|
|
|
| IDENTIFICATION OF LANDSLIDE TYPE AND DETERMINATION OF OPTIMAL REINFORCEMENT SITE BASED ON STRESS FIELD AND DISPLACEMENT FIELD |
| YANG Guanghua1，2，3，4，ZHONG Zhihui1，2，ZHANG Yucheng2，3，WANG Enqi4 |
| (1. School of Civil and Architectural Engineering，Wuhan University，Wuhan，Hubei 430072，China；2. Guangdong Research Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower，Guangzhou，Guangdong 510610，China；3. Geotechnical Engineering Technology Center of Guangdong Province，Guangzhou，Guangdong 510640，China；4. School of Civil Engineering and Transportation，South China University of Technology，Guangzhou，Guangdong 510641，China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Failure types of landslides generally include thrust load-caused type，retrogressive type and combined type. Stress field and displacement field were obtained based on numerical analysis and variable modulus elastoplastic strength reduction method. According to the numerical results，it is found that in thrust load-caused landslide，the displacement and the stress level of the upper region are higher than those of the lower region；while in retrogressive landslide，the displacement and the stress level of the lower region are higher than those of the upper region；and the combined landslide is the combination of those two failure types. Therefore，the failure type of a landslide can be clearly identified by its stress field and displacement field obtained from numerical method. Furthermore，anti-sliding piles were set at different sites of landslide to study the relationships between factor of safety and stress field and displacement field of landslide. It is found that setting the anti-sliding piles at the site of higher stress level and larger displacement can lead to higher factor of safety than at other places. Thus，the optimal reinforcement site is the upper region for the thrust load-caused landslide，while the lower region for the retrogressive landslide. As for the combined landslide，the optimal reinforcement site is the one of higher stress level and displacement. As a result，the optimal reinforcement site can be determined by the stress field and displacement field. These conclusions can offer more clear and reasonable reinforcement sites for engineering treatment，beneficial for the landslide treatment. At last，some typical landslides were analyzed. The results show that the above method is reasonable and feasible.
|
|
Received: 11 April 2012
|
|
|
|
| [1] 郑颖人，陈祖煜，王恭先，等. 边坡与滑坡工程治理[M]. 2版. 北京：人民交通出版社，2007：14–24.(ZHENG Yingren，CHEN Zuyu，WANG Gongxian，et al. Engineering treatment of slope and landslide[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing：China Communications Press，2007：14–24.(in Chinese))
[2] 年廷凯. 桩–土–边坡相互作用数值分析及阻滑桩简化设计方法研究[博士学位论文][D]. 大连：大连理工大学，2005.(NIAN Tingkai. A study on numerical analysis of pile-soil-slope interaction and simplified design procedure of stabilizing piles against landslide[Ph. D. Thesis][D]. Dalian：Dalian University of Technology，2005.(in Chinese))
[3] 李家平，赖允瑾，李永盛，等. 利用抗滑桩加固临水岸坡的边坡稳定性分析[J]. 水利水运工程学报，2005，(2)：53–58.(LI Jiaping，LAI Yunjin，LI Yongsheng，et al. Stabilization analysis of river-side slope reinforced by stabilizing piles[J]. Hydro-science and Engineering，2005，(2)：53–58.(in Chinese))
[4] 高长胜，魏汝龙，陈生水. 抗滑桩加固边坡变形破坏特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报，2009，31(1)：145–148.(GAO Changsheng，WEI Rulong，CHEN Shengshui. Centrifugal model tests on deformation of slopes reinforced with piles[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2009，31(1)：145–148.(in Chinese))
[5] 杨光华，张有祥，张玉成，等. 基于边坡变形场的抗滑桩最优加固位置探讨[J]. 岩土工程学报，2011，33(增1)：1–6.(YANG Guanghua，ZHANG Youxiang，ZHANG Yucheng，et al. Optimal site of anti-landslide piles based on deformation field of slopes[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2011，33(Supp.1)：1–6.(in Chinese))
[6] ZIENKIEWICZ O C，HUMPHESON C，LEWIS R W. Associated and non-associated visco-plasticity and plasticity in soil mechanics[J]. Geotechnique，1975，25(4)：671–689.
[7] GIFFITHS D V，LANE P A. Slope stability analysis by finite elements[J]. Geotechnique，1999，49(3)：387–403.
[8] 连镇营，韩国城，孔宪京. 强度折减有限元法研究开挖边坡的稳定性[J]. 岩土工程学报，2001，23(4)：407–411.(LIAN Zhenying，HAN Guocheng，KONG Xianjing. Stability analysis of excavation by strength reduction FEM[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2001，23(4)：407–411.(in Chinese))
[9] 郑颖人，赵尚毅. 有限元强度折减法在土坡与岩坡中的应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2004，23(19)：3 381–3 388.(ZHENG Yingren，ZHAO Shangyi. Application of strength reduction FEM to soil and rock slopes[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2004，23(19)：3 381–3 388.(in Chinese))
[10] 赵尚毅，郑颖人，时卫民，等. 用有限元强度折减法求边坡稳定安全系数[J]. 岩土工程学报，2002，24(3)：343–346.(ZHAO Shangyi，ZHENG Yingren，SHI Weimin，et al. Analysis of safety factor of slope stability by strength reduction FEM[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2002，24(3)：343–346.(in Chinese))
[11] 张鲁渝，郑颖人，赵尚毅，等. 有限元强度折减系数法计算土坡稳定安全系数的精度研究[J]. 水利学报，2003，(1)：21–27.(ZHANG Luyu，ZHENG Yingren，ZHAO Shangyi，et al. The feasibility study of strength-reduction method with FEM for calculating safety factors of soil slope stability[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering，2003，(1)：21–27.(in Chinese))
[12] DUCAN J M，CHANG C Y. Nonlinear analysis of stress and strain in soils[J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division，ASCE，1970，96(5)：1 629–1 653.
[13] 杨光华. 残积土上基础非线性沉降的双曲线模型的研究[C]// 第7届全国岩土力学数值分析与解析方法讨论会论文集. 大连：大连理工大学出版社，2001：168–171.(YANG Guanghua. Hyperbola model for calculating the nonlinear settlement of foundation on granite residual soil[C]// Proceedings of the 7th National Conference on the Numerical Analysis and Analytical Method for Rock and Soil Mechanics. Dalian：Dalian University of Technology Press，2001：168–171.(in Chinese))
[14] 杨光华. 地基非线性沉降计算的原状土切线模量法[J]. 岩土工程学报，2006，28(11)：1 927–1 931.(YANG Guanghua. Nonlinear settlement computation of the soil foundation with the undisturbed soil tangent modulus method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2006，28(11)：1 927–1 931.(in Chinese))
[15] 杨光华，张玉成，张有祥. 变模量弹塑性强度折减法及其在边坡稳定分析中的应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2009，28(7)：1 506–1 512.(YANG Guanghua，ZHANG Yucheng，ZHANG Youxiang. Variable modulus elastoplastic strength reduction method and its application to slope stability analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2009，28(7)：1 506–1 512.(in Chinese))
[16] 杨光华，钟志辉，张玉成，等. 用局部强度折减法进行边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学，2010，31(增2)：53–58.(YANG Guanghua，ZHONG Zhihui，ZHANG Yucheng，et al. Slope stability analysis by local strength reduction method[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2010，31(Supp.2)：53–58.(in Chinese))
[17] 钟志辉，杨光华，张玉成，等. 基于局部强度折减法的土质边坡位移研究[J]. 岩土工程学报，2011，33(增1)：196–201.(ZHONG Zhihui，YANG Guanghua，ZHANG Yucheng，et al. Displacement of soil slopes based on local strength reduction method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2011，33(Supp.1)：196–201.(in Chinese))
[18] 张俊瑞. 某典型牵引式滑坡形成机制分析及稳定性评价[J]. 土工基础，2010，24(2)：45–48.(ZHANG Junrui. Formation mechanism and stability analysis of a typical retrogressive landslide[J]. Soil Engineering and Foundation，2010，24(2)：45–48.(in Chinese))
[19] 田文丰，李俊杰，张 毅. 二郎镇滑坡特征与稳定性分析[J]. 岩土工程界，2009，12(12)：69–74.(TIAN Wenfeng，LI Junjie，ZHANG Yi. Character and stability analysis of Erlang Town landslide[J]. Geotechnical Engineering World，2009，12(12)：69–74.(in Chinese))
[20] 张有祥. 库岸边坡稳定性及抗滑桩加固研究[博士学位论文][D]. 武汉：武汉大学，2009.(ZHANG Youxiang. Research of reservoir bank slopes and anti-slide pile reinforcement[Ph. D. Thesis][D]. Wuhan：Wuhan University，2009.(in Chinese))
[21] 黄井武. 水库蓄水及水位变动对库岸古滑坡稳定性影响研究[博士学位论文][D]. 广州：暨南大学，2011.(HUANG Jingwu. Research on stability of bank ancient landslide under reservoir impounding and water level fluctuations[Ph. D. Thesis][D]. Guangzhou：Jinan University，2011.(in Chinese))
[22] 广东省水利电力规划勘测设计研究院. 广东省乐昌峡水利枢纽工程可行性研究报告[R]. 广州：广东省水利电力规划勘测设计研究院，2008.(Guangdong Hydropower Planning and Design Institute. Feasibility study report on Lechang Gorge water conservancy project[R]. Guangzhou：Guangdong Hydropower Planning and Design Institute，2008.(in Chinese)) |
|
|
|
2012, Vol. 31 
