液化土中对称双斜桩动力反应特征及p-y曲线规律试验研究

doi:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2017.0832

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1332 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要地震作用下液化土中桩基动力反应一直是岩土工程抗震研究的热点问题，基于非液化土和饱和砂土中对称双直桩和对称双斜桩电磁式振动台试验，在试验中输入不同地震动强度的正弦波和El-Centro地震波，对比研究非液化土和饱和砂土中，直、斜桩水平动力反应特征、桩身弯矩分布及p-y滞回曲线规律。试验研究结果表明：(1) 无论是正弦波输入还是El-Centro地震波输入试验，随着加速度峰值的增加，斜桩承台加速度和位移反应放大值均低于相同工况下的直桩基础，尤其在砂土液化时斜桩的水平抗震性能表现更好；(2) 在非液化砂土中，斜桩和直桩弯矩均较小，而当饱和砂土发生液化后，斜桩的最大弯矩是直桩3倍左右，桩顶和距离桩端0.16 m处，直桩的最大弯矩则主要集中在桩顶与承台连接处；(3) 斜桩p-y曲线包络面积更大，利于能量耗散，在非液化砂土中斜桩p-y滞回曲线整体斜率低于直桩，在饱和砂土中其整体斜率则高于直桩。因此，在进行液化土中桩基抗震设计时，斜桩的整体性能优于直桩基础，但在设计时应增强斜桩桩身的局部抗弯刚度以抵抗较大的弯矩作用。研究成果对可液化土层中工程斜桩抗震设计理论具有重要的参考价值。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	李雨润1
	2
	张雨雷1
	陈张升1
	张玉彬1

关键词 ：土力学, 饱和砂土, 对称双斜桩, 振动台试验, 动力反应特征, p-y曲线

Abstract：The dynamic response of pile foundation in liquefied soil under earthquake has always been a hot issue in the geotechnical engineering. This paper presents the results of the electromagnetic shaking table test on the symmetric double vertical piles and the symmetric double inclined piles in non-liquefied soil and saturated sand. The sinusoidal waves of different earthquake intensities and the El-Centro seismic wave were applied in the tests. The comparsion between the results for two types of piles was made. Under either the sinusoidal wave or the El-Centro seismic wave，when the peakacceleration increases，the acceleration at pile cap and the amplified displacement of inclined piles are lower than those of vertical piles under the same working conditions. The inclined piles resist thehorizontal earthquakebetter than vertical pile especially whensandis liquified. The inclined piles and vertical piles have the smaller bending moments in the non-liquefied sand. But when the saturatedsand is liquefied，the maximum bending moment of the inclinedpiles is located on the pile cap and at the place of 0.16 m away from the pile tipand is about three times as much as that of the vertical pile，which is mostlylocated at the connection of the pile and the pile cap. The enclosedarea of hysteretic p-y curves of inclined piles is larger，which is better for thedissipation of energy. Theoverall slope ofhysteretic p-y curves of inclinedpiles is lower in non-liquefied sandbut higher in saturated sandthan ones of vertical piles. Therefore，the overall performance of inclinedpiles is better than vertical piles，but the local flexural rigidity of inclinedpiles should be increased to resist the larger bending moment.

Key words： soil mechanics saturated sand symmetrical double inclinedpiles shaking table test dynamic response characteristics p-y curve

引用本文:

李雨润1，2，张雨雷1，陈张升1，张玉彬1. 液化土中对称双斜桩动力反应特征及p-y曲线规律试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2018, 37(1): 239-250.
LI Yurun1，2，ZHANG Yulei1，CHEN Zhangsheng1，ZHANG Yubin1. Dynamic response and p-y curve of symmetric inclined piles in liquefied soil. , 2018, 37(1): 239-250.

链接本文:

http://www.rockmech.org/CN/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2017.0832 或 http://www.rockmech.org/CN/Y2018/V37/I1/239

1	958-1 964.(in Chinese))
[5]	王睿，张建民，张嘎. 侧向流动地基单桩基础离心机振动台试验研究[J]. 工程力学，2012，29(10)：98-105.(WANG Rui，ZHANG Jianmin，ZHANG Ga. Centrifuge shaking table test on single pile in lateral spreading soil[J]. Engineering Mechanics，2012，29(10)：98-105.(in Chinese))
[14]	魏星. 液化土-桩基-承台结构侧向动力相互作用试验研究[硕士学位论文][D]. 天津：河北工业大学，2012.(WEI Xing. Research on liquefied soil-pile- slab lateral dynamic interactiontest[M. S. Thesis][D]. Tianjin：Hebei University of Technology，2012.(in Chinese))
[3]	戴启权，钱德玲，张泽涵，等. 液化场地超高层建筑群桩基础动力响应试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2015，34(12)：2 572- 2 579.(DAI Qiquan，QIAN Deling，ZHANG Zehan，et al. Experimental research on rynamicresponse of pile group of super highrisebuilding on liquefiable ground[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2015，34(12)：2 572-2 579.(in Chinese))
[4]	汪明武，TOBITA T，IAI S. 倾斜液化场地桩基地震响应离心机试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2009，28(10)：2 012-2 017. (WANG Mingwu，TOBITA T，IAI S. Dynamiccentrifuge tests of seismic responses of pile foundations in inclined liquefiable soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2009，28(10)：2 012-2 017.(in Chinese))
[7]	马亢，许强，李庶林，等. 高低承台桩基地震行为差异研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报，2015，34(6)：1 250-1 258.(MA Kang，XU Qiang，LI Shulin，et al. Difference of seismic behavior of high and low caps of pile foundations[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2015，34(6)：1 250-1 258.(in Chinese))
[9]	高新文. 地震作用下可液化土层水平受荷桩基力学响应分析[J]. 地震工程与工程振动，2016，1(3)：102-110.(GAO Xinwen. Mechanical response of horizontal loaded pile in liquefiable soil under earthquake load[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics，2016，1(3)：102-110.(in Chinese))
[11]	袁廉华，陈仁朋，孔令刚，等. 轴向荷载对斜桩水平承载特性影响试验及理论研究[J]. 岩土力学，2013，34(7)：1 958-1 964.(YUAN Lianhua，CHEN Renpeng，KONG Linggang，et al. Test and Theoretical research on influence of axial load on lateral bearing capacity of batter piles[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2013，34(7)：
[12]	凌道盛，任涛，王云岗. 砂土地基斜桩水平承载特性p-y曲线法[J]. 岩土力学，2013，34(1)：155-162.(LING Daosheng，REN Tao，WANG Yungang. A p-y curve method for horizontal bearing characteristics of single batter pile in sands[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2013，34(1)：155-162.(in Chinese))
[13]	汪云龙. 先进土工实验技术研发与砾性土动力特性试验研究[博士学位论文][D]. 哈尔滨：中国地震局工程力学研究所，2014.(WANG Yunlong. Development of advanced geotechnical test technology and experimental investigation on dynamic characteristic of gravelly soil[Ph. D. Thesis][D]. Harbin：China Earthquake Administration，2014.(in Chinese))
[16]	CHANG W J，RATHJE E M，STOKOE K H，et al. In situ pore-pressure generation behavior of liquefiable sand[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，2007，133(8)：921-931.
[18]	寇宇平. 电磁式振动台土动力试验技术研究[硕士学位论文][D]. 哈尔滨：中国地震局工程力学研究所，2016.(KOU Yuping. Study on geotechnical dynamic experimental techniques for electromagnetic shaking table[M. S. Thesis][D]. Harbin：China Earthquake Administration，2016.(in Chinese))
[2]	张克绪，凌贤长. 岩土地震工程及工程振动[M]. 北京：科学出版社，2016：565-586.(ZHANG Kexu，LING Xianzhang. Geotechnical earthquake engineering and engineering vibration[M]. Beijing：Science Press，2016：565-586.(in Chinese))
[1]	MONDAL G，RAI D C. Performance of harbour structures in Andaman Islands during 2004 Sumatra earthquake[J]. Engineering Structures，2008，30(1)：174-182.
[6]	马亢，裴建良. 桩筏基础-土动力相互作用的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2011，30(7)：1 488-1 495.(MA Kang，PEI Jianliang. Study of dynamic interaction between pile-raft foundation and soft clay by centrifuge model tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2011，30(7)：1 488-1 495.(in Chinese))
[21]	金秀男. 大跨径预应力混凝土桥梁病害分析及加固技术研究[硕士学位论文][D]. 哈尔滨：哈尔滨工业大学，2009.(JINXiunan. Analysis of defect and research on reinforcement technology of long span prestressed concrete bridges[M. S. Thesis][D]. Harbin：Harbin Industrial University，2009.(in Chinese))
[8]	梁发云，陈海兵，黄茂松，等. 结构-群桩基础地震响应离心振动台模型试验[J]. 建筑结构学报，2016，37(9)：134-141.(LIANG Fayun，CHEN Haibing，HUANG Maosong，et al. Model test on seismic response of superstructure and pile group[J]. Journal of Building Structure，2013，37(9)：134-141.(in Chinese))
[10]	RAJASHREE S S，SITHARAM T G. Nonlinear finite-element modeling of batter piles under lateral load[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，2001，127(7)：604-612.
[17]	孙海峰，景立平，王宁伟，等. 振动台多功能叠层剪切箱研制[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2011，30(12)：2 498-2 506.(SUN Haifeng，JING Liping，WANG Ningwei，et al. Development of multifunctional laminar shear container for shaking table test[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2011，30(12)：2 498-2 506.(in Chinese))
[19]	MAMOON S M，KAYNIA A M，BANERJEE P K. Frequency domain dynamic analysis of piles and pile groups[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics，1990，116(10)：2 237-2 257.
[15]	MADABHUSHI S P G，HOUGHTON N E，HAIGH S K. A new automatic sand pourer for model preparation at University of Cambridge[J]. Journal of Transport Geography，2006，5(2)：99-115.
[20]	GIANNAKOU A，GEROLYMOS N，GAZETAS G，et al. Seismic behavior of batter piles：elastic response[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，2010，136(9)：1 187-1 199.
[22]	徐亦唐. 基于最小二乘法的曲线拟合及其在Matlab中的应用[J]. 电子世界，2013，(10)：102-103.(XU Yitang. The curve fitting and its application in Matlab are based on the least square method[J]. Journal of Electronics World，2013，(10)：102-103.(in Chinese))