|
|
|
| Field test on anchorage performance of different types of prestressed cables |
| LIU Yongquan1，2，LIU Xinrong1，2，YANG Zhongping1，2，KANG Jingwen3 |
| (1. School of Civil Engineering，Chongqing University，Chongqing 400045，China；2. Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area，Ministry of Education，Chongqing University，Chongqing 400045，China；3. China Southwest Geotechnical Investigation and Design Institute Co.，Ltd，Chengdu，Sichuan 610081，China)
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract Based on the elasto-plastic analysis of shear stress distribution in anchorage section，field destructive tests were carried out on the tension-concentrated anchor cable(TCAC)，the tension-dispersed anchor cable (TDAC) and the pressure-dispersed anchor cable(PDAC). The comparative analysis was made regarding the shear stress distribution characteristics，the bearing capacity and the load-displacement curve. In the elastic stage，the peak shear stress appeared in the range of 0.5 m near the acting point of concentrated force and increased with the load growing. In the plastic period，debonding slippage occurred in the range of 0.5 m near the acting point of concentrated force，and the peak shear stress was shifted to the middle of anchorage body gradually. The residual shear stress on debonding section was about 1/3 of the peak value. TDAC has more uniform shear stress distribution and longer effective anchorage length，its carrying capacity was 31.1% higher than TCAC. Due to the radial expansion of anchorage body under pressure，the bond strength between PDAC and soil was improved，which made the PDAC?s carrying capacity to increase by 17.7% compared with TDAC. It can be seen from the load-displacement curve that the PDAC had better displacement ductility and deformation resistivity，therefore，it had advantages in soil anchoring.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] PHILLIPS S H E. Factors affecting the design of anchorages in rock[R]. London：Cementation Research Ltd.，1970.
[2] KIM N，PARK J，KIM S. Numerical simulation of ground anchors[J]. Computers and Geotechnics，2007，34(6)：498–507.
[3] 尤春安. 全长黏结式锚杆受力分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2000，19(3)：339–341.(YOU Chun?an. Mechanical analysis of fully grouted anchor[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2000，19(3)：339–341.(in Chinese))
[4] 尤春安，战玉宝. 预应力锚索锚固段的应力分布规律及分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2005，24(6)：925–928.(YOU Chun?an，ZHAN Yubao. Distributing characters and analysis of stresses in prestressed cables[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2005，24(6)：925–928.(in Chinese))
[5] 尤春安，高 明，张利民，等. 锚固体应力分布的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学，2004，25(增)：63–66.(YOU Chun?an，GAO Ming，ZHANG Limin，et al. Experimental research on stress distribution in anchorage body[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2004，25(Supp.)：63–66.(in Chinese))
[6] 尤春安. 压力型锚索锚固段的受力分析[J]. 岩土工程学报，2004，26(6)：828–831.(YOU Chun?an. Mechanical analysis of anchorage segment of pressure-type cable[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2004，26(6)：828–831.(in Chinese))
[7] 卢 黎，张永兴，吴曙光. 压力型锚杆锚固段的应力分布规律研究[J]. 岩土力学，2008，29(6)：1 345–1 349.(LU Li，ZHANG Yongxing，WU Shuguang. Distribution of stresses on bonded transmission length of compression type rock bolt[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2008，29(6)：1 345–1 349.(in Chinese))
[8] 张永兴，卢 黎，饶枭宇，等. 压力型锚杆力学性能模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学，2010，31(7)：2 045–2 050.(ZHANG Yongxing，LU Li，RAO Xiaoyu，et al. Model test research on mechanical behavior of compression type rock bolt[J]. Rock and soil Mechanics，2010，31(7)：2 045–2 050.(in Chinese))
[9] 卢 黎，张四平，张永兴. 压力型锚索力学机制现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学，2010，31(8)：2 435–2 440.(LU Li，ZHANG Siping，ZHANG Yongxing. On-situ test and behavior analysis of compression type rock anchor cables[J]. Rock and soil Mechanics，2010，31(8)：2 435–2 440.(in Chinese))
[10] 卢 黎，张永兴，张四平. 软质岩中压力型锚索锚固段应力分布特征[J]. 土木建筑与环境工程，2011，33(5)：69–74.(LU Li，ZHANG Yongxing，ZHANG Siping. Stress distribution in fixed anchor length of compression type anchor in soft rock mass[J]. Journal of Civil，Architectural and Environmental Engineering，2011，33(5)：69–74.(in Chinese))
[11] BENMOKRANE B，CHENNOUF A，MITRI H S. Laboratory evaluation of cement-based grouts and grouted rock anchors[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts，1995，32(7)：633–642.
[12] 何思明，田金昌，周建庭. 胶结式预应力锚索锚固段荷载传递特性研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2006，25(1)：117–121.(HE Siming，TIAN Jinchang，ZHOU Jianting. Study on load transfer of bond prestressed anchor rope[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2006，25(1)：117–121.(in Chinese))
[13] 尤春安，战玉宝. 预应力锚索锚固段界面滑移的细观力学分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报，2009，28(10)：1 976–1 985.(YOU Chun?an，ZHAN Yubao. Analysis of interfacial slip mesomechanics in anchorage section of prestressed anchor cable[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2009，28(10)：1 976–1 985.(in Chinese))
[14] 尤春安，战玉宝，刘秋媛，等. 预应力锚索锚固段的剪滞–脱黏模型[J].岩石力学与工程学报，2013，32(4)：800–806.(YOU Chun?an，ZHAN Yubao，LIU Qiuyuan，et al. Shear lag-debonding model for anchorage section of prestressed anchor cable[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2013，32(4)：800–806.(in Chinese))
[15] NAK-KYUNG KIM，ASCE A M. Performance of tension and compression anchors in weathered soil[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，2003，129(12)：1 138–1 150.
[16] BARLEY A D. Discussion of“performance of tension and compression anchors in weathered soil”[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，2005，131(5)：671–672.
[17] 吴曙光，张永兴，康 明. 压力型和拉力型锚杆工作性能对比研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质，2008，(5)：45–49.(WU Shuguang，ZHANG Yongxing，KANG Ming. An analysis of working performance of pressure-type and tensile-type anchor[J]. Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology，2008，(5)：45–49.(in Chinese))
[18] 张四平，候 庆. 压力分散型锚杆剪应力分布与现场试验研究[J]. 重庆建筑大学学报，2004，26(2)：41–47.(ZHANG Siping，HOU Qing. Study on shear stress distribution and in-situ test of pressure- dispersive anchor[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jianzhu University，2004，26(2)：41–47.(in Chinese)) |
| [1] |
HUANG Man1, 2, WANG Yuhao1, 2, TAO Zhigang3, HONG Chenjie1, 2*, WENG Hanqian3, ZHANG Guangtao1, 2, ZHANG Haijiang1, 2. Size effect on anchorage resistance of Quasi-NPR bolt[J]. , 2026, 45(5): 1477-1488. |
|
|
|
|
2016, Vol. 35 
