|
|
|
| Seismic response of pile group foundations in liquefied sites based on centrifuge test and numerical simulation |
| LI Yurun1,2,YAN Zhixiao1,ZHANG Jian1 |
| (1. College of Civil Engineering and Transportation,Hebei University of Technology,Tianjin 300401,China;
2. Civil Engineering Technology Research Center of Hebei Province,Hebei University of Technology,Tianjin 300401,China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Liquefaction-induced pile failure during earthquake is the main reason for building and public infrastructure damage. A centrifuge shaking table test was carried out to explore the seismic response of pile group foundations in the liquefaction sites. A finite element numerical model considering nonlinear liquefaction large deformation under dynamic static coupling,for carrying out plastic response analysis of pile group foundation under earthquake,was established. The research indicates that the liquefaction of the foundation under the action of an earthquake first appears on the surface of foundation around the pile. As the PBA increases,the liquefaction range of the foundation develops toward the depth of the foundation and both sides of the pile. The position of the maximum bending moment of pile group appears at the bottom of the pile,soil surface and caps. The larger deformation of the straight pile occurs at the bottom of the pile and the surface of the foundation,and the larger deformation of the oblique group piles appears in the middle of the piles. The excess pore pressure ratio of the foundation decreases with the foundation depth,but increases with the PBA. The foundation will produce foundation uplift within 20 times the pile diameter of the pile,and foundation seismic subsidence will occur in the far pile area. The group-pile suffers less compression damage and serious tensile damage. The pile bottom produces tensile failure during 0.3 g strong earthquake condition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] 刘惠珊. 桩基震害及原因分析——日本阪神大地震的启示[J]. 工程抗震,1999,(1):37–43.(LIU Huishan. Seismic damage of pile foundation and its cause analysis-Inspiration from the Kobe earthquake in Japan[J]. Earthquake Resistant Engineering,1999,(1):37–43.(in Chinese))
[2] MONDAL G,RAI D C. Performance of harbour structures in Andaman Islands during 2004 Sumatra earthquake[J]. Engineering Structures,2008,30(1):174–182.
[3] 袁晓铭,曹振中,孙 锐,等. 汶川8.0级地震液化特征初步研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动,2011,31(4):137–142.(YUAN Xiaoming,CAO Zhenzhong,SUN Rui,et al. Preliminary research on liquefaction characteristics of Wenchuan 8.0 earthquake[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration,2011,31(4):137–142.(in Chinese))
[4] WOTHERSPOON L M,PENDER M J,ORENSE R P. Relationship between observed liquefaction at Kaiapoi following the 2010 Darfield earthquake and former channels of the Waimakariri River[J]. Engineering Geology,2012,125:45–55.
[5] LI G,MOTAMED R. Finite element modeling of soil-pile response subjected to liquefaction-induced lateral spreading in a large-scale shake table experiment[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,2017,92:573–584.
[6] CHALOULOS Y K,BOUCKOVALAS G D,KARAMITROS D K. Pile response in submerged lateral spreads:common pitfalls of numerical and physical modeling techniques[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,2013,55:275–287.
[7] CHANG D,BOULANGER R,BRANDENBERG S,et al. FEM analysis of dynamic soil-pile-structure interaction in liquefied and laterally spreading ground[J]. Earthquake Spectra,2013,29(3):733–755.
[8] KAMAI R,BOULANGER R W. Simulations of a centrifuge test with lateral spreading and void redistribution effects[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2012,139(8):1 250–1 261.
[9] BOULANGER R W,KAMAI R,ZIOTOPOULOU K. Liquefaction induced strength loss and deformation:simulation and design[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering,2014,12(3):1 107–1 128.
[10] 邵 琪,唐小微,李 宏. 液化砂土地基侧向流动对群桩作用的数值分析[J]. 建筑科学,2012,28(增1):16–28.(SHAO Qi,TANG Xiaowei,LI Hong. Numerical analysis of soil-4-pile interaction in lateral spreading of liquefied ground[J]. Building Science,2012,28(Supp.1):16–28.(in Chinese))
[11] 李雨润,闫志晓,张 健,等. 饱和砂土中直群桩动力响应离心机振动台试验与简化数值模型研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2020,39(6):1 252–1 264.(LI Yurun,YAN Zhixiao,ZHANG Jian,et al. Centrifugal shaking table test and numerical simulation of dynamic responses of straight pile group in saturated sand[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2020,39(6):1 252–1 264.(in Chinese))
[12] 唐 亮,凌贤长,艾格玛艾哈迈德. 液化侧向流动场地桩基动力反应振动台试验三维有限元数值模拟方法[J]. 土木工程学报,2013,46(1):180–184.(TANG Liang,LING Xianzhang,AHMED Elgamal. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of shake-table test for dynamic pile behavior in liquefaction-induced lateral spreading ground[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal,2013,46(1):180–184.(in Chinese))
[13] 刘 星,王 睿,张建民. 液化地基中群桩基础地震响应分析[J]. 岩土工程学报,2015,37(12):2 326–2 331.(LIU Xing,WANG Rui,ZHANG Jianmin. Seismic response analysis of pile groups in liquefiable foundations[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2015,37(12):2 326–2 331.(in Chinese))
[14] 王 睿,张建民. 可液化地基中单桩基础的三维数值分析方法及应用[J]. 岩土工程学报,2015,37(11):1 979–1 985.(WANG Rui,ZHANG Jianmin. Three-dimensional elastic-plastic analysis method for piles in liquefiable ground[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2015,37(11):1 979–1 985.(in Chinese))
[15] LIU X,WANG R,ZHANG J M. Centrifuge shaking table tests on 4×4 pile groups in liquefiable Ground[J]. Acta Geotechnica,2018,13(6):1 405–1 418.
[16] 陈思奇,梁发云,陈海兵,等. 地震作用下预应力混凝土管桩运动响应三维数值分析[J]. 地震工程学报,2015,37(1):55–60.(CHEN Siqi,LIANG Fayun,CHEN Haibing,et al. Characteristics of bending moment distribution in prestressed concrete high pilings during earthquakes[J]. China Earthquake Engineering Journal,2015,37(1):55–60.(in Chinese))
[17] LIANG F Y,LIANG X,ZHANG H,et al. Seismic response from centrifuge model tests of a scoured bridge with a pile-group foundation[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering,2020,25(8):04020054 1–13.
[18] 陈云敏,韩 超,凌道盛,等. ZJU400离心机研制及其振动台性能评价[J]. 岩土工程学报,2011,33(12):1 887–1 894.(CHEN Yunmin,HAN Chao,LING Daosheng. Development of geotechnical centrifuge ZJU400 and performance assessment of its shaking table system[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2011,33(12):1 887–1 894.(in Chinese))
[19] 张敏政. 地震模拟实验中相似律应用的若干问题[J]. 地震工程与工程振动,1997,(2):52–58.(ZHANG Minzheng. Study on similitude laws for shaking table tests[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration,1997,(2):52–58.(in Chinese))
[20] 王 瑞,庄海洋,陈国兴,等. 地面微倾斜可液化场地中地铁地下车站结构的地震反应研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动,2018,38(2):130–140.(WANG Rui,ZHUANG Haiyang,CHEN Guoxing,et al. Seismic response of subway underground station buried in liquefiable soil foundation with the ground surface slight inclined[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration,2018,38(2):130–140.(in Chinese))
[21] 庄海洋,陈国兴. 砂土液化大变形本构模型及在ABAQUS软件上的实现[J]. 世界地震工程,2011,27(2):45–50.(ZHUANG Haiyang,CHEN Guoxing. Constitutive model for large liquefaction deformation of sand and its implementation in ABAQUS software[J]. World Earthquake Engineering,2011,27(2):45–50.(in Chinese))
[22] 庄海洋,黄春霞,左玉峰. 某砂土液化大变形本构模型参数的敏感性分析[J]. 岩土力学,2012,32(1):280–286.(ZHUANG Haiyang,HUANG Chunxia,ZUO Yufeng. Sensitivity analysis of model parameters for predicting liquefied large deformation of sand[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2012,32(1):280–286.(in Chinese))
[23] YANG Z H,AHMED E. Influence of permeability on liquefaction induced shear deformation[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics,2002,128(7):720–729.
[24] AHMED E,YANG Z H,PARRA E. Properties of a phase-conjugate etalon mirror and its application to laser resonator spatial-mode control[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,2002,22(4):259–271.
[25] LEE J,FENVES G L. Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics,1998,124(8):892–900.
[26] ZHUANG H Y,HU Z H,WANG X J,et al. Seismic responses of a large underground structure in liquefied soils by FEM numerical modelling[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering,2015,13(12):3 645–3 668.
[27] 闫志晓,李雨润,张 健. 饱和砂土中直群桩及土体地震动力响应特征研究[J]. 振动与冲击,2020,39(18):44–53.(YAN Zhixiao,LI Yurun,ZHANG Jian. Seismic response characteristics of straight group piles and soil in saturated sand[J]. Journal of Vibr Ation and Shock,2020,39(18):44–53.(in Chinese))
|
|
|
|