大理岩加卸荷破坏过程的能量演化特征分析

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (4655 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要根据大理岩加荷破坏与卸荷破坏试验结果，研究大理岩不同应力路径下的破坏特征和能量演化规律。结果表明，常规三轴破坏岩样吸收总能量高于单轴压缩吸收总能量，峰值强度后常规三轴弹性应变能释放比单轴缓慢，储能极限高于单轴压缩的储能极限。随着卸荷初始围压升高，岩样峰值强度和峰值应变增大，破坏形式由张拉–剪切破坏向剪切破坏过渡，岩样在峰值强度处吸收的总能量和弹性能增大，耗散能却没有明显变化，围压对峰值强度处的和无明显影响。卸荷速度增大，岩样峰值强度和峰值应变减小，破坏形式由剪切破坏向张拉–剪切破坏过渡，岩样在峰值点处吸收的总能量和弹性能减小，耗散能却没有明显变化，卸荷速度对和无明显影响。加荷与卸荷2种应力路径下，岩样在到达峰值强度时所吸收的总能量和储能极限都与峰值强度呈线性关系。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

关键词 ：岩石力学, 大理岩, 应力路径, 能量演化

Abstract：According to the results of marble loading and unloading tests，marble failure characteristics and energy evolution under different stress paths are studied. Results show that the absorbed total energy of conventional triaxial compression is higher than that of uniaxial compression. The release velocity of elastic strain energy under conventional triaxial compression is slower than that of uniaxial compression after peak strength. The energy storage limit of conventional triaxial compression is higher than that of uniaxial compression. The peak strength and peak strain increase with the initial confining pressure increasing. Marble failure mode transfers from tension-shear failure to shear failure. The absorbed total energy and elastic energy increase. But the dissipated energy has no significant change. Confining pressure has no significant effect on the rate of and . The peak strength and peak strain decrease with the unloading velocity increasing. Marble failure mode transfers from shear failure to tension-shear failure. The absorbed total energy and elastic energy decrease. But the dissipated energy has no significant change. Unloading velocity has no significant effect on the rate of and . The absorbed total energy and peak strength are in a linear relationship. The energy storage limit and peak strength are also in a linear relationship.

Key words： rock mechanics marble stress path energy evolution

收稿日期: 2012-12-11

引用本文:

张黎明1，2，高速1，王在泉1，丛宇1. 大理岩加卸荷破坏过程的能量演化特征分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2013, 32(8): 1572-1578.
ZHANG Liming1，2，GAO Su1，WANG Zaiquan1，CONG Yu1. ANALYSIS OF MARBLE FAILURE ENERGY EVOLUTION UNDER LOADING AND UNLOADING CONDITIONS. , 2013, 32(8): 1572-1578.

链接本文:

http://www.rockmech.org/CN/Y2013/V32/I8/1572

[6]	谢和平，鞠杨，黎立云. 基于能量耗散与释放原理的岩石强度与整体破坏准则[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2005，24(17)：3 003-3 010. (XIE Heping，JU Yang，LI Liyun. Criteria for strength and structural failure of rocks based on energy dissipation and energy release principles[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2005，24(17)：3 003-3 010.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[8]	尤明庆，华安增. 岩石试样破坏过程的能量分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2002，21(6)：778-781.(YOU Mingqing，HUA Anzeng. Energy analysis of the failure process of rock specimen[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2002，21(6)：778-781.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[10]	许国安，牛双建，靖洪文，等. 砂岩加卸载条件下能耗特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学，2011，32(12)：3 611-3 617.(XU Guoan，NIU Shuangjian，JING Hongwen，et al. Experimental study of energy features of sandstone under loading and unloading[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2011，32(12)：3 611-3 617.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[5]	苏承东，张振华. 大理岩三轴压缩的塑性变形与能量特征分析[J]. " target="_blank">
[1]	张志镇，高峰. 单轴压缩下红砂岩能量演化试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2012，31(5)：953-962.(ZHANG Zhizhen，GAO Feng. Experimental research on energy evolution of red sandstone samples under uniaxial compression[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2012，31(5)：953-962.(in Chinese))
[2]	黄达，黄润秋，张永兴. 粗晶大理岩单轴压缩力学特性的静态加载速率效应及能量机制试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2012，31(2)：245-255.(HUANG Da，HUANG Runqiu，ZHANG Yongxing. Experimental investigations on static loading rate effects on mechanical properties and energy mechanism of coarse crystal grain marble under uniaxial compression[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2012，31(2)：245-255.(in Chinese))
[3]	ZHANG Z X，KOU S Q，JIANG L G，et al. Effects of loading rate on rock fracture：fracture characteristics and energy partitioning[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2000，37(5)：745-762. " target="_blank">
	岩石力学与工程学报，2008，27(2)：273-280.(SU Chengdong，ZHANG Zhenhua. Analysis of plastic deformation and energy property of marble under pseudo-triaxial compression[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2008，27(2)：273-280.(in Chinese))
[4]	杨圣奇，徐卫亚，苏承东. 大理岩三轴压缩变形破坏与能量特征研究[J]. 工程力学，2007，24(1)：136-141.(YANG Shengqi，XU Weiya，SU Chengdong. Study of deformation failure and energy properties of marble specimen under triaxial compression[J]. Engineering Mechanics，2007，24(1)：136-141.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[7]	赵阳升，冯增朝，万志军. 岩体动力破坏的最小能量原理[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2003，22(11)：1 781-1 783.(ZHAO Yangsheng，FENG Zengchao，WAN Zhijun. Least energy principle of dynamical failure of rock mass[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2003，22(11)：1 781-1 783.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[9]	陈卫忠，吕森鹏，郭小红，等. 基于能量原理的卸围压试验与岩爆判据研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2009，28(8)：1 530-1 540. (CHEN Weizhong，LU Senpeng，GUO Xiaohong，et al. Research on unloading confining pressure tests and rock burst criterion based on energy theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2009，28(8)：1 530-1 540.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">