|
|
|
| STUDY OF TRUE TRIAXIAL STRENGTH PARAMETERS IN UNLOADING PATH OF MARBLES IN DEEP TUNNEL |
| ZHOU Huoming1，SHAN Zhigang2，LI Weishu1，FAN Lei1，XU Jinsong3，ZHOU Chunhong2 |
(1. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Mechanics and Engineering of Ministry of Water Resources，Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute，Wuhan，Hubei 430010，China；2. HydroChina Huadong Engineering Corporation，Hangzhou，Zhejiang 310014，
China；3. Ertan Hydropower Development Company Ltd.，Chengdu，Sichuan 610021，China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract In order to study the failure characteristics of the deep surrounding rocks in unloading path，in-situ true triaxial unloading tests under high pressure were carried out in the field deep experimental adit. The tests have features such as large scale(50 cm ×50 cm×100 cm)，high stress( = 11.2 MPa)，unloading fracture of . This true triaxial test can represent the real stress states of surrounding rocks of deep tunnel and the complete stress-strain curve of marbles in tunnel excavation stress path；and the triaxial strength of rock mass can be obtained. Based on the in-situ true triaxial test of marbles under high pressure in unloading path，Hoek-Brown(H-B) empirical strength criterion is adopted to study the true triaxial strength parameters of marbles in unloading path. The research results are as follows：(1) The values of true triaxial strength parameters in unloading path which are evaluated by using H-B empirical strength criterion may be relatively lower than those in in-situ true triaxial unloading test. The evaluated empirical parameter s is 0.003 951 7， is 3.414. However，the inverse computation parameters according to the test results s = 0.095 53， is 12.208. (2) Based on the evaluated results of rock strength by using H-B empirical strength criterion，Mohr-Coulomb criterion is used to evaluate the values of strength parameters. The true triaxial strength parameters of marbles in unloading path，tan? is 1.39，c is 6.61 MPa，while the true triaxial strength parameters of undisturbed marbles in unloading path，tan? is 1.60，c is 6.73 MPa. The former can stand for unloading damage rock mass.
|
|
Received: 18 April 2012
|
|
|
|
| [1] 侯哲生，龚秋明，孙卓恒. 锦屏二级水电站深埋完整大理岩基本破坏方式及其发生机制[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2011，30(4)：727–732.(HOU Zhesbeng，GONG Qiuming，SUN Zhuoheng. Primary failure types and their failure mechanisms of deep and intact marble at Jinping II hydropower station[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2011，30(4)：727–732.(in Chinese))
[2] HOEK E，BROWN E T. Empirical strength criterion for rock mass[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division，1980，106(9)：1 013–1 035.
[3] HOEK E，BROWN E T. Practical estimates of rock mass strength[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts，1997，34(8)：1 165–1 186.
[4] 宋建波，张倬元. 岩体经验强度准则在地质工程中研究和应用现状[J]. 地球科学进展，2004，19(增)：305–310.(SONG Jianbo，ZHANG Zhuoyuan. The research present state comment on rock mass empirical strength criterion applied to geotechnical engineering[J]. Advance in Earth Sciences，2004，19(Supp.)：305–310.(in Chinese))
[5] 巫德斌，徐卫亚. 基于Hoek-Brown准则的边坡开挖岩体力学参数研究[J]. 河海大学学报：自然科学版，2005，23(1)：89–93.(WU Debin，XU Weiya. Hoek-Brown criterion-based study on mechanical parameters of excavated slope rock masses[J]. Journal of Hohai University：Natural Sciences，2005，23(1)：89–93.(in Chinese))
[6] 刘亚群，李海波，李俊如，等. 基于Hoek-Brown准则的板岩强度特征研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2009，28(增2)：3 452–3 457.(LIU Yaqun，LI Haibo，LI Junru，et al. Study on strength characteristics of slates based on Hoek-Brown criterion[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2009，28(Supp.2)：3 452–3 457.(in Chinese))
[7] 刘树新，刘长武，袁绍国，等. 基于V. RQD值与 Hoek-Brown准则的破碎岩体强度研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2010，29(8)：1 670–1 676.(LIU Shuxin，LIU Changwu，YUAN Shaoguo，et al. Study of broken rock mass strength based on V. RQD value and Hoek-Brown criterion[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2010，29(8)：1 670–1 676.(in Chinese)) |
|
|
|
2012, Vol. 31 
