|
|
|
| Shaking table model tests on the dynamic response of tunnels under multi-directional dynamic loading |
| ZHANG Kai1, 2, 3, GU Yuting1, 2, 3, ZHU Jianbo1, 2, 3, GUO Wei4, HU Guibo1, 2, 3, LUO Junhan1, 2, 3, KONG Ji1, 2, 3, QU Honglue5, XIE Heping1, 2, 3* |
(1. State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Construction and Healthy Operation and Maintenance of Deep Underground Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518060, China; 2. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Deep Earth Sciences and Geothermal Energy Exploitation and Utilization, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518060, China; 3. Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Deep Underground Engineering Sciences and Green Energy, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518060, China; 4. National Engineering Research Center of High-speed Railway Construction Technology, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410075, China; 5. School of Geoscience and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University,
Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Underground structures are typically subjected to multidirectional seismic excitation during earthquakes. To investigate the dynamic response of tunnels under such conditions, large-scale shaking-table model tests were conducted. The dynamic responses of the surrounding rock and key locations on the tunnel cross-section were analyzed, and the evolution of the response along the tunnel axis was examined. The results indicate that, regardless of the loading direction, the acceleration response generally increased from unidirectional to bidirectional and then to three-directional loading. Significant differences were observed in the acceleration responses at different locations on the tunnel cross-section. In particular, horizontal seismic excitation perpendicular to the tunnel axis substantially amplifies the acceleration response along the approximately 45°diagonal direction of the cross-section. At the tunnel invert, both the peak acceleration and the energy fractions in the 0–15.625 and 15.625–31.250 Hz frequency bands exhibit pronounced changes at a portal distance of approximately 1.67 tunnel spans. This finding indicates that, for the unsupported tunnel with no excavated upslope at the portal, a distinct seismic amplification zone extends approximately 1.67 tunnel spans from the portal. These findings provide insights for evaluating the seismic response of tunnels and optimizing their seismic design.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 崔光耀，伍修刚，王明年，等. 汶川8.0级大地震公路隧道震害调查与震害特征[J]. 现代隧道技术，2017，54(2)：9–16.(CUI Guangyao，WU Xiugang，WANG Mingnian，et al. Earthquake damages and characteristics of highway tunnels in the 8.0-Magnitude Wenchuan Earthquake[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology，2017，54(2)：9–16.(in Chinese))
[2] 闫高明，赵伯明. 穿越断层隧道纵向地震响应规律解析解[J]. 工程科学与技术，2023，55(2)：26–38.(YAN Gaoming，ZHAO Boming. Analytical solution for longitudinal seismic responses of fault-crossing tunnels[J]. Advanced Engineering Sciences，2023，55(2)：26–38.(in Chinese))
[3] LU Y，WAN T，HUANG X Y，et al. Preliminary mechanical evaluation of grouting concrete as a protective layer for tunnelling[J]. Materials，2023，16(14)：4957.
[4] 陶连金，李书龙，侯 森，等. 山岭隧道洞口段地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 世界地震工程，2016，32(4)：7–16.(TAO Lianjin，LI Shulong，HOU Sen，et al. Shaking table test for seismic response in portal section of mountain tunnel[J]. World Earthquake Engineering，2016，32(4)：7–16.(in Chinese))
[5] 禹海涛，任辉辉，陈俊涛，等. 强震作用下工法对接变刚度隧道振动台试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2023，42(7)：1 599–1 609. (YU Haitao，REN Huihui，CHEN Juntao，et al. Shaking table experimental study on variable stiffness tunnels under strong excitation[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2023，42(7)：1 599–1 609.(in Chinese))
[6] 汪精河. 基于波动理论的高陡边坡山岭隧道洞口地震响应分析[博士学位论文][D]. 成都：西南交通大学，2016.(WANG Jinghe. Seismic response analysis for mountain tunnel portals in high steep slopes based on wave theory[Ph. D. Thesis][D]. Chengdu：Southwest Jiaotong University，2016.(in Chinese))
[7] 孙 文，梁庆国，刘青霞，等. 强震作用下黄土隧道洞口段地震动放大效应研究[J]. 地震工程学报，2021，43(4)：935–943.(SUN Wen，LIANG Qingguo，LIU Qingxia，et al. Amplification effect of the portal section of loess tunnels under strong earthquake[J]. China Earthquake Engineering Journal，2021，43(4)：935–943.(in Chinese))
[8] 侯 森，陶连金，赵 旭，等. 不同加载方向的山岭隧道洞口段地震响应振动台模型试验[J]. 中南大学学报：自然科学版，2016，47(3)：994–1 001.(HOU Sen，TAO Lianjin，ZHAO Xu，et al. Shaking table test for dynamic response in portal section of mountain tunnel based on different vibration directions[J]. Journal of Central South University：Science and Technology，2016，47(3)：994–1 001.(in Chinese))
[9] 蒲建军. 地震作用下黄土隧道进洞高程对洞口段动力响应的影响研究[硕士学位论文][D]. 兰州：兰州交通大学，2017.(PU Jianjun. Research on influence of loess tunnel tunneling elevation on the dynamic response of portal section under earthquake action[M. S. Thesis][D]. Lanzhou：Lanzhou Jiaotong University，2017.(in Chinese))
[10] 吴 冬，高 波，申玉生，等. 隧道仰坡地震动力响应特性振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学，2014，35(7)：1 921–1 928.(WU Dong，GAO Bo，SHEN Yusheng，et al. Shaking table test study of seismic dynamic response of tunnel entrance slope[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2014，35(7)：1 921–1 928.(in Chinese))
[11] 陶连金，侯 森，赵 旭，等. 不同仰坡度数的山岭隧道洞口段动力响应振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学，2014，35(增1)：91–98.(TAO Lianjin，HOU Sen，ZHAO Xu，et al. Large-scale shaking table test for dynamic response in portal section of mountain tunnel with different gradients of upward slope[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2014，35(Supp.1)：91–98.(in Chinese))
[12] WANG F F，REN Q Y，PENG Y，et al. Experimental study on acceleration response laws of shallow-buried bias tunnels with a small distance[J]. Journal of Vibroengineering，2020，22(7)：1 661–1 673.
[13] 陶志刚，赵 易，丰于翔，等. 双向地震作用下跨断层破碎带隧道地震响应动力学试验研究[J]. 中南大学学报：自然科学版，2025，56(2)：637–650.(TAO Zhigang，ZHAO Yi，FENG Yuxiang，et al. Dynamic experimental study on seismic response of cross fault fractured zone tunnels under bidirectional seismic action[J]. Journal of Central South University：Science and Technology，2025，56(2)：637–650.(in Chinese))
[14] LEI H，WU H G，LAI T W. Shaking table tests for seismic response of oblique overlapped tunnel[J]. Shock and Vibration，2021，(1)：8816755.
[15] 梁庆国，陈克霖，熊玉莲，等. 地震动作用下隧道洞口段破坏特征试验研究[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报，2023，43(1)：122–131.(LIANG Qingguo，CHEN Kelin，XIONG Yulian，et al. Experimental study on failure characteristics of tunnel portal under ground motion[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering，2023，43(1)：122–131.(in Chinese))
[16] 胡 垚，雷华阳，雷 峥，等. 三向地震作用下叠交隧道地震响应振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学，2022，43(增2)：104–116.(HU Yao，LEI Huayang，LEI Zheng，et al. Shaking table test on seismic response of stacked tunnels under three-directional earthquake wave excitation[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2022，43(Supp.2)：104–116.(in Chinese))
[17] 杨长卫，张 良，张凯文，等. 山岭隧道跨断裂带段及洞口段地震响应大型振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2023，42(4)：993–1 002.(YANG Changwei，ZHANG Liang，ZHANG Kaiwen，et al. Large scale shaking table model test on seismic response of mountain tunnel portal section passing through fault zone[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2023，42(4)：993–1 002.(in Chinese))
[18] 李延涛，田 野，宗金辉. 多维地震下考虑地表建筑的土和隧道的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2022，41(7)：1 453–1 465.(LI Yantao，TIAN Ye，ZONG Jinhui. Shaking table test of a tunnel–soil system considering the influence of surface buildings under multi–dimensional seismic waves[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2022，41(7)：1 453–1 465.(in Chinese))
[19] LIU H Y，YU Z W，GUO W，et al. Novel dynamic test system for simulating high-speed train moving on bridge under earthquake excitation[J]. Journal of Central South University，2022，29(8)：2 485–2 501.
[20] 唐建员. 地震下高速列车轮轨横向位移视觉测量及响应规律研究[硕士学位论文][D]. 长沙：中南大学，2023.(TANG Jianyuan. Visual measurement of wheel-rail transverse displacement and response law of high-speed trains under earthquake[M. S. Thesis][D]. Changsha：Central South University，2023.(in Chinese))
[21] 中华人民共和国国家标准编写组. GB 50011—2010建筑抗震设计规范[S]. 北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2010.(The National Standards Compilation Group of People?s Republic of China. GB 50011—2010 Code for seismic design of buildings[S]. Beijing：China Architecture and Building Press，2010.(in Chinese))
[22] 孙建刚. 基于环境振动的实验模态分析方法研究[硕士学位论文][D]. 哈尔滨：哈尔滨工业大学，2006.(SUN Jiangang. The research of experimental modal analysis methods based on ambient vibration[M. S. Thesis][D]. Harbin：Harbin Institute of Technology，2006.(in Chinese))
[23] 杨 兵，杨 翔，杨 涛，等. 地震荷载作用下震裂–溃滑型边坡破坏过程及动力响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2018，37(增1)：3 279–3 290.(YANG Bing，YANG Xiang，YANG Tao，et al. Shaking table model test on dynamic response and failure process of shatter-burst sliding slope under earthquake load[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2018，37(Supp.1)：3 279–3 290.(in Chinese))
[24] 晏启祥，张 煜，王春艳，等. 剪切波作用下盾构隧道地震效应的拟静力分析方法研究[J]. 工程力学，2015，32(5)：184–191.(YAN Qixiang，ZHANG Yu，WANG Chunyan，et al. Quasi-static analysis method for seismic effect of shear waves on shield tunnel[J]. Engineering Mechanics，2015，32(5)：184–191.(in Chinese))
[25] 耿 萍，曹东杰，唐金良，等. 铁路隧道洞口合理抗震设防长度[J]. 西南交通大学学报，2012，25(6)：942–948.(GENG Ping，CAO Dongjie，TANG Jinliang，et al. Rational seismic protective length for portal of railway tunnel[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University，2012，25(6)：942–948.(in Chinese))
[26] 王 尚，梁庆国，乔向进，等. 基于小波包和反应谱的黄土边坡动力特征研究[J]. 地震工程学报，2023，45(1)：94–102.(WANG Shang，LIANG Qingguo，QIAO Xiangjin，et al. Dynamic characteristics of loess slopes based on wavelet packet and response spectrum[J]. China Earthquake Engineering Journal，2023，45(1)：94–102.(in Chinese)) |
|
|
|
2026, Vol. 45 
