摆锤冲击加载下砂岩中应变率动力特性的试验研究

doi:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2014.12.009

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (6204 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract By using the pendulum hammer driven SHPB apparatus，the ideal incident waveform is generated by changing the shape and by controlling the impact velocity of the pendulum hammer. The compressive test and Brazilian test of sandstone specimens were conducted using the pendulum hammer driven split Hopkinson pressure bar(SHPB) apparatus，and the variation of dynamic compressive strength and dynamic tensile strength under different impact velocity of the pendulum hammer is examined. The strain rate ranging from 100/s to 102/s，which is generally considered as intermediate strain rate，is measured during the dynamic compression test，and the loading rate corresponding to the tensile stress at center of rock disc，ranging from 100 GPa/s to 400 GPa/s，are generated during the dynamic Brazilian test. The dynamic compressive strength and dynamic tensile strength of the sandstone samples increase with the impact velocity，showing an obvious strain-rate dependency. During the dynamic Brazilian test the sandstone samples were finally separated into two halves along the loading diameter. The V-shaped failure zone at the contact area between the incident and transmitted bars and the rock specimen becomes larger with the increasing impact velocity. The advantage of the pendulum hammer driven SHPB apparatus is that the ideal incident stress waveform can be excited by the pendulum hammer，and it can supply a feasible experimental method to measure the dynamic strength and failure process of the rock under the intermediate strain rate.

Key words： rock mechanics intermediate strain rate SHPB testimpacted by pendulum hammer dynamic Brazilian test

Received: 28 October 2013

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors

Cite this article:

URL:

https://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/EN/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2014.12.009 OR https://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/EN/Y2014/V33/I12/2443

[1] CHONG K P，HOYT P M，SMITH J W，et al. Effects of strain rate on oil shale fracturing[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts，1980，17(1)：35–43. [2] GRADY D E，KIPP M E. Continuum modelling of explosive fracture in oil shale[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts，1980，17(3)：147–157. [3] CAI M，KAISER P K，SUORINENI F，et al. A study on the dynamic behavior of the Meuse/Haute-Marne argillite[J]. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth，2007，32(8/14)：907–916. [4] 梁昌玉，李晓，李守定，等. 岩石静态和准动态加载应变率的界限值研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2012，31(6)：1 156–1 161. (LIANG Changyu，LI Xiao，LI Shouding，et al. Study of strain rates threshold value between static loading and quasi-dynamic loading of rock[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2012，31(6)：1 156–1 161.(in Chinese)) [5] ZHAO J，LI H B. Experimental determination of dynamic tensile properties of a granite[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2000，37(5)：861–866. [6] LI X B，LOK T S，ZHAO J，et al. Oscillation elimination in the Hopkinson bar apparatus and resultant complete dynamic stress-strain curves for rocks[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2000，37(7)：1 055–1 060. [7] 周子龙，李夕兵，岩小明. 岩石SHPB测试中试样恒应变率变形的加载条件[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2009，28(12)：2 445–2 452. (ZHOU Zilong，LI Xibing，YAN Xiaoming. Loading condition for specimen deformation at constant strain rate in SHPB test of rocks[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2009，28(12)：2 445–2 452.(in Chinese)) [8] WANG Q Z，LI W，SONG X L. A method for testing dynamic tensile strength and elastic modulus of rock materials using SHPB[J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics，2006，163(5)：1 091–1 100. [9] 宋小林，谢和平，王启智. 大理岩的高应变率动态劈裂实验[J]. 应用力学学报，2005，22(3)：419–425.(SONG Xiaolin，XIE Heping，WANG Qizhi. High strain rate dynamic split tests of marble[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics，2005，22(3)：419–425.(in Chinese)) [10] ZHU W C，BAI Y，LI X B，et al. Numerical simulation on rock failure under combined static and dynamic loading during SHPB tests[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering，2012，49：142–157. [11] 张学峰，夏源明. 中应变率材料试验机的研制[J]. 实验力学，2001，16(1)：13–18.(ZHANG Xuefeng，XIA Yuanming. Development of material testing apparatus for intermediate strain rate test[J]. Journal of Experimental Mechanics，2001，16(1)：13–18.(in Chinese)) [12] 李夕兵，罗章，赵伏军. 中应变率下钢纤维混凝土受拉全过程实验研究[J]. 实验力学，2004，19(3)：301–309.(LI Xibing，LUO Zhang，ZHAO Fujun. Experimental study on the tensile behavior of steel fiber reinforced concrete[J]. Journal of Experimental Mechanics，2004，19(3)：301–309.(in Chinese)) [13] 李夕兵，左宇军，马春德. 中应变率下动静组合加载岩石的本构模型[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2006，25(5)：865–874.(LI Xibing，ZUO Yujun，MA Chunde. Constitutive model of rock under coupled static-dynamic loading with intermediate strain rate[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2006，25(5)：865–874.(in Chinese)) [14] 吴衡毅，马钢，夏源明. PMMA低、中应变率单向拉伸力学性能的实验研究[J]. 实验力学，2005，20(2)：193–199.(WU Hengyi， MA Gang，XIA Yuanming. Experimental study on mechanical properties of PMMA under unidirectional tensile at low and intermediate strain rates[J]. Journal of Experimental Mechanics，2005，20(2)：193–199.(in Chinese)) [15] 王斌，李夕兵，尹土兵，等. 饱水砂岩动态强度的SHPB试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2010，29(5)：1 003–1 009.(WANG Bin，LI Xibing，YIN Tubing，et al. Split Hopkinson pressure bar(SHPB) experiments on dynamic strength of water-saturated sandstone[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2010，29(5)：1 003–1 009.(in Chinese)) [16] Amercian Society of Testing and Materials. ASTM E23—2007 Standard test methods for notched bar impact testing of metallic materials[S]. USA：ASTM International，2007. [17] 刘瑞堂，周志方，张智峰，等. 摆锤冲击试验结果的统计分析[J]. 理化检验–物理分册，2006，42：343–344.(LIU Ruitang，ZHOU Zhifang，ZHANG Zhifeng，et al. Statistical analysis of charpy impact energy[J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis Part A：Physical Testing，2006，42：343–344.(in Chinese)) [18] LI J C，MA G W. Experimental study of stress wave propagation across a filled rock joint[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2009，46(3)：471–478. [19] DAVIES R M. A critical study of the Hopkinson pressure bar[C]// Proceedings of the Royal Society A—Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences. [S.l.]：[s.n.]，1948：375–457. [20] 赵习金，卢芳云，王悟，等. 入射波整形技术的实验和理论研究[J]. 高压物理学报，2004，18(3)：231–236.(ZHAO Xijin，LU Fangyun，WANG Wu，et al. The experimental and theoretical study on the incident pulse shaping technique[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics，2004，18(3)：231–236.(in Chinese)) [21] SONG B，CHEN W. Loading and unloading split Hopkinson pressure bar pulse-shaping techniques for dynamic hysteretic loops[J]. Experimental Mechanics，2004，44(6)：622–627. [22] NAGHDABADI R，ASHRAFI M J，ARGHAVANI J. Experimental and numerical investigation of pulse-shaped split Hopkinson pressure bar test[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A，2012，539：285–293. [23] RAMIREZ H，RUBIO-GONZALEZ C. Finite-element simulation of wave propagation and dispersion in Hopkinson bar test[J]. Materials and Design，2006，27(1)：36–44. [24] FREW D J，FORRESTAL M J，CHEN W. Pulse shaping techniques for testing elastic-plastic materials with a split Hopkinson pressure bar[J]. Experimental Mechanics，2005，45(2)：186–195. [25] CHEN W，LU F，FREW D J，et al. Dynamic compression testing of soft materials[J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics Transactions of the ASME，2002，69(3)：214–223. [26] YUAN Q L，LI Y L，LI H J，et al. Strain rate-dependent compressive properties of C/C composites[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A，2008，485(1/2)：632–637. [27] SEDIGHI M，KHANDAEI M，SHOKROLLAHI H. An approach in parametric identification of high strain rate constitutive model using Hopkinson pressure bar test results[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A，2010，527(15)：3 521–3 528. [28] LOK T S，LI X B，LIU D，et al. Testing and response of large diameter brittle materials subjected to high strain rate[J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering，2002，14(3)：262–269. [29] 李夕兵，周子龙，王卫华. 运用有限元和神经网络为SHPB 装置构造理想冲头[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2005，24(23)：4 215–4 218. (LI Xibing，ZHOU Zilong，WANG Weihua. Construction of ideal striker for SHPB device based on FEM and neural network[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2005，24(23)：4 215–4 218.(in Chinese)) [30] 刘孝敏，胡时胜. 应力脉冲在变截面SHPB锥杆中的传播特性[J]. 爆炸与冲击，2000，20(2)：110–114.(LIU Xiaomin，HU Shisheng. Wave propagation characteristics in cone bars used for variable cross section SHPB[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves，2000，20(2)：110–114.(in Chinese)) [31] ELLWOOD S，GRIFFITHS L J，PARRY D J. Materials testing at high constant strain rates[J]. Journal of Physics E-Scientific Instruments，1982，15(3)：280–282. [32] ZHOU Y X，XIA K，LI X B，et al. Suggested methods for determining the dynamic strength parameters and mode-I fracture toughness of rock materials[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2012，49：105–112. [33] 刘德顺，杨襄壁. 冲锤一杆撞击反问题研究(I)[J]. 中国有色金属学报，1995，5(1)：14–17.(LIU Deshun，YANG Xiangbi. Inverse problem between a striker and a bar impacting(I)[J]. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals，1995，5(1)：14–17.(in Chinese)) [34] 刘德顺，杨襄壁，李夕兵. 冲锤一杆撞击反问题研究(II)[J]. 中国有色金属学报，1995，5(4)：154–157.(LIU Deshun，YANG Xiangbi，LI Xibing. Inverse problem between a striker and a bar impacting(II)[J]. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals，1995，5(4)：154–157.(in Chinese)) [35] 刘德顺，朱萍玉，彭佑多，等. 应力波在杆形部件中的传播与反演设计[J]. 振动工程学报，2001，14(4)：482–486.(LIU Deshun，ZHU Pingyu，PENG Youduo，et al. Propagation and inverse design of stress wave in an elastic bar[J]. Journal of Vibration Engineering，2001，14(4)：482–486.(in Chinese)) [36] 徐小荷. 撞击凿入系统的数值计算方法[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，1984，3(1)：75–83.(XU Xiaohe. The digital calculation method of striking penetration system[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，1984，3(1)：75–83.(in Chinese)) [37] 邹定祥. 杆件纵向撞击面局部变形的非线性模型[J]. 东北大学学报：自然科学版，1980，(1)：121–129.(ZOU Dingxiang. A nonlinear theoretical model of the partial deformation on longitudinally striken surface bars[J]. Journal of Northeastern University：Natural Science，1980，(1)：121–129.(in Chinese)) [38] BLANTON T L. Effect of strain rates from 10－2 to 101 s－1 in triaxial compression tests on three rocks[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts，1981，18(1)：47–62. [39] KOBAYASHI R. On mechanical behaviors of rocks under various loading-rates[J]. Rock Mechanics in Japan，1970，(1)：56–58. [40] SANGHA C M，DHIR P K. Strength and deformation of rock subject to multiaxial compressive stresses[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts，1975，12(9)：277–282. [41] ZHU W C. Numerical modelling of the effect of rock heterogeneity on dynamic tensile strength[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering，2008，41(5)：771–779. [42] DAI F，HUANG S，XIA K W，et al. Some fundamental issues in dynamic compression and tension tests of rocks using split Hopkinson pressure bar[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering，2010，43(6)：657–666. [43] DAI F，XIA K W. Loading rate dependence of tensile strength anisotropy of Barre granite[J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics，2010，167(11)：1 419–1 432. [44] ZHANG Q B，ZHAO J. Determination of mechanical properties and full-field strain measurements of rock material under dynamic loads[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2013，60：423–439. [45] ZHU W C，TANG C A. Numerical simulation of Brazilian disk rock failure under static and dynamic loading[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2006，43(2)：236–252. [46] MAHABADI O K，COTTRELL B E，GRASSELLI G. An example of realistic modelling of rock dynamics problems：FEM/DEM simulation of dynamic Brazilian test on Barre granite[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering，2010，43(6)：707–716. [47] ZHOU Z L，ZOU Y，LI X B. Stress evolution and failure process of Brazilian disc under impact[J]. Journal of Central South University，2013，20(1)：172–177.