共和国国家标准编写组. GB 18306—2015 中国地震动参数区划图[S]. 北京：中国标准出版社，2016.(The National Standards Compilation Group of the People's Republic of China. GB 18306—2015 China earthquake parameter zoning map[S]. Beijing：China Standards Press，2016. (in Chinese))
[7]	ZHANG Z G，HUANG M S，XI X G，et al. Complex variable solutions for soil and liner deformation due to tunneling in clays[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics，2018，18(7)：1-19.
[9]	ZHANG C S，MAO Y. Effects of cross section of mine tunnel on the propagation characteristics of UHF radio wave[C]// International Symposium on Antennas. [S. l.]：[s. n.]，2006：1-5.
[16]	陈卫忠，郑东，于建新，等. 交叉隧道施工对已有隧道稳定性影响研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2015，34(增1)：3 097-3 105. (CHEN Weizhong，ZHENG Dong，YU Jianxin，et al. Study on the influence of cross tunnel construction on the stability of existing tunnels[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2015，34(Supp.1)：3 097-3 105.(in Chinese))
[18]	YU H T，YAN X ，ANTONIO BOBET，et al. Multi-point shaking table test of a long tunnel subjected to non-uniform seismic loadings[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering，2017，(9)：1-19.
[25]	WU Z J，LEI T，CHEN Y J，et al. Deformation and instability characteristics of loess slope based on shaking table model test[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University，2015，7(3)：1-17.
[27]	KOSTYUKOV N A. Effect of the initial density of a substance on the conditions of oblique collision of shock waves[J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics，1977，18(3)：379-384.
[2]	刘镇，周翠英. 新旧立体交叉隧道系统力学耦合作用全过程与规律[J]. 岩土力学，2012，33(2)：179-185.(LIU Zhen，ZHOU Cuiying. Whole process and law of mechanical coupling of new and old three-dimensional cross tunnel system[J]. Geotechnical Mechanics，2012，33 (2)：179﹣185.(in Chinese))
[3]	赵则超. 立体交叉隧道不同近接距离对围岩压力和衬砌结构力学行为的影响[硕士学位论文][D]. 成都：西南交通大学，2009.(ZHAO Zechao. The influence of different proximity distance on the surrounding rock pressure and the mechanical behavior of lining structure of a three-dimensional cross tunnel[M. S. Thesis][D]. Chengdu：Southwest Jiaotong University，2009.(in Chinese))
[5]	王国波，彭祥军，郝朋飞，等. 近距离地下穿越结构地震响应研究综述[J]. 岩土工程学报，2019，41(11)：2 026-2 036.(WANG Guobo，PENG Xiangjun，HAO Pengfei，et al. Summary of research on seismic response of short distance underground crossing structures[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2019，41(11)：2 026-2 036.(in Chinese))
[11]	李鹏飞，王帆，张成平，等. 城市地下道路立交隧道合理间距及支护加强范围研究[J]. 现代隧道技术，2015，52(6)：111-117.(LI Pengfei，WANG Fan，ZHANG Chengping，et al. Study on the reasonable spacing and support strengthening range of urban underground road overpass tunnel[J]. Modern tunnel technology，2015，52(6)：111-117.(in Chinese))
[12]	MA G W，ZHENG H B，LI P F. Displacement characteristics for a 'π' shaped double cross-duct excavated by cross diaphragm(CRD) method[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology，2018，51(7)：204-215.
[14]	朱正国，杨利海，刘桂朋，等. 地震对交叉隧道影响机制及抗震方案研究[J]. 铁道工程学报，2018，35(9)：61-66.(ZHU Zhengguo，YANG Lihai，LIU Guipeng，et al. Study on the influence mechanism and anti-seismic scheme of earthquake on cross tunnels[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering，2018，35(9)：61-66.(in Chinese))
[20]	TAO L J，B. ZHANG，X. ZHAO，et al. Shaking table test on the seismic response of cross-structure between subway station and tunnel[C]// China-japan-us Trilateral Symposium on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering. [S. l.]：[s. n.]，2013：353-360.
[21]	高峰，孙常新，谭绪凯，等. 不同埋深隧道的地震响应振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学，2015，36(9)：2 517-2 522.(GAO Feng，SUN Changxin，TAN Xukai，et al. Shaking table test of seismic response of different buried tunnels[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2015，36(9)：2 517-2 522. (in Chinese))
[23]	中华人民共和国行业标准编写组. TB 10003—2016 铁路隧道设计规范[S]. 北京：中国铁道出版社，2017.(The Professional Standards Compilation Group of the People¢s Republic of China. TB 10003—2016 Railway tunnel design code[S]. Beijing：China Railway Publishing House，2017.(in Chinese))
[29]	AN W G，JIANG L，SUN J H，et al. Correlation analysis of sample thickness，heat flux，and cone calorimetry test data of polystyrene foam[J]. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry，2015，119(1)：229-238.
[30]	RAMU M， RAJA V P，THYLA P R. Establishment of structural similitude for elastic models and validation of scaling laws[J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering，2013，17(1)：139-144.
[32]	董金玉，杨继红，杨国香，等. 基于正交设计的模型试验相似材料的配比试验研究[J]. 煤炭学报，2012，37(1)：44-49.(DONG Jinyu，YANG Jihong，YANG Guoxiang，et al. Study on the proportion of similar materials in model test based on orthogonal design[J]. Journal of Coal Society，2012，37(1)：44-49.(in Chinese))
[36]	HONG C S，YANG H J，KANG Y S，et al. A study of the correlation between sinusoidal sweep and random vibration durability tests through specimen tests[J]. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing，2016，17(12)：1 665-1 671.
[34]	牌立芳，赵金，吴红刚，等. 刷方减重下隧道-滑坡平行体系变形演化试验研究[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报，2019，39(5)：842-850. (PAI Lifang，ZHAO Jin，WU Honggang，et al. Experimental study on deformation evolution of tunnel landslide parallel system under brush weight reduction[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering，2019，39(5)：842-850.(in Chinese))