COMPARISON OF THREE METHODS FOR GEOTECHNICAL CENTRIFUGE MODEL TESTS OF EXPLOSION CRATERING IN SAND
FAN Yikai1，2，CHEN Zuyu2，LIANG Xiangqian2，HUANG Xin1，ZHANG Xuedong2
(1. School of Transportation Science and Engineering，Beihang University，Beijing 100191，China；
2. Department of Geotechnical Engineering，China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research，Beijing 100044，China)
Abstract：The explosion cratering effects in dry standard sands were investigated by using a 450 g-t geotechnical centrifuge apparatus. The ten centrifuge model tests were completed with a variety range of explosive mass，burial depth and centrifuge accelerations. Three methods were used to analyze the results of 10 centrifuge model tests of explosion cratering in sand. These three methods included Schmidt formula，Baker formula，and the correction Боресков formula. The first two formulas were derived by similarity analysis. The correctional Боресков formula was an empirical formula based on experimental data. The correlation coefficients R2 of the three methods were 0.931，0.960，and 0.998 respectively. A comparison of these three methods was also given in this paper. The Schmidt formula is the most suitable method for cratering effect analysis. The parameters of this formula can be accurately determined.
范一锴1，2，陈祖煜2，梁向前2，黄 新1，张雪东2. 砂中爆炸成坑的离心模型试验分析方法比较[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2011, 30(S2): 4123-4128.
FAN Yikai1，2，CHEN Zuyu2，LIANG Xiangqian2，HUANG Xin1，ZHANG Xuedong2. COMPARISON OF THREE METHODS FOR GEOTECHNICAL CENTRIFUGE MODEL TESTS OF EXPLOSION CRATERING IN SAND. , 2011, 30(S2): 4123-4128.
SCHMIDT R M，HOUSEN K R. Some recent advances in the scaling of impact and explosion cratering[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering，1987，5(1/4)：543-560.
<body>Your browse does not support frame!</body>
2011, Vol. 30 
