基于钙质砂土的CPT与SPT 经验转换关系研究

doi:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2016.1545

摘要
图/表
参考文献(24)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (435 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要

目前现有的CPT与SPT经验转化关系研究主要基于硅质砂土，而在钙质砂土中比较少见。钙质砂土由于其本身具有较高的可压缩性及可破碎性质并不一定适用现有经验关系，因此有必要在钙质砂土中延伸和拓展2种测试方法之间经验转换关系。通过搜集中东卡塔尔多哈新港区域334组钙质砂土数据，对比和分析既有经验关系钙质砂土中的适用性。分析结果显示，基于单因素的平均粒径D₅₀或细颗粒含量FC(%)(＜0.063 mm)经验关系并不适合钙质砂土；基于CPT土类划分法的经验系数偏高；而基于土性指数I_c经验关系在钙质砂土中表现出较好一致性。同时通过研究分析，提出基于多因素修正参数的经验关系，并在多哈新港区域钙质砂土的相关性分析中得到较高的拟合度，从而为钙质砂土中2种测试参数之间转换提供一种更可靠经验关系。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	梁小丛1
	2
	陈胜1
	2

关键词 ：土力学, CPT-SPT经验关系, 钙质砂土, 相关性分析, 卡塔尔多哈新港

Abstract：

The existing CPT and SPT correlations are mostly limited on silica sands. It is seldom to seen the correlation are based on calcareous sand. Since the calcareous sand are mostly characterized a higher crushability and compressibility，the existing correlation is not applicable. Therefore，it is necessary to extend the CPT-SPT correlation in calcareous sands. 334 group high quality data were collected from New Doha Port project in Qatar and applied to the existing correlations to compare their applicability. The comparative results indicated that the correlation with single factor, either mean diameter D₅₀ or fine content FC(%)(＜0.063 mm)is not applicable to calcareous sand，and the coefficient factors based on CPT soil type method is relatively higher，whereas the typical correlation based on soil behave type index I_c shows a good consistency in calcareous sand. Meanwhile, one correlation method based on corrective factor is proposed and the analysis result shows a better correlation coefficient. Hence one more reliable correlation based on calcareous sand can be provided in future research.

Key words： soil mechanics CPT-SPT correlation calcareous sand correlation analysis New Doha Port in Qatar

引用本文:

梁小丛1，2，陈胜1，2. 基于钙质砂土的CPT与SPT 经验转换关系研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2017, 36(S2): 4276-4281.
LIANG Xiaocong1，2，CHEN Sheng1，2. Study of empirical CPT-SPT correlation for calcareous sand. , 2017, 36(S2): 4276-4281.

链接本文:

https://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2016.1545 或 https://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/Y2017/V36/IS2/4276

[1] NIXON I K. Standard penetration test：state of the art report[C]// Proceedings of the 2nd European Symposium on Penetration Testing. Amsterdam：[s. n.]，1982：3–24.

[2] CLAYTON C R I. The standard penetration test(SPT)：methods and use[M]. London：Construction Industry Research Information Association，1995：30–50.

[3] MEYERHOF G G. Shallow foundations[J]. Journal Soil Mechanical. Foundation Division，1965，91(SM2)：21–31.

[4] SCHMERTMANN J K. Static cone to compute static settlement over sand[J]. ASCE-JSMFD 1970，96 (SM3)：1 011–1 043.

[5] ROBERTSON P K，CAMPANELLA R G，WIGHTMAN A. SPT–CPT correlations[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，1983，109(7)：1 449–1 459.

[6] KULHAWY F，MAYNE P. Manual on estimating soil properties for foundation design[M]. New York：Electric Power Research Institute，1990：142–148.

[7] JEFFERIES M G，DAVIES M P. Use of CPTU to estimate equivalent SPT N60[J]. Geotechnical Testing Journal，1993，16(4)：458–468.

[8] LUNNE T，ROBERTSON P K，POWELL J J M. Cone penetration testing in geotechnical practice[M]. London：Blackie Academic and Professional，1997：304 .

[9] SCHMERTMANN J H. Guidelines for cone penetration test，performance and design[M]. Washington，D. C：U. S. Department of Transportation，1978：145–146.

[10] COUTINHO R Q，MAYNE P W. Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization 4[M]. [S. l.]：CRC Press，2013：3–24.

[11] AKCA N. Correlation of SPT–CPT data from the United Arab Emirates[J]. Engineering Geology，2003，67(3/4)：219–231.

[12] ELKATEB T，ALI H. CPT–SPT correlations for calcareous sand in the Persian Gulf area[C]// Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing. California，USA：[s.n.]，2010：122–126.

[13] KARA O，GU NDU Z Z. Correlation between CPT and SPT in Adapazari[C]// International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing. California，USA：[s. n.]，2010：111–117.

[14] ELKATEB T，ALI H. CPT–SPT correlations for calcareous sand in the Persian Gulf area[C]// International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing. California，USA：[s. n.]，2010：13–16.

[15] SHAHRI A A，JUHLIN C，MALEMIR A. A reliable correlation of SPT-CPT data for southwest of Sweden[J]. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2014，19：1 013–1 032.

[16] ELBANNA M，QUINN J，MARTENS S. SPT-CPT Correlations for oil sands tailings sand[J]// Proceedings of Tailings and Mine Waste. Vancouver，BC，Canada：[s. n.]，2011：115–117.

[17] CHAN C T，DUANN S W，KAO T C. SPT-CPT correlations for granular soils[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts，1990，27(2)：A91.

[18] ROBERTSON P K，CAMPANELLA R G，GILLESPIE D，et al. Use of piezometer cone data[J]. Use of In-situ testing in Geotechnical Engineering，1986：1 263–1 280.

[19] ROBERTSON P K，WRIDE C E F. Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal，1998，35(3)：442–459.

[20] WROTH C P. The interpretation of in-situ soil tests：Rankline Lecture[J]. Geotechnique，1984，34(4)：449–489.

[21] 叶锋，陈小利，贺迎喜，等. 基于CPT判别土类及状态在地基检测中的应用[J]. 水运工程学报，2013，(9)：161–163.(YE Feng，CHEN Xiaoli，HE Yingxi，et al. Application of method of determining soil type and status based on CPT in ground testing[J]. Port and Waterway Engineer，2013，(9)：161–163.(in Chinese))

[22] 梁小丛，陈胜. CPT土分类方法在地基检测中应用对比分析[J]. 水运工程学报，2015，(3)：41–46.(LIANG Xiaocong，CHEN Sheng. Comparative analysis of different soil classifications based on CPT using in ground improvement[J]. Port and Waterway Engineer，2015，(3)：41–46.(in Chinese))

[23] British Institution. BS 5930 Code of practice for site investigation[S]. London：British Standards Institution，1999.

[24] LIAO S S C，WHITMAN R V. Overburden correction factors for SPT in sand[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division，1986，112(3)：373–377.