含剧烈地震动作用不同埋深砂土液化判别统一公式

doi:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2020.1041

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1651 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要震害调查和工程实践均表明，发展含剧烈地震动作用及深埋砂层下合理的液化判别方法为现代城市和重大工程抗震设防所必须。收集整理近期大地震液化新数据，剖析现有代表性液化判别方法，提出基于标准贯入试验的砂土液化判别统一模型和公式，以适于含剧烈地震动作用下不同埋深砂层的液化判别。所提出的双曲线型液化判别模型，对不同深度砂层具有一致的统一表达，符合液化临界线基本特征，且能够做到深、浅砂层和高、低地震动强度作用同时兼顾，较我国规范现有模型明显合理，较国际上基于CSR理论、沿深度分四段表达的NCEER模型明显先进。新公式通过了PGA＜0.9 g作用下液化砂层埋深30 m内大量实测液化数据的检验，克服了我国规范砂层埋深超过10 m时严重保守的弊端，弥补了我国规范PGA＞0.4 g和砂层埋深20 m以下液化判别方法的空白，也消除了国际上NCEER方法中砂层埋深超过10 m后液化临界线出现回弯的不合理现象以及很强和剧烈地震动(0.25 g＜PGA＜0.9 g)作用下较为保守的缺点。提出的公式已被具有样板规范性质的《建筑工程抗震性态设计通则》修订版采纳，可为相关规范修订及工程应用提供指导与技术支持。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	袁晓铭1
	费扬1
	陈龙伟1
	袁近远1
	陈同之1
	2
	张思宇1
	王义德1

关键词 ：岩土工程, 液化判别, 深度一致模型, 剧烈地震动作用, 双曲线模型, 建筑工程抗震性态设计通则

Abstract：The earthquake investigation and the engineering practice both show that it is necessary to develop reasonable liquefaction prediction methods in deep buried sand layers under the actions containing severe seismic ground motion for modern cities and major projects. Based on the survey on the recent liquefaction events and the analysis for the existing representative liquefaction prediction methods，a SPT-based unified discriminant model and the corresponding formula are proposed suitable for sand layers of different buried depths under the action containing the severe seismic ground motion. The proposed hyperbolic model has a consistent and unified expression for sand layers of different depths and conforms to the basic characteristics of the liquefaction critical line. The proposed model can adapt to the situations of shallow and deep sand layers as well as high and low seismic intensities and hence，is more reasonable than the existing models in China's codes and more advanced than the international CSR theory-based NCEER models with four sections along the depth. The new formula is approved by a large number of measured liquefaction data within sand layers of 30 m buried depth under PGA＜0.9 g，which overcomes the serious conservative disadvantages in the buried depth range of 10–20 m in China's codes and makes up for the vacancy of the discriminant methods for PGA＞0.4 g and the sand layers below 20 m in China's codes. The new formula also eliminates the unreasonable phenomenon of NCEER method that the critical boundary of liquefaction turns back when the buried depth of sand layers exceeds 10 m and overcomes the relatively conservative shortage of NCEER method under very strong and severe ground motion of 0.25 g＜PGA＜0.9 g. The proposed formula has been adopted in the revised version of the General Rule for Performance-based Seismic Design of Buildings with role model and can provide guidance and technical support for related specification revision and engineering application.

Key words： geotechnical engineering liquefaction prediction depth consistency model severe ground motion action hyperbolic model the general rule for performance-based seismic design of buildings

引用本文:

袁晓铭1，费扬1，陈龙伟1，袁近远1，陈同之1，2，张思宇1，王义德1. 含剧烈地震动作用不同埋深砂土液化判别统一公式[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2021, 40(10): 2101-2112.
YUAN Xiaoming1，FEI Yang1，CHEN Longwei1，YUAN Jinyuan1，CHEN Tongzhi1，2，ZHANG Siyu1，WANG Yide1. An unified formula for predicting sand liquefaction in different buried depths under severe seismic ground motion. , 2021, 40(10): 2101-2112.

链接本文:

http://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2020.1041 或 http://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/Y2021/V40/I10/2101

[17]	Tonkin and Taylor Ltd.. Christchurch central city geological interpretative report[R]. Christchurch：Christchurch City Council Press，New Zealand，2011.
[15]	YOUD T L，IDRISS I M. Proceeding of the NCEER workshop on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils[R]. Buffalo：Technical Report NCEER-97-0022，1997.
[2]	刘汉龙，王维国，刘军，等. 饱和砂土场地大型爆炸液化现场试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报，2017，39(4)：601-608.(LIU Hanlong，WANG Weiguo，LIU Jun，et al. Large-scale field tests on blast-induced liquefaction in saturated sand[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2017，39(4)：601-608.(in Chinese))
[11]	中华人民共和国国家标准编写组. GBJ11—89 建筑抗震设计规范[S]. 北京：中国建筑工业出版社，1990.(The National Standards Compilation Group of People¢s Republic of China. GBJ11—89 Code for Seismic design of buildings[S]. Beijing：China Architecture and Building Press，1990.(in Chinese))
[20]	喻萍，袁苏跃，王海莹. 昆明地区粉、砂土液化判别存在问题的讨论[J]. 昆明理工大学学报：理工版，2004，29(2)：99-102.(YU Ping，YUAN Suyue，WANG Haiying. Discussion about questions of different methods for liquefaction of sandy soil and silty soil in Kunming Area[J]. Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology：Science and Technology，2004，29(2)：99-102.(in Chinese))
[1]	袁晓铭，曹振中，孙锐，等. 汶川8.0级地震液化特征初步研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2009，28(6)：1 288-1 296.(YUAN Xiaoming，CAO Zhenzhong，SUN Rui，et al. Preliminary research on liquefaction characteristics of Wenchuan 8.0 Earthquake[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2009，28(6)：1 288-1 296.(in Chinese))
[6]	张小玲，朱冬至，许成顺，等. 强度弱化条件下饱和砂土地基中桩土相互作用p-y曲线研究[J]. 岩土力学，2020，41(7)：2 252-2 260. (ZHANG Xiaoling，ZHU Dongzhi，XU Chengshun，et al. Research on p-y curves of soil-pile interaction in saturated sand foundation in weakened state[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2020，41(7)：2 252- 2 260.(in Chinese))
[8]	黄亚虹，吕悦军，荣棉水，等. 关于深层砂土液化判定方法的探讨——港珠澳特大桥水下隧道工程场地为例[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2012，31(6)：856-864.(HUANG Yahong，LU Yuejun，RONG Mianshui，et al. Study of evaluation method of liquefaction for sandy soil in deep layer-taking undersea tunnel site of Hongkong—Zhuhai— Macao great bridge as example[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2012，31(6)：856-864.(in Chinese))
[10]	中华人民共和国国家标准编写组. GB50011—2010 建筑抗震设计规范[S]. 北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2010.(The National Standards Compilation Group of People¢s Republic of China. GB50011—2010 Code for Seismic design of buildings[S]. Beijing：China Architecture and Building Press，2010.(in Chinese))
[12]	SEED H B，IDRISS I M. Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential[J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division，ASCE，1971，97(SM9)：1 249-1 273.
[4]	李晶，陈育民，方志，等. 减饱和砂土缓倾场地的液化性状分析[J]. 岩土力学，2019，40(11)：4 352-4 360.(LI Jing，CHEN Yumin，FANG Zhi，et al. Liquefaction characteristics analysis on gently tilting desaturated sandy ground[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2019，40(11)：4 352-4 360.(in Chinese))
[13]	马维嘉，陈国兴，吴琪. 复杂加载条件下珊瑚砂抗液化强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学，2020，41(2)：542-551.(MA Weijia，CHEN Guoxing，WU Qi. Experimental study on liquefaction resistance of coral sand under complex loading conditions[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2020，41(2)：542-551.(in Chinese))
[3]	周燕国，谭晓明，梁甜，等. 利用地震动强度指标评价场地液化的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学，2017，38(7)：1 869-1 877. (ZHOU Yanguo，TAN Xiaoming，LIANG Tian，et al. Evaluation of soil liquefaction by ground motion intensity index by centrifuge model test[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2017，38(7)：1 869-1 877.(in Chinese))
[5]	邹佑学，王睿，张建民. 可液化场地碎石桩复合地基地震动力响应分析[J]. 岩土力学，2019，40(6)：2 443-2 455.(ZOU Youxue，WANG Rui，ZHANG Jianmin. Analysis on the seismic response of stone columns composite foundation in liquefiable soils[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2019，40(6)：2 443-2 455.(in Chinese))
[7]	刘小丽，刘红军，贾永刚. 黄河三角洲饱和粉土层地震液化判别方法及液化特征研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2007，26(增1)：2 981-2 987.(LIU Xiaoli，LIU Hongjun，JIA Yonggang. Investigation on prediction methods and characteristics of earthquake-induced liquefaction of silty soil in the Yellow River delta[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2007，26(Supp.1)：2 981-2 987. (in Chinese))
[9]	王兰民. 黄土地层大规模地震液化滑移的机理与风险评估[J]. 岩土工程学报，2020，42(1)：1-18.(WANG Lanmin. Mechanism and risk evaluation of sliding flow triggered by liquefaction of loess deposit during earthquakes[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2020，42(1)：1-18.(in Chinese))
[14]	孙锐，赵倩玉，袁晓铭. 液化判别的双曲线模型[J]. 岩土工程学报，2014，36(11)：2 061-2 068.(SUN Rui，ZHAO Qianyu，YUAN Xiaoming. A Hyperbola model for estimating liquefaction potential of sand[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2014，36(11)：2 061-2 068.(in Chinese))
[16]	陈龙伟，袁晓铭，孙锐. 2011年新西兰Mw6.3地震液化及岩土震害评述[J]. 世界地震工程. 2013，29(3)：1-9.(CHEN Longwei，YUAN Xiaoming，SUN Rui. Review of liquefaction phenomena and geotechnical damage in the 2011 New Zealand Mw6.3 earthquake[J]. World Earthquake Engineering，2013，29(3)：1-9.(in Chinese))
[18]	陈同之. 2011年新西兰地震液化特征及现有液化判别方法检验[硕士学位论文][D]. 哈尔滨：中国地震局工程力学研究所，2014.(CHEN Tongzhi. 2011 New Zealand earthquake liquefaction characteristics and test of existing liquefaction discriminant methods[M. S. Thesis][D]. Harbin：Institute of Engineering Mechanics，China Earthquake Administration，2014.(in Chinese))
[19]	董林，王兰民，夏坤，等. 含细粒砂性土标贯液化判别方法改进研究[J]. 岩土工程学报，2015，37(12)：2 320-2 325.(DONG Lin，WANG Lanmin，XIA Kun，et al. Improvement of SPT-based liquefaction discrimination methods for fines-containing sandy soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2015，37(12)：2 320-2 325.(in Chinese))