|
|
|
| Shaking table test study on dynamic responses of underpass tunnels under earthquake |
| PAI Lifang1,2,3,WU Honggang2,3,4#br# |
(1. China Academy of Railway Sciences,Beijing 100081,China;2. China Northwest Research Institute Co. Ltd. of CREC,Lanzhou,Gansu 730000,China;3. Western Environmental Geotechnical and Site Rehabilitation Technology Engineering Laboratory,Lanzhou,Gansu 730000,China;4. China Railway Landslide Engineering Laboratory,Lanzhou,Gansu 730000,China)
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract With the continuous construction and planning of national road networks,a large number of close parallel or cross railway and highway tunnels has been emerging. Due to the limitations of topography,geological conditions and line strike,the engineering problems of near junction tunnels are more and more complicated. In this paper,taking the 3D crossing Strawberry Channel 1# and Pandaoling Tunnel as examples,especially the Pandaoling Tunnel(underpass tunnel) for the shaking table test,the acceleration and strain dynamic responses of the vault and inverted arch cross-section of ultra-small net spacing and small-angle underpass tunnels affected by the upper-span tunnel were analyzed. Specifically,the maximum seismic strain in the hoop direction was evaluated under the loading condition of 0.15 g peak acceleration of ground motion along the field,and according to the range of the effective frequency accelerometer and the input power spectrum amplitude and using the SPECTE response spectrum analysis program,the distributions of the acceleration response spectrum of the vault and inverted arch at the intersection central were compared. The results show that,affected by the spatial position of the 3D cross tunnel,the acceleration time history and spectrum of the ultra-small net spacing and small angle underpass tunnel are larger than the overall response of the inverted arch,the effective duration of vibration is longer and the spatial distribution is characterized by the prominent amplitude response of the arch. The peak acceleration response of the vault has a superposition effect and the peak acceleration ratio is obviously nonlinear and non-stationary. The higher the earthquake intensity is,the greater the strain response will be. The failure of the vault shows a transfer evolution form from the cross section to the river side then to the mountain side. With increasing the input seismic wave,the increases of the dynamic strain and the peak acceleration ratio of the inverted arch show local changes. The surrounding rock of the tunnel has filtering effect on the high frequency band of the seismic wave. The predominant main frequency markedly influencing the tunnel structure concentrates in two low frequency band of 1﹣10 Hz and 11﹣20 Hz,and the values of the predominant frequency corresponding to the maximum acceleration response of the vault and inverted arch are respectively 5 Hz and 12.5 Hz. For different seismic intensities,the peak strain at the vault are largest,followed by the inverted arch,and the arch waists of the riverside and the mountainside in turn. The predominant frequency of the acceleration response and the responses of the velocity and the displacement are affected by the base frequency and the damping,resulting in difference in time and space. It is suggested that he performance of the damping structure of the tunnel during the design process should be improved and the recommended damping ratio is 20%. The research results can provide certain theoretical guidance for the seismic design of 3D cross tunnels.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 何 卫. 暗挖地铁隧道下穿高速铁路路基沉降规律与控制措施研究[硕士学位论文][D]. 北京:北京交通大学,2015.(HE Wei. Research on subgrade settlement law and control measures of underground tunnel tunneling through high-speed railway[M. S. Thesis][D]. Beijing:Beijing Jiaotong University,2015.(in Chinese))
[2] 刘 镇,周翠英. 新旧立体交叉隧道系统力学耦合作用全过程与规律[J]. 岩土力学,2012,33(2):179–185.(LIU Zhen,ZHOU Cuiying. Whole process and law of mechanical coupling of new and old three-dimensional cross tunnel system[J]. Geotechnical Mechanics,2012,33 (2):179﹣185.(in Chinese))
[3] 赵则超. 立体交叉隧道不同近接距离对围岩压力和衬砌结构力学行为的影响[硕士学位论文][D]. 成都:西南交通大学,2009.(ZHAO Zechao. The influence of different proximity distance on the surrounding rock pressure and the mechanical behavior of lining structure of a three-dimensional cross tunnel[M. S. Thesis][D]. Chengdu:Southwest Jiaotong University,2009.(in Chinese))
[4] 李玉峰,彭立敏,雷明锋. 高速铁路交叉隧道动力学问题研究综述[J]. 现代隧道技术,2015,52(2):8–15.(LI Yufeng,PENG Limin,LEI Mingfeng. Summary of research on dynamic problems of high-speed railway cross tunnels[J]. Modern Tunnel Technology,2015,52(2):8–15.(in Chinese))
[5] 王国波,彭祥军,郝朋飞,等. 近距离地下穿越结构地震响应研究综述[J]. 岩土工程学报,2019,41(11):2 026–2 036.(WANG Guobo,PENG Xiangjun,HAO Pengfei,et al. Summary of research on seismic response of short distance underground crossing structures[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2019,41(11):2 026–2 036.(in Chinese))
[6] ZHANG Z G,ZHANG M X,JIANG Y J,et al. Analytical prediction for ground movements and liner internal forces induced by shallow tunnels considering non-uniform convergence pattern and ground-liner interaction mechanism[J]. Soils and Foundations,2017,57(2):211–226.
[7] ZHANG Z G,HUANG M S,XI X G,et al. Complex variable solutions for soil and liner deformation due to tunneling in clays[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics,2018,18(7):1–19.
[8] LIU J L,WANG Z Z,FANG X. Iterative formulas and estimation formulas for computing normal depth of horseshoe cross-section tunnel[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering,2010,136(11):786–790.
[9] ZHANG C S,MAO Y. Effects of cross section of mine tunnel on the propagation characteristics of UHF radio wave[C]// International Symposium on Antennas. [S. l.]:[s. n.],2006:1–5.
[10] LIU J L,WANG Z Z,ZHAO Y F. Iterative calculation for contracted depth of horseshoe tunnel cross-section[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2010,26(Supp.2):167–171.
[11] 李鹏飞,王 帆,张成平,等. 城市地下道路立交隧道合理间距及支护加强范围研究[J]. 现代隧道技术,2015,52(6):111–117.(LI Pengfei,WANG Fan,ZHANG Chengping,et al. Study on the reasonable spacing and support strengthening range of urban underground road overpass tunnel[J]. Modern tunnel technology,2015,52(6):111–117.(in Chinese))
[12] MA G W,ZHENG H B,LI P F. Displacement characteristics for a 'π' shaped double cross-duct excavated by cross diaphragm(CRD) method[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,2018,51(7):204–215.
[13] 杜立兵. 小净距空间交叉隧道施工及运营安全性研究[硕士学位论文][D]. 兰州:兰州交通大学,2013.(DU Libing. Study on construction and operation safety of small clear space cross tunnel[M. S. Thesis][D]. Lanzhou:Lanzhou Jiaotong University,2013.(in Chinese))
[14] 朱正国,杨利海,刘桂朋,等. 地震对交叉隧道影响机制及抗震方案研究[J]. 铁道工程学报,2018,35(9):61–66.(ZHU Zhengguo,YANG Lihai,LIU Guipeng,et al. Study on the influence mechanism and anti-seismic scheme of earthquake on cross tunnels[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering,2018,35(9):61–66.(in Chinese))
[15] 刘桂朋. 地震荷载作用下交叉隧道的动力响应及抗震方案研究[硕士学位论文][D]. 石家庄:石家庄铁道大学,2017.(LIU Guipeng. Study on dynamic response and aseismic scheme of cross tunnel under earthquake load[M. S. Thesis][D]. Shijiazhuang:Shijiazhuang Railway University,2017.(in Chinese))
[16] 陈卫忠,郑 东,于建新,等. 交叉隧道施工对已有隧道稳定性影响研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2015,34(增1):3 097–3 105. (CHEN Weizhong,ZHENG Dong,YU Jianxin,et al. Study on the influence of cross tunnel construction on the stability of existing tunnels[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2015,34(Supp.1):3 097–3 105.(in Chinese))
[17] 刘 聪,彭立敏,雷明锋,等. 立体交叉隧道结构地震动力响应特性及其相互影响规律振动台试验及数值仿真研究[J]. 振动与冲击,2019,38(19):233–241.(LIU Cong,PENG Limin,LEI Mingfeng,et al. Shaking table test and numerical simulation research on seismic dynamic response characteristics and interaction rules of three-dimensional cross tunnel structure[J]. Vibration and Impact,2019,38 (19):233–241.(in Chinese))
[18] YU H T,YAN X ,ANTONIO BOBET,et al. Multi-point shaking table test of a long tunnel subjected to non-uniform seismic loadings[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering,2017,(9):1–19.
[19] 刘鸿哲,黄茂松. 不同埋深矩形隧道地震响应的离心振动台试验[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2013,32(增2):3 404–3 412.(LIU Hongzhe,HUANG Maosong. Centrifugal shaking table test of seismic response of rectangular tunnels with different buried depths[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2013,32(Supp.2):3 404–3 412.(in Chinese))
[20] TAO L J,B. ZHANG,X. ZHAO,et al. Shaking table test on the seismic response of cross-structure between subway station and tunnel[C]// China-japan-us Trilateral Symposium on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering. [S. l.]:[s. n.],2013:353–360.
[21] 高 峰,孙常新,谭绪凯,等. 不同埋深隧道的地震响应振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学,2015,36(9):2 517–2 522.(GAO Feng,SUN Changxin,TAN Xukai,et al. Shaking table test of seismic response of different buried tunnels[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2015,36(9):2 517–2 522. (in Chinese))
[22] 中华人民共和国行业标准编写组. JTG 3370.1—2018公路隧道设计规范[S]. 北京:人民交通出版社,2018.(The Professional Standards Compilation Group of the People's Republic of China. JTG 3370.1—2018 Highway tunnel design specification[S]. Beijing:People¢s Communications Press,2018. (in Chinese))
[23] 中华人民共和国行业标准编写组. TB 10003—2016 铁路隧道设计规范[S]. 北京:中国铁道出版社,2017.(The Professional Standards Compilation Group of the People¢s Republic of China. TB 10003—2016 Railway tunnel design code[S]. Beijing:China Railway Publishing House,2017.(in Chinese))
[24] 张曙光. TRT—6000在山西中南部铁路通道隧道工程中的应用研究[硕士学位论文][D]. 天津:河北工业大学,2015.(ZHANG Shuguang. Research on the application of TRT—6000 in the tunnel engineering of the south central railway channel in Shanxi[M. S. Thesis][D]. Tianjin:Hebei University of Technology,2015.(in Chinese))
[25] WU Z J,LEI T,CHEN Y J,et al. Deformation and instability characteristics of loess slope based on shaking table model test[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University,2015,7(3):1–17.
[26] DOU H,BYRNE P M. Model studies of boundary effect on dynamic soil response[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,1997,34(3):460–465.
[27] KOSTYUKOV N A. Effect of the initial density of a substance on the conditions of oblique collision of shock waves[J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics,1977,18(3):379–384.
[28] 徐炳伟. 大型复杂结构–桩–土振动台模型试验研究[博士学位论文][D]. 天津:天津大学,2010.(XU Bingwei. Model test of large complex structure pile soil shaking table[Ph. D. Thesis] [D]. Tianjin:Tianjin University,2010.(in Chinese))
[29] AN W G,JIANG L,SUN J H,et al. Correlation analysis of sample thickness,heat flux,and cone calorimetry test data of polystyrene foam[J]. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry,2015,119(1):229–238.
[30] RAMU M, RAJA V P,THYLA P R. Establishment of structural similitude for elastic models and validation of scaling laws[J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering,2013,17(1):139–144.
[31] AYRES J,MOURA R,SANTOS P,et al. Exploring similarity relations according to different contexts in mining,generalized association rules[J]. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing,2013,141(9):137–152.
[32] 董金玉,杨继红,杨国香,等. 基于正交设计的模型试验相似材料的配比试验研究[J]. 煤炭学报,2012,37(1):44–49.(DONG Jinyu,YANG Jihong,YANG Guoxiang,et al. Study on the proportion of similar materials in model test based on orthogonal design[J]. Journal of Coal Society,2012,37(1):44–49.(in Chinese))
[33] SHINOZAKI T,IWATATE T,KOBAYASHI T,et al. Seismic response analysis of existing shield tunnel on neighboring construction[J]. Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshuu A,2010,29(22):842–849.
[34] 牌立芳,赵 金,吴红刚,等. 刷方减重下隧道–滑坡平行体系变形演化试验研究[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报,2019,39(5):842–850. (PAI Lifang,ZHAO Jin,WU Honggang,et al. Experimental study on deformation evolution of tunnel landslide parallel system under brush weight reduction[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering,2019,39(5):842–850.(in Chinese))
[35] 中华人民共和国国家标准编写组. GB 18306—2015 中国地震动参数区划图[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2016.(The National Standards Compilation Group of the People's Republic of China. GB 18306—2015 China earthquake parameter zoning map[S]. Beijing:China Standards Press,2016. (in Chinese))
[36] HONG C S,YANG H J,KANG Y S,et al. A study of the correlation between sinusoidal sweep and random vibration durability tests through specimen tests[J]. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing,2016,17(12):1 665–1 671.
[37] CESCA S,GRIGOLI F. Full waveform seismological advances for microseismic monitoring[J]. Advances in Geophysics,2014,56(12):169–228. |
| [1] |
MAO Yuting1, 2, HE Manchao1, 2, LIU Fangzhou3, BAI Xing4, YANG Xiaojie1, 2, TAO Zhigang1, 2*. Development and application of a large-scale physical model system for tunnel creep testing[J]. , 2026, 45(6): 1627-1638. |
|
|
|
|