考虑水泥浆液析水作用的水平裂隙注浆扩散机制研究

doi:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2018.1062

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (964 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要水泥浆液是一种悬浊液且具有明显析水特性，浆液发生析水后，其自身黏度、密度明显变化，由此导致浆液在扩散区内黏度、密度等参数时空分布不均。为准确描述浆液发生析水后的裂隙注浆过程。简化浆液发生析水后在裂隙内的扩散运移形态，建立恒定注浆速率条件下，考虑浆液析水作用的裂隙注浆扩散理论模型，推导浆液扩散半径表达式与浆液微元体压力梯度方程。提出考虑析水作用的裂隙注浆计算方法，基于Matlab编程实现了浆液析水率与浆液压力的时空分布计算。利用自主研发的裂隙注浆模拟试验平台，对理论模型的合理性进行验证。研究结果表明，浆液析水率随浆液扩散距离的增加呈非线性变化；随着水灰比的增加，浆液析水率在空间上的分布差距明显增大；考虑浆液析水作用计算得到的注浆压力明显大于不考虑时的计算结果，并且随着浆液水灰比的增加，考虑析水与不考虑析水作用相比，二者计算得到的注浆压力差距越大；通过对比试验测试结果与理论计算值，理论计算得到的注浆压力是试验测试值的1.2～1.5倍，所建立的理论模型能够描述考虑析水作用下水泥浆液在裂隙中的扩散过程。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	王晓晨1
	刘人太1
	杨为民1
	张连震2
	郭焱旭1
	辛冬冬3
	薄纯杰2

关键词 ：岩土工程, 裂隙注浆, 扩散机制, 析水性, 黏度空间分布不均

Abstract：As a kind of suspension liquid，cement slurry has obvious characteristics of the bleeding. Once the bleeding occurs，the viscosity and the density of the slurry change obviously，which leads to the viscosity and the density of the slurry in time and space are not uniform at the penetration zone. In order to accurately describe the grouting process of the fracture under the function of the bleeding，a theoretical model of fracture grouting，considering the characteristic of cement bleeding，was established under the constant grouting rate，the expressions of the diffusion radius and the pressure gradient of slurry were derived，and a calculation method of fracture grouting considering the cement bleeding was put forward. Based on MATLAB programming，the distribution calculation of the bleeding rate and the grouting pressure in time and space was realized. The rationality of the theoretical model was verified by using the self-developed fracture grouting model test platform. The results show that the bleeding rate of the slurry shows a nonlinear change with the increase of the penetration length of the slurry. With increasing the water-cement ratio，the spatial distribution gap of the bleeding rate increases obviously. The grouting pressure calculated by considering cement bleeding is obviously higher than that of the unconsidered. With increasing the water-cement ratio of the slurry，the difference of the grouting pressure between two cases of considering and without considering cement bleeding rises. Comparison between the test results with the theoretical calculated values indicates that the grouting pressure obtained from the theoretical calculation is 1.2–1.5 times of the model test value. The established theoretical model can better describe the diffusion process of cement slurry in fracture grouting considering the effect of bleeding.

Key words： geotechnical engineering fracture grouting diffusion mechanism bleeding uneven spatial distribution of viscosity

引用本文:

王晓晨1，刘人太1，杨为民1，张连震2，郭焱旭1，辛冬冬3，薄纯杰2. 考虑水泥浆液析水作用的水平裂隙注浆扩散机制研究 [J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2019, 38(5): 1005-1017.
WANG Xiaochen1，LIU Rentai1，YANG Weimin1，ZHANG Lianzhen2，GUO Yanxu1，XIN Dongdong3，BO Chunjie2. Study on grouting mechanism of horizontal fractures considering the bleeding of cement slurry. , 2019, 38(5): 1005-1017.

链接本文:

http://www.rockmech.org/CN/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2018.1062 或 http://www.rockmech.org/CN/Y2019/V38/I5/1005

[17]	MAIR R J. Centrifugal modelling of tunnel construction in soft clay[Ph. D. Thesis][D]. Cambridge：Cambridge University，1979.
[4]	叶飞，何川，王士民. 盾构隧道施工期衬砌管片受力特性及其影响分析[J]. 岩土力学，2011，32(6)：1 801–1 807.(YE Fei，HE Chuan，WANG Shimin. Analysis of mechanical characteristic of shield tunnel segments lining and its influence during construction[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2011，32(6)：1 801–1 807.(in Chinese))
[6]	刘腾，袁大军，王安华，等. 火灾对原型盾构管片接头防水性能损伤试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报，2016，49(7)：116–122.(LIU Teng，YUAN Dajun，WANG Anhua，et al. Experimental study on watertight performance of prototype shield tunnel segment joint affected by fire[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal，2016，49(7)：116–122.(in Chinese))
[8]	李术才，王凯，李利平，等. 海底隧道新型可拓展突水模型试验系统的研制及应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2014，33(12)：2 409– 2 418.(LI Shucai，WANG Kai，LI Liping，et al. Development and application of an extendable model test system for water inrush simulation in subsea tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2014，33(12)：2 409–2 418.(in Chinese))
[14]	郑刚，姚杰，戴轩，等. 不同管片张开量下隧道外水土流失规律试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报，2018，40(6)：969–977.(ZHENG Gang，YAO Jie，DAI Xuan，et al. Experimental study on sand inflow under different opening widths of shield tunnel segments[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2018，40(6)：969–977.(in Chinese))
[16]	COSTA Y D. ZORNBERG J G，ASCE M，et al. Failure mechanisms in sand over a deep active trapdoor[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，2009，135(11)：1 741–1 753.
[1]	谢正光. 城市轨道交通2017年度统计和分析报告[R]. 北京：中国城市轨道交通协会，2018.(XIE Zhengguang. Urban rail transit annual statistics and analysis report 2017[R]. Beijing：China Association of Metros，2018.(in Chinese))
[3]	曾格华，夏才初. 管片径向拼装偏差对盾构隧道管片环防水性能的影响分析[J]. 岩土工程学报，2016，38(11)：2 017–2 025.(ZENG Gehua，XIA Caichu. Effect of radial erection error of segments on waterproofness of segment rings of shield tunnels[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2016，38(11)：2 017–2 025.(in Chinese))
[5]	钟小春，秦建设，朱伟，等. 盾构管片接缝防水材料防水耐久性实验及分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报，2011，7(2)：281–285.(ZHONG Xiaochun，QIN Jianshe，ZHU Wei，et al. Durability tests and analysis on the waterproof material for joint seam of shield tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering，2011，7(2)：281–285.(in Chinese))
[7]	拓勇飞，舒恒，郭小红，等. 超高水压大直径盾构隧道管片接缝防水设计与试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报，2013，35(增1)：227–231.(TUO Yongfei，SHU Heng，GUO Xiaohong，et al. Design and experimental study on waterproof gasket of large-diameter shield tunnel under ultra high water pressure[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2013，35(Supp.1)：227–231.(in Chinese))
[9]	李术才，宋曙光，李利平，等. 海底隧道流固耦合模型试验系统的研制及应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2013，32(5)：883–890.(LI Shucai，SONG Shuguang，LI Liping，et al. Development on subsea tunnel model test system for solid-fluid coupling and its application[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2013，32(5)：883–890.(in Chinese))
[10]	谭忠盛，曾超，李健，等. 海底隧道支护结构受力特征的模型试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报，2011，44(11)：99–105.(TAN Zhongsheng，ZENG Chao，LI Jian，et al. Model test investigation on the mechanical characteristics of support structure of subsea tunnels[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal，2011，44(11)：99–105.(in Chinese))
[13]	ZHENG G，DAI X，DIAO Y. Parameter analysis of water flow during EPBS tunnelling and an evaluation method of spewing failure based on a simplified model[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis，2015，58：96–112.
[15]	张冬梅，高程鹏，尹振宇，等. 隧道渗流侵蚀的颗粒流模拟[J]. 岩土力学，2017，38(增1)：429–438.(ZHANG Dongmei，GAO Chengpeng，YIN Zhenyu，et al. Particle flow simulation of seepage erosion around shield tunnel[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2017，38(Supp.1)：429–438.(in Chinese))
[20]	张成平，岳跃敬，蔡义. 管线渗漏水范围对浅埋隧道围岩变形和破坏的影响[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2015，34(2)：392–400.(ZHANG Chengping，YUE Yuejing，CAI Yi. Influence of pipeline leakage range on ground deformation and failure during shallow tunnelling[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2015，34(2)：392–400.(in Chinese))
[2]	肖明清. 水下隧道设计技术[M]. 北京：中国铁道出版社，2016：11–22.(XIAO Mingqing. Design technology of underwater tunnels[M]. Beijing：China Railway Publishing House，2016：11–22.(in Chinese))
[11]	刘强，谭忠盛，王秀英. 水下隧道渗流场分布规律的模型试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报，2015，48(增1)：388–392.(LIU Qiang，TAN Zhongsheng，WANG Xiuying. Model test study on the distribution law of underwater tunnel seepage field[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal，2015，48(Supp.1)：388–392.(in Chinese))
[12]	郑刚，戴轩，张晓双. 地下工程漏水漏砂灾害发展过程的试验研究及数值模拟[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2014，33(12)：2 458–2 471. (ZHENG Gang，DAI Xuan，ZHANG Xiaoshuang. Experimental study and numerical simulation of leaking process of sand and water in underground engineering[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2014，33(12)：2 458–2 471.(in Chinese))
[19]	中华人民共和国行业标准编写组. JTG D70—2004公路隧道设计规范[S]. 北京：人民交通出版社，2004.(The Professional Standards Compilation Group of People?s Republic of China. JTG D70—2004 Code for design of road tunnel[S]. Beijing：China Communications Press，2004.(in Chinese))
[18]	CHAPMAN D N，AHN S K，HUNT D V L. Investigating ground movements caused by the construction of multiple tunnels in soft ground using laboratory model tests[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal，2007，44(6)：631–643.