基于弹性理论的有限位移条件下挡土墙上土压力解析

doi:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2020.0106

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (405 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要经典土压力理论都是通过研究弹性半空间体内的应力状态，根据土的极限平衡条件和楔体的静力平衡条件而得出的。因土具有蠕变及固结特性，所以产生主动土压力和被动土压力的时机都是暂时的，从长久角度来看，因蠕变及固结现象作用在挡土墙上的土压力也都是非极限平衡条件(有限位移)下的土压力。为计算有限位移条件下作用在挡土墙上的土压力，依据线弹性本构理论建立了有限位移条件下挡土墙上的土压力计算式，引入Duncan-Chang非线性弹性模型中的切线模量来反映土体模量随围压的变化，并推导出发生朗肯主动土压力、静止土压力、主应力方向偏转、朗肯被动土压力的界限应变，依据这4个界限应变将作用在挡土墙上的土压力分为5个状态分区，即主动破坏状态区、有限位移主动土压力状态区、主应力反转前有限位移被动土压力状态区、主应力反转后有限位移被动土压力状态区和被动破坏状态区。通过将所提公式的计算结果与模型试验结果对比分析，得出如下结论：当挡土墙产生水平平动位移、绕墙脚的转动位移和水平平动+绕墙脚转动组合位移时，土压力分布均呈非线性分布，且不同位移下土压力随墙深度的计算值与实测值基本一致，说明提出的有限位移条件下土压力的计算式能够很好地应用在实际工程的挡土墙设计中。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	党发宁
	张乐
	王旭
	丁九龙
	高俊

关键词 ：土力学, 挡土墙, 有限位移条件, 非极限土压力, 界限应变, 土压力状态分区

Abstract：The classical earth pressure theories were established by studying the stress state in an elastic half-space body based on the limit equilibrium condition of soil and the static equilibrium of the wedge. Due to the creep and consolidation characteristics of soil，the active and passive earth pressures have time-dependent features. From a long-term perspective，the earth pressure acting on retaining walls due to the creep and consolidation of soil is under non-limit equilibrium conditions(limited displacement). A calculation formula for calculating the earth pressure acting on the retaining wall under limited displacement is established in this study based on the linear elastic constitution theory. The tangent modulus in Duncan-Chang nonlinear elastic model is introduced to reflect the change of soil modulus with confining pressure，and the boundary strains of Rankine active earth pressure，earth pressure at rest，principal stress direction deflection and Rankine passive earth pressure are derived. According to the four boundary strains，the earth pressure acting on the retaining wall is divided into five state zones as active failure state zone，active earth pressure state zone with limited displacement，passive earth pressure state zone with limited displacement before principal stress deflection，passive earth pressure state zone with limited displacement after principal stress deflection and passive failure state zone. By comparing and analyzing the calculation results by the proposed formula with the model test results，it is concluded that the earth pressure distribution of the wall is always non-linear when the retaining wall moves in a mode of translation displacement (T mode)，rotation displacement around the wall base(RB mode) or translation + rotation displacement around the wall base(RBT mode)，and that the calculated values of the earth pressure along the wall depth under different displacements are basically consistent with the measured values，which indicates that the proposed can be well applied to the design of retaining walls in practical engineering.

Key words： soil mechanics retaining wall limited displacement condition non-limit earth pressure boundary strain earth pressure state zone

引用本文:

党发宁，张乐，王旭，丁九龙，高俊. 基于弹性理论的有限位移条件下挡土墙上土压力解析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2020, 39(10): 2094-2103.
DANG Faning，ZHANG Le，WANG Xu，DING Jiulong，GAO Jun. Analysis of earth pressure on retaining walls with limited displacement based on elastic theory. , 2020, 39(10): 2094-2103.

链接本文:

http://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2020.0106 或 http://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/Y2020/V39/I10/2094

[9]	马平，秦四清，钱海涛. 有限土体主动土压力计算[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2008，27(增1)：3 070-3 074.(MA Ping，QIN Siqing，QIAN Haitao. Calculation of active earth pressure for limited soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2008，27(Supp.1)：3 070-3 074.(in Chinese))
[19]	TERAZGHI K. Large retaining wall tests I—pressure of dry sand[J]. Engineering News Record，1934，112(1)：136-140.
[6]	龚慈. 不同位移模式下刚性挡土墙土压力计算方法研究[硕士学位论文][D]. 浙江：浙江大学，2005.(GONG Ci. Earth pressure against rigid retaining wall of different movement modes[M. S. Thesis][D]. Zhejiang：Zhejiang University，2005.(in Chinese))
[16]	杨明辉，戴夏斌，赵明华，等. 曲线滑裂面下有限宽度填土主动土压力计算[J]. 岩土力学，2017，38(7)：2 029-2 035.(YANG Minghui，DAI Xiabin，ZHAO Minghua，et al. Calculation of active earth pressure for limited soils with curved sliding surface[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2017，38(7)：2 029-2 035.(in Chinese))
[7]	梅国雄，宰金珉. 考虑位移影响的土压力近似计算方法[J]. 岩土力学，2001，22(4)：83-85.(MEI Guoxiong，ZAI Jinmin. Earth pressure calculating method considering displacement[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2001，22(4)：83-85.(in Chinese))
[17]	徐日庆，陈页开，杨仲轩，等. 刚性挡墙被动土压力模型试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报，2002，24(5)：569-575.(XU Riqing，CHEN Yekai，YANG Zhongxuan，et al. Experimental research on the passive earth pressure acting on a rigid wall[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2002，24(5)：569-575.(in Chinese))
[12]	张永兴，陈林. 挡土墙非极限状态主动土压力分布[J]. 土木工程学报，2011，44(4)：112-119.(ZHANG Yongxing，CHEN Lin. Active earth pressure on retaining walls in non-limit state[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal，2011，44(4)：112-119.(in Chinese))
[4]	NADUKURU S S，MICHALOWSKI R L. Arching in distribution of active load on retaining walls[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，2012，138(5)：575-584.
[14]	王闫超，晏鄂川，陆文博，等. 无黏性有限土体主动土压力解析解[J]. 岩土力学，2016，37(9)：2 513-2 520.(WANG Yanchao，YAN E-chuan，LU Wenbo，et al. Analytical solution of active earth pressure for limited cohesionless soils[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2016，37(9)：2 513-2 520.(in Chinese))
[15]	宁源，马石城. 有限黏性土体主动土压力计算分析[J]. 建筑结构，2017，47(增1)：1 161-1 165.(NI Yuan，MA Shicheng. Calculation of active earth pressure for limited cohesive soil[J]. Building Structure，2017，47(Supp.1)：1 161-1 165.(in Chinese))
[2]	FANG Y S，CHEN T J，WU B F. Passive earth pressures with various wall movements[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，1994，120(8)：1 307-1 323.
[5]	TANG Y，LI J P，MA Y. Lateral earth pressure considering the displacement of a rigid retaining wall[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics，2018，18(11)：06018031-1-06018031-12.
[8]	施建勇，雷国辉，艾英钵，等. 土压力变化规律的应力路径三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学，2005，26(11)：1 700-1 704.(SHI Jianyong，LEI Guohui，AI Yingbo，et al. Stress path controlled triaxial experimental study of lateral earth pressure behavior[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2005，26(11)：1 700-1 704.(in Chinese))
[3]	RAO P P，CHEN Q S，ZHOU Y T，et al. Determination of active earth pressure on rigid retaining wall considering arching effect in cohesive backfill soil[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics，2016，16(3)：04015082-1-04015082-9.
[10]	林智勇，戴自航，苏美选. 复杂条件下挡土墙主动土压力解析解[J]. 岩土工程学报，2008，30(4)：556-560.(LIN Zhiyong，DAI Zihang，SU Meixuan. Analytical solution of active earth pressure acting on retaining walls under complicated conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2008，30(4)：556-560.(in Chinese))
[13]	徐日庆，廖斌，吴渐，等. 黏性土的非极限主动土压力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学，2013，34(1)：148-154.(XU Riqing，LIAO Bin，WU Jian，et al. Computational method for active earth pressure of cohesive soil under nonlimit state[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2013，34(1)：148-154.(in Chinese))
[18]	陈奕柏，柯才桐，高洪波，等. 考虑变位影响的刚性挡土墙非极限土压力研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2015，34(5)：1 061-1 070. (CHEN Yibai，KE Caitong，GAO Hongbo，et al. Non-limit state earth pressure against retaining wall considering influence of deformation[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2015，34(5)：1 061-1 070.(in Chinese))
[20]	夏军武，窦国涛，苏琼，等. 不同变位模式黏土非极限被动土压力试验研究[J]. 西南交通大学学报，2019，54(4)：769-777.(XIA Junwu，DOU Guotao，SU Qiong，et al. An experiment study on the non-limit passive earth pressure of clay under different displacement modes[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University，2019，54(4)：769-777.(in Chinese))
[1]	FANG Y S，ISHIBASHI I. Static earth pressures with various wall movements[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，1986，112(3)：317-333.
[11]	卢坤林，杨扬. 非极限主动土压力计算方法初探[J]. 岩土力学，2010，31(2)：615-619.(LU Kunlin，YANG Yang. Preliminary study of active earth pressure under nonlimit state[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2010，31(2)：615-619.(in Chinese))
[21]	路德春，姚仰平，周安楠. 土体平面应变条件下的主应力关系[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2006，25(11)：2 320-2 326.(LU Dechun，YAO Yangping，ZHOU Annan. Relationship between principal stresses of soil mass under plane strain condition[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2006，25(11)：2 320-2 326.(in Chinese))