|
|
|
| Seismic response characteristics of subsea shield tunnels considering seawater-stratum-structure coupling |
| DENG Hongyi1, LIU Chao1*, CUI Jie1, LIU Hai1, HUANG Xiangyun2 |
(1. School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510006, China;
2. Earthquake Engineering Research and Test Center, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510006, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The seismic dynamic response of subsea tunnels in complex hydrogeological environments is crucial for ensuring their safe operation. This study investigates the combined effects of soil-structure interaction (SSI), cover-to-diameter ratio (C/D), and hydrostatic-hydrodynamic pressures on tunnel lining responses, using the Shantou Bay Tunnel as a case study. The Davidenkov constitutive model is employed to characterize the nonlinear dynamic behavior of marine soils, while the coupled acoustic-structure method is integrated into the finite element model to capture the interaction between seawater, seabed, and structure. Results indicate that, under 0.2 g seismic excitation at a water depth of 50 m, the peak tunnel diameter deformation ratio with SSI is 23.74% greater than that without SSI. As the depth increases, the combined hydrostatic and hydrodynamic pressures amplify the deformation ratio by 6% to 42% compared to hydrostatic pressure alone, suggesting that neglecting hydrodynamic effects at significant depths would substantially underestimate structural deformation. Furthermore, when the tunnel C/D is 1.5, the additional impact of hydrodynamic pressure is only 9% to 14%, which is considerably lower than the 22% to 66% observed for a C/D of 0.9. Additionally, the hydrodynamic pressure on the seabed exhibits a non-uniform “double-peak and single-trough” distribution due to the presence of the tunnel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 陈建芹，冯晓燕，魏 怀. 中国水下隧道数据统计与分析(截至2023年底)[J]. 隧道建设(中英文)，2024，44(4)：826–881.(CHEN Jianqin，FENG Xiaoyan，WEI Huai. Statistics and analysis of underwater tunnels in China(by the end of 2023)[J]. Tunnel Construction，2024，44(4)：826–881.(in Chinese))
[2] 唐少辉，张晓平，刘 浩，等. 复杂地层水下盾构隧道工程难点及关键技术研究与展望[J]. 工程地质学报，2021，29(5)：1 477–1 487. (TANG Shaohui，ZHANG Xiaoping，LIU Hao，et al. Engineering difficulties and key technologies for underwater shield tunnel in complex ground[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology，2021，29(5)：1 477–1 487.(in Chinese))
[3] XUE Y，ZHOU B，LI S，et al. Deformation rule and mechanical characteristic analysis of subsea tunnel crossing weathered trough[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology，2021，114：103989.
[4] CHEN P，GENG P，CHEN J，et al. The seismic damage mechanism of Daliang tunnel by fault dislocation during the 2022 Menyuan Ms 6.9 earthquake based on unidirectional velocity pulse input[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis，2023，145：107047.
[5] SHEN Y，GAO B，YANG X，et al. Seismic damage mechanism and dynamic deformation characteristic analysis of mountain tunnel after Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Engineering Geology，2014，180：85–98.
[6] 王国波，王亚西，陈 斌，等. 隧道–土体–地表结构相互作用体系地震响应影响因素分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2015，34(6)：1 276–1 287.(WANG Guobo，WANG Yaxi，CHEN Bin，et al. Analysis of factors influencing seismic responses of tunnel-soil-ground structural system[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2015，34(6)：1 276–1 287.(in Chinese))
[7] CHENG X，LI G，CHEN J，et al. Seismic response of a submarine tunnel under the action of a sea wave[J]. Marine Structures，2018，60：122–135.
[8] SHEKARI M R. A coupled numerical approach to simulate the effect of earthquake frequency content on seismic behavior of submarine tunnel[J]. Marine Structures，2021，75：102848.
[9] 唐雄俊，肖明清，焦齐柱，等. 甬舟铁路金塘海底隧道总体设计与关键技术研究[J]. 铁道标准设计，2021，65(10)：20–25.(TANG Xiongjun，XIAO Mingqing，JIAO Qizhu，et al. Investigation of overall design and key technology of Jintang subsea tunnel of Ningbo-Zhoushan Railway[J]. Railway Standard Design，2021，65(10)：20–25.(in Chinese))
[10] 肖明清，孙文昊，曲立清，等. 胶州湾第二海底隧道总体设计方案研究[J]. 隧道建设(中英文)，2023，43(2)：199–216.(XIAO Mingqing，SUN Wenhao，QU Liqing，et al. Study on general design of Second Jiaozhou Bay subsea tunnel[J]. Tunnel Construction，2023，43(2)：199–216.(in Chinese))
[11] 陈国兴，庄海洋. 基于Davidenkov骨架曲线的土体动力本构关系及其参数研究[J]. 岩土工程学报，2005，27(8)：860–864.(CHEN Guoxing，ZHUANG Haiyang. Developed nonlinear dynamic constitutive relations of soils based on Davidenkov skeleton curve[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2005，27(8)：860–864.(in Chinese))
[12] XU L，XI J，CAI F，et al. Dynamic response of subsea tunnel in liquefiable layered seabed under combined earthquake and wave action[J]. Ocean Engineering，2024，301：117595.
[13] ZHAO Z，CUI J，LIU C，et al. Seismic damage characteristics of large-diameter shield tunnel lining under extreme-intensity earthquake[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering，2023，171：107958.
[14] KUHLEMEYER R L，LYSMER J. Finite element method accuracy for wave propagation problems[J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division，1973，99(5)：421–427.
[15] RAWAT A，MITTAL V，CHAKRABORTY T，et al. Earthquake induced sloshing and hydrodynamic pressures in rigid liquid storage tanks analyzed by coupled acoustic-structural and Euler-Lagrange methods[J]. Thin-Walled Structures，2019，134：333–346.
[16] LIU C，DENG H，LIU H，et al. Seismic response of a subsea shield tunnel considering water-stratum-structure interaction[J]. Ocean Engineering，2025，330：121228.
[17] HARDIN B O，DRNEVICH V P. Shear modulus and damping in soils： design equations and curves[J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics Foundations Division，1972，98(7)：667–692.
[18] MARTIN P P，SEED H B. One-dimensional dynamic ground response analyses[J]. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division，1982，108(7)：935–952.
[19] 赵丁凤，阮滨，陈国兴，等. 基于Davidenkov骨架曲线模型的修正不规则加卸载准则与等效剪应变算法及其验证[J]. 岩土工程学报，2017，39(5)：888–895.(ZHAO Dingfeng，RUAN Bin，CHEN Guoxing，et al. Validation of modified irregular loading-unloading rules based on Davidenkov skeleton curve and its equivalent shear strain algorithm implemented in ABAQUS[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2017，39(5)：888–895.(in Chinese))
[20] PYKE R M. Nonlinear soil models for irregular cyclic loadings[J]. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division，1979，105(6)：715–726.
[21] 张 劲，王庆扬，胡守营，等. ABAQUS混凝土损伤塑性模型参数验证[J]. 建筑结构，2008，38(8)：127–130.(ZHANG Jin，WANG Qingyang，HU Shouying，et al. Parameters verification of concrete damaged plastic model of ABAQUS[J]. Building Structure，2008，38(8)：127–130.(in Chinese))
[22] 刘晶波，王振宇，杜修力，等. 波动问题中的三维时域黏弹性人工边界[J]. 工程力学，2005，22(6)：46–51.(LIU Jingbo，WANG Zhenyu，DU Xiuli，et al. Three-dimensional visco-elastic artificial boundaries in time domain for wave motion problems[J]. Engineering Mechanics，2005，22(6)：46–51.(in Chinese))
[23] 马笙杰，迟明杰，陈红娟，等. 黏弹性人工边界在ABAQUS中的实现及地震动输入方法的比较研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2020，39(7)：1 445–1 457.(MA Shengjie，CHI Mingjie，CHEN Hongjuan，et al. Implementation of viscous-spring boundary in ABAQUS and comparative study on seismic motion input methods[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2020，39(7)：1 445–1 457.(in Chinese))
[24] CHEN W，LIN J，ZHENG Y，et al. Nonlinear seismic response of seabed with terrain variation and seawater-seabed coupling[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering，2024，180：108579. |
|
|
|
2026, Vol. 45 
