干湿循环作用下红砂岩动态拉伸力学性能试验研究

doi:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2018.0039

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (729 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要为研究干湿循环对岩石动态拉伸力学性能的影响，利用?50 mm分离式霍普金森压杆(SHPB)试验系统，对红砂岩试样进行动态巴西圆盘试验。结果表明：干湿循环对红砂岩动静态抗拉强度有明显的劣化作用，动静态抗拉强度随干湿循环次数的增加逐渐降低；在不同加载速率条件下，经历不同干湿循环次数后的红砂岩试样均存在一个临界加载速率；当加载速率小于时，红砂岩动态拉伸强度随加载速率的增加而提高，当加载速率超过时，红砂岩动态拉伸强度基本保持不变；加载速率相同时，红砂岩动态拉伸强度随干湿循环次数的增加而逐渐下降，下降速度先快后慢。不同干湿循环次数后红砂岩破碎块度分形特征明显，分形维数为2.46～2.81，分形维数与加载速率呈对数增长关系。综合考虑干湿循环次数与加载速率的共同影响，给出了红砂岩动态拉伸强度的计算公式，可为岩土工程相关设计参数提供理论依据。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	杜彬1
	2
	3
	白海波1
	马占国1
	李明1
	武光明1

关键词 ：岩石力学, 干湿循环, 加载速率, 动态拉伸强度, 分形维数

Abstract：In order to investigate the influence of cyclic wetting and drying on the dynamic tensile strength of rock，a series dynamic Brazilian disc tests on red-sandstone were carried out through split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) apparatus with a diameter of 50 mm. The laboratory test results indicate that cyclic wetting and drying have a strong deterioration effect on the static and dynamic tensile strength and that the static and dynamic tensile strength both decrease with the increasing of the number of cycles. Under the different conditions of loading rate，all specimens(the times of wet-dry cycles as the variable) have a critical loading rate . When the loading rate is below ，the dynamic tensile strength increases with the increasing of loading rate. While the dynamic tensile strength remains unchanged when the loading rate is above . When the loading rates are the same，the dynamic tensile strengths decrease with the increasing of the number of wet-dry cycles，and the decreasing rate appears quickly initially and slowly later. There is an obvious fractal feature of red-sandstone fragment after different wet-dry cycles，ranging from 2.46 to 2.81 of the fractal dimension，The relationship between the fractal dimension and loading rate is logarithmic. An empirical equation considering the combined effect of the wet-dry cycles and loading rate is established to calculate the dynamic tensile strength of red-sandstone.

Key words： rock mechanics wetting and drying cycle loading rate dynamic tensile strength fractal dimension

引用本文:

杜彬1，2，3，白海波1，马占国1，李明1，武光明1. 干湿循环作用下红砂岩动态拉伸力学性能试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2018, 37(7): 1671-1979.
DU Bin1，2，3，BAI Haibo1，MA Zhanguo1，LI Ming1，WU Guangming1. Experimental study on the dynamic tensile properties of red-sandstone after cyclic wetting and drying#br#. , 2018, 37(7): 1671-1979.

链接本文:

http://www.rockmech.org/CN/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2018.0039 或 http://www.rockmech.org/CN/Y2018/V37/I7/1671

[2]	HALE P A，SHAKOOR A. A laboratory investigation of the effects of cyclic heating and cooling，wetting and drying，and freezing and thawing on the compressive strength of selected sandstones[J]. Environmental and Engineering Geoscience，2003，9(2)：117-130.
[1]	邓华锋，李建林，王孔伟，等. 饱和-风干循环过程中砂岩次生孔隙率变化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学，2012，33(2)：483-488.(DENG Huafeng，LI Jianlin，WANG Kongwei，et al. Research on secondary porosity changing law of sandstone under saturation-air dry cycles[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2012，33(2)：483-488.(in Chinese))
[6]	刘新荣，张梁，傅晏. 酸性环境干湿循环对泥质砂岩力学特性影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学，2014，35(增2)：45-52.(LIU Xinrong，ZHANG Liang，FU Yan. Experimental study of mechanical properties of argillaceous sandstone under wet and dry cycle in acid environment[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2014，35(Supp.2)：45-52.(in Chinese))
[7]	杨建林，王来贵，李喜林，等. 遇水-风干循环作用下泥岩断裂的微观机制研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2014，33(增2)：3 606- 3 612.(YANG Jianlin，WANG Laigui，LI Xilin，et al. Research on micro-fracture mechanism of mudstone after wet-dry cycles[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2014，33(Supp.2)：3 606-3 612.(in Chinese))
[3]	姚华彦，张振华，朱朝辉，等. 干湿交替对砂岩力学特性影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学，2010，31(12)：3 704-3 709.(YAO Huayan，ZHANG Zhenhua，ZHU Chaohui，et al. Experimental study of mechanical properties of sandstone under cyclic drying and wetting[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2010，31(12)：3 704-3 709.(in Chinese))
[5]	谈云志，胡莫珍，周玮韬，等. 荷载-干湿循环共同作用下泥岩的压缩特性[J]. 岩土力学，2016，37(8)：2 165-2 171.(TAN Yunzhi， HU Mozhen，ZHOU Weitao，et al. Effects of drying-wetting cycle and loading on compressive property of mudstone[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2016，37(8)：2 165-2 171.(in Chinese))
[11]	宫凤强，李夕兵，ZHAO J. 巴西圆盘劈裂试验中拉伸模量的解析算法[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2010，29(5)：881-891.(GONG Fengqiang，LI Xibing，ZHAO J. Analytical algorithm to estimate tensile modulus in Brazilian disk splitting tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2010，29(5)：881-891.(in Chinese))
[13]	平琦. 煤矿深部岩石动态力学特性试验研究及其应用[博士学位论文][D]. 淮南：安徽理工大学，2013.(PING Qi. Experimental research and application of rock dynamic me¬chanical properties for coal mine deep part[Ph. D. Thesis][D]. Huainan：Anhui University of Science and Technology，2013.(in Chinese))
[15]	王斌，李夕兵，尹土兵，等. 饱水砂岩动态强度的SHPB试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2010，29(5)：1 003-1 009.(WANG Bin，LI Xibing，YIN Tubing，et al. Split Hopkinson pressure bar(SHPB) experiments on dynamic strength of water-saturated sandstone[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2010，29(5)： 1 003-1 009.(in Chinese))
[16]	许金余，刘石. SHPB试验中高温下岩石变形破坏过程的能耗规律分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2013，32(增2)：3 109-3 115.(XU Jinyu，LIU Shi. Analysis of energy dissipation rule during deformation and fracture process s of rock under high temperatures in SHPB test[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2013，32(Supp.2)：3 109-3 115.(in Chinese))
[17]	WANG P，XU J Y，LIU S H，et al. Dynamic mechanical properties and deterioration of red sand-stone subjected to repeated thermal shocks[J]. Engineering Geology，2016，212：44-52.
[4]	傅晏. 干湿循环水岩相互作用下岩石劣化机制研究[博士学位论文][D]. 重庆：重庆大学，2010.(FU Yan. Study on water-rock interaction with the cyclic drying-wetting effect on rock[Ph. D. Thesis][D]. Chongqing：Chongqing University，2010.(in Chinese))
[8]	谢和平，周宏伟，薛东杰，等. 煤炭深部开采与极限开采深度的研究与思考[J]. 煤炭学报，2012，37(4)：535-542.(XIE Heping，ZHOU Hongwei，XUE Dongjie，et al. Research and consid¬eration on deep coal mining and critical mining depth[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2012，37(4)：535-542.(in Chinese))
[14]	洪亮，李夕兵，马春德，等. 岩石动态强度及其应变率灵敏性的尺寸效应研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2008，27(3)：526-533. (HONG Liang，LI Xibing，MA Chunde，et al. Study of size effect of rock dynamic strength and strain rate sensitivity[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2008，27(3)：526-533.(in Chinese))
[18]	中华人民共和国国家标准编写组. GB/T 23561.5—2009煤与岩石物理力学性质测定方法[S]. 北京：中国质检出版社，2009.(The National Standard Compilation Groups of People′s Republic of China. GB/T 23561.5—2009 Methods for determining the physical and mechanical properties of coal and rock[S]. Beijing：Standards Press of China，2009.(in Chinese))
[10]	LI X B，LOK T S，ZHAO J，et al. Oscillation elimination in the Hopkinson bar apparatus and resultant complete dynamic stress-strain curves for rocks[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2000，37(7)：1 055-1 060.
[12]	赵毅鑫，肖汉，黄亚琼. 霍普金森杆冲击加载煤样巴西圆盘劈裂试验研究[J]. 煤炭学报，2014，39(2)：286-291.(ZHAO Yixin，XIAO Han，HUANG Yaqiong. Dynamic split tensile test of Brazilian disc of coal with split Hopkinson pressure bar loading[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2014，39(2)：286-291.(in Chinese))
[19]	李德建，贾雪娜，苗金丽，等. 花岗岩岩爆试验碎屑分形特征分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2010，29(5)：3 280-3 289.(LI Dejian，JIA Xuena，MIAO Jinli，et al. Analysis of fractal characteristics of fragment from rockburst test of granite[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2010，29(5)：3 280-3 289.(in Chinese))
[20]	袁璞，马芹永. 干湿循环条件下煤矿砂岩分离式霍普金森压杆试验研究[J]. 岩土力学，2013，34(9)：2 557-2 562.(YUAN Pu，MA Qinyong. Split Hopkinson pressure bar tests on sandstone in coalmine under cyclic wetting and drying[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2013，34(9)：2 557-2 562.(in Chinese))
[9]	黄理兴. 岩石动力学研究成就与趋势[J]. 岩土力学，2011，32(10)：2 889-2 900.(HUANG Lixing. Development and new achievements of rock dynamics in China[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2011，32(10)：2 889-2 900.(in Chinese))