有限数据条件下空间变异岩土力学参数随机反演分析及比较

doi:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2019.0893

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (490 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要现场和室内试验数据通常非常有限，基于有限数据难以确定岩土力学参数统计特征。随机反演方法可为有限数据条件下岩土力学参数统计特征及概率分布推断提供一条有效的途径。发展3种可解释岩土力学参数空间变异性的参数随机反演方法(DREAM(zs)、BUS和aBUS)，并从随机样本产生方式、收敛判据、模型证据和后验失效概率计算等方面对这3种方法的基本原理进行比较。最后，通过2个边坡案例对这3种方法的收敛性、计算精度和效率等进行了系统比较，进而总结了针对不同岩土力学参数随机反演问题应优先推荐使用的方法。结果表明：DREAM(zs)方法对于低维问题计算精度和效率高。BUS方法在子集模拟运算之前需要提前确定似然函数乘子取值，适合分析考虑参数空间变异性和似然函数计算量较大的高维问题。aBUS方法不依赖于似然函数乘子取值，并且计算精度较高，适合求解考虑参数空间变异性和似然函数计算量相对较小的高维问题，但是该方法需要耗费一定的计算量来定量地判断计算是否收敛。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	蒋水华1
	2
	刘源1
	张小波1
	2
	黄劲松1
	周创兵1
	2

关键词 ：岩土工程, 岩土力学参数, 空间变异性, 随机反演, 后验概率分布, 贝叶斯更新

Abstract：In-situ and laboratory test data are often quite limited，by which it is hard to determine the statistical characteristics of geomechanical parameters. Fortunately，the stochastic back analysis method provides an approach to overcome the shortcoming. In this paper，three stochastic back analysis methods(i.e.，DREAM(zs)，BUS and aBUS) of geomechanical parameters accounting for the effect of spatial variation are developed，and the basic principles of the three methods are compared from the aspects of generation of random samples，convergence criterion，model evidence and estimation of posterior probability of failure. Two slope examples are investigated to further compare these three methods systematically on the convergence，computational accuracy and efficiency. Based on these，the DREAM(zs)，BUS and aBUS methods are respectively recommended to give priority to tackle different stochastic back analysis problems. The results indicate that the DREAM(zs) method has good computational accuracy and efficiency only for dealing with low-dimensional problems，that the BUS method，in which the value of likelihood function multiplier has to be determined before the operation of subset simulation，is preferable to solve high-dimensional problems involving the spatial variability of mechanical parameters and intensive computations likelihood function，and that the aBUS method，which does not rely on the likelihood function multiplier and has good computational accuracy，is fairly suitable for analyzing high-dimensional problems involving the spatial variability of mechanical parameters and less computation of likelihood function，although it is time consuming to quantitatively determine whether the computations converge to the accurate results.

Key words： geotechnical engineering geomechanical parameters spatial variability stochastic back analysis posterior probability distribution Bayesian updating

引用本文:

蒋水华1，2，刘源1，张小波1，2，黄劲松1，周创兵1，2. 有限数据条件下空间变异岩土力学参数随机反演分析及比较[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2020, 39(6): 1265-1276.
JIANG Shuihua1，2，LIU Yuan1，ZHANG Xiaobo1，2，HUANG Jinsong1，ZHOU Chuangbing1，2. Stochastic back analysis and comparison of spatially varying geotechnical mechanical parameters based on limited data#br#. , 2020, 39(6): 1265-1276.

链接本文:

http://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2019.0893 或 http://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/Y2020/V39/I6/1265

[27]	CAO Z，WANG Y. Bayesian model comparison and selection of spatial correlation functions for soil parameters[J]. Structural Safety，2014，49：10-17.
[3]	DENG J H，LEE C F. Displacement back analysis for a steep slope at the Three Gorges Project site[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2001，38(2)：259-268.
[5]	ZHANG L L，ZHANG J，ZHANG L M，et al. Back analysis of slope failure with Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation[J]. Computers and Geotechnics，2010，37(7-8)：905-912.
[8]	LI X Y，ZHANG L M，JIANG S H. Updating performance of high rock slopes by combining incremental time-series monitoring data and three-dimensional numerical analysis[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2016，83：252-261.
[9]	左自波，张璐璐，程演，等. 基于MCMC法的非饱和土渗流参数随机反分析[J]. 岩土力学，2013，34(8)：2 393-2 400.(ZUO Zibo，ZHANG Lulu，CHENG Yan，et al. Probabilistic back analysis of unsaturated soil seepage parameters based on Markov chain Monte Carlo method[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2013，34(8)：2 393- 2 400.(in Chinese))
[12]	SHI X，YE M，CURTIS G P，et al. Assessment of parametric uncertainty for groundwater reactive transport modeling[J]. Water Resources Research，2014，50(5)：4 416-4 439.
[14]	STRAUB D，PAPAIOANNOU I. Bayesian updating with structural reliability methods[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics，2015，141(3)：04014134.
[6]	WANG L，HWANG J H，LUO Z，et al. Probabilistic back analysis of slope failure-a case study in Taiwan[J]. Computers and Geotechnics，2013，51：12-23.
[15]	GIOVANIS D G，PAPAIOANNOU I，STRAUB D，et al. Bayesian updating with subset simulation using artificial neural networks[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering，2017，319：124-145.
[4]	LV Q，LIU Y，YANG Q. Stability analysis of earthquake-induced rock slope based on back analysis of shear strength parameters of rock mass[J]. Engineering Geology，2017，228：39-49.
[13]	郑栋，黄劲松，李典庆. 基于多源信息融合的路堤沉降预测方法[J]. 岩土力学，2019，40(2)：709-719.(ZHENG Dong，HUANG Jinsong，LI Dianqing. An approach for predicting embankment settlement by integrating multi-source information[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2019，40(2)：709-719.(in Chinese))
[22]	VRUGT J A，TER BRAAK C J F，DIKS C G H，et al. Accelerating Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation by differential evolution with self-adaptive randomized subspace sampling[J]. International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation，2009，10(3)：273-290.
[32]	TER BRAAK C J F，VRUGT J A. Differential evolution Markov chain with snooker updater and fewer chains[J]. Statistics and Computing，2008，18(4)：435-446.
[17]	曹子君，郑硕，李典庆，等. 基于静力触探的土层自动划分方法与不确定性表征[J]. 岩土工程学报，2018，40(2)：336-345.(CAO Zijun，ZHENG Shuo，LI Dianqing，et al. Probabilistic characterization of underground stratigraphy and its uncertainty based on cone penetration test[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2018，40(2)：336-345.(in Chinese))
[18]	JIANG S H，PAPAIOANNOU I，STRAUB D. Bayesian updating of slope reliability in spatially variable soils with in-situ measurements[J]. Engineering Geology，2018，239：310-320.
[21]	TER BRAAK C J F. A Markov Chain Monte Carlo version of the genetic algorithm Differential Evolution：easy Bayesian computing for real parameter spaces[J]. Statistics and Computing，2006，16(3)：239-249.
[24]	AU S K，BECK J L. Estimation of small failure probabilities in high dimensions by subset simulation[J]. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics，2001，16(4)：263-277.
[26]	VRUGT J A. Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation using the DREAM software package：Theory，concepts，and MATLAB implementation[J]. Environmental Modelling and Software，2016，75：273-316.
[29]	蒋水华，姚池，杨建华，等. 基于BUS方法的无限长边坡可靠度更新[J]. 岩土力学，2017，38(12)：3 555-3 564.(JIANG Shuihua，YAO Chi，YANG Jianhua，et al. Reliability updating for infinite soil slopes using BUS method[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2017，38(12)： 3 555-3 564.(in Chinese))
[31]	CHOWDHURY R N，XU D W. Geotechnical system reliability of slopes[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety，1995，47(3)： 141-151.
[1]	江权，冯夏庭，向天兵，等. 大型洞室群稳定性分析与智能动态优化设计的数值仿真研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2011，30(3)：524-539.(JIANG Quan，FENG Xiating，XIANG Tianbing，et al. Numerical simulation method for stability analysis and intelligent and dynamic optimization design of large cavern group[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2011，30(3)：524-539.(in Chinese))
[2]	伍国军，陈卫忠，贾善坡. 大型地下洞室围岩体蠕变参数位移反分析研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2010，29(增2)：4 043-4 049. (WU Guojun，CHEN Weizhong，JIA Shanpo. Displacement back analysis of creep parameters of engineering rock mass in large-scale underground chambers[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2010，29(Supp.2)：4 043-4 049.(in Chinese))
[10]	LI S，ZHAO H，RU Z，et al. Probabilistic back analysis based on Bayesian and multi-output support vector machine for a high cut rock slope[J]. Engineering Geology，2016，203：178-190.
[11]	LALOY E，VRUGT J A. High-dimensional posterior exploration of hydrologic models using multiple‐try DREAM(ZS) and high-performance computing[J]. Water Resources Research，2012，48(1)：W01526.
[19]	何健，李典庆，曹子君，等. 基于贝叶斯理论的泥石流参数概率模型识别方法[J]. 武汉大学学报：工学版，2019，52(2)：95-105. (HE Jian，LI Dianqing，CAO Ziju，et al. Bayesian identification of probabilistic model of observation data for debris flow[J]. Engineering Journal of Wuhan University，2019，52(2)：95-105.(in Chinese))
[20]	DIAZDELAO F A，GARBUNO-INIGO A，AU S K，et al. Bayesian updating and model class selection with Subset Simulation[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering，2017，317：1 102-1 121.
[28]	WANG L，CAO Z J，LI D Q，et al. Determination of site-specific soil-water characteristic curve from a limited number of test data - A Bayesian perspective[J]. Geoscience Frontiers，2018，9(6)：76-88.
[7]	ZHANG J，HUANG，H W，ZHANG L.M，et al. Probabilistic prediction of rainfall-induced slope failure using a mechanics-based model[J]. Engineering Geology，2014，168(1)：129-140.
[16]	蒋水华，魏博文，张文举，等. 基于多源试验数据空间变异土体参数概率反演及边坡可靠度更新[J]. 岩土力学，2018，39(4)：1 491- 1 499.(JIANG Shuihua，WEI Bowen，ZHANG Wenju，et al. Probabilistic back analysis of spatially varying soil properties and reliability updating of slopes with multiple sources of test data[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2018，39(4)：1 491-1 499.(in Chinese))
[25]	GELMAN A G，RUBIN D B. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences[J]. Statistic Science，1992，7(4)：457-472.
[23]	BETZ W，PAPAIOANNOU I，BECK J L，et al. Bayesian inference with subset simulation：strategies and improvements[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering，2018，331：72-93.
[30]	OBERGUGGENBERGER M，FELLIN W. From probability to fuzzy sets：The struggle for meaning in geotechnical risk assessment[C]// Pötter R，Klapperich H，Schweiger H F. Probabilistic in Geotechnics： Technical and Economic Risk Estimation. Essen，Germany：Verlag Glückauf GmbH，2002：29-38.