矿井断裂构造带滞后突水的流–固耦合模拟方法分析与滞后时间确定

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (0)

全文: PDF (1437 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要矿井断裂构造带滞后突水是威胁煤矿深部开采的主要水害类型。基于流–固耦合理论，提出弹塑性应变–渗流耦合、流变–渗流耦合及变参数流变–渗流耦合3种模拟评价模型。将断层破碎带物质等效为连续介质模型，材料本构模型分别采用弹塑性模型和流变模型，应用FLAC3D软件，对上述3种评价模型进行数值模拟，结果表明弹塑性应变–渗流耦合模拟结果在某些情况下可以适用；流变–渗流耦合模拟结果最接近实际；渗透性可变的条件下变参数流变–渗流耦合对渗流参数变化机制的解释最好。以流变–渗流耦合模拟结果为例，最危险滞后突水可能发生时间得以确定，在模拟开采的不同阶段，岩石巷道附近(即模型8#点处)分别产生3.26，3.63，3.77 MPa的最高水压，对应滞后时间分别为15，131，546 d。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

关键词 ：采矿工程；滞后突水；流&ndash, 固耦合；流变&ndash, 渗流耦合；变参数流变&ndash, 渗流耦合；FLAC3D

Abstract：The lagging water-inrush near mine fault belt is the main type of water damage threatening the deep coal mining. Based on the flow-solid coupling theory，three types of simulation model including the elasticplastic strain-seepage coupling model，the rheology-seepage coupling model and the variable parameter rheology-seepage coupling model were proposed. Regarding the materials of fault zone as equivalent continuum model，using elasticplastic model and rheological model as material constitutive model respectively，a numerical simulation was carried by using FLAC3D. The results show that the simulation of the elasticplastic strain-seepage coupling can be applied to some circumstances；the rheology-seepage coupling is the closest to reality；under the condition of the variable permeability，the variable parameter rheology-seepage coupling gives the best explanation to the mechanism of permeability parameters changing. Taking the rheology-seepage coupling model for example，the most dangerous time occurring possible lagging water-inrush can be identified better. In the three mining stages simulated，the highest water pressures of 3.26，3.63，3.77 MPa are generated separately near rock roadway，i.e.，at the location of model observation point #8，corresponding to lag times of 15，131，546 d respectively.

Key words： mining engineering lagging water-inrush flow-solid coupling rheology-seepage coupling variable parameter rheology-seepage coupling fast Lagrangian analysis of continua in 3 dimensions(FLAC3D)

引用本文:

武强1，朱斌2，3，刘守强1. 矿井断裂构造带滞后突水的流–固耦合模拟方法分析与滞后时间确定[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2011, 30(1): 93-104.
WU Qiang1，ZHU Bin2，3，LIU Shouqiang1. FLOW-SOLID COUPLING SIMULATION METHOD ANALYSIS AND TIME IDENTIFICATION OF LAGGING WATER-INRUSH NEAR MINE FAULT BELT. , 2011, 30(1): 93-104.

链接本文:

http://www.rockmech.org/CN/Y2011/V30/I1/93

[2]	靳德武，董书宁，刘其声. 带(水)压开采安全评价技术及其发展方向[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2005，33(增1)：21-24.(JIN Dewu，DONG Shuning，LIU Qisheng. Safety evaluation technique and development tendency of safety mining above confined aquifer[J]. Coal Geology and Exploration，2005，33(Supp.1)：21-24.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[5]	武强，朱斌，李建民，等. 断裂带煤矿井巷滞后突水机制数值模拟[J]. 中国矿业大学学报，2008，37(6)：780-785.(WU Qiang， ZHU Bin，LI Jianmin，et al. Numerical simulation of lagging water-inrush mechanism of rock roadways near fault zone[J]. Journal of China University of Mining and Technology，2008，37(6)：780-785.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[8]	BARTON N，BANDIS S，BAKHTAR K. Strength，deformation and conductivity coupling of rock joints[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science and Geomechanics Abstracts，1985，22(3)：121-140. " target="_blank">
[12]	叶源新，刘光廷. 三维应力作用下砂砾岩孔隙型渗流[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版)，2007，47(3)：335-339.(YE Yuanxin，LIU Guangting. Porous seepage in calcirudite rock with 3D stresses[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology)，2007，47(3)：335-339.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[19]	BRADY B H G，BROWN E T. Rock mechanics for underground mining[M]. London：George Allen and Unwin.，1985. " target="_blank">
[20]	李建明，朱斌，武强. 赵各庄矿大倾角煤层综放开采突水条件的力学机制分析[J]. 煤炭学报，2007，32(5)：453-457.(LI Jianming，ZHU Bin，WU Qiang. Mechanical mechanism analysis of water inrush condition on mechanized top-coal caving in steep seam in Zhaogezhuang coal mine[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2007，32(5)：453-457.(in Chinese))
[22]	朱斌. 断裂带滞后突水流-固耦合机制模拟及应用研究[R]. 北京：中国矿业大学，2009：64-66.(ZHU Bin. Research on fluid- mechanical interaction simulation and application on lagging water-inrush near fault zone[R]. Beijing：China University of Mining and Technology，2009：64-66.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[3]	WU Q，WANG M Y，WU X. Investigations of groundwater bursting into coal mine seam floors from fault zones[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2004，41(4)：557-571.
[15]	GERRARD C M. Equivalent elastic moduli of a aock mass consisting of orthorhombic layers[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts，1982，19(1)：9-14. " target="_blank">
[1]	武强，刘金韬，董东林，等. 煤层底板断裂突水时间弱化效应机制的仿真模拟研究——以开滦赵各庄煤矿为例[J]. 地质学报，2001，75(4)：554-561.(WU Qiang，LIU Jintao，DONG Donglin，et al. Trial analyses and numerical simulations of water-bursting time-effect under coal bed[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica，2001，75(4)：554-561.(in Chinese))
[4]	倪宏革，罗国煜. 煤矿水害的优势面机制研究[J]. 煤炭学报，2000，25(5)：518-521.(NI Hongge，LUO Guoyu. Study on the mechanism of preferred plane of water hazard in coal mine[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2000，25(5)：518-521.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[11]	刘才华，陈从新. 三轴应力作用下岩石单裂隙的渗流特性[J]. 自然科学进展，2007，17(7)：989-994.(LIU Caihua，CHEN Congxin. Seepage properties of single fracture rock under 3D stress[J]. Progress in Natural Science，2007，17(7)：989-994.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[17]	BIENIAWSKI Z T. Determining rock mass deformability：Experience from case histories[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts，1978，15(5)：237-247. " target="_blank">
[21]	Itasca Consulting Group，Inc.. FLAC3D，Fast lagrangian analysis of continua in 3 dimensions，user?s manual[R]. 2nd ed，USA：Itasca Consulting Group，Inc.，1997. " target="_blank">
[6]	仵彦卿. 岩体水力学基础(三)——岩体渗流场与应力场耦合的集中参数模型及连续介质模型[J]. 水文地质工程地质，1997，24(2)：54-57.(WU Yanqing. Principles of rock mass hydraulics(3)：concentrated parameter model of rock mass coupling fields of flow and stress and continuum model[J]. Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology，1997，24(2)：54-57.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[9]	刘继山. 单裂隙受正应力作用时的渗流公式[J]. 水文地质工程地质，1987，14(2)：28-32.(LIU Jishan，The seepage formula of a single fracture under normal stress[J]. Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology，1987，14(2)：28-32.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[13]	向文飞，周创兵. 裂隙岩体表征单元体研究进展[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2005，24(增2)：5 686-5 692.(XIANG Wenfei，ZHOU Chuangbing. The advances in investigation of representative elementary volume for fractured rock mass[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2005，24(Supp.2)：5 686- 5 692.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[7]	WANG M.，KULATILAKE P H S. Estimation of REV size and three-dimensional hydraulic conductivity tensor for a fractured rock mass through a single well packer test and discrete fracture fluid flow modeling[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2002，39(7)：887-904.
[10]	赵阳升，杨栋，郑少河，等. 三维应力作用下岩石裂缝水渗流物性规律的实验研究[J]. 中国科学(E辑)，1999，29(1)：82-86.(ZHAO Yangsheng，YANG Dong，ZHENG Shaohe，et al. Experimental study of seepage properties of rock fracture under three-dimensional stress[J]. Science in China(Series E)，1999，29(1)：82-86.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[14]	仵彦卿. 岩体水力学基础(四)——岩体渗流场与应力场耦合的等效连续介质模型[J]. 水文地质工程地质，1997，24(3)：10-14.(WU Yanqing. Principles of rock mass hydraulics(4)：equivalent continuum model of rock mass coupling fields of flow stress[J]. Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology，1997，24(3)：10-14.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[16]	GERRARD C M. Elastic models of rock masses having one，two and three sets of joints[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts，1982，19(1)：15-23. " target="_blank">
[18]	GOODMAN R E. Introduction to rock mechanics[M]. New York：John Wiley and Sons，1980. " target="_blank">