一种基于能量孔隙水压力模型的饱和砂土液化风险评估方法

doi:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2020.0906

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (637 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要根据场地液化风险评估结果，采用相应措施对场地进行治理，可避免液化引起的破坏，因此场地液化评估具有重要的研究价值。基于双向动三轴数值试验，以地震波阿里亚斯强度为能量参数，建立一种新的能量孔隙水压力模型，同时研究固结压力和固结比对孔隙水压力模型的影响；利用饱和福建标准砂动三轴试验结果验证该能量孔隙水压力模型的合理性和准确性；基于能量孔隙水压力模型，考虑渗透性以及剪应力折减函数对孔隙水压力的影响，建立一种新的场地液化风险评估方法，并利用离心机振动台试验和数值试验验证该评估方法。结果表明，该评估方法能够准确地预测出土体孔隙水压力的产生和累积规律，因此可用于场地液化风险的评估。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	张建磊1
	程谦恭1
	2
	3
	李艳4
	张恩铭1
	吴九江5
	王玉峰1

关键词 ：土力学, 液化, 孔隙水压力模型, 阿里亚斯强度, 数值模拟

Abstract：Evaluation of site liquefaction，according to which some remediation measures can be adopted to avoid liquefaction-induced damage，has important research value. Based on cyclic triaxial numerical tests，in this paper， a new energy-based pore pressure model for evaluating site liquefaction was proposed by taking the Arias intensity of seismic waves as the energy parameter，and the effects of the consolidation pressure and the consolidation ratio on the proposed model were discussed. The energy-based pore pressure model was verified by the cyclic triaxial tests results. Based on the verified model，a new method taking into consideration of the permeability and the shear stress reduction coefficient was proposed for evaluating the liquefaction. The new method was verified by centrifuge tests and numerical simulation. The results show that the new method can accurately predict the generation and accumulation of the excess pore pressure and hence，can be used to evaluate the liquefaction of ground.

Key words： soil mechanics')" href="#">

soil mechanics liquefaction pore water pressure model Arias intensity
')" href="#">numerical simulation

引用本文:

张建磊1，程谦恭1，2，3，李艳4，张恩铭1，吴九江5，王玉峰1. 一种基于能量孔隙水压力模型的饱和砂土液化风险评估方法[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2021, 40(10): 2136-2148.
ZHANG Jianlei1，CHENG Qiangong1，2，3，LI Yan4，ZHANG Enming1，WU Jiujiang5，WANG Yufeng1. An energy-based pore water pressure model for evaluating liquefaction of saturated sands. , 2021, 40(10): 2136-2148.

链接本文:

http://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2020.0906 或 http://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/Y2021/V40/I10/2136

[8]	TOWHATA I，ISHIHARA K. Shear work and pore water pressure in untrained shear[J]. Soils and Foundations，1985，25(3)：73-84.
[14]	ARIAS A. Measure of earthquake intensity[J]. Seismic Design for Nuclear Power Plants，1970，(1)：438.
[30]	ARULANANDAN K，SYBICO J. Post-liquefaction settlement of sands[C]// Proceedings of Wroth Memorial Symposium. Oxford：St Catherine's College，1992：27-29.
[1]	HAMADA M. Large ground deformations and their effects on lifelines：1964 Niigata earthquake. Case studies of liquefaction and lifelines performance during past earthquake[R]. Buffalo：National Centre for Earthquake Engineering Research，1992.
[2]	YOUD T L，DRISS I M. Liquefaction resistance of soils：summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，2001，127(4)：297-313.
[4]	DOBRY R，LADD R，YOKEL F，et al. Prediction of pore water pressure buildup and liquefaction of sands during earthquakes by the cyclic strain method[C]// National Bureau of Standards Building Science Series. Washington，DC：US Department of Commerce，1982：138.
[6]	FARDAD AMINI P，NOORZAD R. Energy-based evaluation of liquefaction of fiber-reinforced sand using cyclic triaxial testing[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering，2018，104(2018)：45-53.
[10]	谢定义，巫志辉. 不规则动力荷载脉冲波对砂土液化特性的影响[J]. 岩土工程学报，1987，9(4)：1-12.(XIE Dingyi，WU Zhihui. Effect of irregular dynamic impulse history on liquefaction characteristics of saturated sand[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，1987，9(4)：1-12.(in Chinese))
[11]	孟上九，刘添华. 不规则荷载下饱和砂土孔隙水压力模型研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2014，33(增1)：3 050-3 055.(MENG Shangjiu，LIU Tianhua. Study of pore-pressure model of saturated sands under irregular load[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2014，33(Supp.1)：3 050-3 055.(in Chinese))
[13]	付海清. 现场液化试验方法及液化土体特征研究[博士学位论文][D]. 哈尔滨：中国地震局工程力学研究所，2016.(FU Haiqing. An approach of dynamic in-situ liquefaction test and characteristics of liquefaction soil[Ph. D. Thesis][D]. Harbin：Institute of Engineering Mechanics，2016.(in Chinese))
[15]	MAZZONI S，MCKENNE F，SCOTT M，et al. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation user manual version 2.1.0[R] Berkeley：University of California，Pacific Earthquake Engineering Center，2009.
[17]	ZIENKIEWICZ O C，SHIOMI T. Dynamic behavior of saturated porous media： the generalized Biot formulation and its numerical solution[J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics，1984，8(1)：71-96.
[20]	YANG Z H，ELGAMAL A，PARRA E. Computational model for cyclic mobility and associated shear deformation[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，2003，129(12)： 1 119-1 127.
[22]	ZHANG J L，CHENG Q G，LI Y，et al. Mechanism of liquefaction mitigation by rectangular closed diaphragm walls in sloping liquefiable deposits[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering，2021，142(2021)：106582.
[24]	GOLESORKHI R. Factors influencing the computational determination of earthquake-induced shear stresses in sandy soils[Ph. D. Thesis][D]. Berkeley：University of California，1989.
[29]	SHAHIR H，MOHAMMADI-HAJI B，GHASSEMI A. Employing a variable permeability model in numerical simulation of saturated sand behavior under earthquake loading[J]. Computers and Geotechnics，2014，55：211-223.
[31]	TAIEBAT M，SHAHIR H，PAK A. Study of pore pressure variation during liquefaction using two constitutive models for sand[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering，2007，27(1)：60-72.
[33]	RAHMANI A，GHASEMI FARE O，PAK A. Investigation of the influence of permeability coefficient on the numerical modeling of the liquefaction phenomenon[J]. Scientia Iranica，2012，19(2)：179-187.
[7]	NEMAT-NASSER S，SHOKOOH A. A unified approach to densification and liquefaction of cohesionless sand in cyclic shearing[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal，1979，16(4)：659-678.
[16]	MCGANN C R，ARDUINO P，MACKENZIE-HELNWEIN P. Stabilized single-point 4-node quadrilateral element for dynamic analysis of fluid saturated porous media[J]. Acta Geotechnica，2012，7(4)：297-311.
[25]	IDRISS I M，BOULANGER R W. Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering，2006，26(2/4)：115-130.
[34]	LI Y，CHENG Q G，ZHANG J L，et al. Seismic behavior of rectangular closed diaphragm walls serving as bridge foundations in gently sloping liquefiable deposit：dynamic centrifuge tests[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，2019，145(12)：04019105.
[9]	LAW K T，CAO Y L，HE G N. An energy approach for assessing seismic liquefaction potential[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal，1990，27(3)：320-329.
[18]	BIOT M A. Theory of elasticity and consolidation for a porous anisotropic solid[J]. Journal of Applied Physics，1955，26：182-185.
[27]	IDRISS I M. Earthquake ground motions at soft soil sites[C]// Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Recent Advance in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics. St. Louis，Missouri：[s. n.]，1991：2 265-2 271.
[3]	SEED H B，IDRISS I M. Simpli?ed procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential[J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division，1971，97(SM8)：1 249-1 274.
[5]	DAVIS R O，BERRILL J B. Pore pressure and dissipated energy in earthquakes-field verification[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，2001，127(3)：269-274.
[12]	王天颂，刘颖，同筠，等. 地震荷载作用下饱和砂层孔隙水压力的增长与消散[J]. 岩土工程学报，1983，5(3)：87-102.(WANG Tiansong，LIN Ying，TONG Jun，et al. Generation and dissipation of pore pressure in saturated sand layer due to earthquake loading[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，1983，5(3)：87-102.(in Chinese))
[21]	ZHANG J L，CHENG Q G，LI Y，et al. Performance of rectangular closed diaphragm walls in gently sloping liquefiable deposits subjected to different earthquake ground motions[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration.(Accepted)
[23]	孙锐. 液化土层地震动和场地液化识别方法研究[博士学位论文][D]. 哈尔滨：中国地震局工程力学研究所，2006.(SUN Rui. Study on seismic ground motion on liquefiable soil layer and site liquefaction detection[Ph. D. Thesis][D]. Harbin：Institute of Engineering Mechanics，2006.(in Chinese))
[32]	王禹，高广运，顾晓强，等. 渗透系数对砂土液化震陷影响的数值研究[J]. 岩土力学，2017，38(6)：1 813-1 818.(WABG Yu，GAO Guangyun，GU Xiaoqiang，et al. A numerical study of the influence of permeability coefficient on the liquefaction-induced settlement of sands[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2017，38(6)：1 813-1 818.(in Chinese))
[19]	ELGAMAL A，YANG Z H，PARRA E. Computational modeling of cyclic mobility and post-liquefaction site response[J]. Soil Dynamic and Earthquake Engineering，2002，22(4)：259-271.
[26]	王克，孙锐，袁晓铭. 动剪应力折减系数影响因素及计算公式[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2018，37(1)：177-189.(WANG Ke，SUN Rui，YUAN Xiaoming. Influence factors and formula for dynamic stress reduction coefficient[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2018，37(1)：177-189.(in Chinese))
[28]	SEED R B，DICKENSON S E，RAU G A，et al. Site effects on strong shaking and seismic risk：Recent developments and their impact on seismic design codes and practice[C]// Proceedings of the Structure. Congress. New York：ASCE，1994：573-578.