水压致裂原地应力测试井下水压力数据采集系统及其应用研究

doi:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2016.0816

摘要
图/表
参考文献(14)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (981 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要中国地震局地壳应力研究所首次研发了水压致裂原地应力测量井下压力数据采集系统。该系统的使用可以对井下压裂段的水压力进行较为精确的测量，克服了水压致裂测试系统柔性以及测段孔壁孔隙压力的不均匀性等因素对测试结果的影响，大大提高了水压致裂应力测试的精度。现场测试表明，井下压力采集系统运行的稳定性、环境适用性都达到了应用的要求。笔者课题组运用该系统成功的进行2个测段的原地应力测试，并分别对比分析各测段的井下和地面采集系统得到的数据。结果显示，测试深度越大，测试结果受系统柔性和其他不确定性因素的影响也越大，最终的计算结果误差也越大。压裂过程中，地面采集压裂曲线在升压阶段的压力梯度和井下压力采集曲线基本一致；降压阶段，地面采集曲线的压力梯度要明显大于井下数据采集曲线的压力梯度；地面压力采集计算得到各个压力特征值尤其重张压力值，以及原地应力值比井下数据采集得到的准确值要偏小。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	王建新1
	张策1
	郭啓良1
	李兵1
	刘晓丽2

关键词 ：岩石力学, 水压致裂, 井下数据采集, 原地应力

Abstract：The downhole pressure data acquisition system has first been developed by the Institute of Crustal Dynamics. According to accurately recording the water pressure in a hydraulic fracturing test section，the system can not only eliminates the effects of hydraulic fracturing test system compliance and pore water pressure unevenness in the hole wall，but also greatly improves accuracy of the hydraulic fracturing system. The system has been successfully applied in practice，and its running stability and environmental suitability are satisfied to the requirements of further applications. Recently，two in-situ stress tests were successfully carried out by our work team，then the paper conducted a comparison of the two test results based on the data obtained by downhole and ground data acquisition system respectively. The results show that the test errors become larger with the test depth increasing. Moreover，both of two pressure gradients recorded by ground and downhole data acquisition systems are consistent during the pressure increasing stage，nevertheless，the pressure gradient obtained by ground data acquisition system is significantly greater than the one recorded by downhole system during pressure decreasing stage. The stress characteristics and in-situ stress values，especially reopen pressure，are smaller by ground system than those values obtained by downhole system.

Key words： rock mechanics hydraulic fracturing downhole data acquisition in-situ stress

引用本文:

王建新1，张策1，郭啓良1，李兵1，刘晓丽2. 水压致裂原地应力测试井下水压力数据采集系统及其应用研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2016, 35(S2): 3971-3976.
WANG Jianxin1，ZHAGN Ce1，GUO Qiliang1，LI Bing1，LIU Xiaoli2. The downhole pressure data acquisition system and its application in hydraulic fracturing in- situ stress testing. , 2016, 35(S2): 3971-3976.

链接本文:

https://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2016.0816 或 https://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/Y2016/V35/IS2/3971

[1] SCHEIDEGGER A E. Stress in the earth’s crust as determined from hydraulic fracturing data[J]. Geologie und Bauwesen，1962，27：45–53.

[2] KEHLE R O. Determination of tectonic stresses through analysis of hydraulic well fracturing[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research，1964，69(2)：259–273.

[3] HAIMSON B C，FAIRHURST C. Initiation and extension of hydraulic fractures in rocks [J]. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal，1967，(9)：310–318.

[4] HAIMSON B C，CORNET F H. ISRM suggested methods for rock stress estimation-Part 3：Hydraulic fracturing(HF) and/or hydraulic testing of pre-existing fractures(HTPF)[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2003，40(7/8)：1 011–1 020.

[5] HAIMSON B C. Earthquake related stresses at Rangely，Colorado[C]// The American Society of Civil Engineers. The 4th U S. Symposium on Rock Mechanics. University Park：The American Society of Civil Engineering，1972：689–708.

[6] 郭啟良，安其美，赵仕广. 水压致裂应力测量在广州抽水蓄能电站设计中的应用研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2002，21(6)：828–832.(GUO Qiliang，AN Qimei，ZHAO Shiguang. Application of hydraulic fracturing test in the design of Guangzhou pump storage project[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2002，21(6)：828–832.(in Chinese))

[7] 王成虎，郭啟良，丁立丰，等. 工程区高地应力判据研究及实例分析[J]. 岩土力学，2009，30(8)：2 359–2 364.(WANG Chenghu，GUO Qiliang，DING Lifeng，et al. High in-situ stress criterion for engineering area and a case analysis[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2009，30(8)：2 359–2 364.(in Chinese))

[8] BAO L H. In-situ stress measurement and surrounding rock stability analysis of the Gaoligong Mountain Tunnel[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials，2014，501：1 766–1 773.

[9] 包林海，王成虎，郭啟良，等. 巴基斯坦某隧洞地应力状态及围岩大变形研究[J]. 现代隧道技术，2015，52(1)：38–44.(BAO Linhai， WANG Chenghu，GUO Qiliang，et al. Research on the geostress state and large-rock deformation of a water conveyance tunnel in Pakistan[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology，2015，52(1)：38–44.(in Chinese))

[10] 刘允芳. 水压致裂法三维地应力测量[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，1991，10(3)：246–256.(LIU Yunfang. In-situ 3-dimensional stress measurements by hydraulic fracturing technique[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，1991，10(3)：246–256.(in Chinese))

[11] Commission on Testing Methods，International Society for Rock Mechanics. Suggested methods for stress rock determination [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts，1987，24(1)：55–63.

[12] ITO T，EVANSB K，KAVAIA K，et al. Hydraulic fracture reopening pressure and the estimation of maximum horizontal stress[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，1999，36(5/6)：811–826.

[13] 王成虎，宋成科，邢博瑞. 水压致裂应力测量系统柔性分析及其对深孔测量的影响[J]. 现代地质，2012，26(4)：808–815.(WANG Chenghu，SONG Chengke，XING Borui. Compliance of drilling-rod system for hydro-fracturing in situ stress measurement and its effect on measurements at great depth[J]. Geoscience，2016，26(4)：808–815.(in Chinese))

[14] ITO T，SATOH T，KATO H. Deep rock stress measurement by hydraulic fracturing method taking account of system compliance effect [M]// XIE F R. Proceeding of the 5th International Symposium on In-situ Rock Stress. Boca Raton：CRC Press，2010：43–49.