|
|
|
| Fluid-solid coupling mechanisms in the evolution of hydraulic fracture networks in large-scale true triaxial tight sandstone |
| WANG Hongjian1, 2, 3, 4, YIN Bohao1, WANG Yongbo1, XU Xianlei4, ZHAO Shankun3*, ZHAO Fei1,SHI Xiaoshan2, WANG Guozhu5 |
(1. College of Geosciences and Engineering, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, Henan 450046, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Coal Mining and Strata Control, China Coal Technology and Engineering Group, Beijing 100013, China; 3. National Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Prevention and Control, CCTEG China Coal Research Institute, China Coal Technology and Engineering Group, Beijing 100013, China; 4. State Key Laboratory of Fine
Exploration and Intelligent Development of Coal Resources, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing),
Beijing 100083, China; 5. Research Institute of Petroleum Engineering Technology, Sinopec Zhongyuan Oilfield
Company, Puyang, Henan 457001, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The mechanism of hydraulic fracture propagation and fracture network formation in tight sandstone is essential for deep energy development. To investigate the influence of injection rate on hydraulic fracture behavior in tight sandstone containing natural fractures, this study conducted large-scale true triaxial fracturing tests on specimens measuring 400 mm × 400 mm × 400 mm from the tight sandstone in the Puguang area of Sichuan. By integrating three-dimensional acoustic emission monitoring, isotope tracing, and fractal analysis of fractures, we systematically analyzed the fracture propagation process under three injection rates (100, 200 and 300 mL/min). The results indicate that: (1) The high quartz content (40.5%) and high brittleness index (64) of the reservoir provide a geological basis for the formation of complex fracture networks. (2) As the injection rate increases, the hydraulic fracture growth rate escalates from 19.95% at 100 mL/min to 67.01% at 300 mL/min, while the fractal dimension increases from 1.102 2 to 1.267 5. The fracture morphology transitions from a single dominant direction to a complex radial network. (3) Increasing the injection rate raises the maximum borehole pressure from 68 MPa to 100 MPa, with cumulative acoustic emission energy surging by 415.1% when the rate increases from 100 mL/min to 200 mL/min, while the increase slows to 6.1% when the rate rises from 200 mL/min to 300 mL/min, indicating that energy release tends to saturate at high injection rates. (4) Acoustic emission events are concentrated along the direction of maximum principal stress (at angles ≤ 45° to the wellbore). The time-series curve of the fractal dimension exhibits a three-stage characteristic: decline–rise–fluctuating decline, revealing the evolution of damage from disordered initiation to ordered connectivity. (5) Theoretical analysis indicates that breakdown pressure is influenced by the competing effects of injection rate and fluid infiltration. At low injection rates, fluid infiltration predominates, resulting in lower breakdown pressure, while at high injection rates, the injection rate dominates, leading to higher breakdown pressure. This study elucidates the influence of injection rate on hydraulic fracture propagation in tight sandstone and provides a crucial theoretical basis for optimizing parameters in deep volumetric fracturing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 何满潮. 深部的概念体系及工程评价指标[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2005，24(16)：2 854–2 858.(HE Manchao. Conception system and evaluation indexes for deep engineering[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2005，24(16)：2 854–2 858.(in Chinese))
[2] 汤继周，张 卓，张丰收，等. 陆相页岩储层水平井无限级压裂工艺优化[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2023，42(9)：2 096–2 108.(TANG Jizhou，ZHANG Zhuo，ZHANG Fengshou，et al. Optimization of unlimited stage fracturing technology for horizontal wells in continental shale formation[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2023，42(9)：2 096–2 108.(in Chinese))
[3] 冯宏波. 致密砂岩气田体积压裂及简易测试求产技术的探究与应用[J]. 中国石油和化工标准与质量，2025，45(15)：187–189.(FENG Hongbo. Exploration and application of volume fracturing and simplified production testing technology in tight sandstone gas fields[J]. China Petroleum and Chemical Standard and Quality，2025，45(15)：187–189.(in Chinese))
[4] 屈小磊，赫建明，陈 杰，等. 页岩水力压裂微裂纹扩展演化试验研究及力学机制分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2023，42(增1)：3 151–3 159. (QU Xiaolei，HE Jianming，CHEN Jie，et al. Experimental study on micro-crack propagation and mechanical mechanism analysis of hydraulic fracturing in shale[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2023，42(Supp.1)：3 151–3 159.(in Chinese))
[5] 陈 勉. 页岩气储层水力裂缝转向扩展机制[J]. 中国石油大学学报：自然科学版，2013，37(5)：88–94.(CHEN Mian. Re-orientation and propagation of hydraulic fracture s in shale gas reservoir[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum：Natural Science，2013，37(5)：88–94.(in Chinese))
[6] GUO T K，WANG H Y，CHEN M，et al. Numerical simulation of fracture propagation in deflagration-hydraulic composite fracturing of unconventional reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development，2025，52(4)：1 017–1 028.
[7] 侯 冰，张其星，陈 勉. 页岩储层压裂物理模拟技术进展及发展趋势[J]. 石油钻探技术，2023，51(5)：66–77.(HOU Bing，ZHANG Qixing，CHEN Mian. Status and tendency of physical simulation technology for hydraulic fracturing of shale reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques，2023，51(5)：66–77.(in Chinese))
[8] 郭印同，杨春和，贾长贵，等. 页岩水力压裂物理模拟与裂缝表征方法研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2014，33(1)：52–59.(GUO Yintong，YANG Chunhe，JIA Changgui，et al. Research on hydraulic fracturing physical simulation of shale and fracture characterization methods[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2014，33(1)：52–59.(in Chinese))
[9] 魏元龙，杨春和，郭印同，等. 须家河组致密砂岩水力压裂裂缝形态的试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2016，35(增1)：2 720–2 731. (WEI Yuanlong，YANG Chunhe，GUO Yintong，et al. Experimental study on hydraulic fracture geometry of tight sandstone from Xujiahe group[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2016，35(Supp.1)：2 720–2 731.(in Chinese))
[10] 曾义金，周 俊，王海涛，等. 深层页岩真三轴变排量水力压裂物理模拟研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2019，38(9)：1 758–1 766.(ZENG Yijin，ZHOU Jun，WANG Haitao，et al. Research on true triaxial hydraulic fracturing in deep shale with varying pumping rates[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2019，38(9)：1 758–1 766.(in Chinese))
[11] 杜涛涛，鞠文君，卢志国，等. 岩石水力压裂力学特性劣化实验研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术，2025，53(10)：74–83.(DU Taotao，JU Wenjun，LU Zhiguo，et al. Experimental study on mechanical properties of rock degraded by hydraulic fracturing[J]. Coal Science and Technology，2025，53(10)：74–83.(in Chinese))
[12] 陈瑞杰，熊志文，王 瑞，等. 煤层顶板水力压裂裂缝扩展规律实验研究[J]. 中国矿业，2024，33(12)：208–216.(CHEN Ruijie，XIONG Zhiwen，WANG Rui，et al. Experimental study on the expansion law of hydraulic fracturing cracks in coal seam roof[J]. China Mining Magazine，2024，33(12)：208–216.(in Chinese))
[13] 崔俊艳，姚亚辉，李胜涛，等. 水力压裂条件下花岗岩裂缝扩展行为与声发射特性[J]. 科学技术与工程，2025，25(28)：11 921–11 931. (CUI Junyan，YAO Yahui，LI Shengtao，et al. Fracture expansion behavior and acoustic Emission characteristics of granite under hydraulic fracturing conditions[J]. Science Technology and Engineering，2025，25(28)：11 921–11 931.(in Chinese))
[14] 侯振坤，杨春和，王 磊，等. 大尺寸真三轴页岩水平井水力压裂物理模拟试验与裂缝延伸规律分析[J]. 岩土力学，2016，37(2)：407–414.(HOU Zhenkun，YANG Chunhe，WANG Lei，et al. Hydraulic fracture propagation of shale horizontal well by large-scale true triaxial physical simulation test[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2016，37(2)：407–414.(in Chinese))
[15] 吴福元，李献华，郑永飞，等. Lu-Hf同位素体系及其岩石学应用[J]. 岩石学报，2007，32(2)：185–220.(WU Fuyuan，LI Xianhua，ZENG Yongfei，et al. Lu-Hf isotopic systematic and their applications in petrology[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica，2007，32(2)：185–220.(in Chinese))
[16] 中华人民共和国行业标准编写组. NB/T 10248—2019 页岩脆性指数测定及评价方法[S]. [S. l.]：[s. n.]，2019.(The Professional Standards Compilation Group of People?s Republic of China. NB/T 10248—2019 Determination and evaluation method of shale brittleness index[S]. [S. l.]：[s. n.]，2019.(in Chinese))
[17] 李庆辉，陈 勉，金 衍，等. 页岩脆性的室内评价方法及改进[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2012，31(8)：1 680–1 685.(LI Qinghui，CHRN Mian，JIN Yan，et al. Indoor evaluation method for shale brittleness and improvement[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2012，31(8)：1 680–1 685.(in Chinese))
[18] 石美璟. 岩相约束的页岩脆性指数预测方法研究[J]. 能源技术与管理，2025，50(4)：29–32.(SHI Meijing. Study on a lithofacies-constrained prediction method for shale brittleness index[J]. Energy Technology and Management，2025，50(4)：29–32.(in Chinese))
[19] 秦晓艳，王震亮，于红岩，等. 基于岩石物理与矿物组成的页岩脆性评价新方法[J]. 天然气地球科学，2016，27(10)：1 924–1 932.(QIN Xiaoyan，WANG Zhenliang，YU Hongyan，et al. A new shale brittleness evaluation method based on rock physics and mineral compositions[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience，2016，27(10)：1 924–1 932.(in Chinese))
[20] 张 乐，党发宁，丁卫华，等. 基于改进差分盒维数法的混凝土细观损伤定量研究[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报，2021，29(4)：973–985. (ZHANG Le，DANG Faning，DING Weihua，et al. Quantitative study on meso-damage of concrete based on improved differential box-counting method[J]. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering，2021，29(4)：973–985.(in Chinese))
[21] 刘 晟，王卫星，曹 霆，等. 基于差分计盒维数及最大熵阈值的裂缝提取[J]. 长安大学学报：自然科学版，2015，35(5)：13–21.(LIU Sheng，WANG Weixing，CAO Ting，et al. Road crack extraction based on differential box dimension and maximum entropy threshold[J]. Journal of Chang?an University：Natural Science，2015，35(5)：13–21.(in Chinese))
[22] 李克玺，党建东，张 见，等. 基于声发射特征参数的不同类型砂岩破裂特征研究[J]. 现代隧道技术，2025，62(4)：26–36.(LI Kexi，DANG Jiandong，ZHANG Jian，et al. Study on fracture characteristics of different types of sandstone based on acoustic emission characteristic parameters[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology，2025，62(4)：26–36.(in Chinese))
[23] 薛瑞雄，孔颖慧，冯金翔. 基于声发射不同岩石破裂特征及失稳前兆信息研究[J]. 煤炭技术，2024，43(12)：13–19.(XUE Ruixiong，KONG Yinghui，FENG Jinxiang. Research on different rock fracture characteristics and instability precursor information based on acoustic emission[J]. Coal Technology，2024，43(12)：13–19.(in Chinese))
[24] 赵兴东，刘建坡，李元辉，等. 岩石声发射定位技术及其实验验证[J]. 岩土工程学报，2008，30(10)：1 472–1 476.(ZHAO Xingdong，LIU Jianpo，LI Yuanhui，et al. Experimental verification of rock locating technique with acoustic emission [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2008，30(10)：1 472–1 476.(in Chinese))
[25] 赵兴东，李元辉，袁瑞甫，等. 基于声发射定位的岩石裂纹动态演化过程研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2007，26(5)：944–950.(ZHAO Xingdong，LI Yuanhui，YUAN Ruifu，et al. Study on crack dynamic propagation process of rock samples based on acoustic emission location[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2007，26(5)：944–950.(in Chinese))
[26] 马军强，李学华，张佳琦，等. 煤系岩层真三轴水力压裂裂缝扩展规律研究[J]. 采矿与岩层控制工程学报，2025，7(4)：32–57.(MA Junqiang，LI Xuehua，ZHANG Jiaqi，et al. The study on the propagation laws of hydraulic fractures in coal measure strata under true triaxial conditions[J]. Journal of Mining and Strata Control Engineering，2025，7(4)：32–57.(in Chinese))
[27] 许 丹，胡瑞林，高 玮，等. 页岩纹层结构对水力裂缝扩展规律的影响[J]. 石油勘探与开发，2015，42(4)：523–528.(XU Dan，HU Ruilin，GAO Wei，et al. Effects of laminated structure on hydraulic fracture propagation in shale[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development，2015，42(4)：523–528.(in Chinese))
[28] GRASSBERGER P，PROCACCIA I. Estimation of the Kolmogorov entropy from a chaotic signal[J]. Physical Review A，1983，28(4)：2 591.
[29] 祁 浩，李春晓，李长祺. 基于多重分形理论的花岗岩岩爆试验声发射信号特征研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报，2024，41(5)：934–945.(QI Hao，LI Chunxiao，LI Changqi. Study on the characteristics of acoustic emission signals of granite under rockburst based on multifractal theory[J]. Journal of Mining and Safety Engineering，2024，41(5)：934–945.(in Chinese))
[30] 姜永东，谢成龙，宋 晓，等. 真三轴下砂岩水力压裂物理模拟与声发射特征[J]. 地下空间与工程学报，2024，20(4)：1 145–1 151. (JIANG Yongdong，XIE Chenglong，SONG Xiao，et al. Physical simulation and acoustic emission characteristics of sandstone hydraulic fracturing under true triaxial[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering，2024，20(4)：1 145–1 151.(in Chinese))
[31] ZOBACK M D，POLLARD D D. Hydraulic fracture propagation and the interpretation of pressure-time records for in-situ stress determinations[C]// Proceedings of the 19th U.S. Symposium on Rock Mechanics (USRMS). Reno，Nevada：[s. n.]，1978：ARMA–78–0014.
[32] ZHANG Y F，ZHAO Y，ZANG A，et al. Acoustic emission evolution and hydraulic fracture morphology of Changning shale stressed to failure at different injection rates in the laboratory[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering，2023，57(2)：1 287–1 308.
[33] ITO T，HAYASHI K. Physical background to the breakdown pressure in hydraulic fracturing tectonic stress measurements[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts，1991，28(4)：285–293. |
|
|
|
2026, Vol. 45 
