圆盘厚径比对岩石劈裂抗拉强度影响的试验研究

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (346 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Because the Brazilian disc tensile strength formula is the analytic solution based on elastic mechanics plane problems，the results calculated by this formula are very different with the direct tension test results. Based on this，splitting tensile test on more than 100 sandstone disc specimens with different thickness-to-diameter ratios are conducted. The test results show that the tensile strength increases gradually with the decreasing thickness- to-diameter ratio；when the thickness-to-diameter ratio is less than 0.3，the tensile strength gradually increases and tends to a relatively stable value；and the change curve can be better simulated with cubic function. In order to fully grasp the effect of thickness-to-diameter ratio on tensile strength，3D finite element models with different thickness-to-diameter ratios are established especially；and the distribution law of equivalent stress on disc central axis is studied in detail. The study results show that the maximum tensile stress on central axis appears in the center of the specimen end face；and the larger the specimen thickness-to-diameter ratio is，the greater the tensile stress in the center of disc end face is. The first fracture starting point is in the center of end face not in the internal center point；and the 3D finite element calculation results can provide a favorable evidence for the distribution law of tensile strength accurately. According to the multivariate linear regression of the 3D finite element calculation results，a modified formula of the Brazilian disc splitting strength considering the thickness-to- diameter ratio is given；and the modified formula has better applicability. The research results provide favorable evidence for testing tensile strength of rock accurately.

Key words： rock mechanics Brazilian splitting test tensile strength thickness-to-diameter ratio

Received: 08 October 2011

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors

Cite this article:

URL:

https://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/EN/Y2012/V31/I4/792

[1] 中华人民共和国国家标准编写组. GB/T50266—99工程岩体试验方法标准[S]. 北京：中国计划出版社，1999.(The National Standards Compilation Group of People?s Republic of China. GB/T50266—99 Standard for tests method of engineering rock masses[S]. Beijing：China Planning Press，1999.(in Chinese)) [2] 中华人民共和国行业标准编写组. SL264—2001水利水电工程岩石试验规程[S]. 北京：中国水利水电出版社，2001.(The Professional Standard Compilation Group of People?s Republic of China. SL264—2001 Specifications for rock tests in water conservancy and hydroelectric engineering[S]. Beijing：China Water Power Press，2001.(in Chinese)) [3] GUO H，AZIZ N I，SHMIDT L C. Rock fracture toughness determination by the Brazilian test[J]. Engineering Geology，1993，33(3)：177–178. [4] 贾学明，王启智. 标定ISRM岩石断裂韧度新型试样CCNDB的应力强度因子[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2003，22(8)：1 227–1 233. (JIA Xueming，WANG Qizhi. Stress intensity factors of international society for rock mechanics(ISRM) suggested cracked chevron notched Brazilian disk(CCNDB) specimen used for mode fracture toughness determination[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2003，22(8)：1 227–1 233.(in Chinese)) [5] 杨同，王宝学，孙林，等. 垫条方式对岩石劈裂试验的影响分析[J]. 勘察科学技术，2002，(1)：3–7.(YANG Tong，WANG Baoxue，SUN Lin，et al. Effects of various spacer methods for rock split tests[J]. Site Investigation Science and Technology，2002，(1)：3–7.(in Chinese)) [6] TANG C A，THAM L G，LEE P K K，et al. Numerical studies on the influence of microstructure on rock failure in uniaxial compression [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2000，37(4)：571–583. [7] 徐根，陈枫，肖建清. 载荷接触条件对岩石抗拉强度的影响[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2006，25(1)：168–173.(XU Gen，CHEN Feng，XIAO Jianqing. Influence of load contact condition on rock tensile strength[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2006，25(1)：168–173.(in Chinese)) [8] 张少华，缪协兴，赵海云. 试验方法对岩石抗拉强度测定的影响[J]. 中国矿业大学学报，1999，28(3)：243–246.(ZHANG Shaohua，MIAO Xiexing，ZHAO Haiyun. Influence of test methods on measured results of rock tensile strength[J]. Journal of China University of Mining and Technology，1999，28(3)：243–246.(in Chinese)) [9] 王启智，贾学明. 用平台巴西圆盘试样确定脆性岩石的弹性模量、拉伸强度和断裂韧度——第一部分：解析与数值结果[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2002，21(9)：1 285–1 289.(WANG Qizhi，JIA Xueming. Determination of elastic modulus，tensile strength and fracture toughness of brittle rocks by using flattened Brazilian disc specimen—part 1：analytical and numerical results[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2002，21(9)：1 285–1 289.(in Chinese)) [10] WANG Q Z，XING L. Determination of fracture toughness KIC by using the flattened Brazilian disk specimen for rocks[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics，1999，64(2)：193–201. [11] 王启智，吴礼舟. 用平台巴西圆盘试样确定脆性岩石的弹性模量、拉伸强度和断裂韧度——第二部分：试验结果[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2004，23(2)：199–204.(WANG Qizhi，WU Lizhou. Determination of elastic modulus，tensile strength and fracture toughness of brittle rocks by using flattened Brazilian disk specimen—part 2：experimental results[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2004，23(2)：199–204.(in Chinese)) [12] 张盛，梁亚磊，李大伟. 圆盘厚度对岩石抗拉强度公式的影响性研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报，2009，26(4)：450–454.(ZHANG Sheng，LIANG Yalei，LI Dawei. Effect of disc thickness on rock tensile strength formula[J]. Journal of Mining and Safety Engineering，2009，26(4)：450–454.(in Chinese)) [13] 喻勇，陈平. 岩石巴西圆盘试验中的空间拉应力分布[J]. 岩土力学，2005，26(12)：1 913–1 916.(YU Yong，CHEN Ping. Spatial distribution of tensile stress in Brazilian disc test of rock[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2005，26(12)：1 913–1 916.(in Chinese)) [14] 邓华锋，李建林，邓成进，等. 岩石力学试验中试样选择和抗压强度预测方法研究[J]. 岩土力学，2011，32(11)：3 399–3 403.(DENG Huafeng，LI Jianlin，DENG Chengjin，et al. Analysis of sampling in rock mechanics test and compressive strength prediction methods[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2011，32(11)：3 399–3 403.(in Chinese)) [15] 叶明亮，续建科，牟宏. 岩石抗拉强度试验方法的探讨[J]. 贵州工业大学学报：自然科学版，2001，30(6)：19–25.(YE Mingliang，XU Jianke，MU Hong. Approach to test method of rock strength in uniaxial tension[J]. Journal of Guizhou University of Technology：Natural Science，2001，30(6)：19–25.(in Chinese)) [16] 窦庆峰，岳顺，代高飞. 岩石直接拉伸试验与劈裂试验的对比研究[J]. 地下空间，2004，24(2)：178–181.(DOU Qingfeng，YUE Shun，DAI Gaofei. Comparative Study on direct tension test and splitting test of rock[J]. Underground Space，2004，24(2)：178–181.(in Chinese)) [17] 喻勇. 质疑岩石巴西圆盘拉伸强度试验[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2005，24(7)：1 150–1 157.(YU Yong. Questioning the validity of the Brazilian test for determining tensile strength of rocks[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2005，24(7)：1 150– 1 157.(in Chinese)) [18] 朱腾华，杨圣奇，苏承东. 大理岩抗拉强度的离散性及与厚度的关系[J]. 焦作工学院学报：自然科学版，2003，22(6)：469–471.(ZHU Tenghua，YANG Shengqi，SU Chengdong. Size effect and discreteness of splitting tensile strength of marble[J]. Journal of Jiaozuo Institute of Technology：Natural Science，2003，22(6)：469–471.(in Chinese))