考虑法向应力历史的黏土–混凝土界面弹塑性分析

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (0)

全文: PDF (289 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要土与混凝土接触界面剪切力学特性研究对桩基础设计至关重要，非挤土桩施工过程中由于成孔卸荷或桩身混凝土凝结造成界面附近土体径向卸荷，径向荷载的变化势必改变桩土界面的荷载传递规律。通过大型结构剪切试验发现：法向应力的变化历史对黏土–混凝土接触面剪切变形特性和强度参数影响明显。为给钻孔灌注桩桩土接触界面数值模拟提供合理的剪切力学模型，以接触界面积累的能量为硬化参数，假定接触界面剪切过程为界面积累能量对外做功的过程，考虑法向应力历史对剪切刚度的影响，提出考虑法向应力历史的黏土–混凝土界面模型，并介绍各模型参数的确定方法。模型原理清晰，参数物理意义明确。通过大型直剪试验成果数据对界面模型进行验证。结果表明：提出的模型能准确地再现和预测不同法向应力历史条件下的黏土–混凝土接触界面的力学特性。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

关键词 ：土力学；黏土&ndash, 混凝土接触面；弹塑性分析；本构关系；应力历史

Abstract：The behavior of soil-structure interface is crucial to the design of pile foundation. The radial unloading occurs during the process of hole boring and concrete curing，which will effect the load transfer rule of pile-soil interface. Through the large shear tests on interface between clay and concrete，it can be concluded that the normal stress history influences significantly the shear behavior and strength parameter of interface. The numerical simulation of bored shaft-soil interaction problem requires proper modeling of the interface. Through taking the energy on the interface as a hardening parameter and viewing the shearing process of interface as the process of the accumulated energy dissipated to do work，considering the influence of normal stress history on the shearing rigidity，a mechanical model of interface between clay and concrete is put forward to take the effect of normal stress history into consideration. Then，The determination methods for the model parameters are introduced. The model based on a legible mathematical theory and all its parameters have definite physical meaning. The model is validated through the data from direct shear test. The results show that the model can reproduce and predict the mechanical behavior of interface between clay and concrete under arbitrary normal stress histories.

Key words： soil mechanics clay-concrete interface elastoplastic analysis constitutive law stress history

收稿日期: 2011-10-17

引用本文:

赵春风1，2，龚辉1，2，赵程1，2，廖乾旭3. 考虑法向应力历史的黏土–混凝土界面弹塑性分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(4): 848-855.
ZHAO Chunfeng1，2，GONG Hui1，2，ZHAO Cheng1，2，LIAO Qianxu3. ELASTOPLASTIC ANALYSIS OF INTERFACE BETWEEN CLAY AND CONCRETE CONSIDERING EFFECT OF NORMAL STRESS HISTORY. , 2012, 31(4): 848-855.

链接本文:

http://www.rockmech.org/CN/Y2012/V31/I4/848

[15]	HOULSBY G T，WROTH C P. The variation of shear modulus of a clay with pressure and overconsolidation ratio[J]. Soils and Foundations，1991，31(3)：138-143. " target="_blank">
[2]	GOMEZ J E，FILZ G M，EBELING R M. Extended hyperbolic model for sand-to-concrete interfaces[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，2003，129(11)：993-1 000. " target="_blank">
[6]	HU L M，PU J L. Testing and modeling of soil-structure interface[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，2004，130(8)：851-860. " target="_blank">
[7]	张嘎. 粗粒土与结构接触面静动力学特性及弹塑性损伤理论研究[博士学位论文][D]. 北京：清华大学，2002.(ZHANG Ga. A new monotonic and cyclic elasto-plasticity damage theory for coarse grained soil-structure interface[Ph. D. Thesis][D]. Beijing：Tsinghua University，2002.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[8]	王伟. 基于能量耗散原理的土与结构接触面模型研究及应用[博士学位论文][D]. 南京：河海大学，2006.(WANG Wei. Study on soil-structure interface model based on potential energy dissipating principle and its application[Ph. D. Thesis][D]. Nanjing：Hohai University，2006.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[10]	栾茂田，武亚军. 土与结构间接触面的非线性弹性-理想塑性模型及其应用[J]. 岩土力学，2004，25(4)：507-513.(LUAN Maotian，WU Yajun. A nonlinear elasto-perfectly plastic model of interface element for soil-structure interaction and its applications[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2004，25(4)：507-513.(in Chinese))
[14]	ANUBHAV，BASUDHAR P K. Modeling of soil-woven geotextile interface behavior from direct shear test results[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes，2010，28(4)：403-408.
[5]	YIN Z Z，ZHU H，XU G H. A study of deformation in the interface between soil and concrete[J]. Computers and Geotechnics，1995，17(1)：75-92. " target="_blank">
[13]	ZHOU G Q，XIA H C，ZHAO G S，et al. Nonlinear elastic constitutive model of soil structure interfaces under relatively high normal stress[J]. Journal of China University of Mining and Technology，2007，17(3)：301-305. " target="_blank">
[1]	CLOUGH G W，DUNAN J M. Finite element analyses of retaining wall behavior[J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division，1971，97(12)：1 657-1 673. " target="_blank">
[3]	GOMEZ J E，FILZ G M，EBELING R M，et al. Sand-to-concrete interface response to complex load paths in a large displacement shear box[J]. Geotechnical Testing Journal，2008，31(4)：358-369. " target="_blank">
[4]	DESAI C S，DRUMM E C，ZAMAN M M. Cyclic testing and modeling of interfaces[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，1985，111(6)：793-815. " target="_blank">
[9]	中华人民共和国国家标准编写组. GB/T50123—1999 土工试验方法标准[S]. 北京：中国计划出版社，1999.(The National Standards Compilation Group of People?s Republic of China. GB/T 50123—1999 Standard for soil test method[S]. Beijing：China Planning Press，1999.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[11]	LIU H B，SONG E X，LING H I. Constitutive modeling of soil-structure interface through the concept of critical state soil mechanics[J]. Mechanics Research Communications，2006，33(4)：515-531. " target="_blank">
[12]	ZEGHAL M，EDIL T B. Soil structure interaction analysis：modeling the interface[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal，2002，39(3)：620-628. " target="_blank">