循环剪切作用下砾石–格栅界面颗粒破碎特性研究

doi:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2020.0793

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (0)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1543 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract In order to analyze the particle breakage of gravel-geogrid interfaces under cyclic shearing，cyclic direct shear tests of gravel geogrid interfaces were performed under different cyclic shear displacement amplitudes，normal stresses，shear frequencies and cycle numbers. The particle distribution change before and after cyclic shearing was analyzed，and the particle breakage was quantified by the relative particle breakage ratio. The test results show that the peak shear stress of each hysteresis loop increases gradually as the number of cycles increases，and fluctuates due to particle breakage. The relative particle breakage ratio increases with increasing the amplitude of the cyclic shearing displacement，obeying a hyperbolic function relationship. A logarithmic function can be used to describe the relationships between the normal stress and the shear frequency with the relative breakage ratio. The maximum relative breakage ratios are 13.54% and 11.22% for different normal stresses and shear frequencies. The number of cycles has a significant influence on the relative particle breakage ratio，and the larger the cycle number，the larger the relative breakage ratio. Moreover，under different test conditions，the relative particle breakage ratio has a non-linear positive correlation with the input plastic work，and the relationship between them can be described by a hyperbolic function.

Key words： soil mechanics cyclic direct shear tests particle distribution relative particle breakage ratio shear displacement amplitude plastic work

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	YING Mengjie1
	WANG Jun2
	LIU Feiyu1

Cite this article:

YING Mengjie1,WANG Jun2,LIU Feiyu1. Experimental study on particle breakage of gravel-geogrid interfaces under cyclic shear[J]. , 2021, 40(7): 1484-1490.

URL:

https://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/EN/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2020.0793 OR https://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/EN/Y2021/V40/I7/1484

[1] 卢谅，张均均，马书文，等. 预应力返包式加筋土挡墙的动力响应分析[J]. 岩土工程学报，2020，42(2)：344–353.(LU Liang，ZHANG Junjun，MA Shuwen，et al. Dynamic response of prestressed wrap-reinforced earth retaining walls[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2020，42(2)：344–353.(in Chinese))
[2] ZHENG Y，FOX P J，MCCARTNEY J S. Numerical simulation of deformation and failure behavior of geosynthetic reinforced soil bridge abutments[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，2018，144(7)：04018037.
[3] HALDER K，CHAKRABORTY D. Effect of interface friction angle between soil and reinforcement on bearing capacity of strip footing placed on reinforced slope[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics，2019，19(5)：06019008.
[4] WANG J，LIU F Y，WANG P，et al. Particle size effects on coarse soil-geogrid interface response in cyclic and post-cyclic direct shear tests[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes，2016，44(6)：854–861.
[5] MAGHOOL F，ARULRAJAH A，MIRZABABAEI M，et al. Interface shear strength properties of geogrid-reinforced steel slags using a large-scale direct shear testing apparatus[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes，2020，48(5)：625–633.
[6] 王军，林旭，刘飞禹，等. 砂土与格栅界面相互作用的直剪试验研究[J]. 岩土力学，2014，35(增1)：113–120.(WANG Jun，LIN Xu，LIU Feiyu，et al. Research on interaction of geogrid and sand interface by direct shear tests[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2014，35(Supp.1)：113–120.(in Chinese))
[7] 王军，林旭，符洪涛. 砂土–格栅筋土界面特性的本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学，2014，35(增2)：75–84.(WANG Jun，LIN Xu，FU Hongtao. Study of constitutive model of sand-geogrid interface geogrid/geotextile reinforced soil[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2014，35(Supp.2)：75–84.(in Chinese))
[8] HAN B，LING J，SHU X，et al. Laboratory investigation of particle size effects on the shear behavior of aggregate-geogrid interface. Construction and Building Materials，2018，158：1 015–1 025.
[9] 刘新荣，涂义亮，王鹏，等. 基于大型直剪试验的土石混合体颗粒破碎特征研究[J]. 岩土工程学报，2017，39(8)：1 425–1 434.(LIU Xinrong，TU Yiliang，WANG Peng，et al. Particle breakage of soil-rock aggregate based on large-scale direct shear tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2017，39(8)：1 425–1 434.(in Chinese))
[10] SWETA K，HUSSAINI S K K. Behavior evaluation of geogrid- reinforced ballast-subballast interface under shear condition[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes，2019，47(1)：23–31.
[11] SWETA K，HUSSAINI S K K. Effect of shearing rate on the behavior of geogrid-reinforced railroad ballast under direct shear conditions[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes，2018，46(3)：251–256.
[12] 刘飞禹，王攀，王军，等. 颗粒粒径对格栅–土界面静、动力直剪特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学，2017，38(1)：150–156.(LIU Feiyu，WANG Pan，WANG Jun，et al. Influence of soil particle size on monotonic and cyclic direct shear behaviors of geogrid-soil interface[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2017，38(1)：150–156.(in Chinese))
[13] LIU F Y，WANG P，GENG X，et al. Cyclic and post-cyclic behaviour from sand-geogrid interface large-scale direct shear tests[J]. Geosynthetics International，2016，23(2)：129–139.
[14] 刘飞禹，林旭，王军. 砂土颗粒级配对筋土界面抗剪特性的影响[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2013，32(12)：2 575–2 582.(LIU Feiyu，LIN Xu，WANG Jun. Influence of particle-size gradation on shear behavior of geosynthetics and sand interface[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2013，32(12)：2 575–2 582.(in Chinese))
[15] 刘飞禹，胡惠丽，王军，等. 粒孔比对筋–土界面循环剪切特性的影响[J]. 中国公路学报，2019，32(12)：115–122.(LIU Feiyu，HU Huili，WANG Jun，et al. Influence of aperture ratio on cyclic shear behavior of geogrid-soil interface[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport，2019，32(12)：115–122.(in Chinese))
[16] VIEIRA C S，LOPES M D L，CALDEIRA L M. Sand-geotextile interface characterisation through monotonic and cyclic direct shear tests[J]. Geosynthetics International，2013，20(1)：26–38.
[17] CEN W J，WANG H，YU L，et al. Response of high-density polyethylene geomembrane-sand interfaces under cyclic shear loading：laboratory investigation[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics，2020，20(2)：04019166.
[18] 冯大阔，张建民. 循环直剪条件下粗粒土与结构接触面颗粒破碎研究[J]. 岩土工程学报，2012，34(4)：767–773.(FENG Dakuo，ZHANG Jianmin. Particle breakage of gravel-structure interface under cyclic shear[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2012，34(4)：767–773.(in Chinese))
[19] 韩华强，陈生水，傅华，等. 循环荷载作用下堆石料的颗粒破碎特性[J]. 岩土工程学报，2017，39(10)：1 753–1 760.(HAN Huaqiang，CHEN Shengshui，FU Hua，et al. Particle breakage of rockfill materials under cyclic loadings[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2017，39(10)：1 753–1 760.(in Chinese))
[20] INDRARATNA B，THAKUR P K，VINOD J S. Experimental and numerical study of railway ballast behavior under cyclic loading. International Journal of Geomechanics，2010，10(4)：136–144.
[21] HARDIN B O. Crushing of soil particles[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，1985，111(10)：1 177–1 192.
[22] LIU H，ZENG K，ZOU Y. Particle breakage of calcareous sand and its correlation with input energy[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics，2020，20(2)：04019151.
[23] SABERI M，ANNAN C D，KONRAD J M. Three-dimensional constitutive model for cyclic behavior of soil-structure interfaces[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering，2020，134：106162.
[24] VANGLA P，LATHA G M. Effect of particle size of sand and surface asperities of reinforcement on their interface shear behaviour[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes，2016，44(3)：254–268.