不同应力路径下深埋软岩力学特性试验研究

doi:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2018.0973

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1525 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要为探讨深埋软岩在不同应力路径下力学性质的差异，对取自丹巴水电站右岸平硐深埋软岩分别进行室内三轴加载试验和不同围压等级、不同卸荷应力水平、不同卸荷速率的恒轴压卸围压试验，并对岩样卸荷破坏面进行微观形貌扫描，分别探讨不同条件下岩样的变形、强度及破坏特征，结果发现：(1) 相比三轴加载试验，同等级围压的软岩在卸荷条件下的强度、峰值应变及力学参数都有减小，应力–应变曲线从延性向脆性转换；(2) 软岩峰值轴向应变、极限强度、残余强度与卸荷应力水平、卸荷速率均呈正相关性；(3) 相比Hoek-Brown经验强度准则，Mohr-Coulomb强度准则能更好地描述软岩强度特性，不同应力路径对抗剪强度参数影响有差异性，卸荷速率对c值的影响更为显著，而卸荷应力水平对?值的影响更为显著；(4) 软岩加、卸载条件下都发生剪切破坏，加载时除主裂纹外基本没有衍生微裂纹，卸载时，低卸荷应力水平下岩样破坏后的次生裂纹更发育，且卸荷速率越大岩样破坏程度越强烈；低围压下卸荷破坏时，岩石断面微观形貌演化自由度较高，破坏面粗糙度大。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	王乐华1
	2
	牛草原1
	张冰祎1
	马云彪1
	尹思杰1
	许晓亮1

关键词 ：岩石力学, 深埋软岩, 应力路径, 卸荷速率, 卸荷应力水平, 微观形貌

Abstract：In order to investigate the difference of mechanical properties of deep-buried soft rock under different stress paths，the indoor triaxial loading test and confining pressure unloading test with a constant axial stress under different confining pressure levels，different unloading stress levels and different unloading rates were performed on the deep-buried soft rock samples from the right bank of the Danba Hydropower Station，and the microtopography of the unloading failure surface of the rock samples was scanned. Deformation，strength and failure characteristics of rock samples under different conditions were discussed. The results show that，compared with the triaxial loading test，the strength and the peak strain the soft rock with the same grade confining pressure under the unloading condition are reduced，and the stress-strain curve is converted from ductility to brittleness. The peak axial strain，the ultimate strength and the residual strength of the soft rock are positively correlated to the unloading stress level and the unloading rate. Compared with the Hoek-Brown empirical strength criterion，the Mohr-Coulomb strength criterion can better describe the soft rock strength characteristics. Different stress paths have different effects on the shear strength parameters. The unloading rate has a more significant effect on c value while the unloading stress level has a more significant effect on ? value. The failure mode of soft rock under both loading and unloading is shear failure. There is no derivatized microcrack except for the main crack under loading，but the low unloading stress level is more likely to induce new cracks than the high unloading stress level. The larger the unloading rate，the more severe the damage is. When the sample fails under a lower confining pressure unloading，there is a higher degree of freedom of failure surface microtopography evolution and the roughness of the failure surface is larger.

Key words： rock mechanics deep-buried soft rock stress paths unloading rate unloading stress levels microtopography

引用本文:

王乐华1，2，牛草原1，张冰祎1，马云彪1，尹思杰1，许晓亮1. 不同应力路径下深埋软岩力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2019, 38(5): 973-981.
WANG Lehua1，2，NIU Caoyuan1，ZHANG Bingyi1，MA Yunbiao1，YIN Sijie1，XU Xiaoliang1. Experimental study on mechanical properties of deep-buried soft rock under different stress paths. , 2019, 38(5): 973-981.

链接本文:

http://www.rockmech.org/CN/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2018.0973 或 http://www.rockmech.org/CN/Y2019/V38/I5/973

[1]	张国锋，何满潮，金龙，等. 煤巷倾斜层状顶板变形失稳机制及支护技术[J]. 煤炭科学技术，2011，39(5)：1–5.(ZHANG Guofeng，HE Manchao，JIN Long，et al. Deformation and stability lost mechanism and support technology of inclined layer roof in seam gateway[J]. Goal Science and Technology，2011，39(5)：1–5.(in Chinese))
[3]	邱士利，冯夏庭，张传庆，等. 不同初始损伤和卸荷路径下深埋大理岩卸荷力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2012，31(8)：1 686–1 697.(QIU Shili，FENG Xiating，ZHANG Chuanqing，et al. Experimental research on mechanical properties of deep marble under different initial damage levels and unloading paths[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2012，31(8)：1 686–1 697. (in Chinese))
[5]	郭喜峰，尹健民，晏鄂川，等. 不同卸荷速率下变质石英砂岩力学性质试验分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报，2016，50(1)：78–83.(GUO Xifeng，YIN Jianmin，YAN Echuan，et al. Mechanical oroperty test at different unloading velocities of metamorphic quartz sandstone[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University，2016，50(1)：78–83.(in Chinese))
[8]	赵国彦，戴兵，董陇军，等. 不同应力路径下岩石三轴卸荷力学特性与强度准则研究[J]. 岩土力学，2015，36(11)：3 121–3 127.(ZHAO Guoyan，DAI Bing，DONG Longjun，et al. Experimental research on mechanical characteristics and strength criterion of rock of triaxial unloading tests under different stress paths[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2015，36(11)：3 121–3 127.(in Chinese))
[11]	李地元，孙志，李夕兵，等. 不同应力路径下花岗岩三轴加卸载力学响应及其破坏特征[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2016，35(增2)：3 449–3 457.(LI Diyuan，SUN Zhi，LI Xibing，et al. Mechanical response and failure characteristics of granite under different stress paths in triaxial loading and unloading conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2016，35(Supp.2)：3 449–3 457. (in Chinese))
[13]	左建平，刘连峰，周宏伟，等. 不同开采条件下岩石的变形破坏特征及对比分析[J]. 煤炭学报，2013，38(8)：1 319–1 324.(ZUO Jianping，LIU Lianfeng，ZHOU Hongwei，et al. Deformation failure mechanism and analysis of rock under different mining condition[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2013，38(8)：1 319–1 324.(in Chinese))
[15]	张黎明，高速，王在泉，等. 不同加卸荷应力路径下大理岩屈服函数研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2014，33(12)：2 497–2 503. (ZHANG Liming，GAO Su，WANG Zaiquan，et al. Analysis of yield functions of marble under different loading and unloading stress paths[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2014，33(12)：2 497–2 503.(in Chinese))
[21]	刘新荣，刘俊，李栋梁，等. 不同初始卸荷水平对深埋砂岩力学特性影响规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学，2017，38(11)：3 081–3 088. (LIU Xinrong，LIU Jun，LI Dongliang，et al. Experimental research on the effect of different initial unloading levels on mechanical properties of deep-buried sandstone[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2017，38(11)：3 081–3 088.(in Chinese))
[23]	尤明庆，苏承东，缑勇. 大理岩孔道试样的强度及变形特性的试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2007，26(12)：2 420–2 429.(YOU Mingqing，SU Chengdong，GOU Yong. et al. Experimental study on strength and deformation droperties of hollow cylindrical specimens of marbles[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering， 2007，26(12)：2 420–2 429.(in Chinese))
[6]	黄润秋，黄达. 高地应力条件下卸荷速率对锦屏大理岩力学特性影响规律试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2010，29(1)：21–33.(HUANG Runqiu，HUANG Da. Experimental research on affection laws of unloading rates on mechanical properties of Jinping marble under high geostress[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2010，29(1)：21–33.(in Chinese))
[9]	戴兵，赵国彦，杨晨，等. 不同应力路径下岩石峰前卸荷破坏能量特征分析[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报，2016，33(2)：367–374.(DAI Bing，ZHAO Guoyan，YANG Chen，et al. Energy evolution law of rocks in process of unloading failure under different paths[J]. Journal of Mining and Safety Engineering，2016，33(2)：367–374.(in Chinese))
[16]	张黎明，王在泉，石磊，等. 不同应力路径下大理岩破坏过程的声发射特性[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2012，31(6)：1 230–1 236. (ZHANG Liming，WANG Zaiquan，SHI Lei，et al. Acoustic emission characteristics of marble during failure process under different stress paths[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2012，31(6)：1 230–1 236.(in Chinese))
[19]	中华人民共和国国家标准编写组. GB/T 50266—2013 工程岩体试验方法标准[S]. 北京：中国计划出版社，2013.(The National Standards Compilation Group of the People′s Republic of China. GB/T 50266—2013 Standard for tests method of engineering rock masses[S]. Beijing：China Planning Press，2013.(in Chinese))
[4]	邱士利，冯夏庭，张传庆，等. 不同卸围压速率下深埋大理岩卸荷力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2010，29(9)：1 807–1 817. (QIU Shili，FENG Xiating，ZHANG Chuanqing，et al. Experimental research on mechanical properties of deep-buried marble under different unloading rates of confining pressures[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2010，29(9)：1 807–1 817.(in Chinese))
[7]	陈子全，李天斌，陈国庆，等. 不同应力路径下砂岩能耗变化规律试验研究[J]. 工程力学，2016，33(6)：120–128.(CHEN Ziquan，LI Tianbin，CHEN Guoqing，et al. Experimental study on energy evolution of sandstone under different stress paths[J] Engineering Mechanics，2016，33(6)：120–128.(in Chinese))
[14]	张凯，周辉，潘鹏志，等. 不同卸荷速率下岩石强度特性研究[J]. 岩土力学，2010，31(7)：2 072–2 078.(ZHANG Kai，ZHOU Hui，PAN Zhijun，et al. Characteristics of strength of rocks under different unloading rates[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2010，31(7)：2 072–2 078.(in Chinese))
[17]	尹光志，秦虎，黄滚. 不同应力路径下含瓦斯煤岩渗流特性与声发射特征实验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2013，32(7)：1 315– 1 320.(YIN Guangzhi，QIN Hu，HUANG Gun. Experimental study of characteristics of seepage and acoustic emission of gas-filled coal under different stress paths[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2013，32(7)：1 315–1 320.(in Chinese))
[24]	尤明庆. 围压对岩石试样强度的影响及离散性[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2014，33(5)：929–937.(YOU Mingqing. Effect of confining pressure on strength scattering of rock specimen[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2014，33(5)：929–937.(in Chinese))
[2]	许东俊，耿乃光. 岩体变形和破坏的各种应力途径[J]. 岩土力学，1986，7(2)：17–25.(XU Dongjun，GENG Naiguang. The various stress paths causing deformation and failure in rocks[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，1986，7(2)：17–25.(in Chinese))
[12]	肖家双. 深埋隧道岩体加卸载力学特性及围岩稳定性研究[硕士学位论文][D]. 武汉：武汉理工大学，2014.(XIAO Jiashuang. Study on load/unload mechanical properties of marble in deep tunnel stratum and its stability of surrounding rocks[M. S. Thesis][D]. Wuhan：Wuhan University of Technology，2014.(in Chinese))
[22]	李建林，王瑞红，蒋昱州，等. 砂岩三轴卸荷力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2010，29(10)：2 034–2 041.(LI Jianlin，WANG Ruihong，JIANG Yuzhou，et al. Experimental study of sandstone mechanical properties by unloading triaxial tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2010，29(10)：2 034–2 041. (in Chinese))
[10]	丛宇，王在泉，郑颖人，等. 不同卸荷路径下大理岩破坏过程能量演化规律[J]. 中南大学学报：自然科学版，2016，47(9)：3 140–3 147. (CONG Yu，WANG Zaiquan，ZHENG Yingren，et al. Energy evolution principle of fracture propagation of marble with different unloading stress paths[J]. Journal of Central South University：Science and Technology，2016，47(9)：3 140–3 147.(in Chinese))
[18]	韩铁林，陈蕴生，师俊平，等. 应力路径对裂隙试样力学特性影响的试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2013，32(增2)：3 092–3 099. (HAN Tielin，CHEN Yunsheng，SHI Junping，et al. Experimental study of effect of stress paths onmechanical characteristics of cracked samples[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2013，32(Supp.2)：3 092–3 099.(in Chinese))
[20]	邓华锋，李建林，邓成进，等. 岩石力学试验中岩样选择和抗压强度预测方法研究[J]. 岩土力学，2011，32(3)：647–654.(DENG Huafeng，LI Jianlin，DENG Chengjin，et al. Analysis of sampling in rock mechanics test and compressive strength prediction methods[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2011，32(3)：647–654.(in Chinese))