砂土与结构物界面的应力–位移–微结构特性及本构模型

doi:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2023.0791

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (0)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (2301 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The microstructure of sand-structure interface would evolve due to resulting in the state dependence of its stress-displacement behavior. A series of monotonic and cyclic interface direct shear tests on the sand-steel interface under constant normal stiffness(CNS) and constant normal load(CNL) conditions were carried out，where the evolution of the microstructure within the interface was analyzed using high-resolution image identification technique. It was found that different extents of interface dilatancy occurred under monotonic tests with CNS and CNL. Higher extent of dilatancy and microstructure evolution took place under CNL，where the particle probabilistic entropy increased with the shear displacement. When subjected to cyclic shearing，the interface with initial state under the critical state line exhibited contraction and dilatancy alternately. As the load cycles increased，the microstructure within the interface evolved，with an alternately increase or decrease in the particle probabilistic entropy，which resulted in an overall contraction of the interface. Thus，microstructure evolution influences the interface dilatancy. To capture these phenomena，a microstructure-dependent dilatancy state line was proposed，based on which a nonassociated kinematic hardening elastoplastic model for sand-structure interface was developed. The model had 12 parameters，which can be all determined from laboratory test. Simulations of the test data revealed that the model can reasonably capture the dilatancy and softening behaviors，etc.，of the interface，especially the strong contraction behavior under cyclic loads.

Key words： soil mechanics interface microstructure dilatancy state parameter constitutive model

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	YE Zhitao
	GAO Yufeng
	HUANG Xingbo
	SUN Yifei

Cite this article:

YE Zhitao,GAO Yufeng,HUANG Xingbo, et al. Stress-displacement-microstructure characteristics and constitutive modelling of sand-structure interfaces[J]. , 2024, 43(6): 1549-1560.

URL:

https://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/EN/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2023.0791 OR https://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/EN/Y2024/V43/I6/1549

[1] ZHANG G，WANG L，ZHANG J M. Dilatancy of the interface between a structure and gravelly soil[J]. Géotechnique，2011，61(1)：75–84.
[2] RUI S J，WANG L Z，GUO Z，et al. Cyclic behavior of interface shear between carbonate sand and steel[J]. Acta Geotechnica，2021，16：189–209.
[3] FENG D K，ZHANG J M，HOU W J. Three-dimensional behaviors of a gravel-steel interface considering initial shear stress[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，2021，147(2)：04020158.
[4] EVGIN E，FAKHARIAN K. Effect of stress paths on the behaviour of sand-steel interfaces[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal，1996，33(6)：853–865.
[5] 张嘎，张建民. 粗粒土与结构接触面统一本构模型及试验验证[J]. 岩土工程学报，2005，27(10)：1 175–1 179.(ZHANG Ga，ZHANG Jianmin. Unified modeling of soil-structure interface and its test confirmation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2005，27(10)：1 175–1 179.(in Chinese))
[6] 刘俊伟，王明明，凌贤长，等. 桩–砂土界面循环弱化宏细观机制[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报，2019，51(2)：146–153.(LIU Junwei，WANG Mingming，LING Xianzhang，et al. Macroscopic and microscopic mechanism of cyclic degradation behavior on pile-sand interface[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology，2019，51(2)：146–153.(in Chinese))
[7] WANG P，YIN Z Y，ZHOU W H，et al. Micro-mechanical analysis of soil-structure interface behavior under constant normal stiffness condition with DEM[J]. Acta Geotechnica，2022，17：2 711–2 733.
[8] 路德春，罗磊，王欣，等. 土与结构接触面土体软/硬化本构模型及数值实现[J]. 工程力学，2017，34(7)：41–50.(LU Dechun，LUO Lei，WANG Xin，et al. Softening/hardening constitutive model for soil-structure interface and numerical implementation[J]. Engineering Mechanics，2017，34(7)：41–50.(in Chinese))
[9] BEEN K，JEFFERIES M G. A state parameter for sands[J]. Géotechnique，1985，35(2)：99–112.
[10] LIU H B，SONG E X，LING H I. Constitutive modeling of soil-structure interface through the concept of critical state soil mechanics[J]. Mechanics Research Communications，2006，33(4)：515–531.
[11] LIU J M，ZOU D G，KONG X J. A two-mechanism soil-structure interface model for three-dimensional cyclic loading[J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics，2020，44(15)：2 042–2 069.
[12] LASHKARI A. A plasticity model for sand-structure interfaces[J]. Journal of Central South University，2012，19(4)：1 098–1 108.
[13] ZHOU W H，JING X Y，YIN Z Y，et al. Effects of particle sphericity and initial fabric on the shearing behavior of soil-rough structural interface[J]. Acta Geotechnica，2019，14(6)：1 699–1 716.
[14] FAKHARIAN K，EVGIN E. Cyclic simple-shear behavior of sand-steel interfaces under constant normal stiffness condition[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，1997，123(12)：1 096– 1 105.
[15] CHAN IZ W，STEVENS M，TODD P A. Pat-geom：A software package for the analysis of animal patterns[J]. Methods in Ecology and Evolution，2019，10(4)：591–600.
[16] SCHMIDT U，WEIGERT M，BROADDUS C，et al. Cell detection with star-convex polygons[J]. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention，2018，2018：265–273.
[17] SHI B，MURAKAMI Y，WU Z. Orientation of aggregates of fine-grained soil：quantification and application[J]. Engineering Geology，1998，50(1)：59–70.
[18] REN Y B，YANG S L，ZHANG S X，et al. Experimental study of the thixotropic strength recovery and microstructural evolution of marine clays[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，2022，148(8)：04022059.
[19] FENG D K，ZHANG J M，HOU W J. Role of normal stiffness in 3D cyclic behavior of gravel-steel interface from large-scale direct shear tests[J]. Acta Geotechnica，2021，16(1)：151–165.
[20] ROY A，CHOW SH，O?LOUGHLIN CD，et al. Use of a bounding surface model in predicting element tests and capacity in boundary value problems[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal，2020，58(6)：782–799.
[21] SABERI M，ANNAN CD，KONRAD JM. Three-dimensional constitutive model for cyclic behavior of soil-structure interfaces[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering，2020，134：106162.
[22] 方火浪，王文杰，施可南. 粒状土与结构接触面多重剪切边界面模型[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报，2020，52(11)：80–87.(FANG Huolang，WANG Wenjie，SHI Kenan. A multi-shear bounding surface model for coarse granular soil-structure interfaces[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology，2020，52(11)：80–87.(in Chinese))
[23] SUN Y F，SUMELKA W，HE S H，et al. Enhanced fractional model for soil-structure interface considering 3D stress state and fabric effect[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics，2022，148(9)：04022054.
[24] SUN Y F，SUMELKA Wojciech，GAO Y F. Reformulated fractional plasticity for soil-structure interface[J]. Mechanics Research Communications，2020，108：103580.
[25] 李海潮，马博，张升，等. 基于分数阶热弹塑性理论的软岩力学特性描述[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2020，39(7)：1 311–1 320. (LI Haichao，MA Bo，ZHANG Sheng，et al. Mechanical behaviors of soft rocks based on the fractional thermal elastic-plastic theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2020，39(7)：1 311–1 320.(in Chinese))
[26] LU D C，ZHOU X，DU X L，et al. A 3D fractional elastoplastic constitutive model for concrete material[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures，2019，165：160–175.