铁路运营隧道衬砌背后接触状态及其分析

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (444 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要铁路隧道衬砌背后接触状态可分为衬砌背后接触密实、衬砌背后接触松散和衬砌背后空洞3种情况，其中，衬砌背后接触松散和衬砌背后空洞统称为衬砌背后接触不良，是常见的隧道质量缺陷。研究表明：衬砌背后接触不良是诱发隧道病害的重要原因，直接影响到隧道结构的安全性。通过对100余座铁路运营隧道衬砌无损检测及统计分析，取得以下结论：(1) 同等条件下，单层衬砌比复合式衬砌更易出现衬砌背后接触不良状况，且单层衬砌背后接触不良程度高于复合式衬砌；(2) 衬砌背后接触不良段所占比例及严重程度与围岩级别有密切关系，在隧道围岩稳定性较差的区段更为严重；(3) 衬砌背后接触不良状况随断面位置而变化，以拱顶处最大，拱脚减小；(4) 衬砌背后空洞的存在受到隧道设计理念、工程质量控制和运营养护水平等因素的影响，而衬砌背后及时的回填注浆则是控制的关键。取得的隧道衬砌背后接触状态及其分布规律可为结构缺陷的病害演化及致灾机制的研究提供参考与借鉴。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

关键词 ：隧道工程, 铁路运营隧道, 衬砌背后接触状态, 接触松散, 空洞, 无损检测

Abstract：There are three types of contact states between the primary linings and the secondary linings for the railway tunnels. Those are tight contact state，loose contact state and voids. Both the loose contact state and the voids behind the linings can be regarded as poor contact，which are deemed as typical tunnel quality defects. The research results show that the poor contact states have great influence on tunnel structure safety. General law of contact states behind railway tunnel linings in China is obtained according to the lining nondestructive test data of more than 100 railway tunnels. The research results show that：(1) Poor contact states behind linings are more incidental and serious in single shell lining than in the composite lining under the same conditions. (2) The occurrence proportion and severity of poor contact conditions behind linings have a close relationship with the surrounding rock classification；and they are more disadvantageous in the poorer surrounding rock. (3) The occurrence proportion and severity of poor contact states behind linings are affected by the positions of the poor contact states around the tunnel cross-section. The negative effects of the contact states decrease from the tunnel crowns to tunnel feet. (4) The appearance of the voids is affected by tunnel design principle，construction quality control，operational maintenance efficiency，etc. The prompt contact grouting between the primary lining and surrounding ground is the key to control this undesired phenomenon. The results obtained in this study can provide useful reference for studying the contact states between the primary linings and the secondary linings. It will also be helpful to study the development of the defects in the tunnel structure system.

Key words： tunnelling engineering railway operation tunnel contact states behind tunnel linings loose contact voids nondestructive test

收稿日期: 2012-08-06

引用本文:

张顶立，张素磊，房倩，陈峰宾. 铁路运营隧道衬砌背后接触状态及其分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2013, 32(2): 217-224.
ZHANG Dingli，ZHANG Sulei，FANG Qian，CHEN Fengbin. STUDY OF CONTACT STATE BEHIND TUNNEL LINING IN PROCESS OF RAILWAY OPERATION AND ITS ANALYSIS. , 2013, 32(2): 217-224.

链接本文:

http://www.rockmech.org/CN/Y2013/V32/I2/217

[8]	宋瑞刚，张顶立.“接触问题”引起的隧道病害分析[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报，2004，15(4)：69-72.(SONG Ruigang，ZHANG Dingli. Analysis of cause of fracturing failure of tunnel lining[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control，2004，15(4)：69-72.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[11]	中华人民共和国行业标准编写组. JTGH12—2003公路隧道养护技术规范[S]. 北京：人民交通出版社，2003.(The Professional Standards Compilation Group of People?s Republic of China. JTGH12—2003 Technical specification of maintenance for highway tunnel[S]. Beijing：China Communications Press，2003.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[13]	张顶立. 海底隧道不良地质体及结构界面的变形控制技术[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2007，26(11)：2 161-2 169.(ZHANG Dingli. Deformation control techniques of unfavorable geologic bodies and discontinuous surfaces in subsea tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2007，26(11)：2 161-2 169.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[3]	铁道部工程设计鉴定中心. 高速铁路隧道[M]. 北京：中国铁道出版社，2006：323-348.(Engineering Design and Appraisal Center of Ministry of Railways. High-speed railway tunnel[M]. Beijing：China Railway Publishing House，2006：323-348.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[6]	MEGUID M A，DANG H K. The effect of erosion voids on existing tunnel linings[J]. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology，2009，24(3)：278-286.
[10]	李明，陈洪凯，熊峰伟. 隧道衬砌背后空洞健康判据试验研究[J].重庆交通大学学报：自然科学版，2011，30(3)：398-402.(LI Ming，CHEN Hongkai，XIONG Fengwei. Test research on health criterion of cavities behind the lining[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University：Natural Science，2011，30(3)：398-402.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[1]	王梦恕. 中国隧道及地下工程修建技术[M]. 北京：人民交通出版社，2010：237-274.(WANG Mengshu. Tunnelling and underground engineering technology in China[M]. Beijing：China Communications Press，2010：237-274.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[2]	杨新安，姚永勤，喻渝. 铁路隧道[M]. 北京：中国铁道出版社，2011：148-163.(YANG Xin?an，YAO Yongqin，YU Yu. Railway tunnel[M]. Beijing：China Railway Publishing House，2011：148-163.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[4]	张素磊，张顶立，刘胜春，等. 基于对应分析模型的隧道衬砌病害主成因挖掘[J]. 中国铁道科学，2012，33(2)：54-58.(ZHANG Sulei，ZHANG Dingli，LIU Shengchun，et al. Discovering the main causes of tunnel lining damage based on correspondence analysis model[J]. China Railway Science，2012，33(2)：54-58.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[5]	吴江滨. 铁路运营隧道衬砌状态评估体系的建立及工程应用研究[博士学位论文][D]. 北京：北京交通大学，2004.(WU Jiangbin. Research on lining condition assessment and engineering application for railway operation tunnel[Ph. D. Thesis][D]. Beijing：Beijing Jiaotong University，2004.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[7]	刘海京. 公路隧道健康诊断计算模型研究[博士学位论文][D]. 上海：同济大学，2007.(LIU Haijing. Research on highway tunnel health evaluation computational model[Ph. D. Thesis][D]. Shanghai：Tongji University，2007.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[9]	何川，佘健. 高速公路隧道维修与加固[M]. 北京：人民交通出版社，2006：67-80.(HE Chuan，SHE Jian. Highway tunnel maintenance and reinforcement[M]. Beijing：China Communications Press，2006：67-80.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[12]	关宝树. 隧道工程施工要点集[M]. 北京：人民交通出版社，2003：183-247.(GUAN Baoshu. Tunnel construction points set [M]. Beijing：China Communications Press，2003：183-247.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">