基于张量距离的深埋隧洞围岩应力扰动指标及特征分析

doi:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2021.0695

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (4229 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要针对目前深埋隧洞开挖过程中应力扰动程度难以表征，尤其是主应力方向改变难以量化的问题，基于应力张量间距离建立应力扰动度指标(SDI)，可以定量描述主应力大小和方向的改变。依托加拿大Mine-by深部地下实验室工程和锦屏地下实验室二期(CJPL–II)工程，研究隧洞分步开挖时主应力及其应力扰动度指标的变化特征。结果表明，隧洞开挖过程中，轴向不同位置处应力受扰动度与掌子面位置有关，具有明显的空间分布特征，应力仅在掌子面影响区域内受扰动剧烈。沿隧洞径向方向应力扰动度从洞壁到围岩深部逐渐降低，当掌子面开挖接近监测断面时，应力扰动深度逐渐增大，随着掌子面远离，扰动深度逐渐减小。洞壁处SDI最大，但主应力方向扰动度则不一定最大，峰值位置随掌子面位置变化。扰动度指标物理意义明确，合理地描述隧洞开挖时主应力大小和方向的改变，并且主应力大小和方向的扰动度指标量纲一致，可方便地进行比较。该研究可以为深部地下工程中的围岩稳定性分析和支护设计提供量化的应力扰动评价指标。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	郑民总1
	2
	李邵军1
	冯泽杰1
	2
	曾志3
	薛涛3

关键词 ：岩石力学, 深埋隧洞, 围岩应力, 应力扰动指标, 主应力方向, 张量距离

Abstract：It is difficult to characterize the degree of stress disturbance during underground tunnel excavation，especially to quantify the change of principal stress direction. Based on the distance between the stress tensors，the index of stress disturbed degree(SDI) is proposed，which can quantitatively describe the change of the magnitude and direction of the principal stress. Taking Mine-by Laboratory in Canada as an example，the variation characteristics of principal stress and stress disturbed degree during step-by-step tunnel excavation were studied by numerical simulation. The results show that during tunnel excavation，the degree of stress disturbance at different axial positions of the tunnel is related to the excavation face and has significant spatial distribution characteristics. The stress disturbance is more serious only in the area affected by the excavation face. The stress disturbed degree along the radial direction of the tunnel decreases gradually from the tunnel wall to deep into the surrounding rock. The depth of stress disturbance increases when the excavation surface is close to the monitoring section and decreases gradually after the excavation face leaves. SDI at the wall is the largest，but the disturbed degree of the principal stress direction is not necessarily the largest，and the peak value position varies with the position of the excavation face. The proposed index has a clear physical meaning，which can well describe the variation characteristics of the magnitude and direction of the principal stress. The disturbing degree of the magnitude and direction of the principal stress have the same dimension and are easy to compare. The position with a large degree of stress disturbance corresponds well to the fracture of surrounding rock，which can provide reference for the stability of surrounding rock in deep rock engineering and provide a scientific basis for support design.

Key words： rock mechanics deep tunnel surrounding rock stress stress disturbance index principal stress direction tensor distance

引用本文:

郑民总1，2，李邵军1，冯泽杰1，2，曾志3，薛涛3. 基于张量距离的深埋隧洞围岩应力扰动指标及特征分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2023, 42(S1): 3447-3457.
ZHENG Minzong1，2，LI Shaojun1，FENG Zejie1，2，ZENG Zhi3，XUE Tao3. Stress disturbance index and characteristic analysis of surrounding rock mass based on tensor distance in the deep tunnel. , 2023, 42(S1): 3447-3457.

链接本文:

http://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2021.0695 或 http://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/Y2023/V42/IS1/3447

[2]	蔡美峰. 地应力测量原理和方法的评述[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，1993，12(3)：275-283.(CAI Meifeng. Review on the principle and method of in-situ stress measurement[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，1993，12(3)：275-283.(in Chinese))
[15]	张宜虎，卢轶然，周火明，等. 围岩破坏特征与地应力方向关系研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2010，29(增2)：3 526-3 535.(ZHANG Yihu，LU Yiran，ZHOU Huoming，et al. Study of relationship between failure properties of surrounding rock and direction of geostress[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2010，29(Supp.2)：3 526-3 535.(in Chinese))
[17]	READ R S. 20 years of excavation response studies at AECL?s Underground Research Laboratory[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2004，41(8)：1 251-1 275.
[20]	DIEDERICHS M S，KAISER P K，EBERHARDT E. Damage initiation and propagation in hard rock during tunneling and the influence of near-face stress rotation[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2004，41(5)：785-812.
[22]	江权. 高地应力下硬岩弹脆塑性劣化本构模型与大型地下洞室群围岩稳定性分析[博士学位论文][D]. 武汉：中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所，2009.(JIANG Quan. Study on model and stability of surrounding rock of large underground caverns under high geo-stress condition[Ph. D. Thesis][D]. Wuhan：Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics，Chinese Academy of Sciences，2009.(in Chinese))
[3]	王连捷，潘立宙，廖椿庭，等. 地应力测量及其在工程中的应用[M].北京：地质出版社，1991：16-17.(WANG Lianjie，PAN Lizhou，LIAO Chunting，et al. In-situ stress measurement and its application in mining engineering[M]. Beijing：Geological Publishing House，1991：16-17.(in Chinese))
[13]	靳晓光，李晓红. 高地应力区深埋隧道三维应力场数值模拟[J]. 重庆大学学报：自然科学版，2007，30(6)：97-101.(JIN Xiaoguang，LI Xiaohong. Numerical modeling of three-dimension stress field in deep tunnel of high geo-stress area[J]. Journal of Chongqing University：Natural Science，2007，30(6)：97-101.(in Chinese))
[23]	KE G，HARRISON J P. Generation of random stress tensors[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2017，94(1)：18-26.
[25]	苏国韶. 高地应力下大型地下洞室群稳定性分析与智能优化研究[博士学位论文][D]. 武汉：中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所，2006. (SU Guoshao. Study on stability analysis and intelligent optimization for large underground caverns under high geostress condition[Ph. D. Thesis][D]. Wuhan：Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics，Chinese Academy of Sciences，2006.(in Chinese))
[27]	FENG X T，WANG Z，ZHOU Y，et al. Modelling three-dimensional stress-dependent failure of hard rocks[J]. Acta Geotechnica，2021，16(11/12)：1-31.
[8]	薛东杰，周宏伟，彭瑞东，等. 基于应力降的非连续支承压力强扰动特征研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2018，37(5)：1 080-1 095. (XUE Dongjie，ZHOU Hongwei，PENG Ruidong，et al. Strong disturbance of discontinuous abutment pressure[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2018，37(5)：1 080-1 095.(in Chinese))
[18]	DOP A，PAC B. A bonded-particle model for rock[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2004，41(8)：1 329- 1 364.
[28]	李邵军，郑民总，邱士利，等. 中国锦屏地下实验室开挖隧洞灾变特征与长期原位力学响应分析[J]. 清华大学学报：自然科学版，2021，61(8)：842-852.(LI Shaojun，ZHENG Minzong，QIU Shili，et al. Characteristics of engineering disaster during excavation and long-term in-situ mechanical behavior analysis of the tunnels in China Jinping Underground Laboratory Phase II[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University：Science and Technology，2021，61(8)：842-852.(in Chinese))
[4]	刘宁，张春生，陈祥荣，等. 深埋隧洞开挖围岩应力演化过程监测及特征研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2011，30(9)：1 729-1 737. (LIU Ning，ZHANG Chunsheng，CHEN Xiangrong，et al. Monitoring and characteristics study of stress evolution of surrounding rock during deep tunnel excavation[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2011，30(9)：1 729-1 737.(in Chinese))
[5]	SIREN T，KANTIA P，RINNE M. Considerations and observations of stress-induced and construction-induced excavation damage zone in crystalline rock[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2015，73(1)：165-174.
[7]	蔡美峰，冀东，郭奇峰. 基于地应力现场实测与开采扰动能量积聚理论的岩爆预测研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2013，32(10)：1 973-1 980.(CAI Meifeng，JI Dong，GUO Qifeng. Study of rockburst prediction based on in-situ stress measurement and theory of energy accumulation caused by mining disturbance[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2013，32(10)：1 973-1 980.(in Chinese))
[10]	CHEN C N，CHANG W C. Directional projection in stereographic representation of three-dimensional stress redistribution during tunnelling[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology，2017，70：309-316.
[12]	李建贺，盛谦，朱泽奇，等. 地下洞室分期开挖应力扰动特征与规律研究[J]. 岩土力学，2017，38(2)：549-556.(LI Jianhe，SHENG Qian，ZHU Zeqi，et al. Stress disturbance characteristics and laws of underground cavern during stage excavation[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2017，38(2)：549-556.(in Chinese))
[14]	EBERHARDT E. Numerical modelling of three-dimension stress rotation ahead of an advancing tunnel face[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2001，38(4)：499-518.
[9]	朱泽奇，盛谦，周永强，等. 隧洞围岩应力开挖扰动特征与规律研究[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报，2015，23(2)：349-358.(ZHU Zeqi，SHENG Qian，ZHOU Yongqiang，et al. Stress disturbance characteristics and law research of surrounding rock during tunnel excavation[J]. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering，2015，23(2)：349-358.(in Chinese))
[19]	CHO N，MARTIN C D，SEGO D C. A clumped particle model for rock[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2007，44(7)：997-1 010.
[29]	ZHENG M Z，LI S J，ZHAO H B，et al. Probabilistic analysis of tunnel displacements based on correlative recognition of rock mass parameters[J]. Geoscience Frontiers，2021，12(4)：1011136.
[1]	刘允芳. 岩体地应力与工程建设[M]. 武汉：湖北科学技术出版社，2000：1-2.(LIU Yunfang. Geostress and engineering construction[M]. Wuhan：Science and Technology Press，2000：1-2.(in Chinese))
[11]	周辉，渠成堃，王竹春，等. 深井巷道掘进围岩演化特征模拟与扰动应力场分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2017，36(8)：1 821- 1 831.(ZHOU Hui，QU Chengkun，WANG Zhuchun，et al. Simulating the variation of surrounding rock and analyzing the disturbed stress field during excavation of deep mine roadway[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2017，36(8)：1 821-1 831.(in Chinese))
[21]	李建贺，盛谦，朱泽奇，等. Mine-by试验洞开挖过程中围岩应力路径与破坏模式分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2017，36(4)：821-830.(LI Hejian，SHENG Qian，ZHU Zeqi，et al. Analysis of stress path and failure mode of surrounding rock during Mine-by test tunnel excavation[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2017，36(4)：821-830.(in Chinese))
[6]	刘立鹏，姚磊华，王成虎，等. 地应力对脆性岩体洞群稳定性的影响[J]. 中南大学学报：自然科学版，2010，41(2)：709-714.(LIU Lipeng，YAO Leihua，WANG Chenghu，et al. Influence of in-situ stress on stability of underground openings in hard rock[J]. Journal of Central South University：Science and Technology，2010，41(2)：709-714.(in Chinese))
[16]	张社荣，梁礼绘. 考虑三维应力旋转的隧洞衬砌支护时机研究[J]. 水利学报，2007，38(6)：704-709.(ZHANG Sherong，LIANG Lihui. Analysis of tunnel liner supporting time considering three-dimensional stress rotation[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering，2007，38(6)：704-709.(in Chinese))
[26]	CAI M，KAISER P K，MARTIN C D. Quantification of rock mass damage in underground excavations from microseismic event monitoring[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2001，38(8)：1 135-1 145.
[24]	MARTIN C D. Seventeenth Canadian geotechnical colloquium：the effect of cohesion loss and stress path on brittle rock strength[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal，1997，34(5)：698-725.