(1. Institute of Geomechanics，Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences，Beijing 100081，China；2. Key Laboratory of Neotectonic Movement and Geohazard，Ministry of Land and Resources，Institute of Geomechanics，Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences，Beijing 100081，China；3. Beijing Research Institute of Uranium Geology，Beijing 100029，China)
Abstract：In order to know the geostress characteristics of a candidate repository，in-situ stress measurement of hydraulic fracturing using a single loop system was carried out in four boreholes in granite rock. The data of geostress and the orientation of the maximum horizontal principal stress at depths ranging from 0 to 700 m below the ground surface were obtained successfully based on the information of borehole log. The geostress state and the fault activity in the candidate repository were analyzed according to the measured data，Byerlee law and Coulomb criterion for fault friction. Three principal stresses have the good linear relationships with depth. Within the range of tested depth，the horizontal stresses are generally higher than vertical stresses and the regional stress field is dominated by the tectonic horizontal stresses，which attenuate gradually with depths. The horizontal force in rock mass in the north is greater than that in the middle and south and it is the lowest in the south. The orientations of the maximum horizontal stress are dominantly in the NEE direction，which is in accordance with the direction of regional tectonic stress field. From the interior and the edge of the Tibetan plateau to the eastern Tianshan mountain，the maximum horizontal stress orientations show the variation of the NE to NEE. The geostress values do not reach the limit state of fault friction sliding and the fault activity is weak.
[1] 潘自强，钱七虎. 高放废物地质处置战略研究[M]. 北京：原子能出版社，2009：3–4.(PAN Ziqiang，QIAN Qihu. Strategic research for deep geological disposal of high level radioactive waste[M]. Beijing：Atomic Energy Press，2009：3–4.(in Chinese))
[2] 王 驹，苏 锐，陈伟明，等. 中国高放废物深地质处置[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2006，25(4)：649–658.(WANG Ju，SU Rui，CHEN Weiming，et al. Deep geological disposal of high-level radioactive wastes in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2006，25(4)：649–658.(in Chinese)).
[3] WANG J. High-level radioactive waste disposal in China：update 2010[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering，2010，2(1)：1–11.
[4] 赵星光，王 驹，马利科，等. 高放废物地质处置库北山预选区新场岩体地应力场分布规律[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2014，33(增2)：3 750–3 759.(ZHAO Xingguang，WANG Ju，MA Like，et al. Distribution characteristics of geostress field in Xinchang rock block of candidate Beishan area for high level radioactive waste repository in china[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2014，33(Supp.2)：3 750–3 759.(in Chinese))
[5] ANDERSSON J，AHOKAS H，HUDSON J A，et al. Olkiluoto site description 2006，Technical report Posiva 2007–03[M]. Finland：Posiva Oy Press，2007：1–50.
[6] LEHTONEN E R. Evaluation of rock stress estimation by the Kaiser effect. Posiva working report 2005-67[M]. Finland：Posiva Oy Press，2005：8–17.
[7] 王 驹，范显华，徐国庆，等. 中国高放废物地质处置十年进展[M]. 北京：原子能出版社，2004：1–12.(WANG Ju，FAN Xianhua，XU Guoqing，et al. Geological disposal of high-level radioactive waste in China：progress in last decade[M]. Beijing：Atomic Energy Press，2004：1–12.(in Chinese))
[8] 李文明，任秉琛，杨兴科，等. 东天山中酸性侵入岩浆作用及其地球动力学意义[J]. 西北地质，2002，35(4)：41–42.(LI Wenming，REN Bingchen，YANG Xingke，et al. The intermediate-acid intrusive magmatism and its geodynamic significance in Eastern Tianshan region[J]. Northwestern Geology，2002，35(4)：41–42.(in Chinese))
[9] 田明明，何建国，张 松，等. 新疆阿奇山花岗岩体岩石地球化学特征及其形成的构造环境[J]. 铀矿地质，2014，30(1)：14–15.(TIAN Mingming，HE Jianguo，ZHANG Song，et al. The lithogeochemical characteristics and tectonic environment of Archie mountain granite pluton，Xinjiang[J]. Uranium Geology，2014，30(1)：14–15.(in Chinese))
[10] HAIMSON B C，COMET F H. ISRM suggested methods for rock stress estimation Part 3：hydraulic fracturing(HF)and/or hydraulic testing of Pre-existing fractures(HTPF)[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2003，40：1 011–1 020.
[11] 丰成君，陈群策，吴满路，等. 水压致裂应力测量数据分析——对瞬时关闭压力ps的常用判读方法讨论[J]. 岩土力学，2012，33(7)：2 149–2 159.(FENG Chengjun，CHEN Qunce，WU Manlu，et al. Analysis of hydraulic fracturing stress measurement data—discussion of methods frequently used to determine instantaneous shut-in pressure[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2012，33(7)：2 149–2 159.(in Chinese))
[12] HAST N. The state of stress in the upper part of the earth?s crust[J]. Tectonophysics，1969，8(3)：169–211.
[13] HAIMSON B C. Near surface and deep hydrofracturing stress measurements in the Waterloo Quartzite[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts，1980，17(2)：81–88.
[14] WOROTNIKI G，DENHAM D. The state stress in the upper part of the earth?s crust in australia according to measurements in tunnels and mines and from seismic observation[C]// Investigation of Stress in Rock—Advances in Stress Measurement，Int. Soc. Rock Mech. Symp.. Sydney，Australia：[s. n.]，1976：71–82.
[15] STACEY T R，WESSELOO J. The in-situ stress regime in Southern Africa[C]// VOUILLE G，BEREST P ed. Proceedings of the 9th International Congress on Rock Mechanics. Rotterdam：A. A. Balkema，1999：1 189–1 192.
[16] 李方全，祁英男. 地壳应力随深度的变化规律[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，1988，7(4)；301–309.(LI Fangquan，QI Yingnan.Variation of crustal stresses with depth in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，1988，7(4)：301–309.(in Chinese))
[17] 景 锋，盛 谦，张勇慧，等. 中国大陆浅层地壳实测地应力分布规律研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2007，26(10)；2 056–2 062. (JING Feng，SHENG Qian，ZHANG Yonghui，et al. Research on distribution rule of shallow crustal geostress in china mainland[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2007，26(10)：2 056–2 062.(in Chinese))
[18] 杨树新，姚 瑞，崔效锋，等. 中国大陆与各活动地块、南北地震带实测应力特征分析[J]. 地球物理学报，2012，55(12)：4 207–4 217. (YANG Shuxin，YAO Rui，CUI Xiaofeng，et al. Analysis of the characteristics of measured stress in Chinese mainland and its active blocks and north-south seismic belt[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics，2012，55(12)：4 207–4 217.(in Chinese))
[19] BROWNE T，HOEK E. Technical note trends in relationships between measured in-situ stress and depth[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts，1978，15(4)：211–215.
[20] TAN C X，WANG R，SUN Y，et al. Numerical modelling estimation of the“tectonic stress plane”(TSP) beneath topography with quasi-U-shaped valleys[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2004，41：303–310.
[21] ANDERSON E M. The dynamics of faulting[J]. Tansactions of Edinburgh Geological Society，1905，(8)：387–402.
[22] JAEGER J C，COOK N G W，ZIMMERMAN R. Fundamentals of rock mechanics[M]. London：Chapman and Hall Press，1969：97–513.
[23] ZOBACK M D，HEALY J H. Friction，faulting，and in-situ stress[J]. Annals of Geophysics.，1984，2(6)：689–698.
[24] BYERLEE J. Friction of rocks[M]. Pageoph，1978，116(4/5)：615–626.
[25] ZOBACK M D，HICKMAN S. In-situ study of the physical mechanisms controlling induced seismicity at Monticello Reservoir，South Carolina[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research，1982，87(B8)：6959–6974.
[26] 苏恺之，李方全，张伯崇，等. 长江三峡坝区地壳应力与孔隙水压力综合研究[M]. 北京：地震出版社，1996：151–165.(SU Kaizhi，LI Fangquan，ZHANG Bochong，et al. Integrated research on the crustal stress and pore water pressure at the dam site of the Three Gorges[M]. Beijing：Earthquake Press，1996：151–165.(in Chinese))
[27] 牛之俊，王 敏，孙汉荣，等. 中国大陆现今地壳运动速度场的最新观测结果[J]. 科学通报，2005，50(8)：839–840.(NIU Zhijun，WANG Min，SUN Hanrong，et al. The latest observations of present-day crustal movement velocity field in China continent[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin，2005，50(8)：839–840.(in Chinese))
[28] 谢富仁，陈群策，崔效锋，等. 中国大陆地壳应力环境基础数据库[J]. 地球物理学进展，2007，22(1)：131–136.(XIE Furen，CHEN Qunce，CUI Xiaofeng，et al. Fundamental database of crustal stress environment in continental China[J]. Progress in Geophysics，2007，22(1)：131–136.(in Chinese))
[29] 许志琴，杨经绥，李海兵，等. 印度–亚洲碰撞大地构造[J]. 地质学报，2011，85(1)：1–33.(XU Zhiqin，YANG Jingsui，LI Haibing，et al. On the tectonics of the India-Asia collision[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica，2011，85(1)：1–33.(in Chinese))
2017, Vol. 36 
