深埋隧洞岩爆风险尺寸效应问题探讨

doi:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2017.0326

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (474 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要岩爆是深埋工程建设面临的关键技术难题，岩爆风险的准确预测与评估至关重要。以全长超过16 km的锦屏二级7条不同洞径的深埋隧洞群岩爆实际发生情况作为统计依据，通过岩爆倾向性试验、应力状态、应力路径、蓄能深度、释放能量等多种方法和指标，对岩爆风险中存在的尺寸效应进行了深入探讨。研究结果表明，以小尺度岩石力学性质为基础的岩爆倾向性评价方法，由于难以反映地应力条件的变化，因此具有一定的局限性，而采用应力和能量分析方法则能够较准确地揭示岩爆风险中存在的尺寸效应。基于对深埋大理岩力学特性的深入认识，结合应力路径、蓄能能力、释放能量等因素的分析，7 m洞径的排水洞较6 m洞径的交通洞和13 m洞径的引水隧洞具有更高的岩爆风险，证明岩爆风险与隧洞尺寸并不存在完全的线性对应关系，存在一定的尺寸效应。根据现场实际统计数据，无论岩爆段所占比例，还是强烈～极强岩爆比例，排水洞也均高于交通洞和引水隧洞，而交通洞与引水隧洞的岩爆频次和强度基本相当，与理论分析结果基本吻合。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	刘宁1
	2
	张春生1
	褚卫江1
	2
	倪绍虎1

关键词 ：隧道工程, 深埋隧洞, 岩爆风险, 尺寸效应, 锦屏二级, 大理岩

Abstract：Rock burst is a key problem in the engineering construction. An accurate forecast and assessment of rock burst risk is crucial. The actual rock burst occurred in the deep buried tunnel group of Jinping II with 7 tunnels of different diameters and total length more than 16 km. The rock burst tendency test was carried out and the stress condition，stress path，energy storage depth and releasing energy were investigated. The test of rock burst tendency is based on the mechanical properties of rock in small scale，which is difficult to reflect the influence of geostress on rock burst risk，so the method has some limitations. Accordingly，the stress and the energy analysis method are able to reveal accurately the problems of size effect. The results based on the mechanical characteristics，the stress path，the energy storage capacity and the energy releasing analysis of deep buried marble show that the drainage tunnel of 7 m diameter has a higher risk of rock burst than the traffic tunnel of 6 m diameter and the diversion tunnel of 13 m diameter. This proves that there is no linear relation between the rock burst and size. According to the actual statistical data，the ratio of rock burst and the proportion of strong to super strong rock burst of the drainage tunnel are also higher than those of the traffic and diversion tunnels. The frequency and intensity of rock burst of the traffic tunnel and diversion tunnel are in the same level，and the result is consistent with the theoretical analysis.

Key words： tunnelling engineering deep buried tunnel rock burst risk size effect Jinping II marble

引用本文:

刘宁1，2，张春生1，褚卫江1，2，倪绍虎1. 深埋隧洞岩爆风险尺寸效应问题探讨[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2017, 36(10): 2514-2521.
LIU Ning1，2，ZHANG Chunsheng1，CHU Weijiang1，2，NI Shaohu1. Discussion on size effect of rock burst risk in deep buried tunnel. , 2017, 36(10): 2514-2521.

链接本文:

http://www.rockmech.org/CN/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2017.0326 或 http://www.rockmech.org/CN/Y2017/V36/I10/2514

[8]	张传庆. 基于破坏接近度的岩石工程安全性评价方法的研究[博士学位论文][D]. 武汉：中国科学院研究生院，2006.(ZHANG Chuanqing. Study on method of safety evaluation for rock engineering based on failure approach index[Ph. D. Thesis][D]. Wuhan：Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences，2006.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[4]	YOUNG R P，COLLINS D S，REYES-MONTES J M，et al. Quantification and interpretation of seismicity[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2004，41(8)：1 317-1 327. " target="_blank">
[2]	COOK N G W. The failure of rock[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts，1965，2(4)：389-395. " target="_blank">
[11]	KIDYBINSKI A Q. Bursting liability indices of coal[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，1981，18(4)：295-304. " target="_blank">
[14]	赵阳升，冯增朝，万志军. 岩体动力破坏的最小能量原理[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2003，22(11)：1 781-1 783.(ZHAO Yangsheng， FENG Zengchao，WAN Zhijun. Least energy principle of dynamical failure of rock mass[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2003，22(11)：1 781-1 783.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[3]	FAIRHURST C. Nuclear waste disposal and rock mechanics：contributions of the underground research laboratory(URL)，Pinawa，Manitoba[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2004，41(8)：1 221-1 227. " target="_blank">
[7]	苏国韶，冯夏庭，江权，等. 高地应力下地下工程稳定性分析与优化的局部能量释放率新指标研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2006，25(12)：2 453-2 460.(SU Guoshao，FENG Xiating，JIANG Quan，et al. Study on new index of local energy release rate for stability analysis and optimal design of underground rockmass engineering with high geostress[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2006，25(12)：2 453-2 460.(in Chinese))
[5]	GIBOWICZ S J，KIJKO A. An introduction to mining seismology[M]. New York：Academic Press，1994：85-110. " target="_blank">
[1]	冯夏庭，陈炳瑞，张传庆，等. 岩爆孕育过程的机制、预警与动态调控[M]. 北京：科学出版社，2013：1-3.(FENG Xiating，CHEN Bingrui，ZHANG Chuanqing，et al. Mechanism，warning and dynamic control of rockburst development process[M]. Beijing：Science Press，2013：1-3.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[6]	COOK N G W，HOEK E，PRETORIUS J P G，et al. Rock mechanics applied to the study of rockbursts[J]. Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy，1966，66(10)：436-528. " target="_blank">
[10]	吴世勇，张春生，陈宏钧，等. 雅砻江锦屏二级水电站——世界上规模最大的水工隧道工程[J]. 现代隧道技术，2004，(增2)：140-145. (WU Shiyong，ZHANG Chunsheng，CHEN Hongjun，et al. Jinping-II hydropower station at Yalong river—the largest underground hydro tunnel in the world[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology，2004，(Supp.2)：140-145.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[9]	严鹏，陈祥荣，单治钢，等. 基于超剪应力控制的岩爆防治措施研究[J]. 岩土力学，2008，29(增1)：453-458.(YAN Peng，CHEN Xiangrong，SHAN Zhigang，et al. Study of rock-burst prevention measures based on controlling the super shear stress[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2008，29(Supp.1)：453-458.(in Chinese))
[12]	张春生，陈祥荣，侯靖，等. 锦屏二级水电站深埋大理岩力学特性研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2010，29(10)：1 999-2 009. (ZHANG Chunsheng，CHEN Xiangrong，HOU Jing，et al. Study of mechanical behavior of deep-buried marble at Jinping II hydropower station[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2010，29(10)：1 999-2 009.(in Chinese))
[13]	谢和平，彭瑞东，鞠杨，等. 岩石破坏的能量分析初探[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2005，24(15)：2 603-2 608.(XIE Heping，PengRuidong，JU Yang，et al. On energy analysis of rock failure[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2005，24(15)：2 603-2 608.(in Chinese))
[15]	徐则民，吴培关，王苏达，等. 岩爆过程释放的能量分析[J]. 自然灾害学报，2003，12(3)：104-110.(XU Zemin，WU Peiguan，WANG Suda，et al. Analysis of energy released in process of rock burst[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters，2003，12(3)：104-110.(in Chinese))
[16]	朱焕春，吴家耀，朱永生，等. 锦屏二级水电站引水隧洞岩爆专题研究—2008～2010年阶段性总结报告[R]. 武汉：Itasca(武汉)咨询有限公司，2010.(ZHU Huanchun，WU Jiayao，ZHU Yongsheng，et al. Research on rockburst of Jinping II hydropower station diversion tunnel—2008-2010 summary report[R]. Wuhan：Itasca Consulting Co.，Ltd.，2010.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[17]	中华人民共和国国家标准编写组. GB50287—2006中国水力发电工程地质勘察规范[S]. 北京：中国计划出版社，2008.(The National Standards Compilation Group of People?s Republic of China. GB50287—2009 Code for hydropower engineering geological investigation[S]. Beijing：China Planning Press，2008.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">