Abstract：Ideal elastoplastic model used in deformation analysis induced by underground engineering excavation leads to inaccurate prediction. Based on modified hardening soil model，considering the effect of small strain condition on soil behavior，a case study of deep excavation on the deformation of diaphragm wall and settlement of ground surface is numerical analyzed. The results show：according to the movement of diaphragm wall，the prediction result by using ideal elastoplastic mode—Mohr-Coulomb(MC) model is larger than observed deformation，and especially the part below the base of excavation. The result obtained from hardening soil model is consistent with but a little larger than the observed deformation. For the prediction of surface settlement，the trough obtained from MC model is deeper and wider than that obtained from modified hardening soil model，and the settlement from hardening soil model is larger. In general，because modified hardening model can be used to simulate the variation of soil behavior such as modulus and small strain during different loading and unloading states，modified hardening model is superior to MC model and hardening soil model whether in value and regular of deformation prediction.
崔 溦，王 宁，宋慧芳. 基于修正硬化模型的软土深基坑变形数值分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2013, 32(s2): 4041-4047.
CUI Wei，WANG Ning，SONG Huifang. DEFORMATION NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF DEEP EXCAVATION IN SOFT SOIL BASED ON MODIFIED HARDENING MODEL. , 2013, 32(s2): 4041-4047.
WHITTLE AJ，HASHASH YMA，WHITMAN RV. Analysis of deepexcavation in Boston[J]. Journal ofGeotechnicalEngineering，1993，119(1)：69-90.
[2]
NG CWW，YAN WM. A true three-dimensional numerical analysis of diaphragmwalling[J]. Geotechnique，2000，49(6)：825-834.
[3]
WONG KS，BROMS BB. Lateral deflection of braced excavation in clays[J]. Journal ofGeotechnicalEngineering，1990，115(6)：853-870.
[4]
ADDENBROOKE TI，POTTS DM，PUZRIN AM. The influence ofpre-failure soil stiffness on the numerical analysis of tunnelconstruction[J]. Geotechnique，1997，47(3)：693-712.
[5]
HEJAZI Y，DIAS D，KASTNERR. Impact of constitutive models on the numerical analysis of underground constructions[J]. Acta Geotechnica，2008，3(4)：251-258.
[6]
徐中华，王卫东. 敏感环境下基坑数值分析中土体本构模型的选择[J]. 岩土力学，2010，31(1)：258-264.(XU Zhonghua，WANG Weidong. Selection of soil constitutive model for numerical analysis of deep excavations in close proximity to sensitive properties[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2010，31(1)：258-264.(in chinese))
[7]
BURLAND JB. Ninth laurits bjerrum memorial lecture：small is beautiful—the stiffness of soils at small strains[J]. Canadian GeotechnicalJournal，1989，26(4)：499-516.
[8]
KUNG GTC，OU CY，JUANG CH. Modeling small-strain behaviour of Taipei claysfor finite element analysis of braced excavations[J]. Computer and Geotechnics，2009，36(1)：304-319.
[9]
SCHANZ T，VERMEER PA，BONNIER PG.Formulation andverification of the hardening-soil model[C]//Beyond 2000 in Computational Geotechnics. Rotterdam：A. A. Balkema，1999：281-290.
[10]
BENZ T，VERMEER P A，SCHWAB R.A small-strain overlay model[J]. InternationalJournal for NumericalAnalyticalMethods in Geomechanics，2009，33(1)：25-44.
[11]
HARDINB O，DRNEVICHVP.Shear modulus and dampingin soils：design equations and curves[J]. Journal of theSoil Mechanics and Foundations Division，1972，98(7)：667-692.
[12]
HSIUNG BC. Engineering performance of deep excavations in Taipei[Ph. D. Thesis][D].Bristol，UK：University of Bristol，2002.
2013, Vol. 32 
