双江口电站超高应力区地下厂房岩爆空间特性规律研究

doi:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2022.0069

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (2274 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要双江口电站左岸实测地应力达37.82MPa，从地应力平面空间展布规律和技施阶段岩体空间应力测试成果分析，地应力具有一定的区域差异性，可从洞室布置区域的地应力大小、洞轴线与地应力方向夹角关系宏观定性分析主副厂房岩爆最强、破坏现象最严重，上游侧岩爆破坏大于下游侧，数值模拟定量分析也得到相同结论。开挖后，在现场大量调查、统计岩爆发育基础上，对岩爆的空间特性进行了分析，概括总结了宏观岩爆空间发育规律，3大洞室中主副厂房岩爆最严重、尾调室次之、主变室最弱，主厂房岩爆破坏程度中导洞、第I层、第II层上游侧拱肩和边墙大于下游侧，而第III层、第IV层下游侧岩锚梁和边墙大于上游侧岩锚梁和边墙，宏观调查规律与前期成果较吻合。结合微震监测事件空间分布规律，研究发现双江口电站具有典型的岩爆空间特性，通过总结这些特征，可初步预估小尺度区域岩爆特征，对今后引水系统地应力细化研究及支护具有一定的指导意义。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	马行东1
	李鹏2
	郭松峰3
	徐鼎平4
	黎昌有1

关键词 ：岩石力学, 超高应力, 地下厂房, 岩爆, 空间特性

Abstract：The measured ground stress on the left bank of Shuangjiangkou Hydropower Station reached 37.82MPa. From the analysis of the spatial distribution law of ground stress and the spatial stress test results of rock mass in the technical construction stage，the ground stress has certain regional differences. From the macro qualitative analysis of the magnitude of ground stress in the cavern layout area and the angle between the tunnel axis and the direction of ground stress，the rock burst of the main and auxiliary power houses is the strongest and the destruction phenomenon is the most serious，and the rock burst damage on the upstream side is greater than that on the downstream side，Numerical simulation and quantitative analysis also get the same conclusion. After excavation，based on a large number of on-site investigations and statistics on the development of rock burst，the spatial characteristics of rock burst were analyzed，and the macro spatial development law of rock burst was summarized. Among the three caverns，the rock burst in the main and auxiliary power houses was the most serious，followed by the tail dispatching room，and the main transformer room was the weakest. The damage degree of rock burst in the main power house was greater in the pilot tunnel，the spandrels and side walls on the upstream side of the first and second layers than that on the downstream side，while the third layer The rock anchor beam and side wall at the downstream side of the fourth layer are larger than those at the upstream side，and the macro investigation law is consistent with the previous results. Combined with the spatial distribution law of microseismic monitoring events，it is found that Shuangjiangkou Hydropower Station has typical spatial characteristics of rockburst. By summarizing these characteristics，the characteristics of small-scale regional rockburst can be preliminarily estimated，which has certain guiding significance for the refinement of ground stress and support of water diversion system in the future.

Key words： rock mechanics ultra high stress underground powerhouse rockburst spatial characteristics

引用本文:

马行东1，李鹏2，郭松峰3，徐鼎平4，黎昌有1. 双江口电站超高应力区地下厂房岩爆空间特性规律研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2023, 42(S1): 3141-3150.
MA Xingdong1，LI Peng2，GUO Songfeng3，XU Dingping4，LI Changyou1. Study on spatial characteristics of rockburst in underground powerhouse of Shuangjiangkou Hydropower Station in ultra-high stress area. , 2023, 42(S1): 3141-3150.

链接本文:

http://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2022.0069 或 http://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/Y2023/V42/IS1/3141

[1]	中华人民共和国行业标准编写组. NB/T 10143—2019 水电工程岩爆风险评估技术规范[S]. 北京：中国水利水电出版社，2019.(The Professional Standards Compilation Group of People?s Republic of China. NB/T 10143—2019 Technical code for rockburst risk assessment of hydropower projects[S]. Beijing：China Water and Power Press，2019.(in Chinese))
[11]	LUO Y，GONG F Q，LIU D Q，et a1. Experimental simulation investigation on the process and failure characteristics of spalling in D-shaped tunnels under true-triaxial loading conditions[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology，2019，90：42-61.
[21]	中华人民共和国国家标准编写组. GB50287—2016 水力发电工程地质勘察规范[S]. 北京：中国计划出版社，2016.(The National Standards Compilation Group of People′s Republic of China. GB50287—2016 Code for hydropower engineering geological investigation[S]. Beijing：China Planning Press，2016.(in Chinese))
[9]	GONG F Q，SI X F，LI X B，et a1. Experimental investigation of strain rockburst in circular caverns under deep three-dimensional high-stress conditions[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering，2019，52(5)：1 459-1 474.
[19]	韩侃，陈贤丰，杨文斌，等. 基于微震监测的川藏铁路某隧道岩爆预测研究[J]. 铁道工程学报，2020，(11)：90-95.(HAN Kan，CHEN Xianfeng，YANG Wenbin，et al. Research on the rock burst prediction of a tunnel in Sichuan—Tibet railway based on microseismic monitoring[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society，2020，(11)：90-95.(in Chinese))
[16]	白国峰. 高原深埋硬岩隧道岩爆特征及施工方法研究[J]. 施工技术，2020，49(1)：87-92.(BAI Guofeng. Study on characteristics of rockburst and construction methods in deep and hard rock tunnel in plateau area[J]. Construction Technology，2020，49(1)：87-92.(in Chinese))
[14]	魏新江，陈涛涛，王霄，等. 岩爆灾害研究及进展[J]. 现代隧道技术，2020，57(2)：1-12.(WEI Xinjiang，CHEN Taotao，WANG Xiao，et al. Progress in research of the rockburst hazard[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology，2020，57(2)：1-12.(in Chinese))
[2]	马行东，黎昌有，王修华，等. 双江口电站高地应力区地下厂房系统第I层开挖岩爆发育规律和岩爆预测初步研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2020，39(增2)：2 964-2 972.(MA Xingdong，LI Changyou，WANG Xiuhua，et al. Preliminary study on rockburst development law and rockburst prediction in excavation of layer I of underground powerhouse system in high geostress area of Shuangjiangkou hydropower station[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2020，39(Supp.2)：2 964-2 972.(in Chinese))
[4]	张文东，马天辉，唐春安，等. 锦屏二级水电站引水隧洞岩爆特征及微震监测规律研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2014，33(2)：339-348.(ZHANG Wendong，MA Tianhui，TANG Chun?an，et al. Research on characteristics of rockburst and rules of microseismic monitoring at diversion tunnels in Jinping II hydropower station[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2014，33(2)：339-348.(in Chinese))
[5]	刘立鹏.锦屏二级水电站施工排水洞岩爆问题研究[博士学位论文][D]. 北京：中国地质大学(北京)，2011.(LIU Lipeng. Study of rockburst of drainage tunnels in Jinping II hydropower station[Ph. D. Thesis][D]. Beijing：China University of Geosciences(Beijing)，2011.(in Chinese))
[7]	司雪峰，宫凤强，罗勇，等. 深部三维圆形洞室岩爆过程的模拟试验[J]. 岩土力学，2018，39(2)：621-634.(SI Xuefeng，GONG Fengqiang，LUO Yong，et al. Experimental simulation on rockburst process of deep three-dimensional circular cavern[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2018，39(2)：621-634.(in Chinese))
[10]	GONG F Q，WU W X，LI T B，et a1. Experimental simulation and investigation of spalling failure of rectangular tunnel under different three-dimensional stress states[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2019，122：104081.
[12]	LI X B，GONG F Q，TAO M，et a1. Failure mechanism and coupled static-dynamic loading theory indeep hard rock mining：A review[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering，2017，9(4)：767-782.
[15]	吴春成. 川藏铁路巴玉隧道开挖二次应力分布特征与岩爆风险分析[J]. 铁道标准设计，2021，65(7)：131-142.(WU Chuncheng. Secondary stress distribution characteristics and rockburst risk analysis of Bayu tunnel in Sichuan—Tibet railway[J]. Railway Standard Design，2021，65(7)：131-142.(in Chinese))
[17]	严健，何川，汪波，等. 高地温高应力隧道岩爆特征及机制研究[J]. 铁道学报，2020，42(12)：186-194(YAN Jian，HE Chuan，WANG Bo，et al. Research on characteristics and mechanism of rockburst occurring in high geo-temperature and high Geo-stress Tunnel[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society，2020，42(12)：186-194.(in Chinese))
[3]	XU D P，HUANG X，JIANG Q，et al. Estimation of the three-dimensional in situ stress field around a large deep underground cavern group near a valley[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering，2021，13(3)：529-544.(in Chinese))
[6]	宫凤强，罗勇，司雪峰，等. 深部圆形隧洞板裂屈曲岩爆的模拟试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2017，36(7)：1 634-1 648. (GONG Fengqiang，LUO Yong，SI Xuefeng，et a1. Experimental modelling on rockburst indeep hard rock circular tunnels[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2017，36(7)：1 634-1 648. (in Chinese))
[8]	GONG F Q，LUO Y，LI X B，et a1. Experimental simulation investigation on rockburst induced by spalling failure in deep circular tunnels[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology，2018，81：413-427.(in Chinese))
[13]	李响，怀震，李夕兵，等. 基于裂纹扩展模型的深部硐室围岩致裂规律[J]. 煤炭学报，2019，44(5)：1 378-1 390.(LI Xiang，HUAI Zhen，LI Xibing，et al. Fracture patterns induced by deep underground excavation based on a crack propagation model[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2019，44(5)：1 378-1 390.(in Chinese))
[18]	林开盛，张蜀豫，焦雨起. 基于微震监测的深埋隧洞岩爆微震事件时空分布特征研究[J]. 人民珠江，2020，41(2)：140-146.(LIN Kaisheng，ZHANG Shuyu，JIAO Yuqi. Study on temporal and spatial distribution characteristics of rock burst micro-seismic incident in deep-buried tunnels based on micro-seismic monitoring[J]. Pearl River，2020，41(2)：140-146.(in Chinese))
[20]	褚冬攀，吴帮标，王奇智. 双江口水电站深埋地下隧洞微震活动的特征分析[J]. 科学技术与工程，2018，18(28)：151-155.(CHU Dongpan，WU Bangbiao，WANG Qizhi. Microseismic activity characteristics analyses of underground traffic tunnel of Shuangjiangkou hydropower station[J]. Science Technology and Engineering，2018，18(28)：151-155.(in Chinese))
[22]	张頔，李邵军，徐鼎平，等. 双江口水电站主厂房开挖初期围岩变形破裂与稳定性分析研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2021， 40(3)：520-532.(ZHANG Di，LI Shaojun，XU Dingping，et al. Investigation on deformation and cracking behaviors and stability analysis of surrounding rock mass of underground main powerhouse of Shuangjiangkou hydropower station during preliminary excavation[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2021，40(3)：520-532.(in Chinese))