高应变率下砂岩动态拉伸性能SHPB试验与分析

摘要
图/表
参考文献(23)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1333 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要为研究高应变率下煤矿砂岩的动态拉伸性能，将岩样加工成厚径比为0.5的圆盘试件，利用直锥变截面分离式Hopkinson压杆(SHPB)试验装置，采用6种冲击气压对试件沿径向进行加载，实施不同加载速率的动态劈裂拉伸试验，测试试件的动态拉伸应力和应变率。试验结果表明：砂岩试件的动态劈裂破坏形态满足巴西圆盘试验有效性条件，试件内的径向应力分布达到应力均匀性要求；分析试验实测波形和应变率效应，得出高应变率下煤矿砂岩试件的拉伸应力和应变率特性。在试验采用冲击气压范围内，试件平均应变率由48 s－1增加至137 s－1，平均应变率与冲击气压近似为对数函数关系，动态拉伸强度与平均应变率近似为乘幂函数关系。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	平琦1
	马芹永1
	张经双1
	袁璞1
	陈柏生2

关键词 ：岩石力学, 砂岩, 高应变率, 分离式Hopkinson压杆(SHPB), 巴西圆盘, 动态拉伸

Abstract：In order to investigate the dynamic tensile performance of mine sandstone under high strain rate，variable cross-section split Hopkinson pressure bar(SHPB) apparatus is used to measure both the dynamic tensile stress and the strain rate of specimens. Rock samples are processed into disc specimens with the thick-diameter ratio of 0.5. Six impact pressures loaded in radial direction are applied in splitting tests to implement various loading speeds. The results show that not only splitting failure mode of tested specimens meets the validity condition in Brazilian disc test，but also radial stress distribution in specimen achieves the stress homogenization demand. Both the actuall measured waves and the strain rate effect are analyzed. The tensile stress and the strain rate of specimens under high strain rate are also studied. When the impact pressures are in the test range and the average strain rate increases from 48 to 137 s－1，the relationship between the average strain rate and the impact pressure is approximately an logarithmic function，and that between the dynamic tensile strength and the average strain rate is close to a power function.

Key words： rock mechanics sandstone high strain rate split Hopkinson pressure bar(SHPB) Brazilian disc dynamic tension

引用本文:

平琦1，马芹永1，张经双1，袁璞1，陈柏生2. 高应变率下砂岩动态拉伸性能SHPB试验与分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(S1): 3363-3369.
PING Qi1，MA Qinyong1，ZHANG Jingshuang1，YUAN Pu1，CHEN Baisheng2. SHPB TEST AND ANALYSIS OF DYNAMIC TENSILE PERFORMANCE OF SANDSTONE UNDER HIGH STRAIN RATE. , 2012, 31(S1): 3363-3369.

链接本文:

https://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/Y2012/V31/IS1/3363

[1] 蔡美峰. 岩石力学与工程[M]. 北京：科学出版社，2002：31–72. (CAI Meifeng. Rock mechanics and engineering[M]. Beijing：Science Press，2002：31–72.(in Chinese))

[2] 于亚伦. 高应变率下的岩石动载特性[J]. 北京科技大学学报，1992，14(2)：128–134.(YU Yalun. The dynamic behavior of magnetites and granite under high strain rates[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing，1992，14(2)：128–134.(in Chinese))

[3] 曹安业，范军，牟宗龙，等. 矿震动载对围岩的冲击破坏效应[J]. 煤炭学报，2010，35(12)：2 006–2 010.(CAO Anye，FAN Jun，MOU Zonglong，et al. Burst failure effect of mining-induced tremor on roadway surrounding rock[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2010，35(12)：2 006–2 010.(in Chinese))

[4] International Society for Rock Mechanics(ISRM). Suggested methods for determining tensile strength of rock materials[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts，1978，15(1)：99–103.

[5] 中华人民共和国行业标准编写组. MT 47—87 煤和岩石单向抗拉强度测定方法[S]. 北京：煤炭工业出版社，1987.(The Professional Standards Compilation Group of People¢s Republic of China. MT 47—87 Methods for determining the one-way tensile strength mechanical properties of coal and rock[S]. Beijing：Coal Industry Publishing House，1987.(in Chinese))

[6] 中华人民共和国国家标准编写组. GB/T 50266—99 工程岩体试验方法标准[S]. 北京：中国计划出版社，1999.(The National Standards Compilation Group of People¢s Republic of China. GB/T 50266—99 Standards for test method of engineering rock masses[S]. Beijing：China Planning Press，1999.(in Chinese))

[7] MA Q Y. Experimental analysis of dynamic mechanical properties for artificially frozen clay by the split Hopkinson pressure bar[J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics，2010，51(3)：448–452.

[8] 刘剑飞，胡时胜，王道荣. 用于脆性材料的Hopkinson压杆动态实验新方法[J]. 实验力学，2001，16(3)：283–290.(LIU Jianfei，HU Shisheng，WANG Daorong. A novel experimental method of Hopkinson pressure bar system for brittle material[J]. Journal of Experimental Mechanics，2001，16(3)：283–290.(in Chinese))

[9] 李夕兵，古德生. 岩石冲击动力学[M]. 长沙：中南工业大学出版社，1994：2–50.(LI Xibing，GU Desheng. Rock impact dynamics[M]. Changsha：Central South University of Technology Press，1994：2–50.(in Chinese))

[10] 尹土兵，李夕兵，王斌，等. 高温后砂岩动态压缩条件下力学特性研究[J]. 岩土工程学报，2011，33(5)：777–784.(YIN Tubing， LI Xibing，WANG Bin，et al. Mechanical properties of sandstones after high temperature under dynamic loading[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2011，33(5)：777–784.(in Chinese))

[11] 王斌，李夕兵，尹土兵，等. 饱水砂岩动态强度的SHPB试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2010，29(5)：1 003–1 009.(WANG Bin，LI Xibing，YIN Tubing，et al. Split Hopkinson pressure bar(SHPB) experiments on dynamic strength of water-saturated sandstone[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2010，29(5)：1 003–1 009.(in Chinese))

[12] 胡时胜. Hopkinson压杆实验技术的应用进展[J]. 实验力学，2005，20(4)：589–594.(HU Shisheng. The application development of experimental technique of Hopkinson pressure bar[J]. Journal of Experimental Mechanics，2005，20(4)：589–594.(in Chinese))

[13] 李伟，谢和平，王启智. 大理岩动态劈裂拉伸的SHPB实验研究[J]. 爆炸与冲击，2006，26(1)：12–20.(LI Wei，XIE Heping，WANG Qizhi. An experimental study for the dynamic split tension of marble disc using SHPB[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves，2006，26(1)：12–20.(in Chinese))

[14] 翟越，赵均海，门玉明. 花岗岩和混凝土动态拉伸性能研究[J]. 西安建筑科技大学学报：自然科学版，2009，41(3)：334–339. (ZHAI Yue，ZHAO Junhai，MEN Yuming. Analysis of the dynamic tension strength of granite and concrete materials under high strain- rate[J]. Journal of Xi¢an University of Architecture and Technology：Natural Science，2009，41(3)：334–339.(in Chinese))

[15] 宋小林，谢和平，王启智. 大理岩动态劈裂试样的破坏应变[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2005，24(16)：2 953–2 959.(SONG Xiaolin，XIE Heping，WANG Qizhi. Failure strain of Brazilian disc samples of marble under dynamic split tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2005，24(16)：2 953–2 959.(in Chinese))

[16] 宫凤强，李夕兵，ZHAO J. 巴西圆盘劈裂试验中拉伸模量的解析算法[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2010，29(5)：881–891.(GONG Fengqiang，LI Xibing，ZHAO J. Analytical algorithm to estimate tensile modulus in Brazilian disk splitting tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2010，29(5)：881–891.(in Chinese))

[17] 王礼立. 应力波基础[M]. 2版. 北京：国防工业出版社，2010：5–64.(WANG Lili. Foundation of stress waves[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing：National Defense Industry Press，2010：5–64.(in Chinese))

[18] 刘孝敏，胡时胜. 应力脉冲在变截面SHPB锥杆中的传播特性[J]. 爆炸与冲击，2000，20(2)：110–114.(LIU Xiaomin，HU Shisheng. Wave propagation characteristics in cone bars used for variable cross- section SHPB[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves，2000，20(2)：110–114.(in Chinese))

[19] 董钢，巫绪涛，杨伯源，等. 直锥变截面Hopkinson压杆实验的数值模拟[J]. 合肥工业大学学报：自然科学版，2005，28(7)：795–798.(DONG Gang，WU Xutao，YANG Boyuan，et al. Numerical simulation of the conic variable cross-sectional SHPB[J]. Journal of Hefei University of Technology：Natural Science，2005，28(7)：795–798.(in Chinese))

[20] 中华人民共和国国家标准编写组. GB/T 23561—2010煤和岩石物理力学性质测定方法[S]. 北京：中国标准出版社，2010.(The National Standards Compilation Group of People¢s Republic of China. GB/T 23561—2010 Methods for determining the physical and mechanical properties of coal and rock[S]. Beijing：Standards Press of China，2010.(in Chinese))

[21] 王礼立，王永刚. 应力波在用SHPB研究材料动态本构特性中的重要作用[J]. 爆炸与冲击，2005，25(1)：17–25.(WANG Lili，WANG Yonggang. The important role of stress waves in the study of dynamic constitutive behavior of materials by SHPB[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves，2005，25(1)：17–25.(in Chinese))

[22] YANG L M，SHIM V P W. An analysis of stress uniformity in split Hopkinson bar test specimens[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering，2005，31(2)：129–150.

[23] 毛勇建，李玉龙. SHPB试验中试件的轴向应力均匀性[J]. 爆炸与冲击，2008，28(9)：448–454.(MAO Yongjian，LI Yulong. Axial stress uniformity in specimens of SHPB tests[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves，2008，28(9)：448–454.(in Chinese))