|
|
|
| EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF INSTABILITY OF LOOSE SAND |
| DONG Quanyang1,CAI Yuanqiang1,2,WANG Jun2,GU Chuan2,DING Guangya2 |
| (1. Research Center of Coastal and Urban Geotechnical Engineering,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou,Zhejiang 310058,China;2. College of Architecture and Civil Engineering,Wenzhou University,Wenzhou,Zhejiang 325035,China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Undrained and constant shear drained(CSD) tests were conducted on loose Toyoura sand using high-precision variable confining pressure triaxial apparatus,which can maintain the deviator stress constant,more reliable results can be obtained from this study. Based on the test results,it can be concluded that the specimens of the same void ratio under different effective stresses have the same instability line,but the instability line slope of sand with the same effective stresses decreases gradually along with the increase of void ratio and tends to be stable. The instability can occur under completely drained conditions,instability as defined in this paper refers to a behavior in which large plastic strains are generated rapidly and continuously,and the axial strain and volumetric strain develop rapidly. In the previous CSD studies axial force were maintained constant;the decrease of the deviatoric stress during the process of test may affect the judgment of the instability;this may be the important reason for the researchers hold different conclusions. The instability occurring under drained conditions is different from that observed under undrained conditions. The differences and similarities between the two types of instability were elaborated. It can be included that instability of undrained tests and CSD tests occur on the similar stress ratios for a given void ratio of specimens. The test results in this study provide a more powerful evidence for the research of instability under drained condition;and they also can be used to analyze the failure mechanisms of granular soil slope.
|
|
Received: 08 May 2013
|
|
|
|
| [1] CHU J,LEROUEIL S,LEONG W K. Unstable behaviour of sand and its implication for slope stability[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,2003,40(5):873–885.
[2] CHU J,LEONG W K,LOKE W L,et al. Instability of loose sand under drained conditions[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2012,138(2):207–216.
[3] LADE P V. Static instability and liquefaction of loose fine sandy slopes[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,1992,118(1):51–71.
[4] KRAFT L M,GAVIN T M,BRUTON J C. Submarine flow slide in puget sound[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,1992,118(10):1 577–1 591.
[5] HIGHT D W. Anisotropy in soils——Its measurement and practical implications[R]. Singapore:Nanyang Technological University,1998.
[6] CASAGRANDE A. Liquefaction and cyclic deformation of sands——a critical review[C]// Proceedings of the 5th Pan American Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. [S.l.]:[s.n.],1975:79–133.
[7] 韦昌富,江礼茂,章根德. 饱和砂土的非稳定性[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1994,16(6):39–46.(WEI Changfu,JIANG Limao,ZHANG Gende. On the instability of saturated sands[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,1994,16(6):39–46.(in Chinese))
[8] 符新军,赵仲辉. 饱和粉砂不稳定性的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学,2008,29(2):381–385.(FU Xinjun,ZHAO Zhonghui. Laboratory study of the instability of saturated silty sand[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2008,29(2):381–385.(in Chinese))
[9] ECKERSLEY J D. Instrumented laboratory flowslides[J]. Géotechnique,1990,40(3):489–502.
[10] OLSON S M,STARK T D,WALTON W H,et al. 1907 Static liquefaction flow failure of the north dike of Wachusett dam[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2000,126(12):1 184–1 193.
[11] BJERRUM L. Subaqueous slope failures in Norwegian fjords[R]. [S.l.]:Norwegian Geotechnical Institute,1971.
[12] ANDERSON S A,RIEMER M F. Collapse of saturated soil due to reduction in confinement[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,1995,121(2):216–220.
[13] SKOPEK P,MORGENSTERN N R,ROBERTSON P K,et al. Collapse of dry sand[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,1994,31(6),1 003–1 008.
[14] SASITHARAN S,ROBERTSON P K,SEGO D C,et al. Collapse behavior of sand[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,1993,30(4): 569–577.
[15] BRAND E W. Some thoughts on rain-induced slope failures[C]// Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. Stockholm:[s.n.],1981:373–376.
[16] LADE P V,PRADEL D. Instability and plastic flow of soils. I:Experimental observations[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics,1990,116(11):2 532–2 550.
[17] LEONG W K,CHU J,THE C I. Liquefaction and instability of a granular fill material[J]. Geotechnical Testing Journal,2000,23(2):178–192.
[18] MONKUL M M,YAMAMURO J A,LADE P V. Failure,instability,and the second work increment in loose silty sand[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,2011,48(6):943–955.
[19] YANG Z X,LI X S,YANG J. Quantifying and modeling fabric anisotropy of granular soils[J]. Géotechnique,2008,58(4):237–248.
[20] HANZAWA H. Undrained strength and stability analysis for quick sand[J]. Soils and Foundations,1980,20(2):17–29.
[21] OLSON S M,STARK T D. Yield strength ratio and liquefaction analysis of slopes and embankments[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2003,129(8):727–737.
[22] POULOS S J. Strength for static and dynamic stability analysis[C]// Proceedings of Conference on Hydraulic Fill Structures. New York:ASCE,1988:452–474.
[23] SLADEN J A,D?HOLLANDER R D,KRAHN J. The liquefaction of sands:a collapse surface approach[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,1985,22(4):564–578.
[24] VAID Y P,CHERN J C. Cyclic and monotonic undrained response of saturated sands[C]// Advances in the Art of Testing Soils under Cyclic Conditions. [S.l.]:[s.n.],1985:120–147.
[25] YANG J. Non-uniqueness of flow liquefaction line for loose sand[J]. Géotechnique,2002,52(10):757–760.
[26] VERDUGO R. Characterization of sandy soil behavior under large deformation[Ph. D. Thesis][J]. Tokyo:University of Tokyo,1992.
[27] NOVA R. Controllability of the incremental response of soil specimens subjected to arbitrary loading programs[J]. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Materials,1994,5(2):193–201. |
|
|
|