基于帽盖模型的强夯地基应力–应变特征与有效加固范围分析

doi:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2017.1367

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (625 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要为了揭示强夯过程中土体应力–应变特征和加固范围发展规律，基于帽盖模型建立二维有限元动力分析模型，通过子程序二次开发实现土体模量等参数随夯击次数的变化。基于该数值模型，首先获得强夯过程中主应力–偏应力(p-q)平面内土体的应力路径和竖向与水平向的应力–应变关系，结果表明土体帽盖面随着强夯压密而逐步扩大，但不同区域土体的加固过程因其应力–应变关系的不同而又有所差异：夯锤正下方土体的加固以竖向压缩变形为主，竖向应力在加固中起主导作用，但浅层土体因侧向惯性导致侧向挤密明显滞后于竖向压密，而较深处的土体侧向惯性作用不再明显，表现为三向压密同时发生；夯锤以外的土体以侧向挤密为主，水平向应力起主要作用。随后，采用偏应力峰值点与前一击帽盖面的相对位置定量表征强夯加固效果，峰值点位于前一击帽盖面之上时，土体屈服硬化；反之，土体得不到压密。最后，对比发现以90%压实度确定的有效加固范围保守于以5%相对密度增量确定的结果，同时提出砂土有效加固范围的计算公式，对类似工程实践提供一定的参考。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	姚占勇1
	周冲1
	蒋红光1
	毕玉峰2
	孙梦林1
	周磊生3
	齐辉3

关键词 ：土力学, 强夯, 帽盖模型, p-q平面应力路径, 屈服硬化, 有效加固范围

Abstract：In order to investigate the stress-strain characteristics of soil and the effective range of reinforcement under dynamic compaction，a two-dimensional dynamic model based on the capped yield hardening model was established and implemented through finite element method. A subroutine was programmed to simulate the parameters such as the soil modulus changing with the ramming times. With the proposed numerical model，the soil stress path in p-q plane( p is principal stress，q is deviatoric stress) and the stress-strain relationship in both vertical and horizontal directions were firstly obtained in the simulation of successive dynamic compaction. Results indicated that the cap surface expanded with the soil densification but that the reinforcement processes varied with the soil locations due to the different characteristics of the stress-strain relationship. Soils right under the pounder were mainly compressed in the vertical direction caused by the higher vertical stresses. However，the development of horizontal deformation at the shallower depths lagged behind the vertical deformation due to the effect of lateral inertia，while the deformation at the deeper locations developed simultaneously in both horizontal and vertical directions. Soils beside the pounder were mainly compressed in the horizontal direction due to the much larger lateral stresses. Then the reinforcement effect was quantitatively characterized by the relative distance between the peak value of the deviatoric stress and its front cap surface. When the deviatoric peak stress located above the cap surface，soils experienced the yield hardening. Otherwise，soils would not be compressed. Finally，the effective improvement ranges determined by the criterion of 90% compaction degree were found to be more conservative than those by the criterion of 5% relative density increment. Empirical formulae were put forward to predict the effective ranges of improvement for the sand foundation.

Key words： soil mechanics dynamic compaction cap model stress path in p-q plane yield hardening effective range of improvement

引用本文:

姚占勇1，周冲1，蒋红光1，毕玉峰2，孙梦林1，周磊生3，齐辉3. 基于帽盖模型的强夯地基应力–应变特征与有效加固范围分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2018, 37(4): 969-977.
YAO Zhanyong1，ZHOU Chong1，JIANG Hongguang1，BI Yufeng2，SUN Menglin1，ZHOU Leisheng3，QI Hui3. Stress-strain characteristics and effective range of improvement under dynamic compaction based on capped yield hardening model. , 2018, 37(4): 969-977.

链接本文:

http://www.rockmech.org/CN/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2017.1367 或 http://www.rockmech.org/CN/Y2018/V37/I4/969

[4]	FENG S J，TAN K，SHUI W H，et al. Densification of desert sands by high energy dynamic compaction[J]. Engineering Geology，2013，157：48-54.
[13]	GU Q，LEE F H. Ground response to dynamic compaction of dry sand[J]. Geotechnique，2002，52(7)：481-493.
[6]	OSHIMA A，TAKADA N. Relation between compacted area and ram momentum by heavy tamping[C]// Proceedings of the International
[15]	姚仰平，张北战. 基于体应变的强夯加固范围研究[J]. 岩土力学， 2016，37(9)：2 663-2 671.(YAO Yangping，ZHANG Beizhan. Reinforcement range of dynamic compaction based on volumetric strain[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2016，37(9)：2 663-2 671.(in Chinese))
[22]	YULEK M. Dynamic compaction of a thin subgrade layer overlying weak deposit[M. S. Thesis][D]. Montreal，Quebec，Canada：Concordia University，2006.
[7]	OSHIMA A，TAKADA N. Evaluation of compacted area of heavy tamping by cone point resistance[C]// Proceedings of Centrifuge. [S. l.]：[s. n.]，1998：813-818.
[21]	KHOURI N Q. Dynamic properties of soils[M. S. Thesis][D]. New York，USA：Syracuse University，1984.
[18]	DIMAGGIO F L，SANDLER I S. Material models for granular soils[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics，1971，97(3)：935-950.
	Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering— International Society for Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. [S. l.]：[s. n.]，1997：1 641-1 644.
[1]	MAYNE P W，JONES JR J S，DUMAS J C. Ground response to dynamic compaction[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，1984，110(6)：757-774.
[3]	郑颖人，李学志，冯遗兴，等. 软黏土地基的强夯机制及其工艺研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，1998，17(5)：571-580.(ZHENG Yingren，LI Xuezhi，FENG Yixing，et al. Study on the DCM mechanisms and engineering techniques of soft clay foundation[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，1998，17(5)：571-580.(in Chinese))
[5]	中国工程建设协会. 强夯地基处理技术规程[M]. 北京：中国计划出版社，2010：7-8.(China Construction Association. Technical specification for dynamic compaction foundation[M]. Beijing：China Planning Press，2010：7-8.(in Chinese))
[10]	何长明，邹金锋，李亮. 强夯动应力的量测及现场试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报，2007，29(4)：628-632.(HE Changming，ZOU Jinfeng，LI Liang. Field tests on measurement of dynamic stress of dynamic compaction[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering， 2007，29(4)：628-632.(in Chinese))
[2]	王国胜，骆胜辉. 强夯法在碎石填土地基处理中的应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，1997，6(2)：188-192.(WANG Guosheng，LUO Shenghui. The use of dynamic compaction in gravel soil improving[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，1997，6(2)：188-192.(in Chinese))
[8]	HAJIALILUE-BONAB M，ZARE F S. Investigation on tamping spacing in dynamic compaction using model tests[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Ground Improvement，2014，167(3)：219-231.
[9]	FENG S J，SHUI W H，TAN K，et al. Field evaluation of dynamic compaction on granular deposits[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities，2010，25(3)：241-249.
[11]	BO M W，NA Y M，ARULRAJAH A，et al. Densification of granular soil by dynamic compaction[J]. Proceedings of the ICE-Ground Improvement，2009，162(3)：121-132.
[19]	LEE F H，GU Q. Method for estimating dynamic compaction effect on sand[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，2004，130(2)：139-152.
[12]	POURJENABI M，GHANBARIAND M，HAMIDI E. Numerical modelling of dynamic compaction by sand using different constitutive models[C]// Proceedings of the 4th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. [S. l.]：[s. n.]，2013：3 195-3 202.
[14]	WANG W，CHEN J J，WANG J H. Estimation method for ground deformation of granular soils caused by dynamic compaction[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering，2017，92：266-278.
[16]	THILAKASIRI H S，GUNARATNE M，MULLINS G，et al. Implementation aid for dynamic replacement of organic soils with sand[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，2001，127(1)：25-35.
[17]	GHANBARI E，HAMIDI A. Numerical modeling of rapid impact compaction in loose sands[J]. Geomechanics and Engineering，2014，6(5)：487-502.
[20]	ISHIBASHI I，ZHANG X. Unified dynamic shear moduli and damping ratios of sand and clay[J]. Soils and Foundations，1993，33(1)：182-191.