高烈度区软硬岩交界段隧道震害机制及减震缝减震技术模型试验研究

doi:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2017.0324

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (19)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (450 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract

In order to study damage mechanism and shock absorption joint damping technology of tunel passing through an interface of soft and hard rock in highly seismic area，the strong earthquake vibration dynamic test was carried out based on a tunnel. By analyzing formation inertia force，differential displacement，principal tensile stress，internal force and safety factor，five kinds of working conditions were comparative studied，mainly including condition A(no damping measures in hard rock)，B(no damping measures in soft rock)，C(no damping measures in junction of soft and hard rock)，D(absorbing joint only secondary lining in junction of soft and hard rock)，E(combination shock absorption measures in junction of soft and hard rock). The result show that displacement difference is significant under strong earthquake crossing interface of soft and hard rock，and the formation inertia force of soft rock is stronger than that of hard rock. The damping rate of principal stress or internal force is beyond 47% and 40% by setting shock absorbing joint only secondary lining. And the rate of maximum damping with staggered joint is increased by about 20% comparing with absorbing joint only secondary lining. The shock absorption structure of staggered joint is recommended to be used in the tunnel crossing interface of soft and hard rock in high intensity zone，namely absorbing joint in secondary lining is combined with the length of lining trolley and the shock absorption gap of initial support is set by 3 m interval. The research results have important significance to anti shock technology for traffic lifeline crossing interface of soft and hard rock in highly seismic area.

Key words： tunnelling engineering highly seismic area interface between soft and hard rock damage mechanism aseismic and absorption measures model test

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors

Cite this article:

URL:

https://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/EN/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2017.0324 OR https://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/EN/Y2017/V36/IS2/4113

[1]	申玉生，高波，王英学. 强震区山岭隧道洞口段结构动力特性分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2009，28(增1)：3 131-3 136.(SHEN Yusheng，GAO Bo，WANG Yingxue. structural dynamic properties analysis for portal part of mountain tunnel in strong earthquake area[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2009，28(Supp.1)：3 131-3 136.(in Chinese))
[2]	崔光耀，王明年，于丽，等. 汶川地震公路隧道洞口结构震害分析及震害机制研究[J]. 岩土工程学报，2013，35(6)：1084-1091.(CUI Guangyao，WANG Mingnian，YU Li，et al.Analysis of seismic damage and mechanism of portalstructure of highway tunnel in Wenchuan earthquake[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2013，35(6)：1084-1091.(in Chinese))
[3]	李林，何川，耿萍，等.浅埋偏压洞口段隧道地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2011，30(12)：2 540-2 548.(LI Lin，HE Chuang，GENG Ping，et al. Study of shakingtable model test for seismic response of portal section of shallow unsymmetrical loading tunnel[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2011，30(12)：2 540-2 548.(in Chinese))
[4]	信春雷，高波，周佳媚. 跨断层隧道抗减震措施性能振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报，2014(8)：1414-1422.(XIN Chunlei，GAO Bo，ZHOU Jiamei.Shaking table tests on performances of anti-seismic anddamping measures for fault-crossing tunnel structures[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2014(8)：1414-1422.(in Chinese))
[5]	方林，蒋树屏，林志，等. 穿越断层隧道振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学，2011，32(9)：2 709-2 713.(FANG Lin，JIANGShuping，LIN Zhi，et al. Shaking table model test study of tunnelthrough fault[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2011，32(9)：2 709- 2 713.(in Chinese))
[6]	耿萍，何悦，何川，等.穿越断层破碎带隧道合理抗震设防长度研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2014，33(2)：358-365.( GENG Ping，HE Yue，HE Chuang，et al. Study of shakingtable model test for seismic response of portal section of shallow unsymmetrical loading tunnel[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2014，33(2)：358-365.(in Chinese))
[7]	高波，王峥峥，袁松，等. 汶川地震公路隧道震害启示[J]. 西南交通大学学报，2009，44(3)：336-374.(GAO Bo，WANG Zhengzheng，YUAN Song，et al.Lessons learnt from damage of highway tunnels inWenchuanearthquake[J]. Journal of SouthwestJiaotong University，2009，44(3)：336-374.(in Chinese))
[8]	四川省交通厅公路规划勘察设计研究院. “5·12”汶川特大地震四川灾区国省干线公路检测评估技术总结[R]. 成都：四川省交通厅公路规划勘察设计研究院，2008.(Highway Planning，Survey，Design and Research Institute，Sichuan Provincial Communications Department. Conclusion ofdetecting and evaluating of national and provincial highways inSichuan Province after“5·12”Wenchuan earthquake[R]. Chengdu：Highway Plainning Survey，Design and Research Institute，Sichuan ProvincialCommunications Department，2008.(in Chinese))
[9]	四川省交通厅公路规划勘察设计研究院. 5·12汶川地震灾区高速公路和国省干线公路恢复重建工程调查、检测、评估[R]. 成都：四川省交通厅公路规划勘察设计研究院，2008.(Highway Planning，Survey，Design and Research Institute，Sichuan Provincial Communications Department.Investigation，detection and evaluation of the restorationand reconstruction project of highways，national and provincial trunkroads in disaster areas induced by Wenchuan earthquake on May 12，2008[R]. Chengdu：Highway Planning，Survey，Design and ResearchInstitute，Sichuan Provincial Communications Department，2008.(in Chinese))
[10]	WANG Z，GAO B，JIANG Y，et al. Investigation and assessment on mountain tunnels and geotechnical damage after the wenchuan earthquake[J]. Science in China Series E：Technological Sciences，2009，52(2)：546-558.(in Chinese))
[11]	吴冬，高波，申玉生，等. 隧道仰坡地震动力响应特性振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学，2014，35(7)：1 921-1 928.(WU Dong，GAO Bo，SHEN Yusheng，et al. Shaking table test study of seismicdynamic response of tunnel entrance slope[J]. Rock and SoilMechanics，2014，35(7)：1 921-1 928.(in Chinese))
[12]	王帅帅，高波，陶双江，等. 含软弱夹层和均质围岩隧道洞口仰坡动力特性研究[J]. 铁道学报，2014，36(11)：93-98.(WANGShuaishuai，GAO Bo，TAO Shuangjiang，et al. Study on dynamiccharacteristics of front slope of tunnel entrance with weak intercalation andhomogeneous rock strata[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society，2014，36(11)：93-98.(in Chinese))
[13]	LYSMERJ，KUHLEMEYERR L. Finite dynamic model for infinite media[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics，1969，95(4)：859-877.
[14]	殷允腾，李廷春. 土岩软硬结合部隧道结构的震害机制分析及抗震研究[J]. 现代隧道技术，2013，50(4)：84-91.(YIN Yunteng，LI Tingchun. Analysis and study of the seismic failure mechanism and aseismic measures of a tunnel structure in the rock-soil interface area[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology，2013，50(4)：84-91.(in Chinese))
[15]	申玉生，邹成路，靳宗振，等. 穿越软硬交界面隧道结构动力响应特性研究[J]. 现代隧道技术，2015，52(3)：95-101.(SHEN Yusheng，ZOU Chenglu，JIN Zongzhen，et al. A study of the dynamic response characteristics of a tunnel structurethrough an interface of soft and hard rock[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology，2015，52(3)：95-101. (in Chinese))
[16]	侯森，陶连金，赵旭，等. 不同加载方向的山岭隧道洞口段地震响应振动台模型试验[J]. 中南大学学报：自然科学版，2016，47(3)：994-1 001.(HOU Sen，TAO Lianjin，ZHAO Xu，et al. Shaking table test for dynamic respinse in portal section of mountain tunnel based on different vibration directions[J].Journal of Central South University：Science and Technology，2016，47(3)：994-1 001.(in Chinese))
[17]	蒋树屏，文栋良，郑升宝. 嘎隆拉隧道洞口段地震响应大型振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2011，30(4)：649-656.(JIANG Shuping，WEN Dongliang，ZHENG Shengbao.Large-scale shaking table test for seismic response in portalsection of Galongla tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of RockMechanics and Engineering，2011，30(4)：649-656.(in Chinese))
[18]	杨俊杰. 相似理论与结构模型试验[M]. 武汉：武汉理工大学出版社，2005：38-46.(YANG Junjie. Similarity theory and structure model test[M].Wuhan：Wuhan University of Technology Press，2005：38-46.(in Chinese))
[19]	崔光耀，王明年，于丽，等. 断裂黏滑隧道减震缝减震技术模型试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学，2013，32(8)：1 603-1 609.(CUI Guangyao，WAGN Mingnian，YU Li，et al.Model test study of shock absorption joint damping technology of crossing stick-slip fracture tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of RockMechanics and Engineering，2013，32(8)：1 603-1 609.(in Chinese))