|
|
|
| Analytical procedure for mechanical response of surrounding rock of compressed air energy storage caverns considering bidirectional strain-softening |
| XU Chen1, 2, 3, ZHANG Shishu4, XIA Caichu1, 2, 3, 5* |
| (1. Institute of Rock Mechanics, Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315211, China; 2. Ningbo Key Laboratory of Energy Geostructure, Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315211, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Deep Metal Mining and Equipment, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315211, China; 4. PowerChina Chengdu Engineering Corporation Limited, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, China; 5. Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Rock Mechanics and Geohazards, Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315211, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Rock masses exhibit significant strain-softening characteristics under high-stress conditions. During excavation, surrounding rock may undergo plastic shear failure with strain-softening. Under high internal pressure, the primary stress sequence of surrounding rock changes, leading to strain-softening in another direction, known as bidirectional strain-softening. Accordingly, an analytical method for calculating rock stress and displacement—considering the biaxial strain-softening characteristics—has been proposed from a stress path perspective. For rock masses of superior quality (e.g., Grade III and above), the effects of bidirectional strain-softening can be overlooked in the structural design calculations for caverns. However, for lower-quality rock masses (e.g., Grade V1), the calculated rock displacements during high-pressure gas storage can differ significantly—by more than a multiple—when accounting for strain-softening versus neglecting it. For rock masses classified as Grade IV1, this discrepancy is approximately 14%. Therefore, the strain-softening characteristics of medium-to-soft rock strata must be considered in the structural design of compressed air energy storage caverns. These findings offer valuable insights for the design of cavern structures within medium-to-soft rock formations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 张国华，相 月，王薪锦，等. 压气储能地下内衬储气库结构荷载分担解析解及影响因素分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2024，43(增2)：3 633–3 650.(ZHANG Guohua，XIANG Yue，WANG Xinjin，et al. Analytical solution for load sharing in the structure of an underground lined rock cavern for compressed air energy storage and analysis of influencing factors[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2024，43(Supp.2)：3 633–3 650.(in Chinese))
[2] ZHAO J，WANG G. Unloading and reverse yielding of a finite cavity in a bounded cohesive-frictional medium[J]. Computers and Geotechnics，2010，37(1/2)：239–245.
[3] CHEN X，WANG J. Stability analysis for compressed air energy storage cavern with initial excavation damage zone in an abandoned mining tunnel[J]. Journal of Energy Storage，2022，45：103725.
[4] 夏才初，徐 晨，杜时贵. 考虑应力路径的深埋隧道黏弹–塑性围岩与支护相互作用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2021，40(9)：1 789–1 802.(XIA Caichu，XU Chen，DU Shigui. Interaction between viscoelastic-plastic rock mass and support in deep tunnels considering stress paths[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2021，40(9)：1 789–1 802.(in Chinese))
[5] XU C，ZHANG G，XIA C，et al. Mechanical behavior of a new segmented lining for underground rock caverns with high internal pressure[J]. Computers and Geotechnics，2024，167：106100.
[6] 王者超，李嘉祥，郝薛将，等. 压气储能地下内衬洞室建设中若干关键问题研究进展[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治，2024，6(1)：1–13.(WANG Zhechao，LI Jiaxiang，HAO Xuejiang，et al. A review of several issues for compressed gas energy storage in lined rock cavern[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering，2024，6(1)：1–13.(in Chinese))
[7] XU Y，XIA C，ZHOU S，et al. An analytical solution for elastoplastic responses of a lined rock cavern for compressed air energy storage considering excavation and high internal pressure[J]. Computers and Geotechnics，2024，170：106318.
[8] 张世殊，徐 晨，夏才初. 压气储能硐室围岩应力路径及稳定性调控[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2025，44(11)：2 825–2 842.(ZHANG Shishu，XU Chen，XIA Caichu. Stress path and stability control of surrounding rock in caverns for compressed air energy storage[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2025，44(11)：2 825–2 842.(in Chinese))
[9] 彭 俊，荣 冠，周创兵，等. 一种基于GSI弱化的应变软化模型[J]. 岩土工程学报，2014，36(3)：499–507.(PENG Jun，RONG Guan，ZHOU Chuangbing，et al. A strain-softening model based on GSI softening[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2014，36(3)：499–507.(in Chinese))
[10] 王延宁，张 强，李子仪，等. 考虑弹塑性耦合效应的应变软化模型[J]. 煤炭学报，2020，45(12)：4 037–4 051.(WANG Yanning，ZHANG Qiang，LI Ziyi，et al. Strain softening model considering elastic-plastic coupling effect[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2020，45(12)：4 037–4 051.(in Chinese))
[11] 孙振宇，张顶立，房 倩，等. 隧道初期支护与围岩相互作用的时空演化特性[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2017，36(增2)：3 943–3 956. (SUN Zhenyu，ZHANG Dingli，FANG Qian，et al. Spatial and temporal evolution characteristics of interaction between primary support and tunnel surrounding rock[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2017，36(Supp.2)：3 943–3 956.(in Chinese))
[12] ZHANG J，WANG Y，YAO B，et al. Investigation of deep shaft-surrounding rock support technology based on a post-peak strain-softening model of rock mass[J]. Applied Sciences，2022，12(1)：253.
[13] LEE Y K，PIETRUSZCZAK S. A new numerical procedure for elasto-plastic analysis of a circular opening excavated in a strain-softening rock mass[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology，2008，23(5)：588–599.
[14] JING W，ZHOU J，YUAN L，et al. Deformation and failure mechanism of surrounding rock in deep soft rock tunnels considering rock rheology and different strength criteria[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering，2023，57(1)：545–580.
[15] 崔 岚，廖哲贤，盛 谦，等. 弹性模量跌减效应下应变软化围岩开挖力学响应[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2024，43(增2)：3 907–3 922.(CUI Lan，LIAO Zhexian，SHENG Qian，et al. Excavation disturbance characteristics of strain softening surrounding rock under the attenuation effect of elastic modulus[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2024，43(Supp.2)：3 907–3 922.(in Chinese))
[16] XU C，WANG S，XIA C，et al. Viscoelastic plastic interaction of tunnel support and strain-softening rock mass considering longitudinal effect[J]. Rock Mechanics Bulletin，2024，3(4)：100152.
[17] XU C，WANG S，XIA C. Analytical prediction for time-dependent interaction of a circular tunnel excavated in strain-softening rock mass[J]. Rock Mechanics Bulletin，2024，3(3)：100127.
[18] 夏才初，徐 晨，刘宇鹏，等. 基于GZZ强度准则考虑应变软化特性的深埋隧道弹塑性解[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2018，37(11)：2 468–2 477.(XIA Caichu，XU Chen，LIU Yupeng，et al. Elastoplastic solution of deep buried tunnel considering strain-softening characteristics based on GZZ strength criterion[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2018，37(11)：2 468–2 477.(in Chinese))
[19] XU C，XIA C. Interaction between yielding tunnel support and strain-softening rock mass based on the three-dimensional strength criterion[J]. Acta Geotechnica，2024，19：7 835–7 850.
[20] XU C，XIA C. A new large strain approach for predicting tunnel deformation in strain-softening rock mass based on the Generalized Zhang-Zhu strength criterion[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2021，143：104786.
[21] XU C，XIA C，HAN C. Modified ground response curve (GRC) in strain-softening rock mass based on the generalized Zhang-Zhu strength criterion considering over-excavation[J]. Underground Space，2021，6(5)：585–602.
[22] 李兆霖，周 伟，王连国，等. 不同真三轴路径下岩石卸荷特性与破裂特征研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报，2022，39(3)：480–488.(LI Zhaolin，ZHOU Wei，WANG Lianguo，et al. Unloading properties and fracture characteristics of rock under different true triaxial unloading paths[J]. Journal of Mining and Safety Engineering，2022，39(3)：480–488.(in Chinese))
[23] QIU K，LI S，LIU Z，YUAN M，et al. An elastoplastic solution for lined hydrogen storage caverns during excavation and operation phases considering strain softening and dilatancy[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2024，183：105949.
[24] 中华人民共和国行业标准编写组. JTG 3370.1—2018公路隧道设计规范(第一册 土建工程)[S]. 北京：人民交通出版社，2019.(The Professional Standards Compilation Group of People?s Republic of China. JTG 3370.1—2018 Specifications for design of highway tunnels(Section 1 Civil Engineering)[S]. Beijing：China Communications Press，2019.(in Chinese))
|
|
|
|
2026, Vol. 45 
