CO2注入引起井筒周围岩石损伤的热孔弹耦合分析

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (23511 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要以岩石的耦合–去耦合解析为主线，在三场耦合方程中导入损伤变量，建立岩石损伤过程中的热孔弹耦合模型。通过把均质弹性介质材料的热孔弹耦合模型的有限元解同去耦合解析解的对比，验证有限元数值解的精确性。然后，利用该耦合模型研究CO2注入后井筒周围的应力状态和损伤情况。最后，针对服从Weibull分布的非均质岩石材料，研究CO2注入后非均质岩石渗流性质的改变。结果表明，超临界CO2的注入会对岩石的强度和渗透性产生影响，较高的注入速率会引起岩石的受拉破坏并导致拉伸损伤范围的扩大。非均质材料更容易发生岩石的损伤和渗透性增加。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

关键词 ：岩石力学, CO2地质封存, 解析解, 有限元方法, 热孔弹耦合, 损伤扩展, 井筒

Abstract：A coupled thermo-poroelastic model is proposed with integration of a damage factor. The proposed thermo-poroelastic model is firstly utilized to simulate the thermo-hydro-mechanical(THM) response of homogeneous elastic medium；and its accuracy of the numerical results is verified through comparing to the decoupled analytical solution. Secondly，the thermo-poroelastic model is employed to predict stress response and damage propagation around the wellbore due to CO2 injection. Finally，this model is applied to heterogeneous rock under a Weibull distribution to predict stress response and permeability change. The experimental results indicate that the supercritical CO2 injection can change the rock?s strength state and permeability distribution significantly. Too high injection rates will facilitate the tensile damage and extend the tensile damage zone. Heterogeneous rock material is more vulnerable to tensile damage and permeability increase.

Key words： rock mechanics CO2 geological storage analytical solution finite element method themo-poroelastic coupling damage propagation wellbore

收稿日期: 2013-05-21

引用本文:

李琦，井淼. CO2注入引起井筒周围岩石损伤的热孔弹耦合分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2013, 32(11): 2205-2213.
LI Qi，JING Miao. THERMO-POROELASTIC COUPLING ANALYSIS OF ROCK DAMAGE AROUND WELLBORE DUE TO CO2 INJECTION. , 2013, 32(11): 2205-2213.

链接本文:

https://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/Y2013/V32/I11/2205

[1]	孙枢. CO2地下封存的地质学问题及其对减缓气候变化的意义[J]. 中国基础科学，2006，(3)：17-22.(SUN Shu. Geological problems of CO2 underground storage and its significance on mitigating climate change[J]. China Basic Science，2006，(3)：17-22.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[2]	SOLOMON S，QIN D，MANNING M，et al. Climate change 2007：the physical science basis-contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change[M]. Cambridge：Cambridge University Press，2007：131-143. " target="_blank">
[3]	李小春，方志明，魏宁，等. 我国CO2捕集与封存的技术路线探讨[J]. 岩土力学，2009，30(9)：2 674-2 678.(LI Xiaochun，FANG Zhiming，WEI Ning，et al. Discussion on technical roadmap of CO2 capture and storage in China[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2009，30(9)：2 674-2 678.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[4]	SCHEMBRE-MCCABE J M，KAMATH J，GURTON R M. Mechanistic studies of CO2 sequestration[C]// The International Petroleum Technology Conference. Dubai：[s.n.]，2007：IPTC 11 391. " target="_blank">
[5]	VAN DER MEER L，VAN WEES J D. Limitations to storage pressure in finite saline aquifers and the effect of CO2 solubility on storage pressure[C]// The SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. San Antonio，TX，USA：[s.n.]，2006：24-27. " target="_blank">
[6]	BACHU S. Sequestration of CO2 in geological media：criteria and approach for site selection in response to climate change[J]. Energy Conversion and Management，2000，41(9)：953-970. " target="_blank">
[7]	LU C，HAN W S，LEE S Y，et al. Effects of density and mutual solubility of a CO2-brine system on CO2 storage in geological formations：“Warm” vs.“cold” formations[J]. Advances in Water Resources，2009，32(12)：1 685-1 702. " target="_blank">
[8]	BIOT M A. General theory of three-dimensional consolidation[J]. Journal of Applied Physics，1941，12(2)：155-164. " target="_blank">
[9]	RICE J R，CLEARY M P. Some basic stress diffusion solutions for fluid-saturated elastic porous-media with compressible constituents[J]. Reviews of Geophysics，1976，14(2)：227-241. " target="_blank">
[10]	DETOURNAY E，CHENG A H D. Poroelastic response of a borehole in a non-hydrostatic stress-field[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts，1988，25(3)：171-182. " target="_blank">
[11]	PALCIAUSKAS V V，DOMENICO P A. Characterization of drained and undrained response of thermally loaded repository rocks[J]. Water Resources Research，1982，18(2)：281-290. " target="_blank">
[12]	MCTIGUE D F. Thermoelastic response of fluid-saturated porous rock[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth and Planets，1986，91(B9)：9 533-9 542. " target="_blank">
[13]	RUTQVIST J，TSANG C F. A study of caprock hydromechanical changes associated with CO2-injection into a brine formation[J]. Environmental Geology，2002，42(2/3)：296-305. " target="_blank">
[14]	LI Q，WU Z S，LI X. Prediction of CO2 leakage during sequestration into marine sedimentary strata[J]. Energy Conversion and Management，2009，50(3)：503-509.
[15]	LI Q，WU Z S，LEI X L，et al. Experimental and numerical study on the fracture of rocks during injection of CO2-saturated water[J]. Environmental Geology，2006，51(7)：1 157-1 164. " target="_blank">
[16]	LI Q，WU Z S，LI X，et al. Numerical simulation on crust deformation due to CO2 sequestration in deep aquifers[J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics，JSCE，2002，(5)：591-600. " target="_blank">
[17]	张玉军. CO2注入岩体的热-气-应力耦合二维弹塑性有限元分析[J]. 岩土力学，2009，30(3)：582-586.(ZHANG Yujun. 2D elastoplastic finite element analysis of coupled thermo-gas-mechanical process in CO2 injection in strata[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2009，30(3)：582-586.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[18]	张玉军，张维庆. CO2地层注入的热流力耦合模型及有限元分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报，2010，6(3)：509-515.(ZHANG Yujun，ZHANG Weiqing. Coupled thermo-fluid-mechanical model and FEM analysis of subsurface rock masses with CO2 injection[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering，2010，6(3)：509-515.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[19]	KACHANOV L M. Stability of thin-walled bars in the elasto plastic range[J]. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR，1956，107(6)：803-806. " target="_blank">
[20]	SIMAKIN A，GHASSEMI A. Modelling deformation of partially melted rock using a poroviscoelastic rheology with dynamic power law viscosity[J]. Tectonophysics，2005，397(3/4)：195-209. " target="_blank">
[21]	SELVADURAI A P S. Stationary damage modelling of poroelastic contact[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures，2004，41(8)：2 043-2 064. " target="_blank">
[22]	TANG C，THAM L，LEE P，et al. Coupled analysis of flow，stress and damage(FSD) in rock failure[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2002，39(4)：477-489.
[23]	LI S P，LI Y S，LI Y，et al. Permeability strain equations corresponding to the complete stress-strain path of Yinzhuang sandstone[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts，1994，31(4)：383-391. " target="_blank">
[24]	KIYAMA T，KITA H，ISHIJIMA Y，et al. Permeability in anisotropic granite under hydrostatic compression and triaxial compression including post-failure region[C]// The 2nd North American Rock Mechanics Symposium. Montreal，Quebec，Canada：[s.n.]，1996：19-21. " target="_blank">
[25]	COSTE F，BOUNENNI A，CHANCHOLE S，et al. A method for measuring mechanical，hydraulic and hydromechanical properties during damaging in materials with low permeability[C]// Proceedings of the International Workshop on Geomechanics. Paris，France：[s.n.]，2002：11-12. " target="_blank">
[26]	GHASSEMI A，DIEK A. Porothermoelasticity for swelling shales[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering，2002，34(1/4)：123-135. " target="_blank">
[27]	LI LC，TANG CA，THAM LG，et al. Simulation of multiple hydraulic fracturing in non-uniform pore pressure field[J]. Advanced Materials Research，2005，(9)：163-172. " target="_blank">
[28]	ZHU W C，TANG C A. Micromechanical model for simulating the fracture process of rock[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering，2004，37(1)：25-56.