岩土类摩擦材料空间Mohr应力圆与强度准则

doi:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2015.0672

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (0)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (608 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The traditional theory of spatial Mohr stress circle was analyzed in this paper and was found unable to fully reflect the stress state of geo-friction materials under loading in two directions(when consider the medium principle stress). The tests of the geo-friction materials including concrete rock and soil indicated that the compressive strength under biaxial compression was larger than that under uniaxial compression. The bearing capacity of two main shear planes under loading in two directions was suggested to be larger than that of one main shear plane under unidirectional loading. The reason is that the normal stress in the biaxial stress state is larger than the one in the uniaxial stress state，which leads to the friction strength and cohesion to increase. ?1(compression is positive) becomes larger with increasing of ?2，and the Mohr circle becomes larger correspondingly too. Not only the two limit stress circles were changed，but also the three limit stress circles were enlarged when ?2 was increased from ?2 = ?3 = 0 to ?2 = ?1. Therefore，the spatial Mohr circle theory of geo-friction materials adapted to bi-directional loading was established. An energy strength criterion based on traditional spatial Mohr stress circle was developed from the constant strength to variable strength criterion，which reflected the strength characteristics of geo-friction materials under bi-directional loading.

Key words： geotechnical engineering Mohr stress circle compressive strength geo-friction materials strength criterion principal stress

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZHENGYingren1
	XIANG Yuzhou2
	GAO Hong3

Cite this article:

ZHENGYingren1,XIANG Yuzhou2,GAO Hong3. The Mohr stress circle theory and strength criterion of friction materials of rock and soil[J]. , 2016, 35(6): 1081-1089.

URL:

https://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/EN/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2015.0672 OR https://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/EN/Y2016/V35/I6/1081

[1] LADE P V，DUNCAN J M. Elastoplastic stress-strain theory for cohesionless soil[J]. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division，1975，101(10)：1 037–1 053.
[2] LADE P V. Failure criterion for frictional materials in mechanics of engineering materials[M]. DESAL C S，GALLAGHER R H，eds. London，UK：John Wiley and Sons Ltd.，1984：385–402.
[3] MATSUOKA H，NAKAI T. Stress-deformation and strength characteristics of soil under three different principal stresses[C]// Proceedings of Japan Society Civil Engineers. [S.l.]：[s.n.]，1974：59–70.
[4] 罗汀，姚仰平，松岗元. 基于SMP准则的土的平面应变强度公式[J]. 岩土力学，2000，21(4)：390–393.(LUO Ting，YAO Yangping，MATSUOKA Hajime. Soil strength equation in plane strain based on SMP[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2000，21(4)：390–393.(in Chinese))
[5] 俞茂宏. 线性和非线性的统一强度理论[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2007，26(4)：662–669.(YU Maohong. Linear and nonlinear unified strength theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2007，26(4)：662–669.(in Chinese))
[6] 俞茂宏，昝月稳，范文，等. 20世纪岩石强度理论的发展——纪念Mohr-Coulomb强度理论100周年[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2000，19(5)：545–550.(YU Maohong，ZAN Yuewen，FAN Wen，et al. Advances in strength theory of rock in 20 century—100 years in memory of the Mohr-Coulomb strength theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2000，19(5)：545–550.(in Chinese))
[7] 高红，郑颖人，冯夏庭. 岩土材料屈服准则研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2007，26(12)：2 437–2 443.(GAO Hong，ZHENG Yingren，FENG Xiating. Study on energy yield criterion of geomaterals[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2007，26(12)：2 437–2 443.(in Chinese))
[8] 郑颖人，孔亮. 岩土塑性力学[M]. 北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2010：80–83.(ZHENG Yingren，KONG Liang. Geotechnical plastic mechanics[M]. Beijing：China Building Industry Press，2010：80–83.(in Chinese))
[9] 宋玉普. 高等钢筋混凝土结构学[M]. 北京：中国水利水电出版社，2012：101–132.(SONG Yupu. Advanced reinforced concrete structure[M]. Beijing：China Water Power Press，2012：101–132.(in Chinese))
[10] 宋玉普，何振军. 高强高性能混凝土在多轴压下强度与变形性能的试验研究[J] 岩石力学与工程学报，2008，27(2)：3 575–3 584. (SONG Yupu，HE Zhenjun. Experimental investigation on strength and deformation of plain high-strength high-performance concrete under multiaxial compression[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2008，27(2)：3 575–3 584.(in Chinese))
[11] 过镇海. 混凝土的强度与变形[M]. 北京：清华大学出版社，1997：123–137.(GUO Zhenhai. Strength and deformation of concrete[M]. Beijing：Tsinghua University Press，1997：123–137.(in Chinese))
[12] KUPFER H，GERSTLE K H. Behavior of concrete under Biaxial Stresses[J]. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division，1973，99(4)：853–866.
[13] 高延法，陶振宇. 岩石强度准则的真三轴压力试验检验与分析[J].岩土工程学报，1993，15(4)：26–32.(GAO Yanfa，TAO Zhenyu. Examination and analysis of true triaxial compress testing of strength criteria of rock[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，1993，15(4)：26–32.(in Chinese))
[14] 李小春，许东俊. 中间主应力对岩石强度影响程度和规律[J]. 岩土力学，1991，12(1)：9–16.(LI Xiaochun，XU Dongjun. Law and degree of effect the intermediate principle stress on strength of rock[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，1991，12(1)：9–16.(in Chinese))
[15] KIYOO MOGI. Experimental Rock Mechanics[M]. London，UK：Taylor and Francis Group，2006：101–112.
[16] 陈瑜瑶，王敬林，郑颖人. 由试验数据拟合重庆红黏土的屈服条件[J]. 岩土力学，2001，22(4)：443–450.(CHENG Yuyao，WANG Jinglin， ZHENG Yingren. Fitting the yield criterion of Chongqing red clay by experimental data[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2001，22(4)：443–450.(in Chinese))
[17] 邢义川，刘祖典，郑颖人. 黄土的破坏条件[J]. 水利学报，1999，1(1)：12–18.(XING Yichuan，LIU Zudian，ZHENG Yingren. A failure criterion of loess[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering，1999，1(1)：12–18.(in Chinese))
[18] 丛宇，孔亮，郑颖人，等. 混凝土材料剪切强度的试验研究[J].混凝土，2015，(5)：40–45.(CONG Yu，KONG Liang，ZHENG Yingren，et al. Experimental study on shear strength of concrete[J]. Concrete，2015，(5)：40–45.(in Chinese))