磷尾矿改良膨胀土动变形与动强度特性试验研究

doi:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2019.0776

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (0)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (769 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The relationship，dynamic elastic modulus and dynamic strength was studied under different confining pressure and Phosphorus tailings by GDS dynamic triaxial test. The experimental results show that the dynamic strain-dynamic stress( )curves of the improved soil rise first and then decrease with the increase of phosphorus tailings，and the optimal dosage is 7%. The dynamic elastic modulus Ed decreases with the increase of the dynamic strain ，When ≤0.2%，the dynamic elastic modulus decreases rapidly. When ＞0.2%，the soil enters the plastic development stage，and Ed decreases and becomes slow. The dynamic strength curve conforms to the power function relationship；Dynamic strength increases with the increase of confining pressure，and increases first and then decreases with the increase of phosphorus tailings content. Compared with pure expansive soil，the modified soil dynamic strength increases by about 40 kPa，and the increase is about 30%. The improved soil dynamic cohesion cd increases first and then decreases with the increase of phosphorus tailings content；Compared with pure expansive soil，cd increases by about 9 kPa，and the increase is about 36%. The amount of phosphorus tailings has little effect on the internal friction angle φd. The dynamic strength calculation formula is given by nonlinearly fitting the relationship between dynamic strength parameters and phosphorus tailings.

Key words： soil mechanics phosphorus tailings expansive soil dynamic elastic modulus dynamic strength

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZHUANG Xinshan
	ZHUANG Tao
	TAO Gaoliang
	ZHAO Hanwen
	LI Yuxuan

Cite this article:

ZHUANG Xinshan,ZHUANG Tao,TAO Gaoliang, et al. Experimental study on dynamic deformation and dynamic strength of expansive soil modified by phosphorus tailings[J]. , 2020, 39(S1): 3032-3038.

URL:

http://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/EN/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2019.0776 OR http://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/EN/Y2020/V39/IS1/3032

[4]	蔡辉腾，金星. 福州市区粉质黏土动剪切模量与阻尼比试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报，2011，44(增2)：110–113.(CAI Huiteng，JIN Xing. Testing study on dynamic shear modulus and damping ratio of silty clay in Fuzhou downtown area[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal 2011，44(Supp. 2)：110–113.(in Chinese))
[6]	张艳美，阮东华，程志良. 土工合成纤维土动力特性试验研究[J]. 中国石油大学学报：自然科学版，2015，39(2)：119–123.(ZHANGYanmei，RUAN Donghua，CHENG Zhiliang. Experimental study on dynamic characteristics of texsol[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum：Natural Science，2015，39(2)：119–123.(in Chinese))
[9]	毛成，邱延峻. 膨胀土与改性膨胀土的动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2005，24(10)：1 783–1 788.(MAO Cheng，QIU Yanjun. Testing study on dynamic properties of expansive soil and improved expansive soil [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2005，24(10)：1 783–1 788.(in Chinese))
[11]	黄娟，丁祖德，袁铁映，等. 循环荷载作用下泥炭质土的动变形特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学，2017，38(9)：2 551–2 558.(HUANG Juan，DING Zude，YUAN Tieying，et al. Experimental study of dynamic deformation properties of peaty soil under cyclic loading[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2017，38(9)：2 551–2 558.(in Chinese))
[14]	高玉峰，黎冰. 黏土与EPS颗粒混合轻质土的动强度特性试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2007，26(增2)：4 276–4 283.(GAO Yufeng，LI Bing. Experimental study on dynamic strength properties of lightweight clay mixed with EPS beads soil [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2007，26(Supp. 2)：4 276–4 283.(in Chinese))
[12]	白颢，孔令伟. 固结比对石灰土动力特性的影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学，2009，30(6)：1 590–1 594.(BAI Hao，KONG Lingwei. Experimental research on influence of consolidation ratio on dynamic characteristics of lime-treated soil[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2009，30(6)：1 590–1 594.(in Chinese))
[2]	陈存礼，杨鹏，何军芳. 饱和击实黄土的动力特性研究[J]. 岩土力学，2007，28(8)：1 551–1 556.(CHEN Cunli，YANG Peng，HE Junfang. Research on dynamic characteristics of saturated compacted loess[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2007，28(8)：1 551–1 556.(in Chinese))
[3]	王谦，李娜，王平，等. 甘南地区黄土的动模量与阻尼比特性研究[J]. 岩土工程学报，2017，39(增1)：192–197.(WANG Qian，LI Na，WANG Ping，et al. Behaviors of dynamic modulus and damping ratio of loess in Gannan region of Gansu Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2017，39(Supp. 1)：192–197.(in Chinese))
[5]	张茹，何昌荣，费文平，等. 固结应力比对土样动强度和动孔压发展规律的影响[J]. 岩土工程学报，2006，28(1)：101–105.(ZHANG Ru，HE Changrong，FEI Wenping，et al. Effect of consolidation stress ratio on dynamic strength and dynamic pore water pressure of soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2006，28(1)：101–105.(in Chinese))
[7]	王志杰，骆亚生，王瑞瑞，等. 不同地区原状黄土动剪切模量与阻尼比试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报，2010，32(9)：1 464–1 469.(WANG Zhijie，LUO Yasheng，WANG Ruirui，et al. Experimental study on dynamic shear modulus and damping ratio of undisturbed loess in different regions[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2010，32(9)：1 464–1 469.(in Chinese))
[8]	WANG Y X，GUO P P，REN W X，et al. Laboratory investigation on strength characteristics of expansive soil treated with jute fiber reinforcement[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics，2017，17(11)：1–12.
[15]	谢定义. 土动力学[M]. 北京：高等教育出版社，2011：1–30.(XIE Dingyi. Soil dynamic[M]. Beijing：Higher Education Press，2011：1–30.(in Chinese))
[10]	李星，程谦恭，张金存，等. 干湿循环下高铁路基水泥改良膨胀土动力特性试验研究[J]. 铁道建筑，2016，44(6)：99–103.(LI Xing，CHENGQiangong，ZHANGJincun，etal. Experimentalstudyondynami ccharacteristicsofhigh-speedrailway-basedcementmodifiedexpansivesoilunderdry-wetcycle[J]. RailwayEngneering，2016，44(6)：99–103.(in Chinese))
[13]	雷华阳，姜岩，陆培毅，等. 交通荷载作用下结构性软土动应力–动应变关系试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2008，27(增1)：3 052–3 057.(LEI Huayang，JIANG Yan，LU Peiyi，et al. Experimental study of dynamic stress-strain relation of structural soft soil under traffic load[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2008，27(Supp. 1)：3 052–3 057.(in Chinese))
[16]	杨桂通. 土动力学[M]. 北京：中国建材工业出版社，2000：1–46.(YANG Guitong. Soil dynamics materials[M]. Beijing：China Building Materials Industry Press，2000：1–46.(in Chinese))
[1]	孙德安，李宣. 广吸力范围内非饱和粉土动力变形特性[J]岩土工程学报，2019，41(4)：617–624.(SUN Dean，LI Xuan. Dynamic deformation characteristics of unsaturated silt over a wide suction range[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2019，41(4)：617–624.(in Chinese))