考虑应力路径的深埋隧道黏弹–塑性围岩与支护相互作用

doi:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2021.0404

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (10549 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要黏弹–塑性岩体中，隧道的支护反力会随时间增加，致使塑性区内已屈服围岩的应力状态从屈服面上回到屈服面以内。因此，研究隧道围岩与支护结构相互作用的长期力学特性时须先弄清其应力路径。考虑应力路径影响，基于广义Kelvin流变模型和Mohr-Coulomb强度准则，给出深埋隧道黏弹–塑性围岩与支护相互作用的应力、应变及位移的简化计算方法。将高地应力软岩隧道的各种“抗让结合”支护技术归纳为“先让后抗”、“边让边抗”、“先控再让后抗”3类，分别分析3类支护措施对围岩应力路径的影响，并对比研究不同支护措施下隧道黏弹–塑性围岩的变形及支护反力。结果表明，考虑应力路径后计算得到的围岩位移更大。在相同的位移释放量、相同的衬砌支护刚度条件下，采用“先让后抗”的措施，围岩初期变形速率非常大，施加永久支护后，后期增长的支护反力也最大。在高地应力、变形严重的条件(例如初始地应力超过20 MPa)下采用“先控再让后抗”措施是最合适的。隧道开挖后立即施作长锚杆主动支护围岩，不仅可以控制围岩在第一阶段的变形速率，提高第一阶段围岩的稳定性，还可以大幅降低第二阶段永久衬砌的支护力，提高第二阶段衬砌结构的稳定性。在地应力不高、变形不严重的条件下(例如初始地应力低于10 MPa)采用“先让后抗”的措施就可以较好地控制围岩变形，不必采用“先控再让后抗”措施。而“边让边抗”措施适用于2种情况之间(例如初始地应力为10～20 MPa)。此外，黏滞系数较小(较软弱)的围岩开挖后变形速率较大，例如当黏滞系数分别取2×109和1×1010 Pa·d时，采用“先控再让后抗”措施后围岩初期变形速率分别为17.6和3.5 cm/d。因此，黏滞系数较小(较软弱)的围岩在开挖后必须立即施加较大的支护反力以控制围岩变形速率。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	夏才初1
	2
	徐晨1
	3
	杜时贵1
	2

关键词 ：隧道工程, 软岩大变形, 应力路径, 黏弹&ndash, 塑性, 让压支护

Abstract：The support reaction force of tunnels increases with time in viscoelastic-plastic rock mass，which makes the stress state of yielding surrounding rock in plastic zones move inward from the yield surface. Therefore，it is necessary to make clear the stress path of the surrounding rock when investigating the long-term mechanical characteristics of the interaction between rock and tunnel support. Considering the effect of the stress path，based on the generalized Kelvin model and Mohr Coulomb strength criterion，a simplified method for analyzing the viscoelastic-plastic stress，strain and displacement of the surrounding rock and the interaction between the support and the surrounding rock is proposed. In this paper，different kinds of“yield-resist combination”support technologies of high geostress soft rock tunnels are summarized into three categories as“yield before resist”， “yield while resist”and “control-yield-resist”. The influences of three kinds of support measures on the stress path of the surrounding rock are analyzed respectively. The deformation of the viscoelastic-plastic surrounding rock and the support reaction under different support measures are further studied. The results show that the calculated surrounding rock displacement is much larger if the stress path is taken into account. Under the condition of the same displacement release and the same stiffness of the lining support，the deformation rate of the surrounding rock at the initial stage is very large by adopting the measure of “yield before resist”，and the increasing support reaction force at the second stage is also the largest after applying the permanent support. It is most appropriate to adopt the “control-yield-resist”support measure under the condition of high geostress and serious deformation(for example，the initial stress exceeds 20 MPa). The prestress long bolt is employed to support the surrounding rock immediately after the tunnel excavation, which can not only control the deformation rate and improve the stability of the surrounding rock in the first stage，but also greatly reduce the additional support force and improve the stability of the lining structure during the second stage. Under the condition of low geostress and slight deformation(for example，the initial stress is less than 10 MPa)，the “yield before resist”measure can effectively control the deformation of the surrounding rock，and the “control-yield-resist” measure is not necessary. The “yield while resist”measure is applicable to the cases between the above two extreme conditions(e.g.，the initial ground stress is between 10 and 20 MPa). In addition，the deformation rate of the surrounding rock with a small viscosity coefficient is very large after excavation，for example，when the viscosity = 2×109 and 1×1010 Pa·d，the initial rock deformation rates are 17.6 and 3.5 cm/d respectively with the “control-yield-resist”measure. Therefore，for the surrounding rock with a small viscosity，large support reaction force must be applied immediately after excavation to control the deformation rate.

Key words： tunnel engineering large deformation of soft rock stress path viscoelastic plasticity yielding support

引用本文:

夏才初1，2，徐晨1，3，杜时贵1，2. 考虑应力路径的深埋隧道黏弹–塑性围岩与支护相互作用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2021, 40(9): 1789-1802.
XIA Caichu1，2，XU Chen1，3，DU Shigui1，2. Interaction between viscoelastic-plastic surrounding rock and support structure in deep tunnels considering stress path. , 2021, 40(9): 1789-1802.

链接本文:

http://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2021.0404 或 http://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/Y2021/V40/I9/1789

[3]	LI C C. Performance of D-bolts under static loading[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering，2012，45(2)：183-192.
[8]	刘国庆. 木寨岭隧道软岩大变形段支护措施研究[J]. 现代隧道技术，2011，48(4)：135-141.(LIU Guoqin. Study of support measures for large deformed section of Muzhailing Tunnel in soft rocks[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology，2011，48(4)：135-141.(in Chinese))
[1]	MORITZ B. Yielding elements-requirements，overview and comparison[J]. Geomechanics and Tunnelling，2011，4(3)：221-236.
[11]	XANTHAKOS P P. Ground anchors and anchored structures[M]. New York：John Wiley and Sons，1991：494-501.
[19]	夏志皋. 塑性力学[M]. 上海：同济大学出版社，1991：147-148.(XIA Zhigao. Plastic mechanics[M]. Shanghai：Tongji University Press，1991：147-148.(in Chinese))
[2]	BARLA G，BONINI M，SEMERARO M. Performance monitoring and analysis of a yield-control support system in squeezing rock[C]// Eurock 2010—Rock Mechanics in Civil and Environmental Engineering. [S. l.]：[s. n.]，2010：146-154.
[4]	刘宇鹏，夏才初，吴福宝，等. 高地应力软岩隧道长、短锚杆联合支护技术研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2020，39(1)：105-114. (LIU Yupeng，XIA Caichu，WU Fubao，et al. A combined support technology of long and short bolts of soft rock tunnels under high ground stresses[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2020，39(1)：105-114.(in Chinese))
[5]	何满潮，郭志飚. 恒阻大变形锚杆力学特性及其工程应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2014，33(7)：1 297-1 308.(HE Manchao，GUO Zhibiao. Mechanical property and engineering application of anchor bolt with constant resistance and large deformation[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2014，33(7)：1 297-1 308.(in Chinese))
[6]	仇文革，王刚，龚伦，等. 一种适应隧道大变形的限阻耗能型支护结构研发与应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2018，37(8)：1 785-1 795.(QIU Wenge，WANG Gang，GONG Lun，et al. Research and application of resistance-limiting and energy-dissipating support in large deformation tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2018，37(8)：1 785-1 795.(in Chinese))
[16]	ZHAO J，WANG G. Unloading and reverse yielding of a finite cavity in a bounded cohesive-frictional medium[J]. Computers and Geotechnics，2010，37：239-245.
[7]	韩常领，夏才初，徐晨. 软岩隧道挤压性大变形控制技术研究进展[J]. 地下空间与工程学报，2020，16(增1)：492-505.(HAN Changling，XIA Caichu，XU Chen. Research progress for the control measures of the tunnel large deformation in squeezing rocks[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering，2020，16(Supp.1)：492-505.(in Chinese))
[9]	夏才初，金天垚，徐晨，等. 软岩隧道超前导洞应力释放力学机制及适用性[J]. 隧道建设，2020，40(增2)：1-9.(XIA Caichu，JIN Tianyao，XU Chen，et al. Mechanical mechanism and applicability of stress release for advance pilot heading in soft rock tunnel[J]. Tunnel Construction，2020，40(Supp.2)：1-9.(in Chinese))
[12]	KIMURA F，OKABAYASHI N，KAWAMOTO T. Tunnelling through squeezing rock in two large fault zones of the Enasan Tunnel II[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering，1987，20(3)：151-166.
[14]	LI C. Study on the loading and deformation of tunnel segments in soft clay with consideration for the soil mass rheological characteristics[J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering，2019，37：673-682.
[17]	EL JIRARI S，WONG H，DELERUYELLE F，et al. Analytical modelling of a tunnel accounting for elastoplastic unloading and reloading with reverse yielding and plastic flow[J]. Computers and Geotechnics，2020，121：103441.
[10]	AYAYDIN N，LEITNER A. Tauern tunnel first and second tubes from the consultant¢s viewpoint[J]. Geomechanics and Tunnelling，2009，2(1)：14-23.
[13]	余东明，姚海林，段建新，等. 考虑中主应力和剪胀的深埋圆形隧道黏弹塑性蠕变解[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2012，31(增2)：3 586- 3 592.(YU Dongming，YAO Hailin，DUAN Jianxin，et al. Viscoelastoplastic creep solutions to deep circular tunnels considering intermediate principal stress and shear dilatancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2012，31(Supp.2)：3 586-3 592.(in Chinese))
[18]	郑颖人，朱合华，方正昌，等. 地下工程围岩稳定分析与设计理论[M]. 北京：人民交通出版社，2012：59-62.(ZHENG Yingren，ZHU Hehua，FANG Zhengchang，et al. The stability analysis and design theory of surrounding rock of underground engineering[M]. Beijing：People¢s Transportation Press，2012：59-62.(in Chinese))
[20]	卞跃威，夏才初，肖维民，等. 考虑围岩软化特性和应力释放的圆形隧道黏弹塑性解[J]. 岩土力学，2013，34(1)：211-220.(BIAN Yuewei，XIA Caichu，XIAO Weimin，et al. Visco-elastoplastic solutions for circular tunnel considering stress release and softening behaviour of rocks[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2013，34(1)：211-220.(in Chinese))
[21]	储昭飞. 流变软岩中隧道支护-围岩相互作用关系研究[博士学位论文][D]. 北京：北京交通大学，2018.(CHU Zhaofei. Study on interaction between tunnel support and surrounding rock in soft rheological rock[Ph. D. Thesis][D]. Beijing：Beijing Jiaotong University，2018.(in Chinese))
[15]	KARGAR A R. An analytical solution for circular tunnels excavated in rock masses exhibiting viscous elastic-plastic behavior[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2019，124：104128.