动剪应力折减系数影响因素及计算公式

doi:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2017.0871

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (853 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要动剪应力折减系数的计算是国际上最为通用的液化判别方法中的核心技术，研究发展理论上更合理同时具有可操作性的计算方法，不仅对液化判别技术的发展具有重要意义，同时也是土层地震响应认识水平提升的重要标志。基于KiK-net的32个实际场地模型508条实际地震动输入的场地反应分析结果，通过方差分析，研究各影响因素的显著性，揭示变化形态以及形态参数变化规律；遴选出必要因素并提出三因素和单因素计算公式，并与已有方法进行对比。结果表明：深度对值影响最为显著，震级和土层剪切波速次之但其作用不可忽视，地表峰值加速度对值影响不显著；随深度变化服从Logistic模式，由渐近线、参考影响深度和形状变量3个参数控制，3个参数随土层剪切波速和震级变化呈现良好的规律性。以此提出的三因素新计算公式由深度、土层剪切波速和震级确定，单因素简化计算公式由深度确定，均适用于0～50 m深度范围，且具有连续曲线形式，克服了以往公式沿深度拼接的弊端。较Seed曲线和NCEER曲线，单因素新公式准确性有所提高；与目前最复杂的Cetin公式相比，提出的三因素新公式浅层准确性相同，在深层有所提高，且新公式表达简单，便于工程应用。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	王克
	孙锐
	袁晓铭

关键词 ：土力学, 液化判别, 动剪应力折减系数, 变化形态, 单因素简化计算公式, 三因素计算公式

Abstract：The reduction coefficient of dynamic shear stress is the key in the methods of liquefaction evaluation. The reliable and easy method of calculating is very important for liquefaction evaluation and seismic response analysis. The influencing factors of were therefore studied based on the results of site response analysis to 508 records of seismic motion at 32 actual sites. The variation pattern of and the trends of shape parameter are uncovered. The necessary factors are selected and thus a new 3-parameter formula and a single-parameter formula of are proposed. The proposed formulas are compared with the existing formula. The results show that the depth is the most significant factor affecting ，the seismic magnitude and the shear wave velocity are the second significant factors which cannot be neglected，and PGA is the least significant factor. The curve follows the Logistic model，and is controlled by three shape parameters：asymptotic line，reference depth of influence and shape index. The proposed 3-parameter formula depends on d， and ，and the single-parameter formula depends on d. Both formula are applicable in the depth range of 0–50 m，and change continuously with depth，which overcome the disadvantages of existing formula in terms of splicing lines. The single-parameter formula is more accurate in comparing with the curve recommended by Seed and by NCEER. Comparing with the formula proposed by Cetin，the 3-parameter formula has the similar accuracy in the range of shallow depths，and has the higher accuracy in the range of deep depths. The new 3-parameter formula has a simpler form than Cetin curve and is more applicable for engineering applications.

Key words： soil mechanics liquefaction evaluation dynamic stress reduction coefficient variation pattern single-factor formula 3-factor formula

引用本文:

王克，孙锐，袁晓铭. 动剪应力折减系数影响因素及计算公式[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2018, 37(1): 177-189.
WANG Ke，SUN Rui，YUAN Xiaoming. Influence factors and formula for dynamic stress reduction coefficient. , 2018, 37(1): 177-189.

链接本文:

http://www.rockmech.org/CN/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2017.0871 或 http://www.rockmech.org/CN/Y2018/V37/I1/177

[2]	陈龙伟，袁晓铭，孙锐. 2011年新西兰Mw 6.3地震液化及岩土震害述评[J]. 世界地震工程，2013，29(3)：1-9.(CHEN Longwei，YUAN Xiaoming，SUN Rui. Review of liquefaction phenomena and geotechnical damage in the 2011 New Zealand Mw 6.3 earthquake[J]. World Earthquake Engineering，2013，29(3)：1-9.(in Chinese))
[20]	DARENDELI M B. Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves[Ph. D. Thesis][D]. Austin：The University of Texas，2001.
[17]	CETIN K O. Reliability-based assessment of seismic soil liquefaction initiation hazard[Ph. D. Thesis][D]. Berkeley：University of California，2000.
[3]	袁晓铭，曹振中，孙锐，等. 汶川8.0级地震液化特征初步研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2009，28(6)：1 288-1 296.(YUAN Xiaoming，CAO Zhenzhong，SUN Rui，et al. Preliminary research on liquefaction characteristics of Wenchuan 8.0 earthquake[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2009，28(6)：1 288-1 296.(in Chinese))
[5]	中华人民共和国国家标准编写组. GB50487—2008水利水电工程地质勘查规范[S]. 北京：中国计划出版社，2009.(The National Standards Compilation Group of People?s Republic of China. GB50487—2008 Code for seismic design of buildings[S]. Beijing：China Architecture and Building Press，2009.(in Chinese))
[12]	IWASAKI T. Soil liquefaction studies in Japan：state of the art[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering，1986，5(1)：2-68.
[14]	GOLESORKHI R. Factors influencing the computational determination of earthquake-induced shear stresses in sandy soils[Ph. D. Thesis][D]. Berkeley：University of California，1989.
[21]	CETIN K O，SEED R B. Nonlinear shear mass participation factor(rd) for cyclic shear stress ratio evaluation[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering，2004，24(2)：103-113.
[1]	YOUD T L，IDRISS I M，ANDRUS R D，et al. Liquefaction Resistance of soils：summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER∕NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，2001，127(4)：817-833.
[6]	SEED H B，IDRISS I M. A Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential[J]. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division，1971，97(9)：1 249-1 273.
[8]	孔梦云，陈国兴，李小军，等. 以剪切波速与地表峰值加速度为依据的地震液化确定性及概率判别法[J]. 岩土力学，2015，36(5)： 1 239-1 252.(KONG Mengyun，CHEN Guoxing，LI Xiaojun，et al. Shear wave velocity and peak ground acceleration based deterministic and probabilistic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2015，36(5)：1 239-1 252.(in Chinese))
[10]	曹振中，刘荟达，袁晓铭，等. 基于动力触探的砾性土液化判别方法通用性研究[J]. 岩土工程学报，2016，38(1)：163-169.(CAO Zhenzhong，LIU Huida，YUAN Xiaoming，et al. Reliability of Chinese dynamic penetration test for liquefaction evaluation of gravelly soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2016，38(1)：163-169. (in Chinese))
[15]	IDRISS I M，BOULANGER R W. Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering，2006，26(2/4)：115-130.
[19]	CUBRINOVSKI M，BRAY J D，TAYLOR M，et al. Soil liquefaction effects in the central business district during the February 2011 christchurch earthquake[J]. Seismological Research Letters，2011，82(6)：893-904.
[4]	中华人民共和国国家标准编写组. GB50011—2010建筑抗震设计规范[S]. 北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2010.(The National Standards Compilation Group of People?s Republic of China. GB50011—2010 Code for engineering geological investigation of water resources and hydropower[S]. Beijing：China Architecture and Building Press，2010.(in Chinese))
[7]	王克，孙锐，王鸾，等. 液化判别方法中应力折减系数研究发展述评[J]. 世界地震工程，2017，33(1)：264-277.(WANG Ke，SUN Rui，WANG Luan，et al. Review of development of research on stress reduction coefficient in liquefaction evaluated method[J]. World Earthquake Engineering，2017，33(1)：264-277.(in Chinese))
[9]	蔡国军，刘松玉，童立元，等. 基于静力触探测试的国内外砂土液化判别方法[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2008，27(5)：1 019-1 027. (CAI Guojun，LIU Songyu，TONG Liyuan，et al. Evaluation of liquefaction of sandy soils based on cone penetration test[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2008，27(5)：1 019- 1 027.(in Chinese))
[11]	ISHIHARA K. Simple method of analysis for liquefaction of sand deposits during earthquakes[J]. Soils and Foundations，1977，17(3)：1-17.
[13]	IMAI T，TONOUCHI K，KANEMORI T. The simple evaluation method of shear stress generated by earthquakes in soil ground[R]. [S. l.]：Bureau of Practical Geological Investigation，Report No.3，1981：39-58.
[16]	高艳平，王余庆，辛鸿博. 尾矿坝地震液化简化判别法[J]. 岩土工程学报，1995，17(6)：72-79.(GAO Yanping，WANG Yuqing，XIN Hongbo. Simplified procedure for evaluating liquefaction potential of tailings dam[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，1995，17(6)：72-79.(in Chinese))
[18]	韩超，周燕国，凌道盛，等. 液化判别应力折减系数分布特征研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2010，29(9)：1 833-1 839.(HAN Chao，ZHOU Yanguo，LING Daosheng，et al. Study of distribution features of stress reduction coefficient in liquefaction evaluation[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2010，29(9)： 1 833-1 839.(in Chinese))