粉砂质泥岩常规力学、蠕变以及应力松弛特性的对比研究

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (342 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The conventional mechanical，creep and stress relaxation tests of saturated silty mudstone are carried out under triaxial compression with same confining pressure. Based on the test results，the axial strengths of the specimens in three mechanical tests are compared；and the peak axial strains of the specimens are also compared. Then the differences of axial strengths and peak axial strains of the specimens among tests are explained from the view point of rock failure mechanism respectively. Burgers model is selected to describe the creep and stress relaxation properties of silty mudstone. According to the identification results，shear moduli G of the specimens obtained from the conventional mechanical test are compared respectively with instantaneous shear moduli G1 of the specimens identified by the creep model and the stress relaxation model，and the parameter values of the creep model are compared with those of the stress relaxation model. The analysis results show that：(1) The axial strength of the specimens in the conventional mechanical test is the highest，followed by the creep test，and that in the stress relaxation test is the lowest. (2) The peak axial strain of the specimens in the conventional mechanical test is the highest，followed by the stress relaxation test，and that in the creep test is the lowest. (3) Shear modulus G is 64.5 times larger than instantaneous shear modulus G1 of the creep model，and 86.8 times larger than instantaneous shear modulus G1 of the stress relaxation model. (4) Through comparing the values of G1，G2，?1 and ?2 between the creep model and the stress relaxation model，it is found that each of four parameter values of the creep model is larger than that of the stress relaxation model. It is also found that the values of G1of the two models are close，and that the differences among the orders of magnitude of the values of G2，?1 and ?2 of the two models are 1 to 2 series. The difference in the values of G2 is the largest and the difference in the values of ?1 is the smallest between the two models. Moreover，it is shown that the differences in the values of ?1 and ?2 are larger than those of G1 and G2 between the two models. The results indicate that ?1 and ?2 have a great effect on the creep and stress relaxation properties of silty mudstone. (5) The results of comparison between the two models verify the correctness of the creep and stress relaxation parameters. The results show that the creep properties of silty mudstone are not equivalent to its stress relaxation properties，the stress relaxation properties of silty mudstone can?t be deduced simply from its creep properties，which is different from linear viscoelastic materials.　

Key words： rock mechanics conventional mechanics creep stress relaxation axial strength peak axial strain Burgers model parameters

Received: 13 June 2011

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors

Cite this article:

URL:

https://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/EN/Y2012/V31/I1/60

[1] 卢允德，葛修润，蒋宇，等. 大理岩常规三轴压缩全过程试验和本构方程的研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2004，23(15)：2 489–2 493. (LU Yunde，GE Xiurun，JIANG Yu，et al. Study of conventional triaxial compression test of complete process for marble and its constitutive equation[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2004，23(15)：2 489–2 493.(in Chinese)) [2] 何满潮，谢和平，彭苏萍，等. 深部开采岩体力学研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2005，24(16)：2 803–2 813.(HE Manchao，XIE Heping，PENG Suping，et al. Study of rock mechanics in deep mining engineering[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2005，24(16)：2 803–2 813.(in Chinese)) [3] 代高飞，夏才初，晏成. 龙滩工程岩石试件在拉伸条件下的变形特性试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2005，24(3)：384–388. (DAI Gaofei，XIA Caichu，YAN Cheng. Testing study of deformation behavior of rock in Longtan hydropower project under tensile condition[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2005，24(3)：384–388.(in Chinese)) [4] 尤明庆，苏承东，缑勇. 大理岩孔道试样的强度及变形特性的试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2007，26(12)：2 420–2 429.(YOU Mingqing，SU Chengdong，GOU Yong. Experimental study of strength and deformation properties of hollow cylindrical specimens of marbles[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2007，26(12)：2 420–2 429.(in Chinese)) [5] 陈建胜，陈从新，鲁祖德，等. 强风化角岩力学–变形特性的直剪试验研究[J]. 岩土力学，2010，31(9)：2 869–2 874.(CHEN Jiansheng，CHEN Congxin，LU Zude，et al. Direct shear test for strength and deformation characteristics of highly decomposed hornfels[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2010，31(9)：2 869–2 874.(in Chinese)) [6] SUN J，HU Y Y. Time-dependent effects on the tensile strength of saturated granite at the Three Gorges project in China[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，1997，34(2)：323–337. [7] LI J L，WANG L H，WANG X X，et al. Research on unloading nonlinear mechanical characteristics of jointed rock masses[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering，2010，2(4)：357–364. [8] 徐卫亚，杨圣奇，杨松林，等. 绿片岩三轴流变力学特性的研究(I)：试验结果[J]. 岩土力学，2005，26(4)：531–537.(XU Weiya，YANG Shengqi，YANG Songlin，et al. Investigation on triaxial rheological mechanical properties of green schist specimen(I)：experimental results[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2005，26(4)：531–537.(in Chinese)) [9] 王志俭，殷坤龙，简文星，等. 三峡库区万州红层砂岩流变特性试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2008，27(4)：840–847.(WANG Zhijian，YIN Kunlong，JIAN Wenxing，et al. Experimental study of rheological behaviors of Wanzhou red sandstone in Three Gorges reservoir area[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2008，27(4)：840–847.(in Chinese)) [10] 朱珍德，李志敬，朱明礼，等. 岩体结构面剪切流变试验及模型参数反演分析[J]. 岩土力学，2009，30(1)：99–104.(ZHU Zhende，LI Zhijing，ZHU Mingli，et al. Shear rheological experiment on rock mass discontinuities and back analysis of model parameters[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2009，30(1)：99–104.(in Chinese)) [11] 韩庚友，王思敬，张晓平，等. 分级加载下薄层状岩石蠕变特性研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2010，29(11)：2 239–2 247.(HAN Gengyou，WANG Sijing，ZHANG Xiaoping，et al. Study of creep properties of thinly laminated rock under step loading[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2010，29(11)：2 239– 2 247.(in Chinese)) [12] 李永盛. 单轴压缩条件下四种岩石的蠕变和松弛试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，1995，14(1)：39–47.(LI Yongsheng. Creep and relaxation of four kinds of rock under uniaxial compression tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，1995，14(1)：39–47.(in Chinese)) [13] 杨春和，殷建华，DAEMEN J J K. 盐岩应力松弛效应的研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报，1999，18(3)：262–265.(YANG Chunhe，YIN Jianhua，DAEMEN J J K. The investigation of stress relaxation of salt rock[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，1999，18(3)：262–265.(in Chinese)) [14] 唐礼忠，潘长良. 岩石在峰值荷载变形条件下的松弛试验研究[J]. 岩土力学，2003，24(6)：940–942.(TANG Lizhong，PAN Changliang. Experiment study of properties of stress relaxation of rock under deformation at peak load[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2003，24(6)：940–942.(in Chinese)) [15] 李铀，朱维申，彭意，等. 某地红砂岩多轴受力状态蠕变松弛特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学，2006，27(8)：1 248–1 252.(LI You，ZHU Weishen，PENG Yi，et al. Multi-axial experimental study of creep and relaxation properties of red sandstone from somewhere[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2006，27(8)：1 248–1 252.(in Chinese)) [16] 熊良宵，杨林德，张尧. 绿片岩多轴受压应力松弛试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报，2010，32(8)：1 158–1 165.(XIONG Liangxiao，YANG Linde，ZHANG Yao. Stress relaxation tests on green schist speciments under multi-axial compression[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2010，32(8)：1 158–1 165.(in Chinese)) [17] 于怀昌，周敏，刘汉东，等. 粉砂质泥岩三轴压缩应力松弛特性试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2011，30(4)：803–811.(YU Huaichang，ZHOU Min，LIU Handong，et al. Experimental investigation on stress relaxation properties of silty mudstone under triaxial compression[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2011，30(4)：803–811.(in Chinese)) [18] 于怀昌，李亚丽，刘汉东. 粉砂质泥岩三轴压缩应力松弛本构模型研究[J]. 煤炭学报，2011，36(8)：1 258–1 263.(YU Huaichang，LI Yali，LIU Handong. Study of stress relaxation model of silty mudstone under triaxial compression[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2011，36(8)：1 258–1 263.(in Chinese)) [19] International Society for Rock Mechanics. Suggested methods for determining the strength of rock material in triaxial compression[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts，1978，15(2)：47–51. [20] 中国人民共和国行业标准编写组. SL264—2001水利水电工程岩石试验规程[S]. 北京：中国水利水电出版社，2001.(The Professional Standards Compilation Group of People?s Republic of China. SL264—2001 Specifications for rock tests in water conservancy and hydroelectric engineering[S]. Beijing：China Water Power Press，2001.(in Chinese)) [21] 于怀昌，李亚丽. 粉砂质泥岩常规三轴压缩试验与本构方程研究[J].人民长江，2011，42(13)：56–60.(YU Huaichang，LI Yali. Research on conventional triaxial compression test and constitutive model of silty mudstone[J]. Yangtze River，2011，42(13)：56–60.(in Chinese)) [22] 于怀昌. 三峡地区巴东组粉砂质泥岩流变力学特性的研究及其工程应用[博士学位论文][D]. 武汉：中国地质大学，2010.(YU Huaichang. Study of rheological mechanical properties of silty mudstone of Badong formation in Three Gorges area and its engineering applications[Ph. D. Thesis][D]. Wuhan：China University of Geosciences，2010.(in Chinese)) [23] 刘雄. 岩石流变学概论[M]. 北京：地质出版社，1994：40–43.(LIU Xiong. An introduction to rock rheology[M]. Beijing：Geological Publishing House，1994：40–43.(in Chinese)) [24] 李青麟. 软岩蠕变参数的曲线拟合计算方法[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，1998，17(5)：559–564.(LI Qinglin. Curve fitting method for creep parameter of soft rock[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，1998，17(5)：559–564.(in Chinese)) [25] 丁秀丽，付敬，刘建，等. 软硬互层边坡岩体的蠕变特性研究及稳定性分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2005，24(19)：3 410– 3 418.(DING Xiuli，FU Jing，LIU Jian，et al. Study of creep behavior of alternatively distributed soft and hard rock layers and slope stability analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2005，24(19)：3 410–3 418.(in Chinese)) [26] 刘小伟. 引洮工程红层软岩隧洞工程地质研究[博士学位论文][D]. 兰州：兰州大学，2008.(LIU Xiaowei. Study of engineering geology of red bed soft rock tunnel in Yintao Project[Ph. D. Thesis][D]. Lanzhou：Lanzhou University，2008.(in Chinese))