普立特大桥隧道锚现场模型试验研究——抗拔能力试验

doi:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2015.01.010

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (5327 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract In order to reveal the pullout mechanism of tunnel-type anchorages，the deformation characteristics and the potential failure patterns of surrounding rocks and to verify the design safety factor of the tunnel-type anchorage，a field model test with the similarity ratio of 1∶25 for tunnel-type anchorage was conducted in the exploration cave of the Puli Bridge. By performing the elasto-plastic and rheological tests under different loading conditions，the load transmission，deformation distributions and rheological characteristics of the anchorage and surrounding rocks were obtained. The test results show that the distribution curves of maximum deformation at the rear surfaces of anchorage and surrounding rocks exhibit symmetrical double-peak shapes，and those of the frontal surfaces exhibit upward convex shapes. The deformations at the rear surface are bigger than those at the frontal surface. The maximum deformation under 8P load(where，P is the design load) is only 61 μm，and the maximum deformation under 50P load is 566 μm. Due to the clamping effects of the surrounding rocks，the stress in the rear end diffuses very slowly to the front under overloading conditions. Under 50P load，the strain in the front end is only 3% of that in the rear end. The stress concentration clearly occurs at the rear end of the concrete anchorage and the strain is partly irreversible，i.e. the plastic deformation occurs. Having considered that the quality of rock masses at the testing area is better than the one of the prototype tunnel-type anchorage，the overloading stability coefficient is recommend to be larger than 8. As there is no observed rheological behavior under 6P load，the long-term stability coefficient is considered to be larger than 6.

Key words： rock mechanics Puli bridge tunnel-type anchorage field model test pullout mechanism clamping effect

Received: 12 December 2013

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors

Cite this article:

URL:

https://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/EN/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2015.01.010 OR https://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/EN/Y2015/V34/I1/93

[1] 中华人民共和国行业标准编写组. 公路悬索桥设计规范(报批稿)[S]. 北京：人民交通出版社，2002.(The Professional Standards Compilation Group of the People?s Republic of China. Design specification for highway suspension bridge(draft standard for approval)[S]. Beijing：China Communications Press，2002.(in Chinese)) [2] 夏才初，程鸿鑫，李荣强. 广东虎门大桥东锚碇现场结构模型试验研究[J]．岩石力学与工程学报，1997，16(6)：571–576.(XIA Caichu，CHENG Hongxin，LI Rongqiang. Testing study on field structure model of the east anchorage of Guangdong Humen Bridge[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，1997，16(6)：571–576.(in Chinese)) [3] 肖本职，吴相超，彭朝全. 重庆鹅公岩大桥隧道锚碇围岩稳定性[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2005，24(增2)：5 591–5 597.(XIAO Benzhi，WU Xiangchao，PENG Chaoquan. Stability of the anchorage wall rock of tunnel for Chongqing Egongyan bridge[J]．Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2005，24(Supp.2)：5 591–5 597.(in Chinese)) [4] 汪海滨，高波，孙振. 悬索桥隧道式锚碇系统力学行为研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2005，24(15)：2 728–2 735.(WANG Haibin，GAO Bo，SUN Zhen. Study on mechanical behavior of tunnel anchorage system for suspension bridge[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2005，24(15)：2 728–2 735.(in Chinese)) [5] 朱杰兵，邬爱清，黄正加，等. 四渡河特大悬索桥隧道锚模型拉拔试验研究[J]. 长江科学院院报，2006，23(4)：51–55.(ZHU Jiebing，WU Aiqing，HUANG Zhengjia，et al. Pulling test of anchorage model of Siduhe suspension bridge[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute，2006，23(4)：51–55.(in Chinese)) [6] 邬爱清，彭元诚，黄正加，等. 超大跨度悬索桥隧道锚承载特性的岩石力学综合研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2010，29(3)：433–441.(WU Aiqing，PENG Yuancheng，HUANG Zhengjia，et al. Rock mechanics comprehensive study of bearing capacity characteristics of tunnel anchorage for super-large span suspension bridge[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2010，29(3)：433–441.(in Chinese)) [7] 胡波，曾钱帮，饶旦，等. 锚碇–围岩系统在拉剪复合应力条件下的变形规律及破坏机制研究——以坝陵河特大岩锚悬索桥为例[J]. 岩石力学工程学报，2007，26(4)：712–719.(HU Bo，ZENG Qianbang，RAO Dan，et al. Study of deformation law and failure mechanism of anchorage-surrounding rock system under tensile-shear complex stresses—taking super-large suspension bridge on Baling river for example[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2007，26(4)：712–719.(in Chinese)) [8] 李永盛. 江阴长江公路大桥北锚碇模型试验研究[J]. 同济大学学报：自然科学版，1995，23(2)：134–140.(LI Yongsheng. Experimental study of the north anchorage of the Jiangyin Yangtze bridge[J]. Journal of Tongji University：Natural Science，1995，23(2)：134–140.(in Chinese)) [9] 程鸿鑫，夏才初，李荣强. 广东虎门大桥东锚碇岩体稳定性分析[J]. 同济大学学报，1995，23(3)：131–135.(CHENG Hongxin，XIA Caichu，LI Rongqiang. Stability analysis of the rock mass in the east anchoring area of Guangdong Humen Bridge[J]. Journal of Tongji University，1995，23(3)：131–135.(in Chinese)) [10] 曾钱帮，王思敬，彭运动，等. 坝陵河悬索桥西岸隧道式锚碇锚塞体长度方案比选的数值模拟研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质，2005，32(6)：66–70.(ZENG Qianbang，WANG Sijing，PENG Yundong，et al. Numerical simulation on scheme comparison between two concrete-plug lengths of west tunnel-type anchorage of Balinghe suspension bridge[J]. Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology，2005，32(6)：66–70.(in Chinese)) [11] 卫军，李昊，杨曼娟，等. 基于ABAQUS 平台的四渡河悬索桥隧道锚围岩稳定性分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2005，24(增1)：4 894–4 899.(WEI Jun，LI Hao，YANG Manjuan，et al. Stability analysis of rock around tunnel-type anchorage of Siduhe suspension bridge based on ABAQUS software[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2005，24(Supp.1)：4 894–4 899.(in Chinese)) [12] 董志宏，张奇华，丁秀丽，等. 矮寨悬索桥隧道锚碇稳定性数值分析[J]. 长江科学院院报，2005，22(6)：54–58.(DONG Zhihong，ZHANG Qihua，DING Xiuli，et al. Numerical analysis of rock mass stability in tunnel anchorage of Aizhai bridge[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute，2005，22(6)：54–58.(in Chinese)) [13] 张奇华，胡建华，陈国平，等. 矮寨大桥基础岩体稳定问题研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2012，31(12)：2 420–2 430.(ZHANG Qihua，HU Jianhua，CHEN Guoping，et al. Study of rock foundation stability of Aizhai bridge[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2012，31(12)：2 420–2 430.(in Chinese)) [14] MEYERHOF G G，ADAMS J I. The ultimate uplift capacity of foundations[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal，1968，5(4)：225–244. [15] 刘祖德. 抗拔桩基础[J]. 地基处理，1995，6(4)：1–12.(LIU Zude. Uplift pile foundations[J]. Foundation Treatment，1995，6(4)：1–12.(in Chinese)) [16] 刘祖德. 抗拔桩基础(续二)[J]. 地基处理，1996，7(1)：11–16.(LIU Zude. Uplift pile foundations(continued II)[J]. Foundation Treatment，1996，7(1)：11–16.(in Chinese)) [17] 刘祖德. 抗拔桩基础(续三)[J]. 地基处理，1996，7(2)：6–17.(LIU Zude. Uplift pile foundations(continued III)[J]. Foundation Treatment，1996，7(2)：6–17.(in Chinese)) [18] 刘祖德. 抗拔桩基础(续四)[J]. 地基处理，1996，7(3)：8–13.(LIU Zude. Uplift pile foundations(continued IV)[J]. Foundation Treatment，1996，7(3)：8–13.(in Chinese)) [19] 何思明，吴永，李新坡. 嵌岩抗拔桩作用机制研究[J]. 岩土力学，2009，30(2)：333–337.(HE Siming，WU Yong，LI Xinpo. Research on mechanism of uplift rock-socketed piles[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2009，30(2)：333–337.(in Chinese)) [20] 黄茂松，王向军，吴江斌，等. 不同桩长扩底抗拔桩极限承载力的统一计算模式[J]. 岩土工程学报，2011，33(1)：63–69.(HUANG Maosong，WANG Xiangjun，WU Jiangbin，et al. Unified approach to estimate ultimate bearing capacity of uplift piles with enlarged base[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2011，33(1)：63–69.(in Chinese))