|
|
|
| STUDY OF RELEVANCY BETWEEN STRESS WAVE TIME DELAYS AND STIFFNESS OF STRUCTURAL SURFACE |
| ZHOU Jian1,2,ZHANG Luqing1 |
| (1. Key Laboratory of Engineering Geomechanics,Institute of Geology and Geophysics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100029,China;2. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract First of all,the transmission coefficient and the reflection coefficient of P wave crossing a elastic joint are deduced based on the theories both of elastic waves and displacement discontinuity. According to the stress wave time delay theory,the analytical solution of phase delay and group delay are given when the joint obeys the elastic Hooke?s theory. A universal distinct element code(UDEC) is used to simulate stress waves propagation in rocks with a single joint and five parallel joints,respectively. And the incidence stress wave is cosine Gauss pulse. All of the main research results can be summarized as follows. (1) When P wave transmitting the rock model with only a single joint,the phase delay is consistent with the analytical solution calculating from the unfiltered waves,while the group delay deviates from the analytical solution. After the 97–103 Hz band-pass filtered,the phase delay and group delay are both consistent with the analytical solution. (2) For the rock models with multiparallel joints,when the distance of these joints is larger than one half of the wave length of the cosine Gauss pulse,the group delay from filtered wave is more or less in line with the analytical solution. However,if the distance of these joints is smaller than one half of the wave length,the phase delay and group delay both deviate from the analytical solution. (3) As we all know,the wave-front is never disturbed by the multiple reflection. The wave-front delays of three multiparallel joints models are in line with each other under different joint stiffnesses,and the difference between these delays and the analytical results is limited. Under the assumption that the joint is a liner elastic model,the results of this research can be used to predict the joint stiffness or number of joints in rock masses.
|
|
Received: 06 August 2012
|
|
|
|
| [1] SCHOENBERG M. Elastic wave behavior across linear slip interface[J]. Journal Acoustic Society of America,1980,68(5):1 516– 1 521.
[2] PYRAK-NOLTE L J,MYER L R. Transmission of seismic waves across single natural fracture[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research,1990,95(B6):8 617–8 638.
[3] PYRAK-NOLTE L J,MYER L R. Anisotropy in seismic velocities and amplitudes from multiple parallel fractures[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research,1990,95(B7):11 345–11 358.
[4] NOLTE D D,PYRAK-NOLTE L J,BEACHY J,et al. Transition from the displacement discontinuity limit to the resonant scattering regime for fracture interface waves[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciencess,2000,37(1):219–230.
[5] 卢文波. 应力波与可滑移岩石界面间的相互作用研究[J]. 岩土力学,1996,17(3):70–75.(LU Wenbo. A study on interaction between stress wave and slipping rock interface[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,1996,17(3):70–75.(in Chinese))
[6] CAI J G,ZHAO J. Effects of multiple parallel fracture on apparent wave attenuation in rock masses[J]. International of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,2000,37(4),661–682.
[7] ZHAO J,CAI J G. Transmission of elastic P-waves across single fracture with nonlinear normal deformational behavior[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering,2001,34(1):3–22.
[8] ZHAO J,ZHAO X B,CAI J G. A further study of elastic P-waves across parallel fractures with nonlinear normal deformational behavior[J]. International of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,2006,43(5):661–682.
[9] ZHAO J,CAI J G,ZHAO X B,LI H B. Dynamic model of fracture normal behavior and application to prediction of stress wave attenuation across fractures[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering,2008,41(5):671–693.
[10] LI J C,MA G W,ZHAO J. An equivalent viscoelastic model for rock masses with parallel fractures[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research,2010,doi:10.1029/2008JB006241.
[11] LEMOS J V. A distinct element model for dynamic analysis of jointed rock with application to dam foundation and fault motion[Ph. D. Thesis][D]. Minnesota:University of Minnesota,1987.
[12] CHEN S G,ZHAO J. A study of UDEC modeling for blast wave propagation in jointed rock masses[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts,1996,35(1):93–98.
[13] WANG W H,LI X B,ZUO Y J,et al. 3DEC modeling on effect of joints and interlayer on wave propagation[J]. Transaction of Nonferrous Metals Society of China,2006,16(3):728–734.
[14] 石 崇,徐卫亚,周家文. 二维波穿过非线性节理面的透射性能研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2007,26(8):1 645–1 652.(SHI Chong,XU Weiya,ZHOU Jiawen. Research on transmission behaviors of nonlinear joints with 2D wave propagation[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2007,26(8):1 645–1 652.(in Chinese))
[15] 周 剑,张路青,胡瑞林,等. 大型结构面产状影响下应力波传播规律研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2011,30(4):769–780.(ZHOU Jian,ZHANG Luqing,HU Ruilin,et al. Study of rules of stress waves propagation under various attitudes of large-scale fractures[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanical and Engineering,2011,30(4):769–780.(in Chinese))
[16] SEZAWA K,KANAI K. A fault surface or a block absorbs seismic wave energy[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Research Institute,University of Tokyo,1940,18(4):465–482.
[17] SCHEBAUM F. Analysis of digital earthquake signals[M]. [S. n.]:Academic Press,2002:349–355
[18] CUNDALL P A. A computer model for simulating progressive large-scale movements in blocky rock systems[C]// Proceedings of Symposium of International Society of Rock Mechanics. Nancy:[s.n.],l971:11–18. |
|
|
|