|
|
|
| A new type of adaptive robust acceleration integration approach and reliability analysis |
| WANG Tiqiang1,WANG Yongzhi1,YUAN Xiaoming1,WANG Hai2,DUAN Xuefeng1 |
| (1. Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration,Institute of Engineering Mechanics,China Earthquake Administration,Harbin,Heilongjiang 150080,China;2. School of Water Conservancy and Environment,University of Jinan,Jinan,Shandong 250022,China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Acceleration array-based shear stress-shear strain inversion analysis approach is widely used in model tests and in-situ monitoring,but its accuracy and credibility have not yet reached consensus in the geotechnical engineering community. One of the important reasons is the lack of research on the reliability of integration approach for evaluating displacement from acceleration records. A new type of adaptive robust integration approach(ARI) is developed to avoid the influence of traditional human interference,empirical parameters,filtering and other factors. It has the characteristics of sensor deflection correction,self-matching of the fitting function,and residual displacement recognition. The shaking table test of sandy slope is designed and carried out under different conditions such as dynamic and deflection,the accuracy and reliability of ARI integrated displacement are discussed. The test results show that:compared with the USGS approach,the ARI approach effectively reduces the peak errors and the irregular lead of the resolution time caused by filtering. Compared with the recorded displacement,the average peak error of the ARI approach to solve the dynamic integrated displacement is 7.69%,the correlation coefficient is 0.99,and the spectral area error is 1.97% under three different periodic loads. Compared with the recorded displacement,the average peak error of the ARI approach is 8.92%,the correlation coefficient is 0.97,and the spectral area error is 4.21% under the influence of deflection. The results of the two sets of blind test experiments show that the sensors of different types and performance parameters have negligible influence on the integrated displacement accuracy and reliability of the ARI approach. The average peak error of 7–15 mm small displacement with high frequency is 9.74%. The ARI approach can maintain good adaptability and robustness under different displacements and periodic loads. The new type of adaptive robust integration approach for evaluating displacements from acceleration records and verification test results has important theoretical significance and application value to improve the scientific understanding of geotechnical model tests and in-situ monitoring of acceleration integral displacement and to enhance the scientific understanding of the inversion of shear stress-shear strain response of the internal soil.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] 太沙基 K. 理论土力学[M]. 徐志英译. 北京:地质出版社,1960:76–124.(TERZAGHI K. Theoretical soil mechanics[M]. Translated by XU Zhiying. Beijing:Geological Publishing House,1960:67–124.(in Chinese))
[2] ROSCOE K H,BURLAND J B. On the generalized stress-strain behaviour of wet clay[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1968:535–609.
[3] DUNCAN J M,CHANG C Y. Nonlinear analysis of stress and strain in soils[J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division,1970,96(5):1 629–1 652.
[4] 黄文熙. 土的弹塑性应力—应变模型理论[J]. 岩土力学,1979,1(1):1–20.(HUANG Wenxi. Theory of elastoplastic stress-strain model for soil[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,1979,1(1):1–20.(in Chinese))
[5] 孙 丽,梁德志,李宏男. 管式封装FBG应变传感器应变传递率影响因素分析[J]. 沈阳建筑大学学报:自然科学版,2007,23(6):881–885.(SUN Li,LIANG Dezhi,LI Hongnan. Analysis of factors influencing strain transfer ratio of the tube packaged FBG strain sensor[J]. Journal of Shenyang Jianzhu University:Natural Science,2007,23(6):881–885.(in Chinese))
[6] 李 飞,朱鸿鹄,张诚成,等. 地基变形光纤光栅监测可行性的试验研究[J]. 浙江大学学报:工学版,2017,51(1):204–211.(LI Fei,ZHU Honghu,ZHANG Chengcheng,et al. Experimental study on feasibility of fiber Bragg grating-based foundation deformation monitoring[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University:Engineering Science,2017,51(1):204–211.(in Chinese))
[7] KOGA Y,MATSUO O. Shaking table tests of embankments resting on liquefiable sandy ground[J]. Soils and Foundations,1990,30(4):162–174.
[8] ZEGHAL M,ELGAMAL A W,TANG H T,et al. Lotung downhole array. II: Evaluation of soil nonlinear properties[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,1995,121(4):363–378.
[9] ELGAMAL A W,ZEGHAL M,PARRA E. Liquefaction of reclaimed island in Kobe,Japan[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,1996,122(1):39–49.
[10] DAVIS R O,BERRILL J B. Rational approximation of stress and strain based on downhole acceleration measurements[J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics,1998,22(8):603–619.
[11] BRENNAN A J,THUSYANTHAN N I,MADABHUSHI S P G. Evaluation of shear modulus and damping in dynamic centrifuge tests[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2005,131(12):1 488–1 497.
[12] KAMAI R,BOULANGER R. Characterizing localization processes during liquefaction using inverse analysis of instrumentation arrays[M]. [S. l.]:Meso-Scale Shear Physics in Earthquake and Landslide Mechanics,2009:219–238.
[13] BRANDENBERG S J,WILSON D W,RASHID M M. Weighted residual numerical differentiation algorithm applied to experimental bending moment data[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2010,136(6):854–863.
[14] CHANG W J,UENG T S,CHEN C H,et al. Coupled shear strain-pore pressure responses of soil in shaking table tests[J]. Soils and Foundations,2010,50(2):325–334.
[15] 周燕国,梁 甜,李永刚,等. 含黏粒砂土场地液化离心机振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2012,35(9):1 650–1 658.(ZHOU Yanguo,LIANG Tian,LI Yonggang,et al. Dynamic centrifuge tests on liquefaction of clayey sand ground[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2012,35(9):1 650–1 658.(in Chinese))
[16] 陈国兴,王炳辉,孙 田. 饱和南京细砂动剪切模量特性的大型振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2012,34(4):582–590.(CHEN Guoxing,WANG Binghui,SUN Tian. Dynamic shear modulus of saturated Nanjing fine sand in large scale shaking table tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2012,34(4):582–590.(in Chinese))
[17] 刘晶波,赵冬冬,张小波,等. 地基自由场离心机振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2013,35(11):980–987.(LIU Jingbo,ZHAO Dongdong,ZHANG Xiaobo,et al. Dynamic centrifuge model tests on an unconfined soil foundation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2013,35(11):980–987.(in Chinese))
[18] 周恩全,王志华,吕 丛. 饱和南京细砂流动特性的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2013,35(增2):101–106.(ZHOU Enquan,WANG Zhihua,LU Cong. Shaking table tests on fluid characteristics of saturated Nanjing fine sand[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2013,35(Supp.2):101–106.(in Chinese))
[19] 王永志,WILSON D W,KHOSRAVI M,等. 动力离心模型试验循环剪应力–剪应变反演方法对比[J]. 岩土工程学报,2016,38(2):271–277.(WANG Yongzhi,WILSON D W,KHOSRAVI M,et al. Evaluation of cyclic shear stress-strain using inverse analysis techniques in dynamic centrifuge tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2016,38(2):271–277.(in Chinese))
[20] 曹文冉,田 伟,李 春. 双向叠层剪切箱的研制及模型土体振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2017,39(增2):249–253.(CAO Wenran,TIAN Wei,LI Chun. Development of 2-D laminar shear box and shaking table tests on model soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2017,39(Supp.2):249–253.(in Chinese))
[21] 王永志,MOHAMMAD K,DANIEL W,等. CDM格栅复合黏土地基地震反应离心试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2018,37(10):2 394–2 405.(WANG Yongzhi,MOHAMMAD K,DANIEL W,et al. Centrifuge modeling of seismic response of soft clay grounds improved by CDM grids[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2018,37(10):2 394–2 405.(in Chinese))
[22] 杨耀辉,陈育民,刘汉龙,等. 排水刚性桩群桩抗液化性能的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学,2018,39(11):4 025–4 032.(YANG Yaohui,CHEN Yumin,LIU Hanlong,et al. Investigation on liquefaction resistance performance of rigid-drainage pile groups by shaking table[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2018,39(11):4 025–4 032.(in Chinese))
[23] KUTTER B L,CAREY T J,HASHIMOTO T,et al. LEAP-GWU-2015 experiment specifications,results,and comparisons[J]. Soil Dynamic and Earthquake Engineering,2018,113(10):616–628.
[24] ZEGHAL M,GOSWAMI N,KUTTER B L,et al. Stress-strain response of the LEAP-2015 centrifuge tests and numerical predictions[J]. Soil Dynamic and Earthquake Engineering,2018,113(10):804–818.
[25] 韩俊艳,钟紫蓝,李立云,等. 纵向非一致激励下自由场土体的非线性地震反应研究[J]. 岩土力学,2019,40(7):2 581–2 592.(HAN Junyan,ZHONG Zilan,LI Liyun,et al. Nonlinear seismic response of free-field soil under longitudinal non-uniform seismic excitations[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2019,40(7):2 581–2 592.(in Chinese))
[26] 刘 润,马鹏程,练继建. 黏土中宽浅式筒型基础与地基的地震响应[J]. 天津大学学报:自然科学与工程技术版,2020,53(4):366–377.(LIU Run,MA Pengcheng,LIAN Jijian. Seismic response of shallow bucket foundation of soft clay[J]. Journal of Tianjin University:Science and Technology,2020,53(4):366–377.(in Chinese))
[27] 王体强,王永志,袁晓铭,等. 基于振动台试验的加速度积分位移方法可靠性研究[J]. 岩土力学,2019,40(增1):565–573.(WANG Tiqiang,WANG Yongzhi,YUAN Xiaoming,et al. Reliability study on double integral methods of acceleration measurement for displacement based on shaking table test[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2019,40(Supp.1):565–573.(in Chinese))
[28] TRIFUNUC M D. Zero baseline correction of strong-motion accelerograms[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,1971,61(5):1 201–1 211.
[29] GRAIZER V M. Determination of the true ground displacement by using strong motion records[J]. Earth Physics,1979,15(12):875–885.
[30] IWAN W D,MOSER M A,PENG C Y. Strong-motion earthquake measurement using a digital accelerograph[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,1985,75(5):1 225–1 246.
[31] CONVERSE A M,BRADY A G. BAP:Basic strong-motion accelerogram processing software; version 1.0[J]. Center for Integrated Data Analytics Wisconsin Science Center,1992,42(237):37–41.
[32] 周雍年,于海英. 数字强震仪记录的低频误差校正方法[C]// 大型复杂结构的关键科学问题及设计理论研究论文集. 大连:大连理工大学出版社,1999:13–17.(ZHOU Yongnian,YU Haiying. Low frequency error correction method of digital seismic record[C]// Key Scientific Issues and Design Theory Research Papers for Large-scale Complex Structures. Dalian:Dalian University of Technology Press,1999:13–17.(in Chinese))
[33] 王国权,周锡元. 921台湾集集地震近断层强震记录的基线校正[J]. 地震地质,2004,26(1):1–14.(WANG Guoquan,ZHOU Xiyuan. Baseline correction of near fault ground motion recordings of the 1999 chi-chi, Taiwan earthquake[J]. Seismology and Geology,2004,26(1):1–14.(in Chinese))
[34] BOORE D M,BOMMER J J. Processing of strong-motion accelerograms:needs,options and consequences[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,2005,25(2):93–115.
[35] YANG J,LI J B,LIN G. A simple approach to integration of acceleration data for dynamic soil-structure interaction analysis[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,2006,26(8):725–734.
[36] WU Y M,WU C F. Approximate recovery of coseismic deformation from Taiwan strong-motion records[J]. Journal of Seismology,2007,11(2):159–170.
[37] 周宝峰,于海英,温瑞智,等. 一种识别永久位移的新方法[J]. 土木工程学报,2013,46(增2):135–140.(ZHOU Baofeng,YU Haiying,WEN Ruizhi, et al. A new way of permanent displacement identification[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal,2013,46(Supp.2):135–140.(in Chinese))
[38] BOORE D M. On pads and filters processing:strong-motion data[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,2005,95(2):745–750.
[39] DOUGLAS J. High-frequency filtering of strong-motion records[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering,2011,9(2):395–409.
[40] 王春晓,武玉强. 控制方向未知的全状态约束非线性系统的鲁棒自适应跟踪控制[J]. 控制理论与应用,2018,35(2):153-161.(WANG Chunxiao,WU Yuqiang. Robust adaptive tracking control for full state-constrained nonlinear systems with unknown control direction[J]. Control Theory and Applications,2018,35(2):153–161.(in Chinese))
[41] 彭美康,郭蕴华,汪敬东,等. 基于鲁棒容积卡尔曼滤波的自适应目标跟踪算法[J]. 控制理论与应用,2020,37(4):793–800.(PENG Meikang,GUO Yunhua,WANG Jingdong,et al. Adaptive target tracking algorithm based on robust cubature Kalman filter[J]. Control Theory and Applications,2020,37(4):793–800.(in Chinese))
[42] 董芳英,张帼奋. 基因芯片数据标准化局部加权回归法权函数探究[J]. 浙江大学学报:理学版,2010,37(1):22–29.(DONG Fangying,ZHANG Guofen. Normalization for microarray data:the weight function of local weight regression[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University:Science Edition,2010,37(1):22–29.(in Chinese))
[43] MOTAGHI K,GHODS A. Attenuation of ground-motion spectral amplitudes and its variations across the Central Alborz Mountains[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,2012,102(4):1 417–1 428.
|
|
|
|