|
|
|
| Development and application research of a compression shear fracture test device for multi-size rock
|
| LYU Yuanjun，DU Shigui，LUO Zhanyou，FENG Huikun，LI Hao |
| (Institute of Rock Mechanics，Ningbo University，Ningbo，Zhejiang 315211，China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract It is necessary to test the mechanical properties of crack initiation，crack propagation and slip process of fracture surface for multi-size rock under compression shear composite stress. A multi-dimensional rock compression shear fracture test device has been developed，which can apply compression load and shear load synchronously or successively on biaxial. In comparison，some deficiencies exist in existing related equipment，such as the sample size that can be tested is small and single specification，the maximum test force is not high，etc. The developed device is mainly composed of frame，loading and force measuring mechanism，sample box，sample positioning mechanism，electro-hydraulic servo control system，operation software，etc. Cube sample，cuboid sample with the same width or equal ratio can be tested in the size range of 50–300 mm. The maximum normal load is 1 500 kN and the maximum tangential load is 3 000 kN. The stiffness of the test loading system composed of frame and loading mechanism was analyzed. The transition condition from the load control before rock fracture to the displacement control during the slip process of the fracture surface was discussed. The load accuracy calibration of the test device has been carried out. The results show that the indication accuracy reaches 0.5% in the load test range of 2%–100%. A preliminary experimental study on the multi-size cuboid granites，with an aspect ratio of 2∶1，have been carried out. The results are as follows：Firstly，the minimum and large normal load were applied separately to granite samples. Test accuracy and stable loading have been showed by obtained relationship curves of shear load with time or displacement. Then，the test values of two tangential load cell，located at the loading end and support end of the sample box，were obtained. During the initiation and propagation of rock cracks，it is found that the measured values were not synchronized through comparative study. Then，the peak shear load increased with the increase of normal load when different normal loads were applied to the same size samples. Finally，when the normal stress of 10 MPa and 20 MPa was applied to three continuous size samples respectively，the peak shear stress was a nonlinear relationship with the increase of samples size.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] XU S L，HUANG J Y，WANG P F，et al. Investigation of rock material under combined compression and shear dynamic loading：An experimental technique[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering，2015，86：206–222.
[2] XU Y，DAI F. Dynamic response and failure mechanism of brittle rocks under combined compression-shear loading experiments[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering，2018，51：747–764.
[3] HE Q Y，LI Y C，XU J H，et al. Prediction of mechanical properties of igneous rocks under combined compression and shear loading through statistical analysis[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering，2020，53(2)：841–859.
[4] DU K，LI X F，WANG S Y，et al. Compression-shear failure properties and acoustic emission(AE) characteristics of rocks in variable angle shear and direct shear tests[J]. Measurement，2021，183：1–20.
[5] GONG F Q，LUO S，LIN G，et al. Evaluation of shear strength parameters of rocks by preset angle shear，direct shear and triaxial compression tests[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering，2020，53(5)：2 505–2 519.
[6] LIU Y X，XU J，YIN G Z，et al. Development of a new direct shear testing device for investigating rock failure[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering，2017，50(3)：647–651.
[7] WONG R C K，MA S K Y，WONG R H C，et al. Shear strength components of concrete under direct shearing[J]. Cement and Concrete Research，2007，37：1 248–1 256.
[8] FENG X T，WANG G，ZHANG X W，et al. Experimental method for direct shear tests of hard rock under both normal stress and lateral stress[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics，2021，21(3)：1–12.
[9] AV?AR E. An experimental investigation of shear strength behavior of a welded bimrock by meso-scale direct shear tests[J]. Engineering Geology，2021，294：1–12.
[10] VIZINI V O S，FUTAI M M. Mode II fracture toughness determination of rock and concrete via modified direct shear test[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics，2021，257：1–16.
[11] SANTOS V V O，MASSAO F M. Modified direct shear test for determining shear strength of rock and concrete[J]. Geotechnical Testing Journal，2021，44(6)：1 782–1 800.
[12] American Society for Testing and Material. ASTM D5607—16 Standard test method for performing laboratory direct shear strength tests of rock specimens under constant normal force[S]. Philadelphia：ASTM，2017.
[13] 孙鼎杰. 预裂岩石裂纹扩展规律及其力学特性研究[硕士学位论文][D] 绍兴：绍兴文理学院，2019.(SUN Dingjie. Research on crack propagation laws and mechanical properties of pre-cracked rock[M. S. Thesis][D]. Shaoxing：Shaoxing University，2019.(in Chinese))
[14] BARTON N，CHOUBEY V. The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice[J]. Rock Mechanics，1997，(10)：1–54.
[15] PINTO A，CUNHA D A. Scale effects in rock masses[M]. Boca Raton：CRC Press，2020：77–103.
[16] AYATOLLAHI M R，AKBARDOOST J. Size and geometry effects on rock fracture toughness：Mode I fracture[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering，2014，47(2)：677–687.
[17] LI W X，JIN Z F，CUSATIS G. Size effect analysis for the characterization of marcellus shale quasi?brittle fracture properties[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering，2019，52(1)：1–18.
[18] ANDREA M I，JORDI D M，RICARDO J R. Size effect and other effects on mode I fracture toughness using two testing methods[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2021，143：1–16.
[19] 张安林，张朝鹏，李存宝，等. 岩石断裂尺寸效应测试装置研制及实验研究[J]. 实验力学，2021，36(1)：69–79.(ZHANG Anlin，ZHANG Zhaopeng，LI Cunbao，et al. The development of testing device and experimental study on size effect of rock fracture[J]. Journal of Experimental Mechanics，2021，36(1)：69–79.(in Chinese))
[20] RAO Q H，LI C，STILLBORG B，et al. Size effect of the mode II fracture toughness of rock[M]. Balkema，Rotterdam：Rock Mechanics for Industry，1999：1 117–1 124.
[21] 杜时贵，吕原君，罗战友，等. 岩体结构面抗剪强度尺寸效应联合试验系统及初级应用研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2021，40(7)：1 337–1 349.(DU Shigui，LYU Yuanjun，LUO Zhanyou，et al. Combined test system for size effect of rock joint shear strength and its primary application research[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2021，40(7)：1 337–1 349.(in Chinese))
[22] 陈 琼，杜时贵，罗战友. 抗剪强度直剪仪的机制分析和测控系统开发[J]. 机床与液压，2017，45(13)：105–109.(CHEN Qiong，DU Shigui，LUO Zhanyou. Principle analysis and development of measurement and control system with direct shear apparatus for testing shear strength[J]. Machine Tool and Hydraulics，2017，45(13)：105–109.(in Chinese))
[23] DORON M，AMIR S，YOSSEF H H. The significance of displacement control mode in direct shear tests of rock joints[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2020，134：1–8.
[24] 张 静，王志成，侯京锋，等. 静力试验系统力控转位控两种方法研究[J] 机床与液压，2015，43(1)：57–60.(ZHANG Jing，WANG Zhicheng，HOU Jingfeng，et al. Research on two methods of force to position control for static test system[J]. Machine Tool and Hydraulics，2015，43(1)：57–60.(in Chinese))
|
|
|
|
2022, Vol. 41 
