衬砌渗透性对穿越软弱破碎带深埋富水隧洞围岩稳定性的影响研究

doi:10.3724/1000-6915.jrme.2024.0716

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (0)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (710 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract To thoroughly investigate the influence mechanism of lining permeability on the stability of surrounding rock in deep-buried, water-enriched tunnels that traverse weak and fractured zones, the tunnel was modeled as an axially symmetric structure. The surrounding rock was categorized into three zones based on the degree of deformation: the elastic zone, the plastic softening zone, and the fractured zone. Utilizing the Mogi-Coulomb strength criterion, which accounts for the effects of the intermediate principal stress, theoretical derivations were conducted to derive solutions for the distribution of pore water pressure, as well as the stress and deformation resulting from seepage in tunnels. This study, based on specific engineering examples, analyzed the impact of lining permeability on the distribution of pore water pressure within the tunnel, the stress and radii of the plastic softening and fractured zones in the surrounding rock, displacement of tunnel walls, and surrounding rock pressure. It discussed the reasonable range of values for the lining permeability coefficient and further explored the effects of factors such as the characteristics of the weak and fractured zones in surrounding rock, the softening modulus, and the intermediate principal stress on the stability of surrounding rock under conditions of reasonable lining permeability coefficient values. The research findings indicated that as the ratio of the permeability coefficients between the lining and the elastic zone of the surrounding rock increased, the pore water pressure, the radii of the plastic softening and fractured zones, surrounding rock pressure, and tunnel wall displacement all decreased. Conversely, the stress in the weak and fractured zone of the surrounding rock increased. When the permeability coefficient ratio reached a certain threshold , these parameters tended to stabilize. Considering the safety of tunnel lining structures, the stability of surrounding rock, and the capacity to resist deformation, was deemed relatively reasonable. Further results revealed that the softening modulus of the surrounding rock had the most significant effect on the radius of the fractured zone. Additionally, the intermediate principal stress had a pronounced impact on the deformation of the surrounding rock and the expansion of the weak and fractured zone, exhibiting notable interval symmetry.

Key words： tunnel engineering deep-buried and water-enriched tunnel permeable concrete lining Mogi-Coulomb criterion weak and fractured zones reasonable value of permeability coefficient

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LYU Congcong1
	CAO Li1
	LI Zongli2
	LU Xiaochun1
	TIAN Bin1
	WU Zhenchao1

Cite this article:

LYU Congcong1,CAO Li1,LI Zongli2, et al. Influence of lining permeability on the stability of surrounding rocks crossing weak and fractured zones of deep-buried and water-enriched tunnel[J]. , 2025, 44(S2): 78-89.

URL:

https://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/EN/10.3724/1000-6915.jrme.2024.0716 OR https://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/EN/Y2025/V44/IS2/78

[1] 伍国军，陈卫忠，谭贤君，等. 饱和岩体渗透性动态演化对引水隧洞稳定性的影响研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2020，39(11)： 2 172–2 182.(WU Guojun，CHEN Weizhong，TAN Xianjun，et al. Effect of the permeability dynamic evolution of saturated rock on the stability of diversion tunnels[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2020，39(11)：2 172–2 182.(in Chinese))
[2] 刘保国，于明圆，孙景来，等. 水–力耦合作用下页岩力学特性及其损伤本构模型研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2023，42(5)：1 041–1 054.(LIU Baoguo，YU Mingyuan，SUN Jinglai，et al. Study on mechanical properties and damage constitutive model of shale under hydro-mechanical coupling[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2023，42(5)：1 041–1 054.(in Chinese))
[3] LEE S W，JUNG J W，NAM S W，et al. The influence of seepage forces on ground reaction curve of circular opening[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology，2007，22(1)：28–38.
[4] 刘成学，杨林德，李鹏. 考虑应力重分布的深埋圆形透水隧洞弹塑性解[J]. 工程力学，2009，26(2)：16–20.(LIU Chengxue，YANG Linde，LI Peng. Elastic-plastic analytical solution of deep buried circle tunnel considering stress redistribution[J]. Engineering Mechanics，2009，26(2)：16–20.(in Chinese))
[5] 欧阳宇峰，刘成学. 基于Hoke-Brown准则的深埋圆形透水隧洞弹塑性分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报，2019，15(5)：1 410–1 416. (OUYANG Yufeng，LIU Chengxue. Elastic-plastic analysis on deep buried circle tunnel considering seepage effect based on Hoke-Brown criterion[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering，2019，15(5)：1 410–1 416.(in Chinese))
[6] 王睢，钟祖良，刘新荣. 基于D-P屈服准则考虑渗流影响的深埋有压圆形隧洞弹塑性解[J]. 现代隧道技术，2019，56(1)：39–46.(WANG Sui，ZHONG Zuliang，LIU Xinrong. D-P yield criterion based elastoplastic solution for a deep-buried and pressured circular tunnel considering seepage effect[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology，2019，56(1)：39–46.(in Chinese))
[7] 和晓楠. 深埋高水压隧道围岩衬砌共体抗渗支护设计理论研究[博士学位论文][D]. 北京：北京科技大学，2022.(HE Xiaonan. Study on cooperative anti-permeability support design of lining structure and the reinforced surrounding rock of deep buried tunnel with high water pressure[Ph. D. Thesis][D]. Beijing：University of Science and Technology Beijing，2022.(in Chinese))
[8] 何川，齐春，封坤，等. 基于D-P准则的盾构隧道围岩与衬砌结构相互作用分析[J]. 力学学报，2017，49(1)：31–40.(HE Chuan，QI Chun，FENG Kun，et al. Theoretical analysis of interaction between surrounding rocks and linging structure of shield tunnel based on drucker-prager yield criteria[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics，2017，49(1)：31–40.(in Chinese))
[9] 张治国，程志翔，汪嘉程，等. 考虑渗流影响的深埋隧道围岩–衬砌相互作用研究[J]. 隧道建设(中英文)，2021，41(增1)：108–121.(ZHANG Zhiguo，CHENG Zhixiang，WANG Jiacheng，et al. Interaction between surrounding rock and lining of deep-buried tunnel considering influence of seepage[J]. Tunnel Construction，2021，41(Supp.1)：108–121.(in Chinese))
[10] 孙河林，姜海波. 考虑渗流效应的衬砌隧洞围岩弹塑性分析[J]. 隧道建设(中英文)，2023，43(增1)：206–215.(SUN Helin，JIANG Haibo. Elastic-plastic analysis of surrounding rock of lining tunnel considering seepage effect[J]. Tunnel Construction，2023，43(Supp.1)：206–215.(in Chinese))
[11] SCHLEISS A J. 透水压力隧洞的设计[J]. 邵鉴文，译. 人民珠江，1986，(5)：39–46.(SCHLEISS A J. Design of permeable lining of pressure tunnel[J]. Translated by SHAO Jianwen. Peral River，1986，(5)：39–46.(in Chinese))
[12] 李新星，蔡永昌，庄晓莹，等. 高压引水隧洞衬砌的透水设计研究[J]. 岩土力学，2009，30(5)：1 403–1 408.(LI Xinxing，CAI Yongchang，ZHUANG Xiaoying，et al. Design of permeable lining for high pressure hydraulic tunnel[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2009，30(5)：1 403–1 408.(in Chinese))
[13] 李宗利，任青文，王亚红. 考虑渗流场影响深埋圆形隧洞的弹塑性解[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2004，23(8)：1 291–1 295.(LI Zongli，REN Qingwen，WANG Yahong. Elasto-plastic analytical solution of deep-buried circle tunnel considering fluid flow field[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2004，23(8)：1 291–1 295.(in Chinese))
[14] 李宗利，裴向辉，吕从聪，等. 隧道透水性衬砌环渗透系数合理取值与工程措施探讨[J]. 岩土工程学报，2014，36(6)：1 167–1 172. (LI Zongli，PEI Xianghui，LÜ Congcong，et al. Reasonable permeability coefficient and engineering measures of concrete lining circle[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2014，36(6)：1 167–1 172.(in Chinese))
[15] LU C C，LI Z L. Rational permeability coefficient of a permeable lining for composite tunnel lining structures[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2017，36(8)：1 930–1 938.
[16] 赵光明，张小波，王超，等. 软弱破碎巷道围岩深浅承载结构力学分析及数值模拟[J]. 煤炭学报，2016，41(7)：1 632–1 642.(ZHAO Guangming，ZHANG Xiaobo，WANG Chao，et al. Mechanical analysis and numerical simulation for deep and shallow bearing structures of soft and broken roadway surrounding rock[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2016，41(7)：1 632–1 642.(in Chinese))
[17] 张常光，张庆贺，赵均海. 考虑应变软化、剪胀和渗流的水工隧洞解析解[J]. 岩土工程学报，2009，31(12)：1 941–1 946.(ZHANG Changguang，ZHANG Qinghe，ZHAO Junhai. Analytical solutions of hydraulic tunnels considering strain softening，shear dilation and seepage[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2009，31(12)：1 941–1 946.(in Chinese))
[18] 张常光，胡云世，赵均海，等. 深埋圆形水工隧洞弹塑性应力和位移统一解[J]. 岩土工程学报，2010，32(11)：1 738–1 745.(ZHANG Changguang，HU Yunshi，ZHAO Junhai. Elastic-plastic unified solutions for stresses and displacements of a deep buried circular hydraulic tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2010，32(11)：1 738–1 745.(in Chinese))
[19] 高召宁，孟祥瑞，付志亮. 考虑渗流、应变软化和扩容的巷道围岩弹塑性分析[J]. 重庆大学学报，2014，37(1)：96–101.(GAO Zhaoning，MENG Xiangrui，FU Zhiliang. Elasto-plastic analysis on surrounding rock of roadways based on seepage，strain softening and dilatancy[J]. Journal of Chongqing University，2014，37(1)：96–101.(in Chinese))
[20] 潘继良，高召宁，任奋华. 考虑应变软化和扩容的圆形巷道围岩强度准则效应[J]. 煤炭学报，2018，43(12)：3 293–3 301.(PAN Jiliang，GAO Zhaoning，REN Fenhua. Effect of strength criteria on surrounding rock of circular roadway considering strain softening and dilatancy[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2018，43(12)：3 293–3 301.(in Chinese))
[21] ZHANG Q，SHAO C，WANG H Y，et al. A fully coupled hydraulic-mechanical solution of a circular tunnel in strain-softening rock masses[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology incorporating Trenchless Technology Research，2020，99(C)：103 375–103 375.
[22] 张振杰. 高外水压作用下大埋深隧洞围岩稳定分析方法及工程应用[博士学位论文][D]. 济南：山东大学，2021.(ZHANG Zhenjie. Analysis method and engineering application of surrounding rock stability of deep-buried tunnel under high external water pressure[Ph. D. Thesis][D]. Ji?nan：Shandong University，2021.(in Chinese))
[23] 赵阳升. 岩体力学发展的一些回顾与若干未解之百年问题[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2021，40(7)：1 297–1 336.(ZHAO Yangsheng. Retrospection on the development of rock mass mechanics and the summary of some unsolved centennial problems[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2021，40(7)：1 297–1 336.(in Chinese))
[24] 范文，俞茂宏，陈立伟，等. 考虑剪胀及软化的洞室围岩弹塑性分析的统一解[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2004，23(19)：3 213–3 220.(FAN Wen，YU Maohong，CHEN Liwei，et al. Unified elastoplastic solution for surrounding rocks of openings with consideration of material dilatancy and softening[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2004，23(19)：3 213–3 220.(in Chinese))
[25] 经纬，薛维培，姚直书. 巷道围岩塑性软化区岩石内摩擦角与黏聚力变化规律[J]. 煤炭学报，2018，43(8)：2 203–2 210.(JING Wei，XUE Weipei，YAO Zhishu. Variation of the internal friction angle and cohesion of the plastic softening zone rock in roadway surrounding rock[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2018，43(8)：2 203–2 210.(in Chinese))
[26] 蔡晓鸿，蔡勇平. 水工压力隧洞结构应力计算[M]. 北京：中国水利水电出版社，2004：3–8.(CAI Xiaohong，CAI Yongpin. Structural stress calculation for hydraulic pressure tunnel[M]. Beijing：China Water Power Press，2004：3–8.(in Chinese))
[27] 卞康，肖明，刘会波. 考虑脆性损伤和渗流的圆形水工隧洞解析解[J]. 岩土力学，2012，33(1)：209–214.(BIAN Kang，XIAO Ming，LIU Huibo. Analytical solutions of circular hydraulic tunnel considering brittle damage and seepage[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2012，33(1)：209–214.(in Chinese))
[28] 吴创周，杨林德，李秋实. 弹脆塑性围岩应力和位移的广义SMP准则解[J]. 工程力学，2013，30(8)：223–228.(WU Chuangzhou，YANG Linde，LI Qiushi. Perfect elastic-brittle-plastic solution of axisymmetric circular openings in rock mass on extended SMP criterion[J]. Engineering Mechanics，2013，30(8)：223–228.(in Chinese))
[29] LI P F，FANG Q，ZHANG D L. Analytical solutions of stresses and displacements for deep circular tunnels with liners in saturated ground[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University-Science A，2014，15(6)：395–404.
[30] 傅鹤林，史越，龙燕，等. 中主应力系数对岩石强度准则的影响[J]. 中南大学学报：自然科学版，2018，49(1)：158–166.(FU Helin，SHI Yue，LONG Yan，et al. Influence of intermediate principle stress coefficient on rock strength criterion[J]. Journal of Central South University：Science and Technology，2018，49(1)：158–166.(in Chinese))
[31] 吕彩忠. 基于Mogi-Coulomb强度准则的隧道围岩理想弹塑性解答[J]. 土木建筑与环境工程，2014，36(6)：54–59.(LYU Caizhong. Elastic-perfectly plastic solution of tunnel surrounding rocks using Mogi-Coulomb strength criterion[J]. Journal of Civil，Architectural and Environmental Engineering，2014，36(6)：54–59.(in Chinese))